Paddycripps wrote:
If this is true then it's complex
And I said nepotism obviously dad isn't there any more
But it is more about taking the blue coloured glasses off
And I say that being an unabashed Jack fan
But reality is Pitto has to come in
And our one iron is our midfield clearance game and that works best with 2 rucks
So something had to give
And if we take those shades off Jack's ball use has been sloppy of late
That's how I see it
I'm sure he will be a regular moving forwards
But a good team is a team with competition for spots and we and the club need to be objective about things
Jack is one of my favs but he's not an AA calibre players and apparently is on the edge when the list is getting injury free
You can only play so many talls
I thought it was a bit prickly in here.
There is no reason to make a point SOS was dropped.
It would not hurt to say 'managed' and let the footy world go off about rucking/ Fwd/ being Mr Fix It had to pay a toll, and a rest was warranted.
Good Post. Post of reason.
I thought Jack needed a rest because he was looking slow.
TDK has increased his ruck time by the week. Jack has been running well to make position.
I thought Jack looked slow in the chase in the last 2 weeks.
I'm not doubting his endeavour and persistence to make tackles.
What we are losing is good decision making: Footy IQ.
Pittonet's return is not in question. Pitto is so important for midfield strength.
2 rucks is the obvious preference whenever it has been on offer this year for Voss. (which I'm a fan of).
TDK really stretches the opposition's defence and he competes hard on the floor too. Has an x factor about him in the ruck and forward. Weapon.
Something has to give.
It will again when the following push their claim, and each and everyone will given a spot for Finals is on the line.
Hewett
Marchbank
Williams
Martin
Boyd
Forget Cuningham, Dow, Stocker, Newnes and Kemp, because Jack is ahead of them.