Elwood Blues1 wrote:
I would have traded him for Melbournes first pick and a player....that was the rumoured offer and I would have jumped at it.....may have used that pick on Courtney Dempsey to give us some run and flair...
I think we have several players who can be tried and groomed at CHF with Kennedy, Hartlett and Setanta the contenders..
I still cant see where we are playing Lance and what plan he can be incorporated into to keep pace wit the modern game which is more and more based around non stop action and pace...its fine signing him up for $400k a year but I have yet to hear a valid argument about where we intend to play him and in what role...seems like we signed him because we didnt have the courage to trade him....not because we have a defined role for him...if anything we are now have the problem where to play him and have to justify keeping him....dont give me that Wizard cup form guide thing either...Wizard cup equates to 20/20 cricket as a form guide....
All the talk of what we should have traded Lance for is alice in wonderland stuff. The fact is he has been on the trading table for 2 years now and no-one has offered anything of note. Melbourne's pick 12 + Brad Green was a Big Footy invention and there's no evidence to suggest Melbourne offered anything more than a 2nd rounder. The best offer was from St Kilda in the post 2004 trade period when they offered us pick 20 + Leigh Montagna ... how they could fit him into the salary cap, I have no idea.
Let's face it - he has ZERO currency in the current market dominated by an obsession with youth and athleticism. It's now up to the coaching staff to somehow harness his undoubted talent and come up with a game plan which will complement Lance, Fev, Fisher and Waite.