Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 23, 2025 7:00 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6991 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215 ... 350  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Aug 04, 2018 9:47 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 4:52 pm
Posts: 1857
aboynamedsue wrote:
I love Ratts, and want him back at the club, but he was a key player in that 2007-2015 period when our club completely blew its opportunity to re-establish itself. He is not entirely to blame by any means, but he was the wrong choice as senior coach. Just like Malthouse & Pagan were.


+4!

He was unfortunately one of the worst things to happen to us at the worst time (I hate saying this about a past champion but its what I think).

Had Judd, Stevens, Fevola, Simmo, Waite, Carrazzo in their prime and a young brigade of Gibbs, Murphy, Kreuzer, Jamison coming through.

We should've been planning and developing for the future to try and get the young kids in so we were able to strike when our youngsters came of age. Instead we completely overrated our list and Ratts was a massive part of that. Short term fixes like Mclean, Warnock, Laidler and not being able to make the tough decisions to plan for the future - remember that year we couldn't meet the minimum AFL requirement of 3 delistings because we had such a tough choice between Bower and O'Hailpin?

He's set us back marginally less than Malthouse and I can't really forgive him for that. The talent he had at his disposal made his record look a lot better than other coaches we've had. Loved him as a player but as others have said its time to move on.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 12:58 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Nick wrote:
aboynamedsue wrote:
I love Ratts, and want him back at the club, but he was a key player in that 2007-2015 period when our club completely blew its opportunity to re-establish itself. He is not entirely to blame by any means, but he was the wrong choice as senior coach. Just like Malthouse & Pagan were.


+4!

He was unfortunately one of the worst things to happen to us at the worst time (I hate saying this about a past champion but its what I think).

Had Judd, Stevens, Fevola, Simmo, Waite, Carrazzo in their prime and a young brigade of Gibbs, Murphy, Kreuzer, Jamison coming through.

We should've been planning and developing for the future to try and get the young kids in so we were able to strike when our youngsters came of age. Instead we completely overrated our list and Ratts was a massive part of that. Short term fixes like Mclean, Warnock, Laidler and not being able to make the tough decisions to plan for the future - remember that year we couldn't meet the minimum AFL requirement of 3 delistings because we had such a tough choice between Bower and O'Hailpin?

He's set us back marginally less than Malthouse and I can't really forgive him for that. The talent he had at his disposal made his record look a lot better than other coaches we've had. Loved him as a player but as others have said its time to move on.

He wasted that list by getting us to less than a goal from a prelim...
We have no idea what would have followed had he stayed.
He left because MM was available, not because he couldn't coach.
MM had the same list and we went from thirdish to.....oblivion.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 3:55 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8214
Nick wrote:
aboynamedsue wrote:
I love Ratts, and want him back at the club, but he was a key player in that 2007-2015 period when our club completely blew its opportunity to re-establish itself. He is not entirely to blame by any means, but he was the wrong choice as senior coach. Just like Malthouse & Pagan were.


+4!

He was unfortunately one of the worst things to happen to us at the worst time (I hate saying this about a past champion but its what I think).

Had Judd, Stevens, Fevola, Simmo, Waite, Carrazzo in their prime and a young brigade of Gibbs, Murphy, Kreuzer, Jamison coming through.

We should've been planning and developing for the future to try and get the young kids in so we were able to strike when our youngsters came of age. Instead we completely overrated our list and Ratts was a massive part of that. Short term fixes like Mclean, Warnock, Laidler and not being able to make the tough decisions to plan for the future - remember that year we couldn't meet the minimum AFL requirement of 3 delistings because we had such a tough choice between Bower and O'Hailpin?

He's set us back marginally less than Malthouse and I can't really forgive him for that. The talent he had at his disposal made his record look a lot better than other coaches we've had. Loved him as a player but as others have said its time to move on.



We drafted so poorly that was all we had. We played the 2011 SF with 8 rookie nlisted players in the side as our draftees were no F good. Loved to have seen Ratten with SOS, not that idiot Hughes. Then we might've seen something.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 3:57 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8214
aboynamedsue wrote:
I love Ratts, and want him back at the club, but he was a key player in that 2007-2015 period when our club completely blew its opportunity to re-establish itself. He is not entirely to blame by any means, but he was the wrong choice as senior coach. Just like Malthouse & Pagan were.


He was the right choice. 3 finals series, a near PF, better than 50% winning record, and that was after losing his first 9, 6 tanked, all the while he was hamstrung by having Wayne Hughes as a recruiter. You're as good as you're recruiting staff. If you fail then the coach is out the door.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 3:59 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8214
As for today, 105 pts loss, against a side that scored 7 goals to 1 in the last qtr with 16 to 17 men, then the coach can go F right off. That's the height of embarrassment. We are so poorly structured, poorly drilled that we had no idea how to take advantage of it.

They'll still be dills thinking it's all going along nicely.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 4:14 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
I want Bolts to embarrass a few players - SHAKE THEM UP FFS !!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 4:15 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48548
Location: Prison Island
Not sure he is done embarrassing himself yet.

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 4:32 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:45 pm
Posts: 273
For the first time, I regret to say that the tide has started to turn for me about Bolts.

He could well be an inspirational development coach but don't think he has an idea about how to convey his football game plan

Either his playbook is not fit for current day football or he cant communicate it effectively...

Whichever it is, he and/or Carlton has a major problem that can't be brushed under the carpet any longer.

And I dont think its a matter of waiting for 2-3 better players next season for it suddenly to go click

I'm not the greatest expert in the game but even I can see there is a fundamental flaw with the way the Carlton game is being played


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 5:18 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34533
Location: The Brown Wedge
Rexy wrote:
I want Bolts to embarrass a few players - SHAKE THEM UP FFS !!


He won't do that because it's not their fault. They're playing a gameplan they don't understand. The most experienced players have no idea - how do you expect the 20-year-olds to know?

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 5:23 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6630
The Duke wrote:
Rexy wrote:
I want Bolts to embarrass a few players - SHAKE THEM UP FFS !!


He won't do that because it's not their fault. They're playing a gameplan they don't understand. The most experienced players have no idea - how do you expect the 20-year-olds to know?


What absolute rubbish and you know it.
It's the same game plan as last week against a top 4 side that has about 18 A graders on their list, in their prime and a midfield that we have all admired for the last 4 years.

The fact that we didn't lose by 20 goals is a win in my eyes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 5:32 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 2:58 pm
Posts: 1636
18 A graders lol

_________________
"Then joked and said he (Jack himself) probably wouldn't even need to play until round 2 against Collingwood."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 5:35 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34533
Location: The Brown Wedge
Sidefx wrote:
The Duke wrote:
Rexy wrote:
I want Bolts to embarrass a few players - SHAKE THEM UP FFS !!


He won't do that because it's not their fault. They're playing a gameplan they don't understand. The most experienced players have no idea - how do you expect the 20-year-olds to know?


What absolute rubbish and you know it.
It's the same game plan as last week against a top 4 side that has about 18 A graders on their list, in their prime and a midfield that we have all admired for the last 4 years.

The fact that we didn't lose by 20 goals is a win in my eyes.


And i spose it doesn't help that we finished the game with 17 men to their 22..............oh wait, what........???????

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 5:37 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Rexy wrote:
I want Bolts to embarrass a few players - SHAKE THEM UP FFS !!


Didn’t you stop watching after quarter time?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 5:39 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6630
The Duke wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
The Duke wrote:
Rexy wrote:
I want Bolts to embarrass a few players - SHAKE THEM UP FFS !!


He won't do that because it's not their fault. They're playing a gameplan they don't understand. The most experienced players have no idea - how do you expect the 20-year-olds to know?


What absolute rubbish and you know it.
It's the same game plan as last week against a top 4 side that has about 18 A graders on their list, in their prime and a midfield that we have all admired for the last 4 years.

The fact that we didn't lose by 20 goals is a win in my eyes.


And i spose it doesn't help that we finished the game with 17 men to their 22..............oh wait, what........???????


And there in lies your problem "men"!

All of whom are guns in the right age bracket.

Compared to our kids, seniors and top up players.

Must be the game plan......for sure. :banghead:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 5:40 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
verbs wrote:
Rexy wrote:
I want Bolts to embarrass a few players - SHAKE THEM UP FFS !!


Didn’t you stop watching after quarter time?


Yep. What did you think of the players' mindset at qtr time ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 5:43 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Rexy wrote:
verbs wrote:
Rexy wrote:
I want Bolts to embarrass a few players - SHAKE THEM UP FFS !!


Didn’t you stop watching after quarter time?


Yep. What did you think of the players' mindset at qtr time ?


I thought it was great. First time I’d been in the huddle. They were all keen to fight back.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 5:44 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 2:58 pm
Posts: 1636
Muh age bracket hurr durr.

_________________
"Then joked and said he (Jack himself) probably wouldn't even need to play until round 2 against Collingwood."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 6:02 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:06 am
Posts: 1826
LOL!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:10 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8214
Sidefx wrote:
The Duke wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
The Duke wrote:
Rexy wrote:
I want Bolts to embarrass a few players - SHAKE THEM UP FFS !!


He won't do that because it's not their fault. They're playing a gameplan they don't understand. The most experienced players have no idea - how do you expect the 20-year-olds to know?


What absolute rubbish and you know it.
It's the same game plan as last week against a top 4 side that has about 18 A graders on their list, in their prime and a midfield that we have all admired for the last 4 years.

The fact that we didn't lose by 20 goals is a win in my eyes.


And i spose it doesn't help that we finished the game with 17 men to their 22..............oh wait, what........???????


And there in lies your problem "men"!

All of whom are guns in the right age bracket.

Compared to our kids, seniors and top up players.

Must be the game plan......for sure. :banghead:


They were smashing with us 16 players, that is pathetic at AFL level no matter then spin. Age bracket in that situation is irrelevant. We have plenty of kids with talent and we have enough senior ability not be to embarrassed and humiliated like that. Spin doesn't change that. If people think that is ok then they embrace failure. Coach is not getting best out of our players as a unit. So poorly drilled, game plan is so poor that we don't even know how to take advantage of a side playing with 16. What's been happening for 3 years?

Some of us live in the real world. That was coaching low today, an all-time one. That's likely to go with the other low of our worst season in our history.

So spare us the spin.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:18 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21572
Location: North of the border
Its the message that is getting delivered.
It is not the list the plan or the rebuild. You keep telling a group that winning doesnt matter then after a while it doesn't.
We tanked 10 years back set the precidence and have been losing ever since.
It doesn't matter if we win as there is always an excuse.
The list is poor
The coach is shit
We have to many injuries
We need the early draft picks
We are young
We are developing
We have poor age profile.

There is always an excuse and the players coaches administration don't care because winning doesn't matter

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6991 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215 ... 350  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Spudnick001, windy and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group