Sidefx wrote:
I just posted this in the Bolton thread but it probably is more appropriate in here.
A good read.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2018-07-27/w ... erts-speakA good read perhaps, but annoying to read Rhys-Jones’ comments. If people read the same thing enough they end up believing it. “When chequebook recruiting ended Carlton was left lagging”. As in they kept trying to “buy” players and not go to the draft.
This reads well for a media narrative that likes to paint Carlton as the AFL’s bad guys, the evil capitalist. Hence, when Carlton finds itself on the bottom of the ladder there will be no priority pick as Carlton is the “chequebook” club.
The most potent example of chequebook recruiting in the game’s history actually came from North Melbourne in the 1970s, but that’s ok as their chequebook recruiting is held to a different standard. Paper bags were thrown at players en masse there, but let’s let that one fly.
Carlton “went to the draft” just as much as anyone else, but have generally been hopeless at it. Why did they stick with that recruiting boss Hughes for years on end when the evidence was in early on he was sub-par? There were more management mistakes than most other factors... but the media narrative is more fun so let’s stick with that.
Ironically, one of the great drafts was 1994. Carlton had pick 15 and got Scott Camporeale. You could mount an argument that Carlton beat all the clubs above it bar one or two with that selection. He was a vital dose of speed in the 1995 team.