Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 3:17 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6991 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208 ... 350  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 6:14 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7271
DocSherrin III wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Clarkson and bolton's kids play club footy together. they hang out regularly. of course clarkson is gonna speak kindly of bolton.


You sure about that?? Bolts' (roughly 7 yr old) son is playing footy with Clarkos' (roughly 11 yr old) son?? Impressive...



positive. the kids play at the same club where a mate's kids are. he often sees them at the club together with a coffee talking.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 6:16 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7271
Brently8 wrote:
Was shocked to read last week that we had the lowest footy department spending in the entire league this year. Even lower than Gold Coast and Brisbane. Hard to develop players and keep them fit if you don't have the quality or resources.



this is mindblowing. you get what you pay for, huh? typical. when you get business people in charge they tend to run things like a business.


at a time when they should be pushing all their money into off field departments ... instead they're what? trying to run up a profit while cruise through the worst season in history?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 8:09 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Braithy wrote:
DocSherrin III wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Clarkson and bolton's kids play club footy together. they hang out regularly. of course clarkson is gonna speak kindly of bolton.


You sure about that?? Bolts' (roughly 7 yr old) son is playing footy with Clarkos' (roughly 11 yr old) son?? Impressive...



positive. the kids play at the same club where a mate's kids are. he often sees them at the club together with a coffee talking.

All the more reason why Bolton should get some more time. Clarko may be an arse but he’s unfortunately a @#$%&! coaching genius. Much worse guys Bolton can be doing coffee with.

Braithy wrote:
Brently8 wrote:
Was shocked to read last week that we had the lowest footy department spending in the entire league this year. Even lower than Gold Coast and Brisbane. Hard to develop players and keep them fit if you don't have the quality or resources.



this is mindblowing. you get what you pay for, huh? typical. when you get business people in charge they tend to run things like a business.


at a time when they should be pushing all their money into off field departments ... instead they're what? trying to run up a profit while cruise through the worst season in history?

Might explain McKay’s “resignation” and subsequent calls from the Prez to boost our footy dept spending.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 8:57 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2651
The Duke wrote:
redback wrote:
The Duke wrote:
I'm putting up 10 x $100 bets for all those sure that Bolts will win us a flag. This should be a no-brainer way to make $100 if people are convinced we're on the right track.



The telling point might be me how much pain/scrutiny are the people that put him in charge willing to take.






This year is a total disaster Duke and the only thing that I am trying to consider is maybe there is a hidden agenda or something to that ilk. That's how bad things look.
If things don’t change dramatically next year then we don’t have much to hang out hats on.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 10:48 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7271
Donstuie wrote:
Braithy wrote:
DocSherrin III wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Clarkson and bolton's kids play club footy together. they hang out regularly. of course clarkson is gonna speak kindly of bolton.


You sure about that?? Bolts' (roughly 7 yr old) son is playing footy with Clarkos' (roughly 11 yr old) son?? Impressive...



positive. the kids play at the same club where a mate's kids are. he often sees them at the club together with a coffee talking.



All the more reason why Bolton should get some more time. Clarko may be an arse but he’s unfortunately a @#$%&! coaching genius. Much worse guys Bolton can be doing coffee with.



the more i really think about our mess and the league as a whole, the less convinced i am that there are any true coaching geniuses out there. all the coaches are following well worn tactical and strategic paths. no coach in the afl is reinventing anything right now.

rather than coaching geniuses making a club successful. it's the coming together of all footy departments within a club. development of players and culture, scouting, drafting, recruiting and medical.

hawthorn really did develop their squad list & culture into a beast, much the same way matthews did with the lions. they identified how they wanted to play, and got players to meet that criteria, but it wasn't so much for anything clarkson built or achieved on the paddock.

right now hawthorn aren't anything special list-wise, and clarkson isn't elevating them into something that's going to win a finals game.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 11:01 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
The Duke wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
The Duke wrote:
I'm putting up 10 x $100 bets for all those sure that Bolts will win us a flag. This should be a no-brainer way to make $100 if people are convinced we're on the right track.

So by your definition, if he takes us to a losing GF, that isn't us "on the right track"?

Tenuous.


OK - I'll pay out post the Prelim Final.

It’s a bet I’d happily take, however I’d likely lose because someone at the club will give in to external pressure and push the red “Do Old Carlton” button before we’re even back in the 8.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 11:25 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34533
Location: The Brown Wedge
AIRCAV wrote:
The Duke wrote:
I'm putting up 10 x $100 bets for all those sure that Bolts will win us a flag. This should be a no-brainer way to make $100 if people are convinced we're on the right track.


What a surprise that someone who thinks we should just sack all the management, is offering even money on an 18-1 bet!


No worries - if you want 'bookie' odds, hand your $100 over now and I'll pay out in 4-6 years should we make the Prelim :thumbsup: .

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 11:40 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34533
Location: The Brown Wedge
redback wrote:
The Duke wrote:
redback wrote:
The Duke wrote:
I'm putting up 10 x $100 bets for all those sure that Bolts will win us a flag. This should be a no-brainer way to make $100 if people are convinced we're on the right track.



The telling point might be me how much pain/scrutiny are the people that put him in charge willing to take.






This year is a total disaster Duke and the only thing that I am trying to consider is maybe there is a hidden agenda or something to that ilk. That's how bad things look.
If things don’t change dramatically next year then we don’t have much to hang out hats on.


If their agenda is to look as shit as possible so the AFL hand out a PP, then the sooner we sakc the lot, the better. I could understand 'tanking' the last few games to get access to the best player possible, but to torch an entire (3rd of rebuild) season would mean they have NFI.

I don't think it's that - I just reckon they're incompetent.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 11:44 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18035
Braithy wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
Braithy wrote:
DocSherrin III wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Clarkson and bolton's kids play club footy together. they hang out regularly. of course clarkson is gonna speak kindly of bolton.


You sure about that?? Bolts' (roughly 7 yr old) son is playing footy with Clarkos' (roughly 11 yr old) son?? Impressive...



positive. the kids play at the same club where a mate's kids are. he often sees them at the club together with a coffee talking.



All the more reason why Bolton should get some more time. Clarko may be an arse but he’s unfortunately a @#$%&! coaching genius. Much worse guys Bolton can be doing coffee with.



the more i really think about our mess and the league as a whole, the less convinced i am that there are any true coaching geniuses out there. all the coaches are following well worn tactical and strategic paths. no coach in the afl is reinventing anything right now.

rather than coaching geniuses making a club successful. it's the coming together of all footy departments within a club. development of players and culture, scouting, drafting, recruiting and medical.

hawthorn really did develop their squad list & culture into a beast, much the same way matthews did with the lions. they identified how they wanted to play, and got players to meet that criteria, but it wasn't so much for anything clarkson built or achieved on the paddock.

right now hawthorn aren't anything special list-wise, and clarkson isn't elevating them into something that's going to win a finals game.


Spot on.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 11:59 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2138
The club needs a complete overhaul, review - external review. Not just coaching- but marketing.

I rarely go on the Carlton website, but when I do I want a professional presentation that says - we are up there with the big international clubs of other sports, smart, sophisticated.


I went onto the website and saw a picture of a female footballer (no idea who she is) on one side and Cripps on the other side as the central marketing pictures for the club. If you go onto any US sports website you don't see pictures of female footballers, basketballers, baseballers. I get the idea of having women's football. It is great more women are playing it. 100% supportive...but is there a limit to the marketing potential of women's footy?



Essendon* have 20,000 more members than Carlton - is this partly to do (go onto their website and there is no promotion of female football on the front page) with them being a bit more ballsy with their promotion of their players? There are articles on their page on Zaharkhis, retro article on Johnson brothers etc, other features on players....Carlton doesn't have this.




I get that we live in a time when women's football is considered as important as men's football....but surely building up the brand of the men's team is more important now than ever before- where is the picture or feature article on Murphy?
What about an article on Curnow's greatest marks? Your value as a club is based on building up a brand on the players. Collingwood does that with that blonde bloke - DeGoey etc...brand building through player allegiance.


perhaps there are even other footballers? Fisher? Curnow? etc...or are they less important? only equally important? as the female team? Within 2-3 years time perhaps they will get bigger crowds to Carlton's womens football than mens- so maybe they are planning for the future? Not sure of what they are doing marketing wise here, but good luck to them I guess.

Just to reiterate- 100% supportive of female footy-just not surely of the marketing principles. That is all. Just saying. Apologies to all the offence I have caused in advance by not giving female footy equal attention to male football.


Last edited by tap in 79 on Mon Jul 23, 2018 12:14 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 12:05 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 1:26 am
Posts: 8026
Location: Melbourne
The Duke wrote:
AIRCAV wrote:
The Duke wrote:
I'm putting up 10 x $100 bets for all those sure that Bolts will win us a flag. This should be a no-brainer way to make $100 if people are convinced we're on the right track.


What a surprise that someone who thinks we should just sack all the management, is offering even money on an 18-1 bet!


No worries - if you want 'bookie' odds, hand your $100 over now and I'll pay out in 4-6 years should we make the Prelim :thumbsup: .


Ok then, what odds you offering? You’ve told us as nauseum how flowered we are. Your only solution is to sack everyone. Odds must be juicy then.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
Everything before the word "but" is horseshit - J Snow


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 12:54 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
You can add Rocca to those who should be shown the door.

Players have clearly been told to relax their bodies when shooting for goal.

Get Dunstall in to teach them to concentrate on the action.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 1:24 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
Sack everyone repeatedly every 2-3 years, is that the solution?

Bolts may be no good, but I will wait until next year and if we are still un-comptetitve even with an injury run similar to 2016/17 then I will want Bolts & others gone.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 1:29 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 6:29 am
Posts: 13689
tap in 79 wrote:
Essendon** have 20,000 more members than Carlton - is this partly to do (go onto their website and there is no promotion of female football on the front page)


That's because Essendon* don't have an AFLW team and don't even plan on having one. Poor example.

_________________
The measure of a life is a measure of love and respect
So hard to earn, so easily burned
In the fullness of time
A garden to nurture and protect

#DopeThenStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 2:15 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
tap in 79 wrote:
The club needs a complete overhaul, review - external review. Not just coaching- but marketing.

I rarely go on the Carlton website, but when I do I want a professional presentation that says - we are up there with the big international clubs of other sports, smart, sophisticated.


I went onto the website and saw a picture of a female footballer (no idea who she is) on one side and Cripps on the other side as the central marketing pictures for the club. If you go onto any US sports website you don't see pictures of female footballers, basketballers, baseballers. I get the idea of having women's football. It is great more women are playing it. 100% supportive...but is there a limit to the marketing potential of women's footy?



Essendon** have 20,000 more members than Carlton - is this partly to do (go onto their website and there is no promotion of female football on the front page) with them being a bit more ballsy with their promotion of their players? There are articles on their page on Zaharkhis, retro article on Johnson brothers etc, other features on players....Carlton doesn't have this.




I get that we live in a time when women's football is considered as important as men's football....but surely building up the brand of the men's team is more important now than ever before- where is the picture or feature article on Murphy?
What about an article on Curnow's greatest marks? Your value as a club is based on building up a brand on the players. Collingwood does that with that blonde bloke - DeGoey etc...brand building through player allegiance.


perhaps there are even other footballers? Fisher? Curnow? etc...or are they less important? only equally important? as the female team? Within 2-3 years time perhaps they will get bigger crowds to Carlton's womens football than mens- so maybe they are planning for the future? Not sure of what they are doing marketing wise here, but good luck to them I guess.

Just to reiterate- 100% supportive of female footy-just not surely of the marketing principles. That is all. Just saying. Apologies to all the offence I have caused in advance by not giving female footy equal attention to male football.


The 'human rights commissioner' is leaving the board. I would expect that if the staff no longer feel they need to meet her expectations, a sensible re-prioritisation of the men's and women's teams will happen quickly.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 3:12 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7271
Blue Vain wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Donstuie wrote:


All the more reason why Bolton should get some more time. Clarko may be an arse but he’s unfortunately a @#$%&! coaching genius. Much worse guys Bolton can be doing coffee with.



the more i really think about our mess and the league as a whole, the less convinced i am that there are any true coaching geniuses out there. all the coaches are following well worn tactical and strategic paths. no coach in the afl is reinventing anything right now.

rather than coaching geniuses making a club successful. it's the coming together of all footy departments within a club. development of players and culture, scouting, drafting, recruiting and medical.

hawthorn really did develop their squad list & culture into a beast, much the same way matthews did with the lions. they identified how they wanted to play, and got players to meet that criteria, but it wasn't so much for anything clarkson built or achieved on the paddock.

right now hawthorn aren't anything special list-wise, and clarkson isn't elevating them into something that's going to win a finals game.


Spot on.


despite what you might think of me and where i get my info from ... i read every single one of your posts directed at me, and see alotta worth in many things you say.

i don't always agree with you, but that's what makes forum boards like this so interesting to be a part of. hearing different perspectives and going away and thinking about them.


the way i see it, we can all disagree as much as we want... but don't take any of my nonsense personally or become enemies over anything in here. we have a common interest - winning footy games. and a common love - this damned club.


and a common hate – Essendon*.


that's all we need in life :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 3:28 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
Braithy wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Donstuie wrote:


All the more reason why Bolton should get some more time. Clarko may be an arse but he’s unfortunately a @#$%&! coaching genius. Much worse guys Bolton can be doing coffee with.



the more i really think about our mess and the league as a whole, the less convinced i am that there are any true coaching geniuses out there. all the coaches are following well worn tactical and strategic paths. no coach in the afl is reinventing anything right now.

rather than coaching geniuses making a club successful. it's the coming together of all footy departments within a club. development of players and culture, scouting, drafting, recruiting and medical.

hawthorn really did develop their squad list & culture into a beast, much the same way matthews did with the lions. they identified how they wanted to play, and got players to meet that criteria, but it wasn't so much for anything clarkson built or achieved on the paddock.

right now hawthorn aren't anything special list-wise, and clarkson isn't elevating them into something that's going to win a finals game.


Spot on.


despite what you might think of me and where i get my info from ... i read every single one of your posts directed at me, and see alotta worth in many things you say.

i don't always agree with you, but that's what makes forum boards like this so interesting to be a part of. hearing different perspectives and going away and thinking about them.


the way i see it, we can all disagree as much as we want... but don't take any of my nonsense personally or become enemies over anything in here. we have a common interest - winning footy games. and a common love - this damned club.


and a common hate – Essendon**.


that's all we need in life :lol:
:clap:

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 3:45 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2138
bluechucky wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
Essendon*** have 20,000 more members than Carlton - is this partly to do (go onto their website and there is no promotion of female football on the front page)


That's because Essendon** don't have an AFLW team and don't even plan on having one. Poor example.

They do. They have an article on some Essendon* affililiated team on their website.

If you are brave enough to go on their website you will see it.

What is Carlton marketing? Their players? Their brand as based on their players?Or social justice issues?
Is it a political club or a football club?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 3:49 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2138
bluechucky wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
Essendon*** have 20,000 more members than Carlton - is this partly to do (go onto their website and there is no promotion of female football on the front page)


That's because Essendon** don't have an AFLW team and don't even plan on having one. Poor example.

Here you go. You made me link onto their site, which makes me feel very unclean.

I feel a bit ill every time I go on that Essendon* site, so thank you!

http://m.essendonfc.com.au/news/2018-07 ... port-rd-11


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2018 7:03 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2138
The guys On The Couch were shocked by the lack of planning that went into how the coach at Carlton and his match committee approached the problem of Tom Mitchell. No tagging.

I believe Paul Roos’ exact words were “ that’s indefensible coaching.” Pre match Bolton was interviewed and said that “we make our decision in the game” based on how many score involvements he’s going to be in.

In other words, he had a “flexible” approach as to whether or not to tag a bloke who was going to get 40 plus possessions.

Two questions coach- did they ever tag Greg Williams back in the day?
Why was Curnow not put onto him early in the match?

I guess the team is so busy zoning off defending vacant space that they can’t have a player run with Mitchell.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6991 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208 ... 350  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 37 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group