Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jun 25, 2025 9:25 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6991 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195 ... 350  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 1:31 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2651
So you're telling us he stopped, thought about it then he threw Curnow in the ruck while he had Rowe guarding grass in the back.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 1:35 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 4949
fmurphy30 wrote:
There are a lot of confusing things happening at present. This is our purgatory and we have to deal with it.

The club had a poor list three years ago and has done nothing but take the good ones (and some spuds) from Bolton to sell for the future.

I remain confident that future is there. Curnow, McKay, Cripps, Weitering, Fisher, Dow, Silvagni, O'Brien, SPS, Williamson, Kennedy, Docherty, Plowman, Marchbank, Pickett, McCreadie and Byrne have long term value in them. None is older than 24.

Others may make it too.

We have parts to add - we desperately need midfielders to add depth through the middle. They are the easiest to get and the quickest to develop. Therefore it was the last part SOS focused on.

Our club is in a position not dissimilar to GWS in 2013. They won one game. Sheedy left. Everyone thought they were a waste of space. There are many similarities with us now. Not the least of which is SOS.

GWS spent hard and liberally at the top end of the draft. There were hits and there were misses. They worked on the belief that the more you take the more likely you are to get it right. They did not (in the early days) waste too many picks on other club's stars. They recruited has-beens and never-weres to fill the gaps, provide senior experience and leadership.

Now the GWS experiment has not (yet) born the ultimate fruit, although there are a couple of reasons for this: one, the loss of Allan and SOS - after this, I think they went too hard for experienced talent with high picks and gave away too many too easily. Two, injuries have taken a massive toll. No one doubts the club is in a good space though.

That is our benchmark, I believe. We are losing and losing badly but there is a plan. Throwing out Bolton would be foolish and you may as well wind up the club if you do this. I think it is time for new ideas and new assistants. This should happen every couple of years (look at the Hawks).

I am confident we are on the right track. We must be what we are historically not: patient. There have been massive improvements this year despite the W/L column (Cripps, Curnow, Harry, Dow, Fisher etc). It is (slowly) coming together. So long as we stay the path, I am confident it will come.

We also still need to hit the draft, not trade for the now. I am fine with free agents if they come but other than that, patience and purpose are the words.


Great post :clap: :clap: :clap:

Quote:
I remain confident that future is there. Curnow, McKay, Cripps, Weitering, Fisher, Dow, Silvagni, O'Brien, SPS, Williamson, Kennedy, Docherty, Plowman, Marchbank, Pickett, McCreadie and Byrne have long term value in them. None is older than 24.

Others may make it too.


Hopefully Cunningham will make it as well and from what I've read it sounds like DeKoning is an exciting prospect.

_________________
There is no footy god


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 1:38 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 4:49 pm
Posts: 1170
doofdoof wrote:
Mckay took the first 3 centre bounces after Kreuzer went off.

Curnow took the next one.

I agree we should never have thrown Curnow in there & that Mckay was going to relieve regardless


Oh yes, I well remember who took the bounces after Krooz went off. I was yelling at the telly "Why the f%^k is Mckay in the ruck? Get him out!!" And when Charlie and Cripps took some ruck contests the telly was in danger of having a boot put through it. Fair dinkum I despair.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 1:40 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18035
cortez wrote:
doofdoof wrote:
Mckay took the first 3 centre bounces after Kreuzer went off.

Curnow took the next one.

I agree we should never have thrown Curnow in there & that Mckay was going to relieve regardless


Oh yes, I well remember who took the bounces after Krooz went off. I was yelling at the telly "Why the f%^k is Mckay in the ruck? Get him out!!" .


Why? McKay's played ruck in other games he's played. Why would this one be any different?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 1:48 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 11:51 am
Posts: 1291
jim wrote:
ColourMan wrote:
jim wrote:
The Duke wrote:
Simple question - If Bolts walked out of the club tomorrow, would any club offer him the position of head coach?


Doubt it. We've on 2 from our last 26 games. That's putrid! Personal might be young but even for injuries it's alot better than that.


It's not... our list is putrid.

Go through every player on the list

And it's severely unbalanced
No clue!

2 wins in 26 games. No structure, no clue out there, poor game plan, players going backwards. That's coaching. It's not anything else. There's alot of good young players on that list. Drafting has been good. Development poor. No list should win 2 from 26.

Bolton is not the man for job. Those who accept 2 win from 26 embrace mediocity.


Dumb post! :lol:

We lost Cripps for the last half of last year, and Gibbs for this year...

So an already threadbare midfield has became even more vulnerable... our opposition has only had to focus on our one A grader during this ime

I'll spell it out for you, during that period of time we've only had one A grade midfielder

Can't win games without a midfield

Can't win games without forward/midfield pressure

List our midfielders

List our small/mid sized forwards


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 1:51 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
With 3 key defenders in Jones Rowe and Marchbank in the side I'd have preferred to see Rowe and Jones rotate through the ruck when Kreuzer went off and leave Harry and Charlie as our targets up forward to kick a score.
Bolton has a focus on defence so I get why he chose to run the forwards through the ruck even if I don't agree with it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 1:51 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7389
Braithy wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
McKay was always going to play relieving ruck. Thats why he was selected. :?



it makes sense ... only that there was an interview earlier in the week about why mcKay missed the brisbane game and that was because the powers that be declared they don't want him in the ruck, just as a forward.

so, again ... the club is all over the place, huh?

If this is true, and I'm not doubting you... just haven't heard it until now... love for someone at the club to clarify.

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 1:52 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:48 pm
Posts: 4457
Location: Perth
fmurphy30 wrote:
There are a lot of confusing things happening at present. This is our purgatory and we have to deal with it.

The club had a poor list three years ago and has done nothing but take the good ones (and some spuds) from Bolton to sell for the future.

I remain confident that future is there. Curnow, McKay, Cripps, Weitering, Fisher, Dow, Silvagni, O'Brien, SPS, Williamson, Kennedy, Docherty, Plowman, Marchbank, Pickett, McCreadie and Byrne have long term value in them. None is older than 24.

Others may make it too.

We have parts to add - we desperately need midfielders to add depth through the middle. They are the easiest to get and the quickest to develop. Therefore it was the last part SOS focused on.

Our club is in a position not dissimilar to GWS in 2013. They won one game. Sheedy left. Everyone thought they were a waste of space. There are many similarities with us now. Not the least of which is SOS.

GWS spent hard and liberally at the top end of the draft. There were hits and there were misses. They worked on the belief that the more you take the more likely you are to get it right. They did not (in the early days) waste too many picks on other club's stars. They recruited has-beens and never-weres to fill the gaps, provide senior experience and leadership.

Now the GWS experiment has not (yet) born the ultimate fruit, although there are a couple of reasons for this: one, the loss of Allan and SOS - after this, I think they went too hard for experienced talent with high picks and gave away too many too easily. Two, injuries have taken a massive toll. No one doubts the club is in a good space though.

That is our benchmark, I believe. We are losing and losing badly but there is a plan. Throwing out Bolton would be foolish and you may as well wind up the club if you do this. I think it is time for new ideas and new assistants. This should happen every couple of years (look at the Hawks).

I am confident we are on the right track. We must be what we are historically not: patient. There have been massive improvements this year despite the W/L column (Cripps, Curnow, Harry, Dow, Fisher etc). It is (slowly) coming together. So long as we stay the path, I am confident it will come.

We also still need to hit the draft, not trade for the now. I am fine with free agents if they come but other than that, patience and purpose are the words.


Excellent post. I’m hurting like hell so I hope you are right.

I’m on board with our reset and long term plan.

The issue our club has is we have no real meaningful recent success to fall back on and this massive long term strategy is being presided over by the same old board. Rookie coach, rookie CEO, new list manager, soon to be new footy manager but largely the same board.

It’s asking a lot of members/supporters to put blind faith in the club and to cop continual sub standard performances when we’ve butchered so many things over an extended period of time.

I’m not calling for drastic knee jerk reactions however I can understand why some people struggle being patient.

I don’t believe it’s unreasonable to question things as we go either. Starting with our medical department. Even with all our mitigants we still leave a helluva lot to be desired on field at the moment.

_________________
We are on our way back...


Last edited by MPH78 on Sun Jul 15, 2018 2:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 2:20 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7284
Blue Vain wrote:
Braithy wrote:
ok, blue vein. what's your address mate?

i'll be over this arvy with alcoholic peace offerings, which will go great with whatever you're cooking me for dinner tonight.


The weak apology I expected. :lol:



mate, the real apology begins after a bottle of red and dinner at your place. it will get a nomination from the academy, i'm pretty sure.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:17 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Moving on gents...

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:34 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 1:26 am
Posts: 8026
Location: Melbourne
Hornet wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
McKay was always going to play relieving ruck. Thats why he was selected. :?



it makes sense ... only that there was an interview earlier in the week about why mcKay missed the brisbane game and that was because the powers that be declared they don't want him in the ruck, just as a forward.

so, again ... the club is all over the place, huh?

If this is true, and I'm not doubting you... just haven't heard it until now... love for someone at the club to clarify.


The fact is that it is not true. I heard the interview. I posted the comments from Cameron Bruce. (I’d post the article from the Hun but it’s paywallwed)

Absolutely nothing was said about Harry in the Ruck. No mention at all. It was all about the club managing Harry and the rigors of AFL footy, especially given he hadn’t had a preseason.

The “powers that be “ never said it.

_________________
Everything before the word "but" is horseshit - J Snow


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 6:06 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8214
ColourMan wrote:
jim wrote:
ColourMan wrote:
jim wrote:
The Duke wrote:
Simple question - If Bolts walked out of the club tomorrow, would any club offer him the position of head coach?


Doubt it. We've on 2 from our last 26 games. That's putrid! Personal might be young but even for injuries it's alot better than that.


It's not... our list is putrid.

Go through every player on the list

And it's severely unbalanced
No clue!

2 wins in 26 games. No structure, no clue out there, poor game plan, players going backwards. That's coaching. It's not anything else. There's alot of good young players on that list. Drafting has been good. Development poor. No list should win 2 from 26.

Bolton is not the man for job. Those who accept 2 win from 26 embrace mediocity.


Dumb post! :lol:

We lost Cripps for the last half of last year, and Gibbs for this year...

So an already threadbare midfield has became even more vulnerable... our opposition has only had to focus on our one A grader during this ime

I'll spell it out for you, during that period of time we've only had one A grade midfielder

Can't win games without a midfield

Can't win games without forward/midfield pressure

List our midfielders

List our small/mid sized forwards


You're the dummy. No clue or understanding. Know not to listen to you about football.

We have won 2 from 26, before that we won 12 in the same time. We can do better than 2 and not get beaten by bottom sides by 10 goals. We're not talking making the 8, we're talking winning more than one game for the season. Even we have a better side than that. Do you see structure? The players look properly drilled? do you they look like they any idea about the game plan? Why have players such as Weitering, SPS, SOJ gone backwards and have no clue to their role? do you see a real effort and commitment? Unless you have no idea, which you don't you answer those questions is no. That's coaching, unless you know nothing about the game. We have enough decent players to be doing better than what we are. You'll be surprised how much better players get if they are properly coached, properly developed with a proper game plan. That's why Sydney can turn ordinary players into good ones. Near enough half their side is off the rookie list. If they were at Carlton they'd be shit. We could even turn dusty into a dud.

You might embrace failure and make excuses, I don't. That's the difference.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 6:11 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7284
AIRCAV wrote:
Hornet wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
McKay was always going to play relieving ruck. Thats why he was selected. :?



it makes sense ... only that there was an interview earlier in the week about why mcKay missed the brisbane game and that was because the powers that be declared they don't want him in the ruck, just as a forward.

so, again ... the club is all over the place, huh?

If this is true, and I'm not doubting you... just haven't heard it until now... love for someone at the club to clarify.


The fact is that it is not true. I heard the interview. I posted the comments from Cameron Bruce. (I’d post the article from the Hun but it’s paywallwed)

Absolutely nothing was said about Harry in the Ruck. No mention at all. It was all about the club managing Harry and the rigors of AFL footy, especially given he hadn’t had a preseason.

The “powers that be “ never said it.


100% i read it. No ruck work, want a full preseason into him before he takes that on etc etc


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 6:26 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:06 pm
Posts: 3366
Maybe braithy is referencing this article?

From the age: https://amp.theage.com.au/sport/afl/wha ... 4zqp6.html

The reasoning from Carlton was simple. Levi Casboult had to be dropped so they needed a second ruck to relieve Matthew Kreuzer. They were reluctant to throw the callow McKay into the ruck and see him belted around.

_________________
"In better news for Blues fans, Jarrad Waite was not named on the club's injury list."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 6:31 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
They didn't want to drop Phillips because he had a good game the previous week and Kreuzer seemingly doesn't play 2nds, so Levi went out and Harry was overlooked.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 7:13 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 11:51 am
Posts: 1291
jim wrote:
ColourMan wrote:
jim wrote:
ColourMan wrote:
jim wrote:

Doubt it. We've on 2 from our last 26 games. That's putrid! Personal might be young but even for injuries it's alot better than that.


It's not... our list is putrid.

Go through every player on the list

And it's severely unbalanced
No clue!

2 wins in 26 games. No structure, no clue out there, poor game plan, players going backwards. That's coaching. It's not anything else. There's alot of good young players on that list. Drafting has been good. Development poor. No list should win 2 from 26.

Bolton is not the man for job. Those who accept 2 win from 26 embrace mediocity.


Dumb post! :lol:

We lost Cripps for the last half of last year, and Gibbs for this year...

So an already threadbare midfield has became even more vulnerable... our opposition has only had to focus on our one A grader during this ime

I'll spell it out for you, during that period of time we've only had one A grade midfielder

Can't win games without a midfield

Can't win games without forward/midfield pressure

List our midfielders

List our small/mid sized forwards


You're the dummy. No clue or understanding. Know not to listen to you about football.

We have won 2 from 26, before that we won 12 in the same time. We can do better than 2 and not get beaten by bottom sides by 10 goals. We're not talking making the 8, we're talking winning more than one game for the season. Even we have a better side than that. Do you see structure? The players look properly drilled? do you they look like they any idea about the game plan? Why have players such as Weitering, SPS, SOJ gone backwards and have no clue to their role? do you see a real effort and commitment? Unless you have no idea, which you don't you answer those questions is no. That's coaching, unless you know nothing about the game. We have enough decent players to be doing better than what we are. You'll be surprised how much better players get if they are properly coached, properly developed with a proper game plan. That's why Sydney can turn ordinary players into good ones. Near enough half their side is off the rookie list. If they were at Carlton they'd be shit. We could even turn dusty into a dud.

You might embrace failure and make excuses, I don't. That's the difference.


Clearly comprehension or football aren't strengths of yours.. you can't win games without a midfield or forward/midfield pressure :grin:

No MIDFIELD!!!!!

No SMALL/MEDIUM FORWARDS!!!

We have only had one A grade midfielder during this time!

Are Fisher, Curnow and Dow going backwards?

Maybe SPS and SOS aren't as good as you think or maybe they're lacking good senior players around them to provide leadership or maybe they're just young and all this is part of their learning curve....

Difficult to play them in the VFL because of injuries and flowered list

We use the rookie list for delisted players like Matt Shaw... talk to the list manager

Our list is putrid and that responsibility lies with the LIST MANAGER not the coach!

Even though it should only take you a few seconds, the task of listing of our midfielders and small/medium forwards was clearly too much for you

By the way, it's personnel not personal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 7:55 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8176
Rexy wrote:
They didn't want to drop Phillips because he had a good game the previous week and Kreuzer seemingly doesn't play 2nds, so Levi went out and Harry was overlooked.


Yeah, that was my take on it as well. I think they should have given Kreuzer another week off to recover from his multiple injury issues, and played Harry. But given what happened to Phillips last week, we would have ended up with exactly what we got this week. But I can live with a diabolical injury run, as much as I hate it. I just want to see us pour as many games into Harry as we can. He's one of the genuinely exciting talents on our list.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 8:24 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7284
Agree. Harry is the kind of guy if bought along right will be the difference.

That burst of speed and his size and hands. Its pretty exciting


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 8:56 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Rexy wrote:
They didn't want to drop Phillips because he had a good game the previous week and Kreuzer seemingly doesn't play 2nd fiddle to anybody, so Levi went out and Harry was overlooked.


EFA

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2018 12:09 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2139
Great quotes in Carlton’s history:

“Carlton’s a good place. We know what we are doing”

Quote delivered by “Bolts” after a half-time score of 77-7.

We’re on a good trajectory-loss-loss-loss-loss-loss etc

Is it time for the AFL or someone external to do a full audit of the running of the club? Coaches, CEO etc Surely it couldn’t get any worse (wait until after Hawks game perhaps?)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6991 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195 ... 350  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group