Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jun 19, 2025 5:40 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6991 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120 ... 350  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 9:29 am 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
cecil89 wrote:
The Duke wrote:

Essendon*** played finals last year. The year after their ban. I don't think they have a better list, but they've got better mental strength.


Absolute rocks in your head if you think our list is as good as Essendon**’s:

Daniher vs Casboult
Heppell vs Cripps
Merrett vs Murphy
Hooker vs C Curnow
Zaharakis vs E Curnow
McGrath vs SPS
Goddard vs Simpson
Hurley vs Marchbank
Smith vs Wright
Parish vs Dow
Bellchambers vs Kreuzer

Kreuzer is a win to us.
Cripps, C Curnow and Simpson break even at this point.
The rest of those matchups we lose, quite significantly in some cases (see Casboult and Marchbank). Anyone who thinks our list isn’t poor/vastly inexperienced must be biased. Success this year is going to require good structures and a tonne of youthful enthusiasm.


How did Essendon* go without the senior players?

That is the example of where Carlton is at.

We are a bunch of kids with limited senior support. Essendon* have a stronger senior core to support the developing kids.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 9:30 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Heard a bit of a SEN interview with Simon Lethlean re the saints.... yes yes just hear me out.... and one thing he said re their young players was that they had to take ownership from the older guys.

The same applies to us.

Our young guys have to not only be played (Polson, McKay, Jack, etc), but they have to take ownership from the likes of Simmo, Murph and Thomas.

There's no other way.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 9:34 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21543
Location: North of the border
The Normal One wrote:
cecil89 wrote:
The Duke wrote:

Essendon**** played finals last year. The year after their ban. I don't think they have a better list, but they've got better mental strength.


Absolute rocks in your head if you think our list is as good as Essendon***’s:

Daniher vs Casboult
Heppell vs Cripps
Merrett vs Murphy
Hooker vs C Curnow
Zaharakis vs E Curnow
McGrath vs SPS
Goddard vs Simpson
Hurley vs Marchbank
Smith vs Wright
Parish vs Dow
Bellchambers vs Kreuzer

Kreuzer is a win to us.
Cripps, C Curnow and Simpson break even at this point.
The rest of those matchups we lose, quite significantly in some cases (see Casboult and Marchbank). Anyone who thinks our list isn’t poor/vastly inexperienced must be biased. Success this year is going to require good structures and a tonne of youthful enthusiasm.


How did Essendon** go without the senior players?

That is the example of where Carlton is at.

We are a bunch of kids with limited senior support. Essendon** have a stronger senior core to support the developing kids.


the club chose this path of recruitment - Essendon* didn't exactly chose theirs - ( although you could say they did )

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 10:12 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18028
cecil89 wrote:
The Duke wrote:

Essendon*** played finals last year. The year after their ban. I don't think they have a better list, but they've got better mental strength.


Absolute rocks in your head if you think our list is as good as Essendon**’s:

Daniher vs Casboult
Heppell vs Cripps
Merrett vs Murphy
Hooker vs C Curnow
Zaharakis vs E Curnow
McGrath vs SPS
Goddard vs Simpson
Hurley vs Marchbank
Smith vs Wright
Parish vs Dow
Bellchambers vs Kreuzer

Kreuzer is a win to us.
Cripps, C Curnow and Simpson break even at this point.
The rest of those matchups we lose, quite significantly in some cases (see Casboult and Marchbank). Anyone who thinks our list isn’t poor/vastly inexperienced must be biased. Success this year is going to require good structures and a tonne of youthful enthusiasm.


Really? Parish in his 3rd year against Dow who has played 3 games? :lol:

Ask the other 16 coaches who is better, Charlie Curnow or Cale Hooker.
Or Patrick Cripps or Dyson Heppell.
Heppell turns 26 next month and has achieved nothing. Last season his own supporters were calling for him to be dropped!
I'd also take a 21 year old Caleb Marchbank before Michael Hurley who turns 28 in 7 weeks.
Kade Simpson was in the All australian squad in 2016, represented his country in 2017 and is a far more influential player than Brendon Goddard now.

I'd question several of your judgements.
I wouldn't worry about Essendon*. John Worsfold will be gone long before Brendan Bolton is.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 11:46 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Rexy wrote:
Heard a bit of a SEN interview with Simon Lethlean re the saints.... yes yes just hear me out.... and one thing he said re their young players was that they had to take ownership from the older guys.

The same applies to us.

Our young guys have to not only be played (Polson, McKay, Jack, etc), but they have to take ownership from the likes of Simmo, Murph and Thomas.

There's no other way.

This.
SPS has to back himself instad of looking around to see if there is a senior player to dish off to.
Fisher the same.
That kid, Murray from Collingwood had no such qualms.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 11:56 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9818
Location: Australia
aboynamedsue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
We've got a supporter base that wants a rebuild but doesn't want to do the hard yards that come with it. They want to play and develop kids but they also want the hard seasoned bodies to be physical. They bitch about 24 point losses with a team full of kids when 2 and a half years ago we were losing by 130 points with a bunch of older players.

You can't have it all. If you support the club to rebuild, have the guts to see it through. Wetting your pants when it gets a bit tough is what Carlton used to do. Sack the coach and bring in a messiah to appease the uneasy whinging masses.
Those days are hopefully gone


Exactly.

We all said at the end of 2015 that the club basically had to strip itself right back and start again. Bolton, SOS et al have done that. I embraced the club taking that direction, knowing it meant at least 3 years of pain. It’s hard to swallow sometimes, but it is the direction we almost unanimously agreed was the right thing one to take.

I was very surprised at the number of posters over the summer predicting we’d win more games in 2018 than 2017, as I simply could not see where the short term improvement would come from. Docherty & Gibbs are massive outs for a team that is were it is.

Will it all pay off in the long term? Time will tell. But please, Carlton, stay the course for once.


Just because you guys happen to be satisfied with the latest in a long line of “trust us and have patience“ propaganda coming from the club doesn’t mean we all have to. Most of us are sick of the 15 years of crap that’s been served to us. Don’t try and tell us we should be happy with the last 15 years.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 12:24 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Blue Vain wrote:
Or Patrick Cripps or Dyson Heppell.
Heppell turns 26 next month and has achieved nothing. Last season his own supporters were calling for him to be dropped!


I broke my boycott and watched Essendon* vs the Bulldogs. If Heppell didn’t have dreadlocks you wouldn’t even notice him out there, he’s just an OK player.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 12:40 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2646
I don’t think the club has faulted in its drafting or recruiting for now. For me they have done a very good job turning the list around except for some recycled players this year. You need some experienced players but we went overboard with that this year and none look like they are adding to our team. What is the biggest gripe is the structure and effort that is been presented this year.
If we are to progress in this “66 game rebuild” we need to constantly grow and I feel we need to address some obvious critical points which are quite apparent, lazy leadership, selfish play, astonishing decision making, and a less than effective structure and game plan.
Apparently we have been working hard all summer but in three games we have some glaring problems. It’s not about the rebuild itself but Bolton needs to rectify some issues and quickly or he will need to start been accountable and take some responsibility.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:07 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 6047
sinbagger wrote:
aboynamedsue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
We've got a supporter base that wants a rebuild but doesn't want to do the hard yards that come with it. They want to play and develop kids but they also want the hard seasoned bodies to be physical. They bitch about 24 point losses with a team full of kids when 2 and a half years ago we were losing by 130 points with a bunch of older players.

You can't have it all. If you support the club to rebuild, have the guts to see it through. Wetting your pants when it gets a bit tough is what Carlton used to do. Sack the coach and bring in a messiah to appease the uneasy whinging masses.
Those days are hopefully gone


Exactly.

We all said at the end of 2015 that the club basically had to strip itself right back and start again. Bolton, SOS et al have done that. I embraced the club taking that direction, knowing it meant at least 3 years of pain. It’s hard to swallow sometimes, but it is the direction we almost unanimously agreed was the right thing one to take.

I was very surprised at the number of posters over the summer predicting we’d win more games in 2018 than 2017, as I simply could not see where the short term improvement would come from. Docherty & Gibbs are massive outs for a team that is were it is.

Will it all pay off in the long term? Time will tell. But please, Carlton, stay the course for once.


Just because you guys happen to be satisfied with the latest in a long line of “trust us and have patience“ propaganda coming from the club doesn’t mean we all have to. Most of us are sick of the 15 years of crap that’s been served to us. Don’t try and tell us we should be happy with the last 15 years.

Nobody is saying they are happy with the last 15 years. Quite the opposite. It’s about breaking the cycle.

This is the first true rebuild we’ve had. 2002-2015 were just wasted years of quick fixes, sacked coaches, poor player development and atrocious list management.

There’s no guarantee any approach will work. This current one might not result in a flag either. But let’s see a plan through for once.

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:19 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35891
Location: Half back flank
The Duke wrote:
The similarities at this stage to Malthouse, Ratten and Pagan are quite scary.



If we sack Bolton they'll be even more scary.


Sent from my XT1033 using Tapatalk

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:35 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18655
Location: threeohfivethree
:lol:

:clap: :clap:

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:36 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:43 pm
Posts: 4745
aboynamedsue wrote:
sinbagger wrote:
aboynamedsue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
We've got a supporter base that wants a rebuild but doesn't want to do the hard yards that come with it. They want to play and develop kids but they also want the hard seasoned bodies to be physical. They bitch about 24 point losses with a team full of kids when 2 and a half years ago we were losing by 130 points with a bunch of older players.

You can't have it all. If you support the club to rebuild, have the guts to see it through. Wetting your pants when it gets a bit tough is what Carlton used to do. Sack the coach and bring in a messiah to appease the uneasy whinging masses.
Those days are hopefully gone


Exactly.

We all said at the end of 2015 that the club basically had to strip itself right back and start again. Bolton, SOS et al have done that. I embraced the club taking that direction, knowing it meant at least 3 years of pain. It’s hard to swallow sometimes, but it is the direction we almost unanimously agreed was the right thing one to take.

I was very surprised at the number of posters over the summer predicting we’d win more games in 2018 than 2017, as I simply could not see where the short term improvement would come from. Docherty & Gibbs are massive outs for a team that is were it is.

Will it all pay off in the long term? Time will tell. But please, Carlton, stay the course for once.


Just because you guys happen to be satisfied with the latest in a long line of “trust us and have patience“ propaganda coming from the club doesn’t mean we all have to. Most of us are sick of the 15 years of crap that’s been served to us. Don’t try and tell us we should be happy with the last 15 years.

Nobody is saying they are happy with the last 15 years. Quite the opposite. It’s about breaking the cycle.

This is the first true rebuild we’ve had. 2002-2015 were just wasted years of quick fixes, sacked coaches, poor player development and atrocious list management.

There’s no guarantee any approach will work. This current one might not result in a flag either. But let’s see a plan through for once.


Agree with all the angst after all the years of pain and false dawns (the Ratt's 3 amigos era and even Bolt's honeymoon period when we beat top teams with a crap list). I was gutted on Friday night as I thought we'd respond after the GC game, and fired off a fair few broadsides on TC :yikes:

But we have to forget the past and trust this basically new list and coaching staff. The alternative is to wallow in the past and go nowhere. Of course we need to keep tweaking the list, hope that McKay and Kerr keep developing so they can come into the side and give us much needed KPF options, and get the best available in the 2018 Super Draft. An out-of-contract Big Fish would be handy too.....we're due for one surely !!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:52 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 6047
CK95 wrote:
The Duke wrote:
The similarities at this stage to Malthouse, Ratten and Pagan are quite scary.



If we sack Bolton they'll be even more scary.


Sent from my XT1033 using Tapatalk

:clap:

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 2:42 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18028
Blue Sombrero wrote:
Rexy wrote:
Heard a bit of a SEN interview with Simon Lethlean re the saints.... yes yes just hear me out.... and one thing he said re their young players was that they had to take ownership from the older guys.

The same applies to us.

Our young guys have to not only be played (Polson, McKay, Jack, etc), but they have to take ownership from the likes of Simmo, Murph and Thomas.

There's no other way.

This.
SPS has to back himself instad of looking around to see if there is a senior player to dish off to.
Fisher the same.
That kid, Murray from Collingwood had no such qualms.


I agree but "That kid, Murray" is in his 3rd year as an AFL player. He wasn't getting a game when he was SPS or Fishers age.
Let's compare them when they've had the same exposure to the system.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 3:15 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:48 pm
Posts: 4450
Location: Perth
As has been said, there’s no question that a full rebuild was required at the end of 2015 and that the current coaches/recruiters can’t be held accountable for our failures prior to then. The board being excluded from that exemption.

We all knew this would come with many ups and downs and much pain.

As hard as it is/was, especially with our dearth of meaningful success for far too many years, I had accepted this and prepared for what was to come.

I acknowledge that losing Gibbs and Docherty is huge for us right now and I personally wasn’t as optimistic as others going in to the season.

That being said, I’ve been incredibly disappointed with our last 2 games. Even allowing for all the mitigants, I’m incredibly concerned about our glaring inability to execute the ‘basics’:

• Our demonstrated skills are sub standard and flat out amateur hour at times.
• We can’t tackle to save ourselves.
• Our pressure and intensity has dropped off markedly in my opinion. We’ve been flat out soft in large parts of the past two games.
• Our forward entries are poor to say the least. Either the long bomb to the opposition numbers or scrubber/hack kicks forward. There’s no wonder we get rebounded on with ease with system like that.
• Getting beaten by what you know, again (Gold Coast).

These are some of the things that are bothering me. Things we can bring/address regardless of talent/age.

I’m not calling for Bolts’ head or anything like that. I admit to having lost some faith and have been very deflated after the recent games.

The last two games have been unacceptable imho and I don’t believe it is unreasonable to pose questions noting we are now in year 3. There are losses and then there are losses. I put the past 2 games in the latter category because of how poor we have been with the ‘basics’.

Here’s hoping we’ll have an up very soon.

_________________
We are on our way back...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 3:21 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21543
Location: North of the border
MPH78 wrote:
As has been said, there’s no question that a full rebuild was required at the end of 2015 and that the current coaches/recruiters can’t be held accountable for our failures prior to then. The board being excluded from that exemption.

We all knew this would come with many ups and downs and much pain.

As hard as it is/was, especially with our dearth of meaningful success for far too many years, I had accepted this and prepared for what was to come.

I acknowledge that losing Gibbs and Docherty is huge for us right now and I personally wasn’t as optimistic as others going in to the season.

That being said, I’ve been incredibly disappointed with our last 2 games. Even allowing for all the mitigants, I’m incredibly concerned about our glaring inability to execute the ‘basics’:

• Our demonstrated skills are sub standard and flat out amateur hour at times.
• We can’t tackle to save ourselves.
• Our pressure and intensity has dropped off markedly in my opinion. We’ve been flat out soft in large parts of the past two games.
• Our forward entries are poor to say the least. Either the long bomb to the opposition numbers or scrubber/hack kicks forward. There’s no wonder we get rebounded on with ease with system like that.
• Getting beaten by what you know, again (Gold Coast).

These are some of the things that are bothering me. Things we can bring/address regardless of talent/age.

I’m not calling for Bolts’ head or anything like that. I admit to having lost some faith and have been very deflated after the recent games.

The last two games have been unacceptable imho and I don’t believe it is unreasonable to pose questions noting we are now in year 3. There are losses and then there are losses. I put the past 2 games in the latter category because of how poor we have been with the ‘basics’.

Here’s hoping we’ll have an up very soon.



Good Post

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 3:27 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
I'm confident SOS has assembled the natural talent - just need Bolton and his coaches to do their job by getting the young guys to take ownership and deliver on that talent.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 3:30 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34525
Location: The Brown Wedge
Rexy wrote:
Heard a bit of a SEN interview with Simon Lethlean re the saints.... yes yes just hear me out.... and one thing he said re their young players was that they had to take ownership from the older guys.

The same applies to us.

Our young guys have to not only be played (Polson, McKay, Jack, etc), but they have to take ownership from the likes of Simmo, Murph and Thomas.

There's no other way.


The Saints have also employed the same mindfulness coach Richmond used in 2016/17.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 3:39 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34525
Location: The Brown Wedge
CK95 wrote:
The Duke wrote:
The similarities at this stage to Malthouse, Ratten and Pagan are quite scary.



If we sack Bolton they'll be even more scary.


Sent from my XT1033 using Tapatalk


Fair point - but 3 more losses like the last 2 and I don't see the players recovering any time soon.

Weitering is a great young player. Last year he read the play beautifully and disposed of the footy very well. Either he was playing above his ability, or something has happened to his confidence.

As a layman, all I can do is say it for the way it looks - and it looks as if they don't know what they're doing, or where they're supposed to be.

We might have a very cunning plan, but if it looks shit-hot on paper, but like a turd in practice, we have to take another look at the plan......surely?

SPS is another who played with stacks more confidence last year, IMO.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 4:22 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Sydney Blue wrote:
aboynamedsue wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
We have been rebuilding since about 2004 we went through years of tanking


Tanking is not the same as rebuilding. We didn’t start properly rebuilding until 2016. What went on from 2004-2015 has nothing to do with this group of players or coaches.

Sydney Blue wrote:
Carlton needs to put the best team out each week


Are you suggesting we’re not fielding our best available team? Which gun players from our VFL side who lost by 20 goals would have made a winning difference to Carlton on Friday night?
Not suggesting it's a fact.
We have been doing it for years
Polson had done nothing to warrant a call up but Graham racks them up week in week out.
We lost an AA ruckman because we played Kruez and the lanky bean pole from the west in front of him.
And yet we play Casboult and allow Mackay and KJ to try and develop in the NB
There appears to be rules for some and not others

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk


Agree and disagree
Agree: There are different rules for different players
Disagree: We know what Graham brings to the table. We've seen it 50 odd times. It's not going to take us forward. We have yet to see what Polson brings. happy to give him half the games Graham has been given before making an informed assessment

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6991 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120 ... 350  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Crusader, lawrence_angwin and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group