Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed May 01, 2024 4:18 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 171 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2017 9:03 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:02 am
Posts: 1724
Blue Sombrero wrote:
BigKev wrote:
A ball up 1m out from their goal line and Kruezer taps it back into play, (and they goal).
Things like that from an experienced player disappoint me more that skill errors from fringe players.

Kreuzer is a great player and the heart of the club but his tap work is not good.
People rave about his getting hitouts but this week he was no better than any other week. Even against Bont, his taps were missing targets and sometis even going to an opposition player.
There were two or three superb taps to advantage today from our rucks.


Out of 54.


Kreuzer had 20 hit outs to advantage!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2017 10:13 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Must have been at another game Kreuzer was excellent again on the weekend and I suspect only he Gibbs and Jones actually won their position on the day


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2017 10:32 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17567
Yep. Not to mention, the Dogs midfielders are roving to Kruezer as well. They're not going to stand 3 metres off our midfielders and let them have a free run at the ball. They're in our midfielders pockets trying to get the tap as well.
There's some very naive and uninformed comments in this thread over the past couple of days.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2017 1:13 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
Blue Vain wrote:
Give me a break. If he hits it through, it's a free kick. If he hits it over the boundary, it's a free kick.
Yes it would be nice if he could hit it 20 metres away but he has a 105kg ruckman bodying up on him trying to prevent him getting his hands to the ball let alone allowing him to hit it where he wants.


So the only alternative is to aim for the centre of the goal square?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2017 7:45 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17567
Read the post. I'm sure he was trying to hit it wide but he has another ruckman bodying up on him and trying to stop him getting his hands to the ball.
I'm sure that if you make the opposition disappear, he could put it on a 5 cent piece for you.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2017 12:14 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
scottopee wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
BigKev wrote:
A ball up 1m out from their goal line and Kruezer taps it back into play, (and they goal).
Things like that from an experienced player disappoint me more that skill errors from fringe players.

Kreuzer is a great player and the heart of the club but his tap work is not good.
People rave about his getting hitouts but this week he was no better than any other week. Even against Bont, his taps were missing targets and sometis even going to an opposition player.
There were two or three superb taps to advantage today from our rucks.


Out of 54.


Kreuzer had 20 hit outs to advantage!


He had two or three superb taps to advantage.
Many of the others just fell closer to our players than theirs, sometimes at Kreuzer's own feet and don't mean much.

It's like saying Casboult is a good forward because he has a lot of shots at goal and most of them are pretty close to going through. He only kicks 2 a game, though.

When a 200cm ruck goes up against a 193 mid, he should be able to put the ball on the chest of a runner or hit it into his path to run on to or even to a space. Kreuzer v Bont couldn't do that consistently. There was one occasion, just one where he actually backhanded it clear of the pack towards our goal.
If you want to know what a good tap ruckman looks like look at Sandilands, Gawn or Maric of a few years back or Natanui at his best where he taps short, long and not just to his feet. If you want to know what I measure rucks against, go back to Nicholls, and Farmer who were about 186 tall rucking against Len Thompson who was 195. Yes, I know they were different times but they could actually direct the ball towards their rovers and not just get their hands to it.
As I said. Kreuzer is a lot of things but he is not a good tap ruckman. Mind you, apart from Gawn, of the rucks actually playing at the moment, none really stands out as one.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2017 12:22 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
BigKev wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Give me a break. If he hits it through, it's a free kick. If he hits it over the boundary, it's a free kick.
Yes it would be nice if he could hit it 20 metres away but he has a 105kg ruckman bodying up on him trying to prevent him getting his hands to the ball let alone allowing him to hit it where he wants.


So the only alternative is to aim for the centre of the goal square?

I think he was going for Gibbs but it went to the wrong side of him and landed on an opposition player's boot.
Shit happens.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2017 6:47 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17567
Blue Sombrero wrote:
scottopee wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
BigKev wrote:
A ball up 1m out from their goal line and Kruezer taps it back into play, (and they goal).
Things like that from an experienced player disappoint me more that skill errors from fringe players.

Kreuzer is a great player and the heart of the club but his tap work is not good.
People rave about his getting hitouts but this week he was no better than any other week. Even against Bont, his taps were missing targets and sometis even going to an opposition player.
There were two or three superb taps to advantage today from our rucks.


Out of 54.


Kreuzer had 20 hit outs to advantage!


He had two or three superb taps to advantage.
Many of the others just fell closer to our players than theirs.


Yep, that's pretty much the definition of "to advantage" :lol:
Hitting the ball closer to our players than theirs. If a midfielder can't win the ball in that situation more times than not, it's not the ruckmans fault.

I'd give up if I was you. It's just becoming embarrassing now.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2017 11:32 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:02 am
Posts: 1724
Blue Sombrero wrote:
scottopee wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
BigKev wrote:
A ball up 1m out from their goal line and Kruezer taps it back into play, (and they goal).
Things like that from an experienced player disappoint me more that skill errors from fringe players.

Kreuzer is a great player and the heart of the club but his tap work is not good.
People rave about his getting hitouts but this week he was no better than any other week. Even against Bont, his taps were missing targets and sometis even going to an opposition player.
There were two or three superb taps to advantage today from our rucks.


Out of 54.


Kreuzer had 20 hit outs to advantage!


He had two or three superb taps to advantage.
Many of the others just fell closer to our players than theirs, sometimes at Kreuzer's own feet and don't mean much.

It's like saying Casboult is a good forward because he has a lot of shots at goal and most of them are pretty close to going through. He only kicks 2 a game, though.

When a 200cm ruck goes up against a 193 mid, he should be able to put the ball on the chest of a runner or hit it into his path to run on to or even to a space. Kreuzer v Bont couldn't do that consistently. There was one occasion, just one where he actually backhanded it clear of the pack towards our goal.
If you want to know what a good tap ruckman looks like look at Sandilands, Gawn or Maric of a few years back or Natanui at his best where he taps short, long and not just to his feet. If you want to know what I measure rucks against, go back to Nicholls, and Farmer who were about 186 tall rucking against Len Thompson who was 195. Yes, I know they were different times but they could actually direct the ball towards their rovers and not just get their hands to it.
As I said. Kreuzer is a lot of things but he is not a good tap ruckman. Mind you, apart from Gawn, of the rucks actually playing at the moment, none really stands out as one.


Never said Kreuzer was a great tap ruckman but responded to your he only had 2 or 3 taps to advantage when it was in the official stats as 20hitouts to advantage! Simple.
It's not the only time you have had a crack at Kreuzer we get it you don't like him.....
Has their been a bigger game of hit out numbers 50 and 20hitouts to advantage this year??

As for mentioning players from 40yrs ago the game has changed midfielders stood by themselves and had plenty of space now everyone has an opponent at a stoppage or at least should have. Just like forwards don't kick 5 every week because of flooding.
So because Kreuzer didn't thrash the Bont every time because he had a 7cm height differential your telling me Thompson at 195cm flogged Nicholls (I think 188cm) every time because he should have because he had a 7cm height difference??


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2017 12:20 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
Blue Vain wrote:
Read the post. I'm sure he was trying to hit it wide but he has another ruckman bodying up on him and trying to stop him getting his hands to the ball.
I'm sure that if you make the opposition disappear, he could put it on a 5 cent piece for you.


Then we're not talking about the same incident.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:51 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Blue Vain wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
scottopee wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
BigKev wrote:
A ball up 1m out from their goal line and Kruezer taps it back into play, (and they goal).
Things like that from an experienced player disappoint me more that skill errors from fringe players.

Kreuzer is a great player and the heart of the club but his tap work is not good.
People rave about his getting hitouts but this week he was no better than any other week. Even against Bont, his taps were missing targets and sometis even going to an opposition player.
There were two or three superb taps to advantage today from our rucks.


Out of 54.


Kreuzer had 20 hit outs to advantage!


He had two or three superb taps to advantage.
Many of the others just fell closer to our players than theirs.


Yep, that's pretty much the definition of "to advantage" :lol: No it isn't.
Hitting the ball closer to our players than theirs. If a midfielder can't win the ball in that situation more times than not, it's not the ruckmans fault.

I'd give up if I was you. It's just becoming embarrassing now.

If you're embarrased for me, don't bother.
I played ruck. I coached ruck.
I don't give a ruck.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 171 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 217 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group