Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed May 14, 2025 12:19 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 389 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 20  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 9:15 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
GreatEx wrote:
sinbagger wrote:
GreatEx wrote:
I don't quite get this "we've been crap for 15 years" mantra; maybe it's because I am somewhat insulated from the madness up here in Sydney but back around 2009-11 (or whenever Ratten's team hit its peak) we were playing exciting, attacking football and frequently turned over big deficits (especially against the Tiges, oh yes indeed!) because we were unstoppable when on song. Okay so we didn't go that extra step, but when we started Ratten's last season with three straight wins, how many of you can honestly say you came on here and said "the wheels will come off because of our toxic club culture (not an insane injury list), just you watch!" When Mick was brought in to polish off the premiership picture, many of us may have doubted we were actually capable of lifting the cup but how many of you said "well ACTUALLY, our playing list is the worst in the AFL so prepare yourself for some spoonage!"

It's been frustrating, but let's not go all revisionist and pretend it's been all doom and gloom.


Finishing 7-9 for a few years is not success. Compared to the last 50 years the last 15 we've been consistently crap. Failure year after year with a few small bright spots. Previously we had powerhouse year after powerhouse year with a few dark spots.

If you rank the last 15 years as a success then it's you who is being revisionist.


Where on earth did I say the last 15 years was a success? All I said was that were some bright spots, and we were genuinely exciting to watch for a while there. I'm sorry you guys weren't able to enjoy it, but I really had a good time when Ratten was in charge and we were getting better and better each year. Then we had the injury crisis in 2010 (or 2011?) and everyone panicked and made the worst coaching hire in club, nay AFL, nay sporting history, and a squad of smallish run-and-gun players were forced to play squalid boundary-hugging rubbish that utterly ruined them as human beings. At the end of the day, I watch football for enjoyment - not just the reflected glory of premierships - and I've seen highs and lows in that respect over the 15 years, where others apparently only saw lows and lowers.


In hindsight getting rid of Ratts was the wrong idea for a few reasons. Mainly because they gave Mick free reign which couldn't happen at the Pies. We also lost a lot of good assistant coaches replaced by yes men.

I would hope that couldn't happen again. Trigg has been doing a good job, no messiahs and no quick fixes. Get a team working well together, and progress from there. The key is the board and footy department holding their nerve


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 9:47 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1650
The biggest on field issue arguably is this losing mentality/culture call it what you like.

We need to eradicate this the quickest way possible. A tough task indeed.

Having said that Sydney had a shitful culture for many many years. Geelong were handbaggers for an enternity. Freo was well a shipping port.

How they turned it around only God knows. We need a little help a little divine intervention!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 9:53 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 2477
@adam Chatfield agree
The key is the board..holding their nerve AND know what they are doing ...to date they have failed on both issues


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 9:54 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
Rod Waddell wrote:
The biggest on field issue arguably is this losing mentality/culture call it what you like.

We need to eradicate this the quickest way possible. A tough task indeed.

Having said that Sydney had a shitful culture for many many years. Geelong were handbaggers for an enternity. Freo was well a shipping port.

How they turned it around only God knows. We need a little help a little divine intervention!


Get the right people in charge and be a bit ruthless, like Freo in turfing Harvey for a better option


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 11:11 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 11:51 am
Posts: 1291
jimmae wrote:
ColourMan wrote:
Firstly, I hope the 4 players get fit, and play many, many good games for Carlton, however, you've missed the point...

Apart from possibly Plowman, they weren't going to play for GWS again.... they were surplus to requirements for GWS; if they weren't contracted they would have been delisted (if they weren't traded)!

GWS have better, younger, cheaper players they preferred... and they needed the roster spots for their academy players, and mature age replacements.

Why wasn't any other club interested in these players?

How do you think GWS were able to bring in Stevie J? Hopper, Kennedy etc? This trade was critical for GWS!!

We could have, and should have, driven a much better deal (i.e including Tomlinson)!!!

They had enough list space and cap space to accommodate most if not all of them, and none of them were out of contract.

Could have re-rookied them if they so wished.

cecil89 wrote:
Was disappointed to see Docherty going one-on-one with Tippett and Franklin on a few occasions. To play 4 tall defenders and still somehow lose our structure and end up with Docherty covering is not acceptable.

Rowe with a game high 13 spoils, White with 4.



Why do you bother responding when you don't respond to the the actual post?

GWS did not want these players, not even on the rookie list... if they did, we wouldn't have them!!!

How many games did the 4 play in 2015?

It's why they kept Tomlinson, because he was wanted by GWS (by some at GWS, not everyone)!!

But even he was gettable...

GWS achieved their goals when dealing with us, clearly we didn't achieve our goals in our negotiations with GWS!!

Did you think about that?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 11:18 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
Synbad wrote:
But you lost players and got players
Going forward you're going to gain players and lose players
Some years will be total bursts or part busts
It's not about losing blokes and replacing blokes
You need to build not replace


What do you think this is " the Iroquois mourning wars'?

Funny


Henderson a loss. No
Yarran a loss. No. Cant have players with issues who decide when to play
Menzel. No. Injuries, fitness application
Bell. Yes.
Garlett, Waite, Robinson. Suddenly were going to be the difference. Each part of the problem
Betts. Yes


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 11:44 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 11:51 am
Posts: 1291
chelodina wrote:
Synbad wrote:
You realize there's a board a ceo and a football manager just in case you have a coach gone rogue !

Just more loser mentality head in and stuff .. Which gets back to what I was saying that the club totally has a disconnect from what is expected for success from the president down to supporters.
You just proved my point.
This club has no clue.
Waite Eddie etc are playing the best football of their careers

How old is waite now? 33/34? No complaining about his injuries etc.
Relishing playing for north! He's looking fantastic!
Eddie? He's killing it! Absolutely killing it across there!
Our two must consistent players after two games come from Adelaide!
Must be the water over there!

The club is toxic from top to bottom!



Yes and Silvagni came in and got value for our trades last year.. So at least that has changed.

The board has changed significantly since you initially spruiked this, the CEO is different. You have nothing left. Yesterday's keyboard hero.


No, he didn't!!!!

We had 3 picks in the first 21 after the Bell trade...

We then traded 3 players drafted in the first round, and ended up with cast-offs from GWS, and Kerridge (who was un-contracted),
and 4 picks in the first 21!

Look at what other clubs did during the same period!

We could have done so much better during the trading period!

That should have led to more, and better selections in the draft!

Everyone is happy we are embracing the draft like never before, and that's great!

But just because we are now doing what everyone else has been doing for years, it doesn't mean we weren't mediocre!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 4:14 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
jimmae wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
Ratten should never have left.

Nobody can prove me wrong any more than I can prove myself right BUT he did have us winning a few games and he WAS in the throes of turning the list over and he WAS trying to play 'modern' footy.

Ratten kept insisting on the wrong kinds of footballers to execute said game plan, which was over simplified and lacked defensive spine in its planning. It's was Parkin Mk II, and it looked outdated against the top sides.

But we were winning and playing finals, Jim. That's my point. Since Ratten we have gone into a rapid, downwards spiral. Neither you nor I know what might have been had he stayed.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 4:24 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 934
Synbad wrote:
To get all that padre and there has never been an example of the opposite

You must have the right board of directors and the right president chairing them
In the hurly burly of professional sport you're not going to achieve success without the right people on the top

Carlton under Bolton is not hawthorn


Rusty, you never change.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 4:24 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 934
Synbad wrote:
To get all that padre and there has never been an example of the opposite

You must have the right board of directors and the right president chairing them
In the hurly burly of professional sport you're not going to achieve success without the right people on the top

Carlton under Bolton is not hawthorn


Rusty, you never change.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 5:32 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Michael Jezz wrote:
Synbad wrote:
But you lost players and got players
Going forward you're going to gain players and lose players
Some years will be total bursts or part busts
It's not about losing blokes and replacing blokes
You need to build not replace


What do you think this is " the Iroquois mourning wars'?

Funny


Henderson a loss. No
Yarran a loss. No. Cant have players with issues who decide when to play
Menzel. No. Injuries, fitness application
Bell. Yes.
Garlett, Waite, Robinson. Suddenly were going to be the difference. Each part of the problem
Betts. Yes

Everybody is a loss
Just because we can't get a must together doesnt mean they're not a loss.
If you can't galvanize a list that you have to play football you won't galvanize the next one too

It's not the players its the system
I only have reservations for Yarran.. For her chose the wrong club!

Geelong Adelaide will sort theirs out

BTW I love Yarran and hope he can break out!

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 10:20 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
ColourMan wrote:
chelodina wrote:
Synbad wrote:
You realize there's a board a ceo and a football manager just in case you have a coach gone rogue !

Just more loser mentality head in and stuff .. Which gets back to what I was saying that the club totally has a disconnect from what is expected for success from the president down to supporters.
You just proved my point.
This club has no clue.
Waite Eddie etc are playing the best football of their careers

How old is waite now? 33/34? No complaining about his injuries etc.
Relishing playing for north! He's looking fantastic!
Eddie? He's killing it! Absolutely killing it across there!
Our two must consistent players after two games come from Adelaide!
Must be the water over there!

The club is toxic from top to bottom!



Yes and Silvagni came in and got value for our trades last year.. So at least that has changed.

The board has changed significantly since you initially spruiked this, the CEO is different. You have nothing left. Yesterday's keyboard hero.


No, he didn't!!!!

We had 3 picks in the first 21 after the Bell trade...

We then traded 3 players drafted in the first round, and ended up with cast-offs from GWS, and Kerridge (who was un-contracted),
and 4 picks in the first 21!

Look at what other clubs did during the same period!

We could have done so much better during the trading period!

That should have led to more, and better selections in the draft!

Everyone is happy we are embracing the draft like never before, and that's great!

But just because we are now doing what everyone else has been doing for years, it doesn't mean we weren't mediocre!!


The only problem with that observation is that at least one of the GWS "cast-offs" was also a first round selection, and quite high in the first round, at that. Let's at least use the same logic for other teams as we do for ourselves. For instance, for a rebuilding club, where is Lachie Plowman found wanting in comparison to Lachie Henderson? Having said that, I think we are still over-doing the mature age thing by one or two players a year. I'd would much rather have taken the chance on someone like Mabior Chol or Gach noyan, as an extra draftee or rookie, than some equally speculative cast-off tall with a bit of 'baggage'.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 10:41 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24613
Location: Kaloyasena
Pafloyul wrote:
ColourMan wrote:
chelodina wrote:
Synbad wrote:
You realize there's a board a ceo and a football manager just in case you have a coach gone rogue !

Just more loser mentality head in and stuff .. Which gets back to what I was saying that the club totally has a disconnect from what is expected for success from the president down to supporters.
You just proved my point.
This club has no clue.
Waite Eddie etc are playing the best football of their careers

How old is waite now? 33/34? No complaining about his injuries etc.
Relishing playing for north! He's looking fantastic!
Eddie? He's killing it! Absolutely killing it across there!
Our two must consistent players after two games come from Adelaide!
Must be the water over there!

The club is toxic from top to bottom!



Yes and Silvagni came in and got value for our trades last year.. So at least that has changed.

The board has changed significantly since you initially spruiked this, the CEO is different. You have nothing left. Yesterday's keyboard hero.


No, he didn't!!!!

We had 3 picks in the first 21 after the Bell trade...

We then traded 3 players drafted in the first round, and ended up with cast-offs from GWS, and Kerridge (who was un-contracted),
and 4 picks in the first 21!

Look at what other clubs did during the same period!

We could have done so much better during the trading period!

That should have led to more, and better selections in the draft!

Everyone is happy we are embracing the draft like never before, and that's great!

But just because we are now doing what everyone else has been doing for years, it doesn't mean we weren't mediocre!!


The only problem with that observation is that at least one of the GWS "cast-offs" was also a first round selection, and quite high in the first round, at that. Let's at least use the same logic for other teams as we do for ourselves. For instance, for a rebuilding club, where is Lachie Plowman found wanting in comparison to Lachie Henderson? Having said that, I think we are still over-doing the mature age thing by one or two players a year. I'd would much rather have taken the chance on someone like Mabior Chol or Gach noyan, as an extra draftee or rookie, than some equally speculative cast-off tall with a bit of 'baggage'.



He might very well been a first round selection but GWS didn't want him and we did GWS a favour by taking him off their hands.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 10:56 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
padre wrote:
Synbad wrote:
To get all that padre and there has never been an example of the opposite

You must have the right board of directors and the right president chairing them
In the hurly burly of professional sport you're not going to achieve success without the right people on the top

Carlton under Bolton is not hawthorn


Rusty, you never change.

Yes I will! When the club changes
How do you expect smart people to change when the club is bottom with four spoons in fifteen years and starting at five in sixteen?
That's not bad one every three. It's very st kilda like.
Including two in a row after this year bring a distinct probability.
Are you proud?

Loll

Sounds like you are. The kinds of noises YOURE putting out!

Mediocrity is accepted now it seems!
Can't complain against mediocrity must embrace it!

Right padre?

Correct?

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 10:59 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Plowman will be an excellent get! ( BTW)

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2016 1:08 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Adam Chatfield wrote:
Seems people here wanted to be patient until it involved, well, patience.

:clap:

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2016 6:19 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Fine years is patient.. That's how long it takes to turn a list over
Twenty one years of patience is actually somebody that's dead already
Rattens last year we were incredibly crap
His other years we won one elimination final and didn't manage more than three in a row

That's actually hardly a galvanized football club
But it's not rattens fault. He was never ready to be a senior club coach in the afl. He hadn't done an apprenticeship for it and was gifted the job by a crony Carlton board culture.
In the end the players with the typical Carlton crony culture has enough of him. In typical Carlton board culture the board went out to sound out the best coach they could.
Half the board wanted Mick half wanted roos.. The mathiesons including mark wanted Mick the Pratt's wanted the ex swans golden boy roos. Roos rejected all advances and he has been found out equally wanting at Melbourne anyway

Basically crap coaches kill everything.
Both of these coaches were successful till they landed ( only after massive money) at a crap club. Clubs they wouldn't have gone to otherwise!

It's simple!
That Pratt phase was massive to our recovery.. We had the momentum and inertia. The league hadn't yet become anywhere near as professional as it is now....
But we fluffed it with some massive poor choices
-Ratts became senior coach. Totally out of his depth. Was paranoid.. Pointed fingers at players.. Conditioning chief etc
-Sticks because president. Stayed fur seven odd years . the most laughable choice for president in the history of afl. He was unanimously voted in as president each time. Including three times by the current president who speaks about previous admins with a snake I mean scapegoating tone
-Below that swann was drafted in as CEO and kept on rolling his contact over three times or was it four?
-Judd came in and sorted out all of our players giving up hive salary cap space and costing the farm. ( we love our Messiah complex) judd allowed us to take our eyes off the ball.. On the end we killed him too!
-Recruitment and development were poor! List management was totally non existent
- football manager we brought in icke but he couldn't work wetter rattan so he was shot and replaced by the comfortably clueless McKay!
- membership had not been harvested anywhere near what it should have. Hard work was substituted by crappy jingoism.. The whole club was being rotted out by lazy, opulent, misguided self entitlement delusional cronyism.
It didn't make any real inroads into the debt which is still a massive cross the club still bares. And it's blowing out to the point that in afl football terms were now again insolvent.
By rights the afl is supposed to place is into administration which it's hesitant to do for obvious reasons. ( just another afl house rule that isn't really a rule like everything in this sport today) but it can't be far away. The board has been asked to tip in to keep the clubs head above water. Done tipping in more than others of course..
Which is a scary proposition for anybody wanting to come in on a challenge.
They will have to personally fund a massive shortfall and not just mend it.


We're still doing the most laughable things imaginable by any supposedly professional organization.

This thing will not turn around.. As a matter of fact it's going to snowball the other way.. It's already this massive snowball that this board has vomited down our throats.

Three clubs are central to this club.
Elliots
Pratt's
Mathiesons

The more this club slides the more it stays on the control of these three.. They don't always work together but they're the holders of the clubs power base.
Others are drafted in or out.

They have shored up their interests over the years to the exclusion of outsiders beautifully.
They have given much more thought in making sure power can't be vested into anybody else than turning the club around.
The money they have paid on the drip has been the debt many times over and yet they won't pay that money in one hit and wipe off five.
They won't do that because they know if the club is financially out of the woods they're unsafe.

In the meantime the club keeps slipping into oblivion which it can never truly recover from

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2016 6:19 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 6935
Blue Sombrero wrote:
Adam Chatfield wrote:
Seems people here wanted to be patient until it involved, well, patience.

:clap:



i'm not a very patient person by design, but i'm willing to ride this thing out. i mean i have to ride it out. i'm a one club person, there's no other choice for me. watching my son follow the cats has been hard to take ... but i can't blame the kid.

but imo, there's a massive difference to being patient and to being tolerant.

i'm totally intolerant of this board as it's currently made up and ran. they've given us nothing but crap and failure for 16 years, and yet they're still all basically here. If i gave a crap effort and delivered nothing but failure in my job for 16 days, i'd be out on my arse. and this is where my intolerance for them burns.


i'm not convinced bolton is going to pan out any different to ratten. i mean bolton has the exact same framework to operate in. in my mind i can't fathom how bolton can be any more effective over the duration when it's the same people higher up running the joint?

... like synners said. lets see what's happening by round 12 where if we've fallen off the wagon and everyone in here and outside wearing the navy blue are reduced to apes.


what then?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2016 6:27 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
The usual people will run around screaming I'm a teapot?

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2016 7:03 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
Synbad will come back for a long overdue I told you so!

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 389 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 20  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 51 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group