Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 10, 2025 3:57 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 388 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 20  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 5:05 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
aboynamedsue wrote:
Bolton kicked off the preseason by preaching the need for unity.

Poor bastard.

Sickening isn't it!!!

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 5:09 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 10:47 am
Posts: 429
teagueyubeauty wrote:
aboynamedsue wrote:
Bolton kicked off the preseason by preaching the need for unity.

Poor bastard.

Sickening isn't it!!!


Not really. Both sides will be committed to a rebuild...we've got a good little coach and a reasonable CEO.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 5:12 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 2477
The Kick Inside wrote:
cecil89 wrote:
I have 1 simple expectation. If there is a challenge then the challenging group need to release somewhat detailed information on how they propose to guide this club into the future. I won't base my vote on a 'they have to be better than what we've got' premise. I need proof they'll be better, or at least a reason to believe they'll be better.


Fair enough. I think there's some critical questions required from both sides. It's probably a good time for some people to go back and read this to get an idea of what the LoGiudice-led Mathieson mob are proposing from a club strategic sense. Nice motherhood statements though they may be.

http://www.carltonfc.com.au/staticfile/ ... 7_20524858

Then - maybe see this from Tom Elliott back in May.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victor ... 1cb601e035

And then it's probably a fair enough question to ask the rebel alliance whether the current Pratt decision makers withheld monies at a time when the club desperately needed it - in a strategic (though underhanded) bid to make the current President look bad in declaring another big financial loss. If so, they'll be looking for votes in alderaan places and will have little chance of succeeding.

What the club needs at the start of a rebuild is zero factions. Unfortunately, that's not what we're going to get. Historically - Carlton tears itself apart from the inside first and then attempts a rebuild of sorts.

A lot of water to go under the bridge yet I sense.


Tom Elliott has been consistently been touted as the next President and doesn't put his name up for the position either by invitation to the Board or by direct election of the Members.

The fact that no names have been publicly associated with this so called rebel group should be enough to clearly indicate to all that this so called challenge is just another campaign to destabilize the existing administration at Carlton. The fact that no names have been published should be enough to treat this so called challenge with the contempt it deserves.

That said, our club Board needs no factions, no benefactors and no millionaires nor billionaires - just a hard working, smart, commercial, football people that provide the confidence to the market to invest into the Club. We do not need any benefactors putting money in and exerting influence on the club - Pratt and Mathieson included.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 5:12 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Megaman wrote:
Yes, we need Luke to unite the Force


Saladin couldn't unite these pumpkins.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 5:17 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
teagueyubeauty wrote:
jimmae wrote:
teagueyubeauty wrote:
Megaman wrote:
Yes, we need Luke to unite the Force

Sayers is already there!!! On the nominations committee too, fighting the tyranny of evil in ensuring board members are their for expertise and not to shore up numbers...

Pretty sure the only board member on the INC is the President?

Well your wrong, it's on the site within Luke's profile!!
http://m.carltonfc.com.au/club/board

He's on the Finance, Audit & Risk sub-committee and the Nominations & Remuneration sub-committee

The constitution trumps how you or I read someone's title. The only board member who can sit on the INC is the President; the other two members have to be independent.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 5:28 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
The Kick Inside wrote:
cecil89 wrote:
I have 1 simple expectation. If there is a challenge then the challenging group need to release somewhat detailed information on how they propose to guide this club into the future. I won't base my vote on a 'they have to be better than what we've got' premise. I need proof they'll be better, or at least a reason to believe they'll be better.


Fair enough. I think there's some critical questions required from both sides. It's probably a good time for some people to go back and read this to get an idea of what the LoGiudice-led Mathieson mob are proposing from a club strategic sense. Nice motherhood statements though they may be.

http://www.carltonfc.com.au/staticfile/ ... 7_20524858

Then - maybe see this from Tom Elliott back in May.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victor ... 1cb601e035

And then it's probably a fair enough question to ask the rebel alliance whether the current Pratt decision makers withheld monies at a time when the club desperately needed it - in a strategic (though underhanded) bid to make the current President look bad in declaring another big financial loss. If so, they'll be looking for votes in alderaan places and will have little chance of succeeding.

What the club needs at the start of a rebuild is zero factions. Unfortunately, that's not what we're going to get. Historically - Carlton tears itself apart from the inside first and then attempts a rebuild of sorts.

A lot of water to go under the bridge yet I sense.


Tom Elliott has been consistently been touted as the next President and doesn't put his name up for the position either by invitation to the Board or by direct election of the Members.

The fact that no names have been publicly associated with this so called rebel group should be enough to clearly indicate to all that this so called challenge is just another campaign to destabilize the existing administration at Carlton. The fact that no names have been published should be enough to treat this so called challenge with the contempt it deserves.

That said, our club Board needs no factions, no benefactors and no millionaires nor billionaires - just a hard working, smart, commercial, football people that provide the confidence to the market to invest into the Club. We do not need any benefactors putting money in and exerting influence on the club - Pratt and Mathieson included.


you seem a little agitated mosquito fleet... ? :lol:

nothing wrong with a little democracy....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 5:48 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 10:47 am
Posts: 429
Rexy wrote:
you seem a little agitated mosquito fleet... ? :lol:

nothing wrong with a little democracy....


Precisely! Have a little fun with it! The Blues provide pretty good entertainment for a club on the bottom of the ladder...

Heyyyy...Mosquito - what if the new board decide that in Mathieson's absence they'll pay off the debt by selling the Melbourne City Council lease to the AFL and the AFL decide to play games at Princes Park again?! Oh my...that'd be awesome! Right?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 5:54 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 1:06 pm
Posts: 9354
cimm1979 wrote:
Megaman wrote:
Yes, we need Luke to unite the Force


Saladin couldn't unite these pumpkins.


:clap: :clap: :donk: :lol:

_________________
O say does that star spangled banner yet wave.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 6:22 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19391
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
The folly of the long-rumoured and much-vaunted Carlton Football Club civil war was not lost on any number of the suggested challengers on Friday as they moved to distance themselves from the reported rebel ticket.

Real estate boss Anthony Ferraro, a former Blues reserves player, and club champion Anthony Koutoufides were reportedly at the centre of the suggested challenge to Mark LoGiudice's board. Ferraro purchased a club membership in August and was hesitant to take a position when first contacted by Fairfax Media on Friday.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/w ... z3rMFViIsv
Follow us: @theage on Twitter | theageAustralia on Facebook

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 6:24 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
That said, our club Board needs no factions, no benefactors and no millionaires nor billionaires - just a hard working, smart, commercial, football people that provide the confidence to the market to invest into the Club. We do not need any benefactors putting money in and exerting influence on the club - Pratt and Mathieson included.


You sure we don't need benefactors, millionaires and billionaires?

We're about to post a $2mil loss. I think we need them.

What we also need is a board that can reduce our influence on the above mentioned saviours by making the right decisions now. I get the feeling the current board have stopped the bleeding, but rather than turning things around and making some really progressive, innovative decisions (having a process to select a coach isn't that) have just managed not to completely @#$%&! anything up...although to process to remove Malthouse was pretty much a @#$%&! up.

If a group wants to challenge our current board, lets see them do it. None of these shit games, releasing rumours and testing waters....or waiting a year. Now is the time, put yourselves out there, let the members and football community see you and hear what you've got. If you can't gather the balls to do that, and you're not serious about this, then please don't make the job of our current board anymore difficult than it already is.

I don't know which is the right way and anyone who says they do is kidding themselves. At the moment though, there is no choice to make.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 6:26 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 10:47 am
Posts: 429
Caro proves she's got no @#$%&! idea again! Majority of board have been there a very long time...17 months?! Piss off Caroline!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 6:41 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 2477
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
That said, our club Board needs no factions, no benefactors and no millionaires nor billionaires - just a hard working, smart, commercial, football people that provide the confidence to the market to invest into the Club. We do not need any benefactors putting money in and exerting influence on the club - Pratt and Mathieson included.


You sure we don't need benefactors, millionaires and billionaires?

]We're about to post a $2mil loss. I think we need them.

what is the point of having the millionaires or billionaires on the Board when they oversaw or created the 2 million debt?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 6:46 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
That said, our club Board needs no factions, no benefactors and no millionaires nor billionaires - just a hard working, smart, commercial, football people that provide the confidence to the market to invest into the Club. We do not need any benefactors putting money in and exerting influence on the club - Pratt and Mathieson included.


You sure we don't need benefactors, millionaires and billionaires?

]We're about to post a $2mil loss. I think we need them.

what is the point of having the millionaires or billionaires on the Board when they oversaw or created the 2 million debt?


No doubt about that.

Given we made a $2mil loss....what happens when they're not there and the bank starts calling in our loans?

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 7:59 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 6047
http://www.blueseum.org/tiki-index.php? ... %20Ferraro

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 8:13 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
The Kick Inside wrote:
Caro proves she's got no @#$%&! idea again! Majority of board have been there a very long time...17 months?! Piss off Caroline!

Haha, you pull the very last sentence out of the article. I think she is referring to the current term of the leadership of the board but each to their own.

I think she's spot on!!!!!

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 8:18 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 10:47 am
Posts: 429
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Given we made a $2mil loss....what happens when they're not there and the bank starts calling in our loans?


They go into hiding?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:29 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:24 pm
Posts: 1354
The Kick Inside wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Given we made a $2mil loss....what happens when they're not there and the bank starts calling in our loans?


They go into hiding?


The only we are going to get out of this financial mess quickly is via the rank and file members/supporters.

Other clubs have successfully gone to their rank and file because they (a) can market it very well and (b) their members/supporters feel a 'close' connection to their club.

The Hawthorn members reinvigorated their own club by standing up when it counted ... they nearly lost their club through complacency and desertion but stood up when the penny dropped and through a concerted effort increased their membership base by over 100% in one season !!!

Our board cannot go to the rank and file because for too long their has been a "disconnect" ... Carlton people will tell you that they don't feel part of the club but instead feel like a consumer.

If the right group can come along and invigorate the club, provide hope and restore passion then this debt can be demolished through a concerted campaign ... if and when we do that then this club will launch as a power again ... the days of wealthy benefactors holding up clubs was gone long time ago.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:35 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18622
Location: threeohfivethree
dadadadada wrote:
The Kick Inside wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Given we made a $2mil loss....what happens when they're not there and the bank starts calling in our loans?


They go into hiding?


The only we are going to get out of this financial mess quickly is via the rank and file members/supporters.

Other clubs have successfully gone to their rank and file because they (a) can market it very well and (b) their members/supporters feel a 'close' connection to their club.

The Hawthorn members reinvigorated their own club by standing up when it counted ... they nearly lost their club through complacency and desertion but stood up when the penny dropped and through a concerted effort increased their membership base by over 100% in one season !!!

Our board cannot go to the rank and file because for too long their has been a "disconnect" ... Carlton people will tell you that they don't feel part of the club but instead feel like a consumer.

If the right group can come along and invigorate the club, provide hope and restore passion then this debt can be demolished through a concerted campaign ... if and when we do that then this club will launch as a power again ... the days of wealthy benefactors holding up clubs was gone long time ago.


Problem is the Hawks had Don Scott and we have Anthony Koutoufides.

Not inspiring when it comes to vision.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2015 8:43 am 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 8:35 am
Posts: 99
Wasn't it walls having a crack at the board mid season?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:57 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
Plenty of deadwood on the current board and it is in urgent need of a cleanout.
The club is in the position it is in simply due to the decisions they have made.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 388 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 20  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group