Heavs wrote:
I reckon the Rising Star is a bit of a phyrric victory really. Taylor over Bontempelli? Daniel Pearce? Rhys Palmer? Always seems to go to a bloke that has a really good season but is limited in what they are going to produce and their impact on the comp in the long term.
This year could be interesting because Cripps and Hogan have both had pretty good seasons but both look like massive keepers for the long term. Haven't had that in a while
I don't get overly concerned with such awards, All Aus, Brownlow etc. Just more important to have as many young players coming through. The win is a bonus.
Firstly, what is the voting criteria, and how can you judge who has been better out of Cripps and Hogan for example when they are two different types of players? Like comparing McGrath to Ponting.
If the judges were allocating votes on each game throughout the year then fine, but all they are doing is pulling a 5,4,3,2,1 out of their arse at the end.
And finally look at last year's judges:
Gillion Mclachlan, Mark Evans, Warren Tredrea, Glen Jakovich, Danny Frawley, Luke Darcy, Matthew Richardson, Kevin Bartlett, Cameron Ling and Kevin Sheehan.
I wouldn't over analyse the voting, as over half these guys give the impression that they only watch the games they were allocated to work on as media duties each weekend, rather than keeping an eye on the young, lesser known talent running around in 9 games every weekend.