Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 09, 2025 7:48 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 135 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2015 11:20 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1002
scottopee wrote:
Steve_C7 wrote:
There is one other factor of why we went after Judd that I still believe is invaluable but hard to measure.

We had 3 first picks in Murphy, Gibbs & Kruezer and we needed a circuit breaker from our tanking years, our culture was deplorable (we are still suffering in some ways from it), but the club was genuinely trying to rebuild the culture and Judd gave our young guns a mentor to show them the road to being a professional player, had we not had Judd then our players mentors would have been the rat pack in Fev, Lappin, Stevo & Scotland and who knows where we would be now.


Now? Can you get lower than last???????
Gartlett and Robinson another rat pack gone think Judd's leadership is totally overrated yes great professional but to much of an individual. Would have preferred Kennedy, Gibbs, Murphy and Kruezer to take us forward with more draftees instead of feeling we needed to add ready made players to pinch a flag with Judd. We would be in a much better position now.


Imagine being last with no Murphy, Gibbs or Kennedy, what makes you think these guys would have hung around in a club that allows unfit players to booze up during the season. Any decent players who are looking to play finals won't hang around the rat pack that we had. Judd's leadership is not about his communication, it was about showing the young guys what it takes to be a professional athlete i.e what you eat and don't eat, how you train, how you should arrive back from offseason etc.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2015 11:30 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:02 am
Posts: 1724
Steve_C7 wrote:
scottopee wrote:
Steve_C7 wrote:
There is one other factor of why we went after Judd that I still believe is invaluable but hard to measure.

We had 3 first picks in Murphy, Gibbs & Kruezer and we needed a circuit breaker from our tanking years, our culture was deplorable (we are still suffering in some ways from it), but the club was genuinely trying to rebuild the culture and Judd gave our young guns a mentor to show them the road to being a professional player, had we not had Judd then our players mentors would have been the rat pack in Fev, Lappin, Stevo & Scotland and who knows where we would be now.


Now? Can you get lower than last???????
Gartlett and Robinson another rat pack gone think Judd's leadership is totally overrated yes great professional but to much of an individual. Would have preferred Kennedy, Gibbs, Murphy and Kruezer to take us forward with more draftees instead of feeling we needed to add ready made players to pinch a flag with Judd. We would be in a much better position now.


Imagine being last with no Murphy, Gibbs or Kennedy, what makes you think these guys would have hung around in a club that allows unfit players to booze up during the season. Any decent players who are looking to play finals won't hang around the rat pack that we had. Judd's leadership is not about his communication, it was about showing the young guys what it takes to be a professional athlete i.e what you eat and don't eat, how you train, how you should arrive back from offseason etc.


We had players booze up last year????? And have had that right through Judd being at Carlton and Murph Gibbs etc. stayed?? Not sure what your saying. End of the day the path we chose didn't work and I would prefer to be watching Kennedy at Carlton than Judd winning Brownlows..............


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2015 11:35 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20217
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
As if Kennedy would have been this good in our set up.

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2015 11:40 am 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
And, as if Kennedy would've stayed anyway. How many knees in the head from Fev in the F50 do you think he could've taken before pissing off during his first contract negotiation. Home to WA in a flash.

Then we'd have no Kennedy, no Judd, and Fev still gone.

We may have made it to 19th by now.



(That's 19th on the ladder, not 19th flag, btw).

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2015 12:17 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10388
Location: Coburg
yet we are last and [REDACTED] so I'd think the Judd deal was a bust.
the rest is just imagination.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2015 12:49 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
We are bust-ton.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2015 1:00 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10388
Location: Coburg
com-bust-ton?

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2015 1:06 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
you're the wordsmith

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2015 1:12 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 9:32 pm
Posts: 2014
Location: perth
Kennedy wouldn't be half the player he is now if he had stayed at the blues. I'm sure he would have floundered and been pissed on by the supporters, you know, the way he actually was in his first few years with us, much like Henderson and Jacksh now.

The conversation is like a cows opinion it doesn't matter, it's a moo point.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2015 7:02 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:10 pm
Posts: 2862
bluehammer wrote:
As if Kennedy would have been this good in our set up.


Way too tall tag effectively


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 1:11 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 12:23 pm
Posts: 506
dane wrote:
What's a prig?


http://lmgtfy.com/?q=define%3A+prig


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 2:28 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8201
Way too early to judge someone like Jaksch yet. McKay said over summer, still needing 6-10kg, he'd be initially played as a 3rd tall in defence to help his development before becoming a forward. Some haven't learnt the lesson of judging talls, knowing time and again they take quite a few years. Whiley and Boekhorst are essentially extras as we didn't lose a pick at all, just went back 12 places. If Jaksch turns out he'll be worth pick 7 alone. Whiley will end up ok. He's a ball magnet and can be used as such now Malthouse has gone. What a genius, first game with the club and he's forced to tag the likes of Pendlebury.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 6:18 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
Juddy was enormous for us, not his fault that we wasted so many picks and failed to create a team around him. The choice we had was either pick one or JK. We kept pick one and got big K who unluckily has had loads of injury. Also we ended up with jacobs hampson warnock and big k as underdeveloped rucks. In retrospect we should have kept jk and drafted less rucks. We didn't and i suspect by the time jk finishes his career we won't have got near a flag anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 6:50 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
DesEnglish wrote:
bluehammer wrote:
As if Kennedy would have been this good in our set up.


Way too tall to tag effectively


Especially if they were zippy half forward flankers

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 7:01 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
The hero-worship that is going on here for Judd is exactly why the trade was a big bust.

It served the purposes of a clueless organisation like the CFC to bring in a messiah for the fans to worship, with no thought to a long term, strategic plan for our club going forward. It was all a distraction, as was MM and DT.

And we've all fallen for it

He is one of the greatest players of all time, but so were Baldock, Flower, Hawkins et al

I want to idolise a team, not some false god

And let's not kid ourselves...CJ has helped himself to MORE than his fair share of the CFC purse (probably at the expense of Betts and Grigg* to name two)

*Not a real fan of Grigg

18 is the new number....that's the age of all our picks over the next couple of years

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 7:07 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
Just wondering...what quick fixes have we ever tried?

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 8:40 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
99prelim wrote:
And let's not kid ourselves...CJ has helped himself to MORE than his fair share of the CFC purse (probably at the expense of Betts and Grigg* to name two)

*Not a real fan of Grigg


Given his contribution v everyone elses, he should have been getting about 80% of the cap. How is his contribution / $ versus Thomas or Warnock? The problem was with all our picks we should have developed a premiership side but didn't. If we had kept jacobs, given wce pick 1 and retained JK maybe we wd have got closer, but good decisions is not our thing. The problem is not Judd, it is all the other decisions we made. The irony is that if free agency was in when judd came back to vic hevwd have got to the hawks or pies and they wd have given up zilch.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 8:51 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 10:36 am
Posts: 983
gerry atric wrote:
99prelim wrote:
And let's not kid ourselves...CJ has helped himself to MORE than his fair share of the CFC purse (probably at the expense of Betts and Grigg* to name two)

*Not a real fan of Grigg


Given his contribution v everyone elses, he should have been getting about 80% of the cap. How is his contribution / $ versus Thomas or Warnock? The problem was with all our picks we should have developed a premiership side but didn't. If we had kept jacobs, given wce pick 1 and retained JK maybe we wd have got closer, but good decisions is not our thing. The problem is not Judd, it is all the other decisions we made. The irony is that if free agency was in when judd came back to vic hevwd have got to the hawks or pies and they wd have given up zilch.

agreed.

Its not juddy's fault that the club flowered up nearly every pick they've had since he arrived. we've had plenty of chances to bring quality in, and stuffed it at every turn

_________________
i don't wanna spend my life explaining myself. Either you get it, or you don't- Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 10:38 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
gerry atric wrote:
99prelim wrote:
And let's not kid ourselves...CJ has helped himself to MORE than his fair share of the CFC purse (probably at the expense of Betts and Grigg* to name two)

*Not a real fan of Grigg


Given his contribution v everyone elses, he should have been getting about 80% of the cap. How is his contribution / $ versus Thomas or Warnock? The problem was with all our picks we should have developed a premiership side but didn't. If we had kept jacobs, given wce pick 1 and retained JK maybe we wd have got closer, but good decisions is not our thing. The problem is not Judd, it is all the other decisions we made. The irony is that if free agency was in when judd came back to vic hevwd have got to the hawks or pies and they wd have given up zilch.


Thomas and Warnock are also a part of the problem with Carlton

Judd was seen as a saviour. period. I don't want saviours. I want to see my team win, not just cheer for one superstar.

Those flowering idiots who thought that Judd, Fev, Murph, Gibbs and Kruezer would take us to #17 are to blame

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 8:04 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 10:17 pm
Posts: 2057
99prelim wrote:
gerry atric wrote:
99prelim wrote:
And let's not kid ourselves...CJ has helped himself to MORE than his fair share of the CFC purse (probably at the expense of Betts and Grigg* to name two)

*Not a real fan of Grigg


Given his contribution v everyone elses, he should have been getting about 80% of the cap. How is his contribution / $ versus Thomas or Warnock? The problem was with all our picks we should have developed a premiership side but didn't. If we had kept jacobs, given wce pick 1 and retained JK maybe we wd have got closer, but good decisions is not our thing. The problem is not Judd, it is all the other decisions we made. The irony is that if free agency was in when judd came back to vic hevwd have got to the hawks or pies and they wd have given up zilch.


Thomas and Warnock are also a part of the problem with Carlton

Judd was seen as a saviour. period. I don't want saviours. I want to see my team win, not just cheer for one superstar.

Those flowering idiots who thought that Judd, Fev, Murph, Gibbs and Kruezer would take us to #17 are to blame


Let's face it, Judd choosing us was a huge opportunity for the club to get out of the mire and become a force again

however, as some have stated we completely stuffed up recruitment and player development before and since he arrived

we had ample opportunities with early draft picks to build a premiership team

the club hasn't been good enough and has nothing to do with the trade for Judd

do you really think players like Kennedy and Masten would have made any difference


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 135 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 61 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group