Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jun 25, 2025 9:37 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104 ... 321  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2014 5:11 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 934
Cretylus wrote:
padre wrote:
No one able to concede that injuries are playing a role?
Henderson clearly injured
Walker carrying
Garlett ..off field injury
Kreuzer injured
Judd injured still getting back to match fitness
Thomas coming back from major injury. Slowly regaining fitness. Still below his high standard.
Scottland retired due to body issues
Carrazzo coming back from sequential injuries. Still not fit.
Docherty previous injuries reducing match fitness and form
Curnow injured
Bell injured
Buckley injured
Ellard injured
Cripps injured

There are some significant injuries there. The influence on our team structure is undeniable.
Lets judge when we have a fully fit team to put out on the field.
Now the caveat. Yes we are exposed for depth because of those injuries. Hawthorn being a good contrast, can still continue winning despite injuries. But no one here is pretending that we are at the reigning premiers standard, so lets not bemoan that we cant do what the hawks have done.
The point being, judging malthouse based on an injured list is not being fair. Yes we had high expectations at the start of the season, but not adjusting them based on the new information ie injuries is puerile . To blame a coach that is hardly responsible for our lack of depth is even more so . Dare i say it, but this constant criticism of a great coach that we are lucky to have , is the same type of reaction that our great leaders have displayed and got us into our current " situation"



Have you looked at our draw for the first 11 weeks this year? Dream draw. No travel until the lions, didnt play many top teams. Didnt play cats til round 12, hawks til round 13, havent played the dockers, swans yet. havent traveled to Perth yet.

Are you saying the first 4 losses were due to injuries?
the Losses to the demons and the lions who were on the bottom at the time?

An of course every team has injuries - when we played the Hawks, we played a depleted team.

ratten had injuries in 2012 but still managed 11 wins. Mick had very few injuries in 2013 and managed 11 wins. Same list essentially

One needs to explain why Port rocketed up the ladder, and the Blues went backwards when Hinkley and Malthouse took over their respective teams at the end of 2012

Was there a difference in the quality of the teams at the end of 2012?

CHAMPION DATA 2012

CARLTON
Defenders 14th
Midfield/Rucks 3rd
Forwards 2nd
LIST QUALITY 9th

PORT ADELAIDE
Defenders 18th
Midfield/Rucks 12th
Forwards 17th
LIST QUALITY 17th

I am saying that we have depth problems. And because of this, our significant injuries have exposed this.
But equally , for any side to win the premiership, they need a good run with injuries.
I firmly believe that we are still a fringe eight side, but injuries and a combination of bad luck and brain fade, has let us slip below where we could be.
I have given up on this seasons finals aspirations, but i am not a "no hoper". With some smart trading at year end we can bring in some more leadership. Hopefully with a fit list we will regain the form of our players that this year have been below par. Eg henderson, thomas, kreuzer, garlett, walker etc. that will make a big difference


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2014 5:44 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
emtwenty wrote:
If they're injured don't play them. Lachie playing injured yet Waite gets omitted? Any mid that is playing injured - play Graham, Holman and could've played Cachia before he got injured in the 2s last week.

Why are we playing injured players? We are no chance for finals so what is the purpose?


Mick has form for playing injured players but it is beyond reason that we'd risk any of the better players in a season he BBQ'd 10 weeks ago.
I'm hoping that he may play one at a time, but I can't for the life of me see why he can't play Graham.

What @#$%&! use is playing him as sub 4 times.

I think he doesn't see them as game breakers so he'd rather play tagger types like Carrazzo and or Curnow.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2014 6:10 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:29 pm
Posts: 7074
Curnow can stay.

Mclean, Carrots, Armfield etc are all players stealing valuable development time off Holman & Graham. Even Temay. At least Temay has scope for improvement. Mclean and Carrots are cooked. And they're leadership has been piss weak too. So they're not even contributing that way.

On top of playing injured players, playing those who are not going to get us anywhere when we are every chance of finishing bottom 3 (without tanking) is just hilarious.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2014 6:29 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
Why did you include Army?

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2014 6:30 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:29 pm
Posts: 7074
dane wrote:
Why did you include Army?


Because I don't believe he will help us improve.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2014 7:02 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
I don't know how many times it can be discussed, but our season was over before it began.

23 players who were not able to complete a full pre-season, with the vast majority of that 23 players being our starting 22.

hawthorn won a grandfinal, the following year with something like 15 players not doing a full pre-season they struggled to make the eight.

the afl, now more than ever is a game based on a full pre-season with a fully fit side. you don't have it, you are going to struggle.


....

that however does not excuse the inconsistency in effort which I think is out biggest issue, but if we have a fully fit list, we are a far better side.

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2014 7:36 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3258
ScottSaunders wrote:
I don't know how many times it can be discussed, but our season was over before it began.

23 players who were not able to complete a full pre-season, with the vast majority of that 23 players being our starting 22.

hawthorn won a grandfinal, the following year with something like 15 players not doing a full pre-season they struggled to make the eight.

the afl, now more than ever is a game based on a full pre-season with a fully fit side. you don't have it, you are going to struggle.

Scott, your arguement falls down when we consider the last 12 years and then compare the same to Hawthorn
....

that however does not excuse the inconsistency in effort which I think is out biggest issue, but if we have a fully fit list, we are a far better side.


10 years of poor performance by club cannot be explained away by a run of injuries


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2014 10:05 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 934
london blue wrote:
ScottSaunders wrote:
I don't know how many times it can be discussed, but our season was over before it began.

23 players who were not able to complete a full pre-season, with the vast majority of that 23 players being our starting 22.

hawthorn won a grandfinal, the following year with something like 15 players not doing a full pre-season they struggled to make the eight.

the afl, now more than ever is a game based on a full pre-season with a fully fit side. you don't have it, you are going to struggle.

Scott, your arguement falls down when we consider the last 12 years and then compare the same to Hawthorn
....

that however does not excuse the inconsistency in effort which I think is out biggest issue, but if we have a fully fit list, we are a far better side.


10 years of poor performance by club cannot be explained away by a run of injuries


Ok but malthouse has been here for the past 2 only and has been severely hamstrung in what he can do.
Our list is good enough when fit to make the finals.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2014 10:19 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3258
padre wrote:
london blue wrote:
ScottSaunders wrote:
I don't know how many times it can be discussed, but our season was over before it began.

23 players who were not able to complete a full pre-season, with the vast majority of that 23 players being our starting 22.

hawthorn won a grandfinal, the following year with something like 15 players not doing a full pre-season they struggled to make the eight.

the afl, now more than ever is a game based on a full pre-season with a fully fit side. you don't have it, you are going to struggle.

Scott, your arguement falls down when we consider the last 12 years and then compare the same to Hawthorn
....

that however does not excuse the inconsistency in effort which I think is out biggest issue, but if we have a fully fit list, we are a far better side.


10 years of poor performance by club cannot be explained away by a run of injuries


Ok but malthouse has been here for the past 2 only and has been severely hamstrung in what he can do.
Our list is good enough when fit to make the finals.


Perhaps our best 16 is good enough

Our list is not good enough, otherwise we would be competing


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 12:18 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
emtwenty wrote:
Curnow can stay.

Mclean, Carrots, Armfield etc are all players stealing valuable development time off Holman & Graham. Even Temay. At least Temay has scope for improvement. Mclean and Carrots are cooked. And they're leadership has been piss weak too. So they're not even contributing that way.

On top of playing injured players, playing those who are not going to get us anywhere when we are every chance of finishing bottom 3 (without tanking) is just hilarious.

holman and graham are not only slow but cant see out a game...
perfect storm along with menzel who struggles for 100 point losses

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 12:53 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 1531
Location: Melbourne
trublu wrote:
Ratten is part to blame for this mess.

He did not develop.

He didn't know how to.

He had poor man management skills.

Yes our recruiting has been horrible but I also blame the lack of development under rattans reign that has seen many players come and gone.

Plus Ratten had a Chris Judd at his prime that carried this side.

Cant blame ratten. Got carlton a cpl points away from 2011 prelim final with Thornton and setanta as our key forwards with kruzer and jamo out from memory against wce.

25 players still exist on our list today.

You seriously think this list has gone to a bottom 3 team? Even yarran quoted the players not playing as a team, playing as individuals. Mm has lost the players and cant coach in todays era. Hes gonsky.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 12:57 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:29 pm
Posts: 7074
Synbad wrote:
emtwenty wrote:
Curnow can stay.

Mclean, Carrots, Armfield etc are all players stealing valuable development time off Holman & Graham. Even Temay. At least Temay has scope for improvement. Mclean and Carrots are cooked. And they're leadership has been piss weak too. So they're not even contributing that way.

On top of playing injured players, playing those who are not going to get us anywhere when we are every chance of finishing bottom 3 (without tanking) is just hilarious.

holman and graham are not only slow but cant see out a game...
perfect storm along with menzel who struggles for 100 point losses


I don't want them in because I think it'll help us win - I want them in because they'll try more than some of our senior players and will actually play like they care.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:01 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 1531
Location: Melbourne
grrofunger wrote:
our list is aenemic

i can see the process and the signs of improvement

need a talent transfusion

Mick aint going anywhere


Where is this improvement? And please do not list young players who have improved a little. That is basically common from game time and opportunities


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 2:59 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Posts: 1508
I'm not a fan.

How could you be? We are going nowhere fast.

Losing your temper is not cool.

You would think a 60 year old grandfather would have that worked out by now.

Yelling at Gen Y kids doesn't work.

_________________
We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 3:26 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
padre wrote:
No one able to concede that injuries are playing a role?
Henderson clearly injured
Walker carrying
Garlett ..off field injury
Kreuzer injured
Judd injured still getting back to match fitness
Thomas coming back from major injury. Slowly regaining fitness. Still below his high standard.
Scottland retired due to body issues
Carrazzo coming back from sequential injuries. Still not fit.
Docherty previous injuries reducing match fitness and form
Curnow injured
Bell injured
Buckley injured
Ellard injured
Cripps injured

There are some significant injuries there. The influence on our team structure is undeniable.
Lets judge when we have a fully fit team to put out on the field.
Now the caveat. Yes we are exposed for depth because of those injuries. Hawthorn being a good contrast, can still continue winning despite injuries. But no one here is pretending that we are at the reigning premiers standard, so lets not bemoan that we cant do what the hawks have done.
The point being, judging malthouse based on an injured list is not being fair. Yes we had high expectations at the start of the season, but not adjusting them based on the new information ie injuries is puerile . To blame a coach that is hardly responsible for our lack of depth is even more so . Dare i say it, but this constant criticism of a great coach that we are lucky to have , is the same type of reaction that our great leaders have displayed and got us into our current " situation"


lol - injuries? Wasn't that what got caused us to miss finals and got ratten sacked in 2012? How can it be used for one coach and not the other? Particularly when the injury list was significantly worse in 2012

In 2012, we used 41 players (Buckley being the only one who didn't debut and even he missed 8 weeks though injury!).

In terms games missed by best 22 players through injury/suspension (i.e. not form)-> Judd 5, murphy 6, jamison 6, duigan 6, walker 7, carazzo 8, waite 11, henderson 11, hampson 9, ladler 18, ellard 12, warnock 5

Other players such as joseph, thornton & collins missed games due to injury (but also form)

On top of that you had injuries to the following depth players
- rowe - unavailable ALL year
- mitchell - has only been back in the ants for about a month or so
- casboult, davies, white - unavailable for most of the year with injuries
- bell and ROK didnt play in ants until mid may due to injures
- buckley missed about 2 mths of the season with a finger injury
- bray missed 2+ mths due to a shoulder injury
- henye - missed 6 weeks
ie 10 non-first 22 depth players sigificant long term injuries - 7 of which might have made reasonable contributions to the team (exceptions being buckley & bray).

Ladder at start of rd 15 - 2012 we were 10th with 6/7 wins and a % 0f 107.1 (the peak of our injury woes). Before the start of this round we were 4/9 with a % of 87.4

We finished 2012 10th with an 11/11 record @ 108.0% - yet here we are, talking a bottom 4 finish with a likely % of <90, losses to 4 of the other bottom sides (brisbane, GWS, melbourne, richmond) and the coach is blameless?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 3:32 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
Also
2012 - we finished up with the 11th best attack (points for) and 9th best defence (points against).

As of now (pre-pies), we still have the 11th best attack but now our defence is only ranked 14th. What are Malthouse teams generally well known for? - good defence...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 8:19 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Caught the tail end of Mark Stevens bagging Malthouse over his comments on the state of the game on the radio last night. Spider Everett asked him his thoughts on the game and he admitted that it was a much better spectacle a few years ago. "So you agree with Mick?"

His response:
"No, I didn't use the word 'hate' and I'm not a coach."

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 10:14 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
grrofunger wrote:
our list is aenemic

i can see the process and the signs of improvement

need a talent transfusion

Mick aint going anywhere


Agree. :thumbsup:

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 10:39 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:02 am
Posts: 1770
Goltzenberg wrote:
trublu wrote:
Ratten is part to blame for this mess.

He did not develop.

He didn't know how to.

He had poor man management skills.

Yes our recruiting has been horrible but I also blame the lack of development under rattans reign that has seen many players come and gone.

Plus Ratten had a Chris Judd at his prime that carried this side.

Cant blame ratten. Got carlton a cpl points away from 2011 prelim final with Thornton and setanta as our key forwards with kruzer and jamo out from memory against wce.

25 players still exist on our list today.

You seriously think this list has gone to a bottom 3 team? Even yarran quoted the players not playing as a team, playing as individuals. Mm has lost the players and cant coach in todays era. Hes gonsky.


Ratten had Simpson, Judd, Carrots, Scotland, Duigan, Jamieson, Waite all at an age when they reach their peak and had a few talented youngsters coming through like Murphy, Gibbs and Kruezer. Our premiership window was spot on then.

Now we have Simpson, Judd, Carrots, Scotland, Duigan, Jamieson, Waite who are all past their best, Murphy and Gibbs reaching their peak and no youngsters (besides Menzel) coming up to help the team improve.

Our list is in a very bad state compared to what Rats had at his disposal.

_________________
It is not as bad as you are lead to believe.......it is %$#^& worse!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 10:47 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Malthouse has brought in Menzel, Cripps, Docherty, Thomas, Everitt, Graham and Johnson. Our list should have improved a lot with those names.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104 ... 321  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bluebo baggers and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group