Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jul 06, 2025 3:53 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 206 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 11  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 9:26 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:47 am
Posts: 18288
Location: talkingcarlton.com
Sydney Blue wrote:


Sorry Mrs C but I dont know what is posted on TBV or Big footy because I dont go there . I visit CSC occasionally but there is a general agression on this site ( sorry for those words again) to certain players and a certain coach keeps getting off scot free . I get a little sick of people from Carlton criticising everything that went on in the past because of a couple of bad years . I loved Carlton through the Elliott years and I am proud of it.


I understand that Sydney, (although I don't agree entirely with your point of view in this instance. I've seen quite a few posts turning against DP lately, and I'm sure it will strengthen in '05 if on-field performances don't improve).

I would just be happier if it didn't come across as a TC idiosyncracy. My blood pressure would appreciate it. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 9:31 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:08 pm
Posts: 1277
Location: Perth
Sydney Blue,

That just highlights the stupidity of the decision to build the legends stand in the first place. The AFL have had an agenda to close all suburban grounds for a long time, we all now that.

We could have moved rather than build the stand, and we would have saved something like $18million + interest. We'd probably also have a better financial deal with the MCG and/or Docklands.

That money could have been used to develop Optus into a first rate training venue, and the club would now be asset and cash positive.

Yes, all of this is with 20/20 hindsight, but we were the only club in Melbourne not to see this coming.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 9:33 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21618
Location: North of the border
steve wrote:
Sydney Blue,

That just highlights the stupidity of the decision to build the legends stand in the first place. The AFL have had an agenda to close all suburban grounds for a long time, we all now that.

We could have moved rather than build the stand, and we would have saved something like $18million + interest. We'd probably also have a better financial deal with the MCG and/or Docklands.

That money could have been used to develop Optus into a first rate training venue, and the club would now be asset and cash positive.

Yes, all of this is with 20/20 hindsight, but we were the only club in Melbourne not to see this coming.



Tell that to Geelong every one thinks they made the right decision.

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 9:35 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:47 am
Posts: 18288
Location: talkingcarlton.com
Sydney Blue wrote:


Tell that to Geelong every one thinks they made the right decision.


Different scenario...one team, one town.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:01 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:08 pm
Posts: 1277
Location: Perth
Mrs Caz wrote:
Different scenario...one team, one town.


yup, precisely...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:04 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
verbs wrote:
I might be a bit thick, but isn't there a salary cap? and total player payment levels? and aren't all clubs required to pay at least something like 92.5% of the salary cap?

To argue the club's broke beacuse of high salaries to footballers makes little sense to the likes of me.


I think we pay more than most despite our position on the ladder. We also paid a lot extra to 2 players of which half was outside the TPP.


Last edited by BlueWorld on Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:05 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21618
Location: North of the border
Mrs Caz wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:


Tell that to Geelong every one thinks they made the right decision.


Different scenario...one team, one town.


No different just a different agender by the AFL . Carlton when they walked out of Optus gave up there biggest advantage they had and that was the home ground. If a club were to be financially better off by playing on the MCG ot the Dome then Richmond and Melbourne should be the power houses of the AFL because they have been there for years. Clubs make money when they win . We gave up 4-5 wins a year. We will now continue to struggle financially

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:12 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
Sydney Blue wrote:
Mrs Caz wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:


Tell that to Geelong every one thinks they made the right decision.


Different scenario...one team, one town.


No different just a different agender by the AFL . Carlton when they walked out of Optus gave up there biggest advantage they had and that was the home ground. If a club were to be financially better off by playing on the MCG ot the Dome then Richmond and Melbourne should be the power houses of the AFL because they have been there for years. Clubs make money when they win . We gave up 4-5 wins a year. We will now continue to struggle financially


We gave up a certain amount of home ground advantage when the Legends Stand was built and the length of the ground increased to the size of the MCG.

Geelong is a completely different scenario and for every Richmond and Melbourne there is an Essendon* and Collingwood.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:18 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 1376
Location: Melbourne
I disagree with you on this Sydney .. you can compare Geelong and the Blues costs are vastly different.

The Legend stand costs $18mill regardless of if we play at Optus or TD

Yes Optus was good for the Blues home ground ect but not going to work if
* the ALF work against the ground.
* crowds drop down when played at Optus
* TV Rights are working against the Blues at Optus
* Sponsers dont want to be part of the Blues due to less coverage.

So call it what you will as already been stated the AFL had an agenda move or we will make it more difficult and in hindsite we should never have built the stand and prob should have moved earlier and established a base at the MCG but as already stated Hindsite

The Legends stand money would have been better put into the footballing resources and facilities than a glorifiled white Elephant which has drained the club of much of there finances.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:18 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
Back to the topic...

I will be very interested to see how Fevola goes next year now that TD is on board. We all know what he is capable of when he isn't injured and now that Terry is going to be in his ear, who knows what scary heights he may reach.

Here's hoping Brendan can stay injury free and suspension free in 2006.

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:22 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21618
Location: North of the border
Jarusa wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Mrs Caz wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:


Tell that to Geelong every one thinks they made the right decision.


Different scenario...one team, one town.


No different just a different agender by the AFL . Carlton when they walked out of Optus gave up there biggest advantage they had and that was the home ground. If a club were to be financially better off by playing on the MCG ot the Dome then Richmond and Melbourne should be the power houses of the AFL because they have been there for years. Clubs make money when they win . We gave up 4-5 wins a year. We will now continue to struggle financially


We gave up a certain amount of home ground advantage when the Legends Stand was built and the length of the ground increased to the size of the MCG.

Geelong is a completely different scenario and for every Richmond and Melbourne there is an Essendon* and Collingwood.



Essendon* and Collingwood usually win - Richmond and Melbourne dont thats why they attract big crowds and thats why they are better off playing big games at the G but like all clubs if you start losing crowds drop off when the crowds drop off you are better off at your own home.Both financially and playing ability as you are more likely to start winning at home. Its a catch 22 we need to start winning to attract bigger crowds the home ground gave us an advantage but once you have attracted the bigger crowds you need the Dome and The G. We should have stayed at home until such time we were competitive again and bugger the AFL . Geelong is no different its only hour out of Melbourne

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:27 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21618
Location: North of the border
phoenix johnson wrote:
Back to the topic...

I will be very interested to see how Fevola goes next year now that TD is on board. We all know what he is capable of when he isn't injured and now that Terry is going to be in his ear, who knows what scary heights he may reach.

Here's hoping Brendan can stay injury free and suspension free in 2006.



No different PJ 50- 65 goals thats it . It would take ten TD to get this guy to realise his potential. He will wake up at 30 and say Fevola you idiot.

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:29 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
I dunno.

I reckon too much shit happened to Fevola this year. The suspensions, the injuries etc etc I hope now that he is married he will settle down on the field and play the football we know he can.

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:30 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
You cannot run a football club like that.

Waiting until we are more successful until moving?

Our contract would have run out (was it end of 2005?) and then what do your think would have happened?

Do you think the AFL would have signed off happily on us staying at Princes Park?

Doubt it.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:32 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21618
Location: North of the border
Wolfe wrote:
I disagree with you on this Sydney .. you can compare Geelong and the Blues costs are vastly different.

The Legend stand costs $18mill regardless of if we play at Optus or TD

Yes Optus was good for the Blues home ground ect but not going to work if
* the ALF work against the ground.
* crowds drop down when played at Optus
* TV Rights are working against the Blues at Optus
* Sponsers dont want to be part of the Blues due to less coverage.

So call it what you will as already been stated the AFL had an agenda move or we will make it more difficult and in hindsite we should never have built the stand and prob should have moved earlier and established a base at the MCG but as already stated Hindsite

The Legends stand money would have been better put into the footballing resources and facilities than a glorifiled white Elephant which has drained the club of much of there finances.


Wolfe I take the point of view that The AFL should never of built the Dome and should have redeveloped Optus instead. So in hindsight instead of the AFL forcing clubs to the Dome by denying them TV coverage they could have developed Optus. THe AFL turned its back on Carlton we never turned on them

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:33 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21618
Location: North of the border
phoenix johnson wrote:
I dunno.

I reckon too much shit happened to Fevola this year. The suspensions, the injuries etc etc I hope now that he is married he will settle down on the field and play the football we know he can.


Hope you are right.

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:34 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21618
Location: North of the border
Jarusa wrote:
You cannot run a football club like that.

Waiting until we are more successful until moving?

Our contract would have run out (was it end of 2005?) and then what do your think would have happened?

Do you think the AFL would have signed off happily on us staying at Princes Park?

Doubt it.


2006 and I think with an option to 2012


By the Way Sydney did it with Telstra Stadium . I know one club one city :-D

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:43 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:08 pm
Posts: 1277
Location: Perth
Sydney Blue wrote:
Wolfe I take the point of view that The AFL should never of built the Dome and should have redeveloped Optus instead. So in hindsight instead of the AFL forcing clubs to the Dome by denying them TV coverage they could have developed Optus. THe AFL turned its back on Carlton we never turned on them


Every blue fan would have loved that, but with the lack of public, transportation, parking and with the strong likelihood that ny planning would be compromised by local residents, it was never a realistic option.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:55 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
I'm assuming that it wasmy reference to kouta that set a few blokes off, it was a reference to being able to rejig the via salary cap, once he is gone the old contracts are over, that's all.

as for optus, we all loved it (I know i did, hell why do you think i adopted the gjost of optus Oval) but it was dead.

yes the league buried it.

So did the media.

television

and most importantly, the public. It was was a money spinner.

As for homeground where was that in 2001 etc. We lost as many games there as anywhere.

The point of JE was that he spent more than we had

He diminished our membership (no growth compared to other clubs, Optus did not help with this either)

We lost the kids - just go to an auskick clinic once upon a time there were as many carlton juimpers as Essendon* or Collingwood (well almost) and far more than St Kilda - not any more.

He cheated.

Yes th AFL had an agenda and so did JE and that was just as stupid as the AFL's. John built his popularity around being seen as 'man' enough to take on the AFL.

He lost the plot

and we almost lost everything.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:56 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
and as for DP D=Sydney I think there has been a fair bit of questioning of late, so far he remains supported but it has diminished and will continue to do so i think if he does not turn it around soon.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 206 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 11  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 56 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group