Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jul 06, 2025 6:56 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 105 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 6:12 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
Prender and Bannister should be the others.

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 6:13 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:38 am
Posts: 5824
Location: home
I know we have to delist a certain number of players but sad to see hard workers like Diggers and Johnson go(Not that I disagree with the decision). Good luck for the future boys.

_________________
The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 6:16 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
Prender, Bannister and Wiggins should all be moved on.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 6:25 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:50 am
Posts: 3193
Location: Whistler
If Kouta is placed on the veterans list rather than the primary list as now, we can use an extra selection. Not sure if this reduces TPP though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 6:30 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 6154
There is no limit to my sobbing, my distress: for while Prenda stays with our club, our club stands still.

Run athletic Prenda, run away quick!

How can it be that you can run but our club cannot move when they call you a leader?

Set the sufferers free, let them take their hands away from their eyes when you attempt to kick.

Run athletic Prenda run. Or maybe row? Yes, you would make a fine rower. Go row Prenda, gently down the stream, away from Carlton, away, away.

Away.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 6:35 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 11:23 am
Posts: 1797
Location: Half Back Flanker...
Considering depth is one of our many problems, I would have thought Johnson and Digby might have been handy if only as backup for our senior list.

With injury and suspensions this season, it was obvious we had nothing in reserve to take the places in the midfield and talls areas...

As for Norman, another cancer has just been removed

_________________
"...that's the thing about opinion - you don't have to know anything to have one..." Andre Agassi commenting on Pat Cash 2004
"...the less you know - the more you believe..." - Bono 2006


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 6:43 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 2:07 pm
Posts: 349
JuzzCarlton wrote:
Prender, Bannister and Wiggins should all be moved on.


yep agree 100% and you can add sporn who has done jackall so far to that list as well. longmuir and chambers both deserve the flick although i imagine they remain under contract. these 2 players are slimply wasting our time and realistically will not be part of the next Carlton premiership side. WTF was pagan and co thinking when they re-signed Livo earlier in the year??? Davies should stay, has bucketloads of talent, but he is skating on thin ice and needs an absolute rocket up his ass for next year otherwise its bye bye to him too.

If we add those in the abovementioned post plus Aporn that leaves us with another 4 delistings.

So out the door is: Campo, Clarke, Bowyer, Prenda, Norman, Digby, Johnson, Wiggins, Sporn, Prendergast and Bannister. I suspect Lappo will stay. 11 in all

in the door is: Saddington, picks 1,4,20,36,68, 84? PSD picks 1 plus second round. And promote Setanta O'hailpin and Jess Smith. again 11 players.

Don't want to jump the gun but i would say next year we can part with Livingston, Chambers, Longmuir, Davies, possibly Houlihan and one of Deluca or Bryan (there isn't room in the team for both since we need a QUALITY ruckman). Plus the expected retirement of Kouta. That would leave 7 more spaces free to which those in the SuperDraft can be added.

This may seem abit extreme but I just feel we need to clean out all the dead wood if we are to truly stick by this youth policy.

At the start of 2007 that would mean the only remaining present players would be:

Betts
Walker
Russell
Scotland
Mcgrath
Stevens
Fevola
Whitnall
Lappin
Waite
Fisher
Bentick
Simpson
O'hailpin
J Smith
French
Bryan/Deluca
Thornton
Teague
Raso
Hartlett
Blackwell

Thoughts????

_________________
Carlton. Yes, Carlton are into the grand final!!!
- Drew Morphett, after 1999 prelim final


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 6:48 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
Add Aisake and Batson to that list as well.

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 6:57 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 1376
Location: Melbourne
Way i read it on the Delists

Plemming - Prob just didnt do enuff to get promoted dont know enuff about him

Becker - Similar maybe just hasnt shown enuff

Johnson - Been replaced by Bentick they where never played in team together and with Benticks last 5 games he secured that spot

Morrell - may have been 50:50 in comes Saddington Morrell goes on the belief a fit Saddington will do a better job than Morrell

Norman - flower to many dramas whenever was in news was always for some issue in rent / alcohol / Drugs - flower gone

Campo - should be gone as expected


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 7:03 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 6:43 pm
Posts: 30
Location: Melbourne
No real suprise taking into consideration the amount footy those lads played in the seconds this year. All three are very good VFL level players.
I think there are are couple who should be shown the before Diggers.

Probably waiting to see what happens with Campo and Lappin.

Maybe we'll keepng a couple of others guys who garenntee us at least 2 delisting next year.

Both Bannister and Wiggo are borderline.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 7:19 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
dooky wrote:
So out the door is: Campo, Clarke, Bowyer, Prenda, Norman, Digby, Johnson, Wiggins, Sporn, Prendergast and Bannister. I suspect Lappo will stay. 11 in all

I want to keep Sporn for one more year and if he goes before a Wiggins, Bannister or Prendergast I'll crack it. :evil:
dooky wrote:
in the door is: Saddington, picks 1,4,20,36,68, 84? PSD picks 1 plus second round. And promote Setanta O'hailpin and Jess Smith. again 11 players.

What has Smith done to be deserve to be added to the senior list? I haven't seen much of him.
dooky wrote:
At the start of 2007 that would mean the only remaining present players would be:

Betts
Walker
Russell
Scotland
Mcgrath - Can't play in 2007. :x
Stevens
Fevola
Whitnall
Lappin
Waite
Fisher
Bentick
Simpson
O'hailpin
J Smith
French
Bryan/Deluca
Thornton
Teague
Raso
Hartlett
Blackwell

Thoughts????

How many bottom four finishes will we have with that list? :(
Even if we add Murphy, Clark, Lucy, pick 36, etc this year and possibly Thorp, Sheldon, Selwood (PPs hopefully stay) and Sellar in the 2006 superdraft.We'll still be a great chance for the spoon in 2007 if we chop all the players with senior experience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 7:44 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14741
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
Maybe if we are considering a stock up in the 2006 super draft perhaps we are wanting to keep a few duds on the list for who will be out of contract and easily de-listable next year, rather than have a bunch of late picks in an ordinary draft who will be stuck with for 2 years?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 7:45 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6459
You have to drop some players.That is part of the business.The jist of the thread seems to be that Norman deserved his sacking whilst Johnno and Diggers were a bit on the stiff side.I agree

What cost Johnno in the end is the emergence of Bentick an in and under player who lacks a bit of toe and Blackwell who I rate highly and is a similar player.The fact that Johnno has been delisted along with Becker shows that Pagan rates Blackers highly as well.And then there is Murphy assuming he is the first picked in the draft.Johnno is a fine player.I hope he gets another opportunity at a third club although this event is unlikely.


Morrell is the stiffest.In the round 21 game against the scum he kicked 3goals 4 behinds.Would he have played next year if he kicked 7 straight that day.Diggers didnt have a good year But I would have kept him in preference to others(Bannister,Wiggins for starters)what if Fevola,Whitnall,Fisher or Waite go down with injury.Perhaps Diggers could have been kept as insurance for this.

Wherever he goes he will kicked 3 figures,injury aside and not at AFL level.


I guess I wont see Karl Norman at the Meredith Music Festival because on the ticket it says no flower.At 79 he was worth the risk.You win some you lose some.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 7:45 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Thanks Digby, Brett and Karl. All played some decent footy at some stage for the club.

I thought there'd be more, but we need to save someone for next season. There's no point loading up on kids in this draft.

Keep in mind just because we have first pick in the PSD doesnt mean we're going to utilise it. The club may be aware that no one of value will be nominating.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 7:47 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
Anyone likely to want to take over the SEN Locker room from Digby & Harford? :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 8:05 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
Megaman wrote:
Maybe if we are considering a stock up in the 2006 super draft perhaps we are wanting to keep a few duds on the list for who will be out of contract and easily de-listable next year, rather than have a bunch of late picks in an ordinary draft who will be stuck with for 2 years?

That's my theory as well.If we draft duds with pick no.1000 then we'll be stuck with them for 2 years, unlike a Davies, Sporn and Livo who can be chopped if they don't step up.

There might be a better player available at pick 2 in the PSD if only a handfull of clubs can afford to enter.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 8:09 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:18 am
Posts: 1321
Location: Melbourne
Thanks for the memories fellas. Karl you might want to watch some replays of your games if you can't remember any.

I suppose the writing was on the wall for these players. But one thing has me totally fuming..... surely that paragraph about no further delistings is not right.

How could Diggers, Jonno and Karl go before Wiggins. Please some one explain to me how Wiggins can be on the list? He has played 63 games and can't even crack it past 8 possesions a game as an average. Tottaly useless footballer. I agree Prenda and Bannister are also lucky to be on the list but atleast they can PERFORM at times.... unlike Wiggins the stupid confussed person that think's he's an AFL footballer.

http://www.footywire.com/fw/web/ft_play ... er?pid=415


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 8:13 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 437
Location: The Pratt Stand
keogh wrote:
I guess I wont see Karl Norman at the Meredith Music Festival because on the ticket it says no flower.At 79 he was worth the risk.You win some you lose some.


maybe if we hadn't drafted Karl, then Angwin wouldn't have had a playmate and would still be at the club.

that said, i'm glad we drafted karl, helped us get rid of LA

_________________
Number 17 - come on down!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 8:13 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 1:58 pm
Posts: 3464
Location: Procyon II
With the mid season furore over Bannister and the fact that he didn't play any senior footy in the last half of the season (when we needed something like him), I thought Bannister was toast. I still can't see how he survived.
We had better have some more changes or we won't be drafting very much. And low picks seem to be the only good ones we seem to make.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: What furore ?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 8:17 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 3:21 pm
Posts: 195
Beowulf, what was the mid season furore over Bannister ?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 105 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 50 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group