Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 5:54 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 ... 307  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:26 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19421
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Griffiths body doesn't seem to be able to handle AFL footy.

Pears is an interesting one; injuries have hurt him too - has he lost too much speed? Would allow Henderson to move forward.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:31 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Effes wrote:
Griffiths body doesn't seem to be able to handle AFL footy.

Pears is an interesting one; injuries have hurt him too - has he lost too much speed? Would allow Henderson to move forward.

would Sam Reid be an option ?

should be targetting competitive decent sized mids anyeay


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:32 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Not sure about the talls debate.

Watching the mid and small ball users at the Swans it looks like everyone is about 4 or these guys short.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:35 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:28 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: .?../*%$#@
Conclusion: picks 2 and 3 are the real gun picks. Your saved from the pressure of consensus and expectation that comes from pick 1, and tanking for pick 2 and 3 is near on impossible to prove. :smoking:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 2:37 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
TruBlueBrad wrote:
kots1234 wrote:
Bit of overreaction to the loss on Friday and I get that.


I'm not that worried about the talent on the list, I think that needs some work and ironing out, but isn't far off. We've been in a winning position in every game apart from the St Kilda game, and even then....we found ourselves with a chance anyway.

The problem I see is the mental fragility of the list. Its leadership. There aren't enough players who are capable of taking control out there and turning a winning position into a win.

We should have beaten Richmond, St Kilda, Essendon* and Collingwood, but we crumbled.



Spot on!

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 2:42 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
WOW wrote:
carntheblues wrote:
GWS offered O'meara as one of the 17 year old picks for Kruz. WE obviously did not see it as a good deal and if you look at the mids around a lot of them were later picks. The theory being midfielders are a dime a dozen!


although O'meara looks pretty special

like the Cotchin mistake I think this will come back to haunt us


..no, they didn't.. ..they tried to poach him before he re-signed with us.. ..they didn't come back to try and trade.. ..that talk from Sheeds about them offering us the world for a 'star' is bollocks..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 3:17 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
People aren't over-reacting to the Essendon* loss, the loss is a microcosm of everything wrong at the club, and has been wrong for a very long time.

We have done ok with our number 1 picks (Kreuzer is debatable but still a good player), and speculative picks lower in the draft and rookie picks (Carrazzo, Betts, Garlett, Armfield, Jamison, Tuohy, Jacobs etc), but precious little else (Yarran has been good, as has Kennedy). Others have come into our laps like Hendo.

People comparing us to Melb, Doggies and Richmond prove the point.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 3:58 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 8:41 pm
Posts: 2385
Adam Chatfield wrote:
People aren't over-reacting to the Essendon* loss, the loss is a microcosm of everything wrong at the club, and has been wrong for a very long time.

We have done ok with our number 1 picks (Kreuzer is debatable but still a good player), and speculative picks lower in the draft and rookie picks (Carrazzo, Betts, Garlett, Armfield, Jamison, Tuohy, Jacobs etc), but precious little else (Yarran has been good, as has Kennedy). Others have come into our laps like Hendo.

People comparing us to Melb, Doggies and Richmond prove the point.

And yet if the siren went 1min 40secs earlier we would be having this discussion.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 4:12 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13435
Location: Melbourne
Would Jamo really get much interest on the trade table anyway? He's 27 and is so injury prone.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 4:25 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
missnaut wrote:
Would Jamo really get much interest on the trade table anyway? He's 27 and is so injury prone.


I wouldn't think so


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 4:27 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25231
Location: Bondi Beach
muzza wrote:
Adam Chatfield wrote:
People aren't over-reacting to the Essendon* loss, the loss is a microcosm of everything wrong at the club, and has been wrong for a very long time.

We have done ok with our number 1 picks (Kreuzer is debatable but still a good player), and speculative picks lower in the draft and rookie picks (Carrazzo, Betts, Garlett, Armfield, Jamison, Tuohy, Jacobs etc), but precious little else (Yarran has been good, as has Kennedy). Others have come into our laps like Hendo.

People comparing us to Melb, Doggies and Richmond prove the point.

And yet if the siren went 1min 40secs earlier we would be having this discussion.


:idea:

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 5:09 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17219
Rexy wrote:
missnaut wrote:
Would Jamo really get much interest on the trade table anyway? He's 27 and is so injury prone.


I wouldn't think so


I think he would. Tim Golds and a 2nd round pick. Would you do it? I know I would. But i have balls.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 5:20 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:27 am
Posts: 2345
DocSherrin wrote:
Rexy wrote:
missnaut wrote:
Would Jamo really get much interest on the trade table anyway? He's 27 and is so injury prone.

I wouldn't think so


I think he would. Tim Golds and a 2nd round pick. Would you do it? I know I would. But i have balls.


You just have nothing to lose. Don't pat yourself on the back too hard.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 6:07 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:25 am
Posts: 356
Trading Jamison makes no sense unless someone is willing to massively overpay and with his injury history that's unlikely. We have no viable options to replace him and creating a hole at FB to potentially fill a hole elsewhere isn't the way to improve a list. It's just rearranging the problem.

Ruckmen, small forwards and 3rd tall defenders are positions where we have multiple options and can cover a loss. They might not be highly valued positions but at least trading them doesn't create as many problems as it solves.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 6:28 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17219
harker wrote:
DocSherrin wrote:
Rexy wrote:
missnaut wrote:
Would Jamo really get much interest on the trade table anyway? He's 27 and is so injury prone.

I wouldn't think so


I think he would. Tim Golds and a 2nd round pick. Would you do it? I know I would. But i have balls.


You just have nothing to lose. Don't pat yourself on the back too hard.


Of course...you're right. Never the risk takers Carlton. Better give the bloke another contract. :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 6:30 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
harker wrote:
DocSherrin wrote:
Rexy wrote:
missnaut wrote:
Would Jamo really get much interest on the trade table anyway? He's 27 and is so injury prone.

I wouldn't think so


I think he would. Tim Golds and a 2nd round pick. Would you do it? I know I would. But i have balls.


You just have nothing to lose. Don't pat yourself on the back too hard.


Good response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 6:36 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17219
BigKev wrote:
harker wrote:
DocSherrin wrote:
Rexy wrote:
missnaut wrote:
Would Jamo really get much interest on the trade table anyway? He's 27 and is so injury prone.

I wouldn't think so


I think he would. Tim Golds and a 2nd round pick. Would you do it? I know I would. But i have balls.


You just have nothing to lose. Don't pat yourself on the back too hard.


Good response.


Good response from someone who has accepted mediocrity? Suprising response coming from someone old enough to remember when Carlton did most things very well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 6:39 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
muzza wrote:
Adam Chatfield wrote:
People aren't over-reacting to the Essendon* loss, the loss is a microcosm of everything wrong at the club, and has been wrong for a very long time.

We have done ok with our number 1 picks (Kreuzer is debatable but still a good player), and speculative picks lower in the draft and rookie picks (Carrazzo, Betts, Garlett, Armfield, Jamison, Tuohy, Jacobs etc), but precious little else (Yarran has been good, as has Kennedy). Others have come into our laps like Hendo.

People comparing us to Melb, Doggies and Richmond prove the point.

And yet if the siren went 1min 40secs earlier we would be having this discussion.


Would of been prolonged a week perhaps.

I was still angry even when we were holding on for dear life in the last because we shouldn't of even been in that position.

Thing is you can't claim we are unlucky all the time, were we unlucky against Richmond, Collingwood and St Kilda too? Against GC last year?

We very rarely beat top 8 opposition and it can't be down to just bad luck.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 6:45 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
DocSherrin wrote:
harker wrote:
DocSherrin wrote:
Rexy wrote:
missnaut wrote:
Would Jamo really get much interest on the trade table anyway? He's 27 and is so injury prone.

I wouldn't think so


I think he would. Tim Golds and a 2nd round pick. Would you do it? I know I would. But i have balls.


You just have nothing to lose. Don't pat yourself on the back too hard.


Of course...you're right. Never the risk takers Carlton. Better give the bloke another contract. :roll:


I'm all for trading out players for picks/young talent, we've never had the balls to do it and our list has stagnated. But trading Jamison doesn't seem like a SMART risk. We need another KPB to step up and enable Hendo to go forward, your idea would require 2 of them. Do we have them? Maybe Rowe and Watson. But you're weakening an area of weakness.

A smarter play would seem to be - trade one or two rucks. You can only play one of them per game these days anyway. Hampson and Warnock would attract minimal interest. Get something like a pick 6 for Kreuzer or better, get a pick in the low teens and one in the 20s.

There might be other opportunities, and yes we need to be bold. We need to keep replenishing the list. Collingwood somehow got first round picks for Wellingham and Dawes and drafted Grundy and Kennedy. Their future might be secured right there.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 6:56 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
muzza wrote:
Adam Chatfield wrote:
People aren't over-reacting to the Essendon* loss, the loss is a microcosm of everything wrong at the club, and has been wrong for a very long time.

We have done ok with our number 1 picks (Kreuzer is debatable but still a good player), and speculative picks lower in the draft and rookie picks (Carrazzo, Betts, Garlett, Armfield, Jamison, Tuohy, Jacobs etc), but precious little else (Yarran has been good, as has Kennedy). Others have come into our laps like Hendo.

People comparing us to Melb, Doggies and Richmond prove the point.

And yet if the siren went 1min 40secs earlier we would be having this discussion.


If it wasn't that loss, it would be another.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 ... 307  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group