Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri May 16, 2025 1:47 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 981 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 ... 50  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 8:44 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24618
Location: Kaloyasena
Sydney Blue wrote:
Mick needs to win 16 of the last 19 to make top 4 or 14 0f the last 19 to make top 8

not a chance in hell



We need Jezza circa 1978.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 8:47 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21426
Location: North of the border
AGRO wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Mick needs to win 16 of the last 19 to make top 4 or 14 0f the last 19 to make top 8

not a chance in hell



We need Jezza circa 1978.




Ahhh the good old days how I long for them

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 8:54 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
BrianSetzer1 wrote:
Whers that guy that used to post here Scorponi or something like that?
A new one pops up every year!


A new Scorponi, or the old one under another name? :sly:

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 10:24 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3072
Effes wrote:
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/afl/teams/wayne-carey-casts-doubt-over-carlton-coach-mick-malthouses-game-plan/story-e6frf9k6-1226620143763


Absolutely spot on. Blind Freddy can see that.

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 1:08 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8131
frank dardew wrote:
would be a miracle with this list to be 5/5 at round 10 -this is a team that loses to port gold coast etc so no match is assured - don't have a great record of winning streaks even when we were 5th a couple of years ago (remember that ) didn't win more than 3 on the trot because of mental fragility of group


I agree. Obviously with some easier opposition and some more confidence among the playing group and some more time to adjust to the new regime we'll improve. But Melbourne and GWS are the only certainties. Beaten Saints about twice in the last decade. So no certainties there. Should beat Port over here. But they're a much better team at the moment. Brisbane at the Gabba will be hard.

And then we've got Essendon* (who we always lose to first time we play each season). Hawthorn at Etihad, and we're absolutely no chance. Sydney at the SCG, not much chance. And then Collingwood again.

There looks like there are 4 dud teams this year: Melbourne, GWS, Gold Coast and Western Bulldogs. And we only play each of them once.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 1:09 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8131
I like the way a lot of players are getting a look at the moment. But I suspect it's making it a little bit harder to get over the line in these close games. Unsettled sides tend not to play with great cohesion.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 8:09 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13211
Location: Melbourne
Did anyone really think we'd be anywhere near the top 4 this year??

Stefchook wrote:
I like the way a lot of players are getting a look at the moment. But I suspect it's making it a little bit harder to get over the line in these close games. Unsettled sides tend not to play with great cohesion.


I'm with you on this one. Its annoying that we've had a few forced changes through injury/illness already as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 8:17 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
I thought we'd be closer to the top 4 than the bottom 4.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 8:34 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 11:40 am
Posts: 4088
Location: Reclining always
Does anyone else think that the downward spiral started when Icke left??


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 8:40 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..it's silly recruiting.. ..as simple as that.. ..we value flair over substance.. ..we think a few core players are enough.. ..at the draft, we've been clearly in the bottom half of teams [possibly bottom 4] for drafting players the last 15 years..

..2011 is looking more and more likely to be the aberration season..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 9:04 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
verbs wrote:
I thought we'd be closer to the top 4 than the bottom 4.

after the first few rounds?

yes so did most ..... wow!!!

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 10:00 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9099
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Stone Free wrote:
Does anyone else think that the downward spiral started when Icke left??


Should have got rid of him earlier. Lightweight at Freo and then played a big hand in sending us up the garden path.

Not sure what Andy Mackay was thinking not making sure the list got a shake up at the end of 2012 either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 1:02 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
We weren't able to shake up the list because our players such as Davies and Joseph were on multi year contracts and we weren't going to pay them out as we already had to absorb Rattens contract. This is the year we can start to clean out the list.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 1:08 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17959
missnaut wrote:
Did anyone really think we'd be anywhere near the top 4 this year??.


Considering we were'nt too far off last time we had a relatively injury free list, yes.

Besides, the board recently sacked the coach because he failed to make Top 4, so why should we lower our expectations now?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 1:37 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9099
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Michael Jezz wrote:
We weren't able to shake up the list because our players such as Davies and Joseph were on multi year contracts and we weren't going to pay them out as we already had to absorb Rattens contract. This is the year we can start to clean out the list.


I don't get what you are saying? We could have traded and put a new mix together. It was clear we were flogging a dead horse.

trublu says we have a plan and are frontloading contracts with the hope of landing a big fish end of year. Maybe that is what Mackay is thinking. I would hope that is the case.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 1:40 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3072
club29 wrote:
BigBlueWave wrote:
If tricky Micky is teaching the boys about defense ... either ... he is teaching them the wrong thing ... or ... they are not listening. Some of the setups at stopages in our defensive half were abysmal. Our tackling execution is poor ... Our game plan is predictable and because its so slow, the opposition are just being given too much time to fill the spaces and we don't have a player in the forward line to take the big pack mark. Which brings me to another aspect of our game ... delivery into the forward line. Please Mick ... no more bombing recklessly to our forwards ... it just doesn't work!!!

If we lose the next 2 matches and there is a real chance we will ... then we can kiss the season goodbye. :mad: :mad: :mad:


In Micks defence I think he has no choice but to bomb. We don't have a marking forward but we have good crumbers. I am sure the numbers show we get rebounded on far too easy when we try to pinpoint someone inside fifty or attempt shallow entries. We also score well off deep inside 50 stoppages ( that are created from deep bombs). We also have a good press at the start of quarters. Fades later due to our crap fitness. With our personnel i think both Mick and coaches past know what our best bet is. Coaches get a lot of information from stats.

We are scoring ok it is our defensive side that is rubbish.


I think its both. When we Bomb the ball ... it results in quick turnovers that hurt us at the other end.

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 2:04 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:17 pm
Posts: 1639
Location: Within the old Carlton recruting zone ...
The lack of realism in our support base (and hopefully not our Board!) is frightening.

Ratten was sacked because we had not taken the steps necessary to make the jump into the top 4. Even in our best year in recent times (2011), we only finished 5th, beat up on Essendon* on the G and then had an honourable loss in Perth. For the last 3-4 years we've had questionable depth (particularly our talls in attack and smalls in defence) and a midfield mindset focused almost entirely on offence (Carazzo and Robinson excluded). These areas were exposed by our injuries last year with reality finally setting in after the Gold Coast loss.

Malthouse was brought in to fix these deficiencies. These will take time to address and will require personnel changes to ultimately achieve. The contracts in place (another legacy of the Ratten era) made it difficult to move this year but that's why he has a 3 year contract. Who seriously believes that wins over the likes of Gold Coast and Bulldogs early in the season would establish our top 4 credentials??? The hard start to the season has highlighted what needs to be fixed and who's not up to the task of applying the kind of defensive pressure expected of a top 4 side.

_________________
In WADA we trust


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 2:31 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3072
Dukes wrote:
The lack of realism in our support base (and hopefully not our Board!) is frightening.

Ratten was sacked because we had not taken the steps necessary to make the jump into the top 4. Even in our best year in recent times (2011), we only finished 5th, beat up on Essendon* on the G and then had an honourable loss in Perth. For the last 3-4 years we've had questionable depth (particularly our talls in attack and smalls in defence) and a midfield mindset focused almost entirely on offence (Carazzo and Robinson excluded). These areas were exposed by our injuries last year with reality finally setting in after the Gold Coast loss.

Malthouse was brought in to fix these deficiencies. These will take time to address and will require personnel changes to ultimately achieve. The contracts in place (another legacy of the Ratten era) made it difficult to move this year but that's why he has a 3 year contract. Who seriously believes that wins over the likes of Gold Coast and Bulldogs early in the season would establish our top 4 credentials??? The hard start to the season has highlighted what needs to be fixed and who's not up to the task of applying the kind of defensive pressure expected of a top 4 side.


I don't agree with your presumptions ... but time will tell ... I hope you are right ...

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 2:50 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17959
Dukes wrote:
The lack of realism in our support base (and hopefully not our Board!) is frightening.

Ratten was sacked because we had not taken the steps necessary to make the jump into the top 4. Even in our best year in recent times (2011), we only finished 5th, beat up on Essendon* on the G and then had an honourable loss in Perth. For the last 3-4 years we've had questionable depth (particularly our talls in attack and smalls in defence) and a midfield mindset focused almost entirely on offence (Carazzo and Robinson excluded). These areas were exposed by our injuries last year with reality finally setting in after the Gold Coast loss.
.


Questionable depth, a midfield mindset focussed entirely on offence (I'd like to know how you quantify that) and yet we progressed from wooden spoon to 3 years of competitive finals participation with a young developing side.
Perhaps the board and the unrealistic supporters know more than you think?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 2:56 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2644
Our scoring is coming from acts of brilliance or fluke.
We cannot manufacture a straight forward structured forward attack to save our lives.
We are a open forward line with our runners running onto the ball that need to out run the oppositions multiple defender, out marks stronger taller opponents or have a long shot from outside 50, not to mention the shit delivery to the oppositions advantage.
This all coming from a boundary line offensive and if we really get corralled then and only then do we try and center the ball which is then rebounded through the corridor or the opposing open wing.
The ease of which the opposition is entering our defensive 50 is largely attributed to our attack and its structure.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 981 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 ... 50  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 91 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group