Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 8:12 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61 ... 307  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 7:42 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25230
Location: Bondi Beach
verbs wrote:
kezza wrote:
The replay of the round 3 game against Collingwood is on foxtel now. Amazing how much better the side was when we had almost a full strength side and players such as Laidler, Henderson and Waite fit and firing.
Hopefully we can have a better run with injuries next season and if Rogers can get our draft picks right we should have a better season.
MM will have a year to get a better look at our players and i expect us to be pretty active next trade period.


Certainly was an exciting team that ran out that night. If we play like that every week we'd be top 4 without a doubt.


In other verbs, I mean words, we have a Top 4 list....then the caveats therefafter.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 9:15 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
moshe25 wrote:
Rexy wrote:
We need Warnock because Kreuzer and Hampson are susceptible to injury

We need Kreuzer because Warnock and Hampson are susceptible to injury

We need Hampson because Kreuzer and Warnock are susceptible to injury

And we need Casboult because Kreuzer, Warnock, and Hampson are susceptible to injury.


Yeah, and we need Joseph because Waite and Simpson are susceptible to injury. :cool:

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 9:22 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10590
Casboult, Mitchell & Rowe aren't ruckman. They are forwards. Whether they are good forwards still remains to be seen but they are not ruckman.
Hampson, Kruezer & Warnock are ruckman. Whether we can play them as 3rd forwards or even as KP forwards remains to be seen but their no.1 spot is ruck. It's really not that hard to understand. 3 ruckman on the list with 2 of those capable of playing 3rd forward is a positive in anyone's language. DEVELOPMENT and injury is a different issue.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 9:38 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2646
SurreyBlue wrote:
Casboult, Mitchell & Rowe aren't ruckman. They are forwards. Whether they are good forwards still remains to be seen but they are not ruckman.
Hampson, Kruezer & Warnock are ruckman. Whether we can play them as 3rd forwards or even as KP forwards remains to be seen but their no.1 spot is ruck. It's really not that hard to understand. 3 ruckman on the list with 2 of those capable of playing 3rd forward is a positive in anyone's language. DEVELOPMENT and injury is a different issue.


Unfortunately Surrey the issues are all inter related.
If the rucks were fit they are all capable of holding down the number one spot, yes they all offer something different but can also rest in the forward line to some extent.
If our young forwards were fit the would have had more time on the ground thus " being
developed".
These KPP and three ruck could be shortened some what but due to injury and also incorporating development or lack of we need them all of them on the list for insurance and also to assess their worth to the team in the long run.
This unfortunately take away from other important positional players like mids so its not ideal
in all situation we find ourselves into for the time being.
The bright side is every season under the belt injury free means a better position our stocks in trade or depth we find ourselves. :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 10:47 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
We have been saying those kinds of things for roughly five years - "so we can assess them for depth or trade" and yet they either fail and no one wants them or they succeed moderately and we keep them. The time to make changes is always now and yet it's always some little rough graft from another club and/or a piddling of draft picks. How often have we put ourselves into a position to actually target players and not leave everything to chance? Even with the likes of Laidler and McLean they are either forced fits or basement buys turned 'good'.

The rookies play moderately well for us because we have no choice and then we are lulled into a false sense that we have 'found' players.

Who knows, success next year might lull us into the same habits and another prolonged stretch of mediocrity, I'm just a bit peeved of the whole process.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 10:48 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
The key for me is not one of the three have stood up and shown that they are No.1. All have different attributes but none have stood up. Hampson and Warnock are now at an age where they should be producing consistent good football. Kruezer as a No.1 draft pick should be doing better. I know the knee injury slowed him down but I have trouble seeing him dominate that position. IMO he is caught between key forward and ruck and isn't dominant at either. He isn't big enough or physical enough to be a dominant ruckman and doesn't have the skill to be a dominant forward. So what do you do with him? I still get the impression he is a slightly better version of Josh Fraser and just doesn't have the improvement in him. Some people just peak earlier than others, he simply could be at his best now. I hope I'm wrong.

The best set up for us is Warnock fit and firing (IMO when fit our best ruck option) in the ruck and giving our gun mids first use of the ball. A forward line mix of 3 of Henderson, Casboult, Waite, Rowe, Mitchell w them also providing ruck relief is our best way to go.

If they can stay fit we are a real chance to finish top 4.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 2:23 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:00 pm
Posts: 4055
Location: Recovering from the 1st effort
Sad to say but I've been conditioned to expect the inevitable heartbreaking story of how [insert name of key forward] has broken down in training and will unfortunately miss 6 months for a 4th [insert knee, shoulder, pancreas, spleen, kidney, sphincter etc] reconstruction. If all goes well he should be back in time for season 2013 junk time or to help the bullants reserves snatch a spot in the finals. I reckon the club communications department probably has a 'tick and flick' proforma to the above affect permanently ready to go, possibly on the PC with a drop down list to fill in the blanks.

How many people still have those old Telstra 3 shares in a bottom drawer waiting for them to come good. Potential is a commodity that rapidly deteriorates. I'd rather have somebody that is OK now rather than the best credentailled bloke with his name painted on the chair in the physio's rooms. We cant have 5 or 6 injured talls year after year.

_________________
"Who discovered we could get milk from cows, and what did he think he was doing at the time?" Billy Connolly


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 7:53 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:36 pm
Posts: 2960
Location: Oak Park
The potential is there. There are a number of players who have significant upside and could become anything.
The problem is that the club at virtually every level simply doesn't have the ruthless streak and professional nous to be the best. We fell asleep at the wheel and now 15 years later we are just another club running around with the plodders.

I'm not a massive Mick fan but he has the authority and ability to bring discipline to a team and maybe that's the first thing this group needs. At the moment, I don't believe we will be there any time soon

_________________
C'mon Blueboys!


Last edited by marciblue on Mon Oct 29, 2012 8:33 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 8:00 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1650
Pratt asked the question a number of years ago re Brian Cook's availability and Costa closed the door fairly quickly. Now it appears it's slightly ajar and the Roos are knocking????

This is the type of management, leadership, etc we need at our club in order to start our recovery.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 8:05 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:37 pm
Posts: 1378
Rod Waddell wrote:
Pratt asked the question a number of years ago re Brian Cook's availability and Costa closed the door fairly quickly. Now it appears it's slightly ajar and the Roos are knocking????

This is the type of management, leadership, etc we need at our club in order to start our recovery.


Get the best was the mantra, not just the best available at the time.
Would G.Swann make that call.... Cook would be an exceptional get!
Sticks would have to make that call. Same again though, we're not approaching the "unattainable" but waiting for others to jump 1st.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 8:45 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
2ndeffort wrote:
Sad to say but I've been conditioned to expect the inevitable heartbreaking story of how [insert name of key forward] has broken down in training and will unfortunately miss 6 months for a 4th [insert knee, shoulder, pancreas, spleen, kidney, sphincter etc] reconstruction. If all goes well he should be back in time for season 2013 junk time or to help the bullants reserves snatch a spot in the finals. I reckon the club communications department probably has a 'tick and flick' proforma to the above affect permanently ready to go, possibly on the PC with a drop down list to fill in the blanks.

How many people still have those old Telstra 3 shares in a bottom drawer waiting for them to come good. Potential is a commodity that rapidly deteriorates. I'd rather have somebody that is OK now rather than the best credentailled bloke with his name painted on the chair in the physio's rooms. We cant have 5 or 6 injured talls year after year.

Sad, but oh so true :hitcomputer:

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 7:50 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
ThePsychologist wrote:
The key for me is not one of the three have stood up and shown that they are No.1. All have different attributes but none have stood up. Hampson and Warnock are now at an age where they should be producing consistent good football. Kruezer as a No.1 draft pick should be doing better. I know the knee injury slowed him down but I have trouble seeing him dominate that position. IMO he is caught between key forward and ruck and isn't dominant at either. He isn't big enough or physical enough to be a dominant ruckman and doesn't have the skill to be a dominant forward. So what do you do with him? I still get the impression he is a slightly better version of Josh Fraser and just doesn't have the improvement in him. Some people just peak earlier than others, he simply could be at his best now. I hope I'm wrong.

The best set up for us is Warnock fit and firing (IMO when fit our best ruck option) in the ruck and giving our gun mids first use of the ball. A forward line mix of 3 of Henderson, Casboult, Waite, Rowe, Mitchell w them also providing ruck relief is our best way to go.

If they can stay fit we are a real chance to finish top 4.


..i disagree Pyscho.. ..i reckon Krooz has stood up as much as he can, body permitting.. ..prior to doing his ACL he was the next ruck revelation.. ..post knee he has had knee troubles, and yet has put out better quality games even thru his body issues than the other two.. ..what Krooz can do when fit is far superior to the other two.. .he won't get perhaps as many hitouts, but he has far better quality tapwork.. ..he's also got top quality football nous, topend bracket for footy smarts on our entire list.. ..whether he'll manage to get his body right and stay fit is unknown, but plenty of it would be player management.. ..playing him thru injury this season was criminal..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 11:20 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 9:32 pm
Posts: 2014
Location: perth
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
The key for me is not one of the three have stood up and shown that they are No.1. All have different attributes but none have stood up. Hampson and Warnock are now at an age where they should be producing consistent good football. Kruezer as a No.1 draft pick should be doing better. I know the knee injury slowed him down but I have trouble seeing him dominate that position. IMO he is caught between key forward and ruck and isn't dominant at either. He isn't big enough or physical enough to be a dominant ruckman and doesn't have the skill to be a dominant forward. So what do you do with him? I still get the impression he is a slightly better version of Josh Fraser and just doesn't have the improvement in him. Some people just peak earlier than others, he simply could be at his best now. I hope I'm wrong.

The best set up for us is Warnock fit and firing (IMO when fit our best ruck option) in the ruck and giving our gun mids first use of the ball. A forward line mix of 3 of Henderson, Casboult, Waite, Rowe, Mitchell w them also providing ruck relief is our best way to go.

If they can stay fit we are a real chance to finish top 4.


..i disagree Pyscho.. ..i reckon Krooz has stood up as much as he can, body permitting.. ..prior to doing his ACL he was the next ruck revelation.. ..post knee he has had knee troubles, and yet has put out better quality games even thru his body issues than the other two.. ..what Krooz can do when fit is far superior to the other two.. .he won't get perhaps as many hitouts, but he has far better quality tapwork.. ..he's also got top quality football nous, topend bracket for footy smarts on our entire list.. ..whether he'll manage to get his body right and stay fit is unknown, but plenty of it would be player management.. ..playing him thru injury this season was criminal..



He was an athletic freak, but through injuries/surgery shuffles around like a grandpa, moves very slow and can't jump. With contested marking his biggest weakness, it was his athleticism that made him special.

Much like Kouta, injuries have taken away his abilities. Sadly I think he is cooked, and we will never get to see what he could have become. Kouta was able to turn into a dominant inside mid after, Matthew doesn't have that option unfortunately.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 11:45 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:36 pm
Posts: 2960
Location: Oak Park
sstormin123 wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
The key for me is not one of the three have stood up and shown that they are No.1. All have different attributes but none have stood up. Hampson and Warnock are now at an age where they should be producing consistent good football. Kruezer as a No.1 draft pick should be doing better. I know the knee injury slowed him down but I have trouble seeing him dominate that position. IMO he is caught between key forward and ruck and isn't dominant at either. He isn't big enough or physical enough to be a dominant ruckman and doesn't have the skill to be a dominant forward. So what do you do with him? I still get the impression he is a slightly better version of Josh Fraser and just doesn't have the improvement in him. Some people just peak earlier than others, he simply could be at his best now. I hope I'm wrong.

The best set up for us is Warnock fit and firing (IMO when fit our best ruck option) in the ruck and giving our gun mids first use of the ball. A forward line mix of 3 of Henderson, Casboult, Waite, Rowe, Mitchell w them also providing ruck relief is our best way to go.

If they can stay fit we are a real chance to finish top 4.


..i disagree Pyscho.. ..i reckon Krooz has stood up as much as he can, body permitting.. ..prior to doing his ACL he was the next ruck revelation.. ..post knee he has had knee troubles, and yet has put out better quality games even thru his body issues than the other two.. ..what Krooz can do when fit is far superior to the other two.. .he won't get perhaps as many hitouts, but he has far better quality tapwork.. ..he's also got top quality football nous, topend bracket for footy smarts on our entire list.. ..whether he'll manage to get his body right and stay fit is unknown, but plenty of it would be player management.. ..playing him thru injury this season was criminal..



He was an athletic freak, but through injuries/surgery shuffles around like a grandpa, moves very slow and can't jump. With contested marking his biggest weakness, it was his athleticism that made him special.

Much like Kouta, injuries have taken away his abilities. Sadly I think he is cooked, and we will never get to see what he could have become. Kouta was able to turn into a dominant inside mid after, Matthew doesn't have that option unfortunately.


Sadly I agree. I think he is done!
Unfortunately, being a no.1 pick and all, and much loved at the club, it will be hard to get rid of him unless we sell for massive unders and could prove to be an ongoing liability in terms of when and how to play him. The talk of him playing forward already has me concerned. He has rarely shown much as a forward.

_________________
C'mon Blueboys!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 12:46 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..i don't think so.. ..firstly, the Krooz was never a leaper, so this idea that he now can't jump is a little skewed.. ..secondly i've seen him post ACL cover ground well, pivot on a dime.. ..crumb packs, jump/leap at the incoming ball etc etc.. ..so i believe his body is still capable.. ..provided we let him get back to his best.. ..overworked him directly after his comeback games last year, until he had that mystery injury late in the season.. ..this year, we pushed him thru injury for most of the season.. ..he's been back playing for a year and a half post ACL, and has been injured and pushed hard thru injury.. ..he hasn't had a real chance yet to get his body totally right.. ..and he only missed a single game..

..Krooz will come good if allowed to..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 12:56 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..regarding our CHF position, who do we think will be holding it for next year [and beyond]..?.. .... ..Micky Maltz has mentioned players in different positions/roles.. ..will CHF be one position he's thinking of?, will it be Hendo back to CHF perhaps?? [hopefully]..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 1:21 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:37 pm
Posts: 1378
marciblue wrote:
Sadly I agree. I think he is done!
Unfortunately, being a no.1 pick and all, and much loved at the club, it will be hard to get rid of him unless we sell for massive unders and could prove to be an ongoing liability in terms of when and how to play him. The talk of him playing forward already has me concerned. He has rarely shown much as a forward.


There is still a club trading under the MFC banner that could always save us around trade time if we had thoughts of moving Matty out.
MK moves like a cardboard cut-out, just seems so rigid in his movements, especially his marking attempts.
Injuries have hampered him that's for sure. The loyalty he showed in not signing with the GWS may come back at him from CFC but perhaps the early round draft picks may have helped us more. He would have had to of been the equal to Scully in compo.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 5:55 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:37 pm
Posts: 1378
Interesting between our web-site and Collingwood's. Our delisted players are still for show, whereas Collingwood has removed all theirs swiftly and added in their new recruits.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 12:52 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19421
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx

Quote:
CARLTON has announced eight delistings ahead of Wednesday's 2pm first list lodgement deadline.

Paul Bower, Andrew Collins, Rohan Kerr and Bret Thornton have been delisted, along with rookies Nick Heyne and Mitch Carter and two NSW scholarship holders, Blake Bray and Matthew Lodge.

The Blues said Collins would continue to train with the squad with the aim of being re-listed in December's NAB AFL Pre-season Draft.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 12:58 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
No surprises there. Hopefully PB and BT (who IMO is extremely unlucky) find homes elsewhere. GWS/GC would seem natural fits as they both need a bit of experience in key posts.

Shame we never got to see Kerr show us what he could do at the highest level. Perhaps injuries/workrate/inconsistency cost him in the end?

Did a double-take seeing Collins' name there, but I suppose they had to delist someone given our club's contract situations. Hopefully we'll snap him back up and get a good preseason into him.

You'd think the other four will probably miss out on another shot.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61 ... 307  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group