Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue May 06, 2025 7:36 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2166 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 ... 109  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 5:07 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 4578
Location: Blisstonia.
Braithy wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
But are you J Scarponi??????????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!



lol. I was reading the TC boards a long time before I joined. JS had some far out ideas. I'd like to think since I write for a living, the difference in writing styles would scream that me and JS are not one of the same.

... but then again, there's people here questioning why we never won a grand final when we had the mercurial Brad Fisher on our list.

So I won't question anything here ever again.


My bad.

As for Moshe's post, take out Brad Fisher and add Scotland and Stevens then. We didn't do as badly out of those 2 draft periods as people make out. Most of the damage was done before and after...

_________________
"They're [REDACTED]'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 5:17 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Braithy wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
But are you J Scarponi??????????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!



lol. I was reading the TC boards a long time before I joined. JS had some far out ideas. I'd like to think since I write for a living, the difference in writing styles would scream that me and JS are not one of the same.

... but then again, there's people here questioning why we never won a grand final when we had the mercurial Brad Fisher on our list.

So I won't question anything here ever again.


If only the 50m arc was 40m he's have been a sensation. :lol: :lol:

Thank god you're not the dreaded Mascaponi.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 5:36 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7261
Effes wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Don't forget these shows, although maybe not up to your lofty standard of footy knowledge, always have current players on their panel who tipped against us. Considering these are current players/ stars it gives them more of an inside track then anyone here.


:lol:

Funny thing is these "footy shows" savaged Ratten 3 months ago... but they weren't to be listened to back then? :lol:

I still remember the 'structure v individual talent' analogy that was discussed back then, which seems to have been confirmed now that we've had a mini revival.

Ratten's had 5 years to learn his trade, mind you, he's still learning... as every coach does... but players continue to age... how much longer do we give him?

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 5:52 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 6896
Blueboy74 wrote:

My bad.

As for Moshe's post, take out Brad Fisher and add Scotland and Stevens then. We didn't do as badly out of those 2 draft periods as people make out. Most of the damage was done before and after...



It's all good! I got a laugh out of it.

When I think back to the black old post salary cap rort days, I look around at the other teams. Essendon* & Brisbane were dominating, and there weren't too many of our top 22 which would have made their starting sides.

Every game I watched on TV it would be one commentator after another taling about how bad we are and how it'll take a decade to get past this, if at all.

imo, We should be grateful we're on the up and not languishing like Melborne or even Richmond...not critical because in 5 years of having a good coach we haven't won a flag.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 5:55 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
Braithy wrote:
moshe25 wrote:
A decade??!! Mate, a flower century!! Carlton will never be the same again!

Poor lidwe Carlton. Couldn't participate in the first 2 rounds of 2002 draft. When was that?? When Levi Casboult was 9 years old or something.

And Pratt and Mathieson threw over $900K into the club.

So, the fines and sanctions were offset YEARS ago. If you're seriously using something that happened a decade ago, and that has clearly been offset heaps since then, then I can only assume that .......... fades out into [size=50]the distance.[/size]


Haha ... Nice.

Some other clever person in another thread drew the attention of the other clubs with high draft picks in the 2000's ... Melbourne, Essendon*, North etc ... I bet they'd love to have won an elim final and lost a semi by less than a kick.

Sure we're not a grand final threat, but everything is relative.

Aren't we also still in a tubload of debt?

Quote:
We still managed to get Simpson and Fisher - two essentially 100 game players (alright, 2 99 game players).
We still got Walker (PICK 2) in 2003.
And then got top 10 picks in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 - including THREE number 1s PLUS Judd!
And then got lucky getting a top 10 (Robinson) at number 40!!


Ok. So Hawthorn, Collingwood and Geelong are pretty much the yardstick the rest of the AFL measure themselves by. They have the ideal you need a 30-deep list to win a flag over a home and away season to get top 4, and then to have a deep september run.

You just named about 8 quality players and Brad freaking Fisher. We're still a fair way short.

I figure your problems about CFC's hole we were in might centre around Brad Fisher being Flag winning quality.

Next you'll tell me the absence of Brett Thornton and his club worst gps numbers are the reason why we're not top 4.

I don't know why I bother.... :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: Maybe the guy I had dinner with last night was right.... :smoking:

You - yes YOU, Braithy - you brought up fines and sanctions. So, watch this:

1. The fines were about $900K in 2002. About 5 years later - five years ago or so, that money had already been given back to us in spades by our two owner..... oops, I mean our two benefactors. So.... POINT 1: Fines are IRRELEVANT!

2. The sanctions were to miss out on the first two rounds of the 2002 and 2003 drafts. Well, watch this.

a) In 2002, in later rounds, we picked up Simmo, who everyone agrees is a gun, and could be our next captain. And we also picked up a 99 game player in Brad Fisher, who while no Goddard or Wells or Jack Watts, was still servicable but got crueled by injury.
b) In 2003, we got our priority pick and got Andrew Walker at No.2.
c) In 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 - FIVE YEARS RUNNING, we had top 10 picks, including THREE NUMBER ONES, JUDD, and YARRAN. And then snagged Robbo at Pick 40.

What's my point?? That the FINES AND SANCTIONS ARE NOW COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT.

Stop leaning on something that happened 10 years ago and has since been offset completely.

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:18 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 6896
moshe25 wrote:

What's my point??



Dude. I got no idea.

There was a trickle down effect from the sanctions, whether you want to acknowledge it or not. we went another quick fix to get back on track with Pagan. What about the state Pagan left the list? Development of the list, a gameplan, a structure. Ratten had to build it all from scratch.

We finished in the bottom 2 from 2002-2007 directly from the rorts & fines.

re 2004 -2008 with high picks. They take time too. They're only entering their playing prime right now, and possibly without the injuries we'd be top 8, maybe top 4.

So we were stung in 2002, and here we are 10 years later with high picks from that mess only just entering their prime. It really isn't drawing a long bow.

Again, I'll point you to the direction of Melbourne, Richmond, Essendon*, North etc who had high picks in that same time. We are better off than all of them. We've come within a kick short of a prelim final with 3 of our best 10 players missing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:36 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 11:10 am
Posts: 1084
You guys forgot Armfield. Judd was the steak knives in that deal ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:44 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Moshe. You know by now that smart analysis and a good thought process means nothing on TC!

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:57 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9098
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Braithy wrote:
moshe25 wrote:

What's my point??



Dude. I got no idea.

There was a trickle down effect from the sanctions, whether you want to acknowledge it or not. we went another quick fix to get back on track with Pagan. What about the state Pagan left the list? Development of the list, a gameplan, a structure. Ratten had to build it all from scratch.

We finished in the bottom 2 from 2002-2007 directly from the rorts & fines.

re 2004 -2008 with high picks. They take time too. They're only entering their playing prime right now, and possibly without the injuries we'd be top 8, maybe top 4.

So we were stung in 2002, and here we are 10 years later with high picks from that mess only just entering their prime. It really isn't drawing a long bow.

Again, I'll point you to the direction of Melbourne, Richmond, Essendon*, North etc who had high picks in that same time. We are better off than all of them. We've come within a kick short of a prelim final with 3 of our best 10 players missing.


Good points braithy. Not sure why you bother though. They dont want to hear.

The fines also had a massive effect on the playing culture. Stevens fev witty and houla were left to show the way to the high draft picks coming though the door and I am sure we all agree that is not the way forward.

There are loads of reasons the team ratts took over was a basket case. He did a great job to get us into finals while clubs in similar boats at the time are still struggling.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:57 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9098
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Braithy wrote:
moshe25 wrote:

What's my point??



Dude. I got no idea.

There was a trickle down effect from the sanctions, whether you want to acknowledge it or not. we went another quick fix to get back on track with Pagan. What about the state Pagan left the list? Development of the list, a gameplan, a structure. Ratten had to build it all from scratch.

We finished in the bottom 2 from 2002-2007 directly from the rorts & fines.

re 2004 -2008 with high picks. They take time too. They're only entering their playing prime right now, and possibly without the injuries we'd be top 8, maybe top 4.

So we were stung in 2002, and here we are 10 years later with high picks from that mess only just entering their prime. It really isn't drawing a long bow.

Again, I'll point you to the direction of Melbourne, Richmond, Essendon*, North etc who had high picks in that same time. We are better off than all of them. We've come within a kick short of a prelim final with 3 of our best 10 players missing.


Good points braithy. Not sure why you bother though. They dont want to hear.

The fines also had a massive effect on the playing culture. Stevens fev witty and houla were left to show the way to the high draft picks coming though the door and I am sure we all agree that is not the way forward.

There are loads of reasons the team ratts took over was a basket case. He did a great job to get us into finals while clubs in similar boats at the time are still struggling.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:17 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16770
Location: Melbourne
ThePsychologist wrote:
Moshe. You know by now that smart analysis and a good thought process means nothing on TC!


Now, now Psycho. Your catch phrase is - 'Don't get personal'. So don't.

Everything is either black or white on TC these days.

Yes it is - No it isn't
Ratts good - Ratts no good
Good recruiting - bad recruiting
Club improving - Club not improving.
Injuries have hurt us - Injuries should have no effect.
5 years is enough - 5 years is just getting started from where the club was at.

For every set of facts and statistical analysis there is an opposite set put up by someone else.

About 10 more sleeps and maybe the $64 question will be answered. It will have no affect on TC because the black/whites, for/against, yay/nay will just move on to another 'dead horse' thread full of chest beating, overblown opinions and pseudo facts.

Count me in and see you there :thumbsup:

Go Blues.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:23 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16770
Location: Melbourne
club29 wrote:
Good points braithy. Not sure why you bother though. They dont want to hear.

The fines also had a massive effect on the playing culture. Stevens fev witty and houla were left to show the way to the high draft picks coming though the door and I am sure we all agree that is not the way forward.

There are loads of reasons the team ratts took over was a basket case. He did a great job to get us into finals while clubs in similar boats at the time are still struggling.


Another few points that have been forgotten is the Elliot financial legacy.

After black Friday and the eventual overthrow of Elliot the Club was on its knees and almost insolvent. The Board was close to handing the keys back to the AFL. The money bin was empty. I know this for a fact because I started in 2004 and WH was basically doing it all on his own because the club had no money to pay anyone else. They couldn't hire any decent staff to support the players because they couldn't pay what the other Clubs were offering.

It was a big, big spiral down and that was obviously on the back of Black Friday so it was all a double whammy.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:28 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 10:23 am
Posts: 284
Location: HOBART
ThePsychologist wrote:
Moshe. You know by now that smart analysis and a good thought process means nothing on TC!

That is correct because ,95 % of the posts are opinions, and the other 5% that post are irrelavent like your good self,pretend to know allot but know nothing.
How many times has teener ballerina and others been asked to give alternatives to rotten ,and yet they cannot with all their fictious contacts. Phhhh,and we dismiss Parkin and walls because they are not up with the modern game,but you and the ballerina are up with the modern game.the board is split because they are up with the modern game.
Give us an alternative to rotten,and let me tell you allot of supporters are 50/50 on rotten,but you are up with the modern game,but Parkin and walls are not,,,well supporters that I know have more faith in those 2 than you


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:30 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
spider wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Moshe. You know by now that smart analysis and a good thought process means nothing on TC!

That is correct because ,95 % of the posts are opinions, and the other 5% that post are irrelavent like your good self,pretend to know allot but know nothing.
How many times has teener ballerina and others been asked to give alternatives to rotten ,and yet they cannot with all their fictious contacts. Phhhh,and we dismiss Parkin and walls because they are not up with the modern game,but you and the ballerina are up with the modern game.the board is split because they are up with the modern game.
Give us an alternative to rotten,and let me tell you allot of supporters are 50/50 on rotten,but you are up with the modern game,but Parkin and walls are not,,,well supporters that I know have more faith in those 2 than you


WOW :yikes:

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:32 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Cazzesman wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Moshe. You know by now that smart analysis and a good thought process means nothing on TC!


Now, now Psycho. Your catch phrase is - 'Don't get personal'. So don't.

Everything is either black or white on TC these days.

Yes it is - No it isn't
Ratts good - Ratts no good
Good recruiting - bad recruiting
Club improving - Club not improving.
Injuries have hurt us - Injuries should have no effect.
5 years is enough - 5 years is just getting started from where the club was at.

For every set of facts and statistical analysis there is an opposite set put up by someone else.

About 10 more sleeps and maybe the $64 question will be answered. It will have no affect on TC because the black/whites, for/against, yay/nay will just move on to another 'dead horse' thread full of chest beating, overblown opinions and pseudo facts.

Count me in and see you there :thumbsup:

Go Blues.

Regards Cazzesman


Agree. I just sit back and watch now. Makes interesting reading from that angle.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:20 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 8:41 pm
Posts: 2385
ThePsychologist wrote:
spider wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Moshe. You know by now that smart analysis and a good thought process means nothing on TC!

That is correct because ,95 % of the posts are opinions, and the other 5% that post are irrelavent like your good self,pretend to know allot but know nothing.
How many times has teener ballerina and others been asked to give alternatives to rotten ,and yet they cannot with all their fictious contacts. Phhhh,and we dismiss Parkin and walls because they are not up with the modern game,but you and the ballerina are up with the modern game.the board is split because they are up with the modern game.
Give us an alternative to rotten,and let me tell you allot of supporters are 50/50 on rotten,but you are up with the modern game,but Parkin and walls are not,,,well supporters that I know have more faith in those 2 than you


WOW :yikes:

I reckon Spider's happy hour began at 3pm


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:21 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
So is malthouse coaching us next year, or what?

Isn't that what the thread is about?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:26 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 8:41 pm
Posts: 2385
Punter22 wrote:
So is malthouse coaching us next year, or what?

Isn't that what the thread is about?

I suggest you go to this thread

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=31970

and read on.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:35 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48542
Location: Prison Island
i heard today this is dead in the water

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:35 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 10:23 am
Posts: 284
Location: HOBART
WOW :yikes:[/quote]
I reckon Spider's happy hour began at 3pm[/quote]R
Yesterday :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2166 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 ... 109  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Blue Monday, kem and 97 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group