Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 15, 2025 2:54 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 389 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 20  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 5:08 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:06 pm
Posts: 3995
Location: Steven Seagal's Martial Arts Academy
Humpers wrote:
I was surprised that Gibbs wasn't pushed forward in the 2nd half when it was clear that he wasn't having much effect down back and we badly needed his polish and composure in front of goal.
Regardless we were never going to win today with the complacency / lack of intensity shown.
This match reminded me of the Western Bulldogs game last year where we were very flat.


Spot on.
Gibbs was used poorly I thought.


Even with the crap intensity, I thought we battled well enough in the midfield to make a game of it despite losing Carazzo.

The reason we lost today was not being switched on - no confidence, indecision, panic entering the 50.

We can only hope it was a one-off, but having injuries going to Freo is not good.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 5:08 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 5:02 pm
Posts: 1649
The sky didn't fall. We move on and focus on next week. The season is a marathon not a sprint.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 5:10 pm 
Offline
formerly Virgin Blue

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:40 am
Posts: 1628
Humpers wrote:
I was surprised that Gibbs wasn't pushed forward in the 2nd half when it was clear that he wasn't having much effect down back and we badly needed his polish and composure in front of goal.
Regardless we were never going to win today with the complacency / lack of intensity shown.
This match reminded me of the Western Bulldogs game last year where we were very flat.

Agreed we needed his polish up fwd but the move was never made
Missed Army today


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 5:10 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:50 am
Posts: 3188
Location: Whistler
Very disappointed that after talking the talk all week, they didn't walk the walk. Team work? Intensity? Defensive pressure? Working for each other? Four quarters?

Players showed they have still learned nothing over the last 5 years. Bombers gave a lesson in how to play with heart.

Weak insipid performance from players and the lack of reaction to the extra man on the ball early on from the coaching staff.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 5:15 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8201
Sydney Blue wrote:
jim wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
We cant seem to be able to win blocks of games - we get to three in a row and fall over we have been doing it for the last 2 years

If we are going to push for a flag we need to be able to string 5 -6 games in a row


we now go to perth with no carrots curnow yarran and most likely laidler


With McLean that could be 5 changes next week. A pain in the butt but we can cover that ok.

It was more about "want" and "intensity" today.



I would drop Jamo on his performance today more than I would drop Maclean

Mind you there is hardly a player who could hold his head up today


Tipping that won't happen. Jammo has a few credits in the bank. Thornton needs to come in to provide and extra marking option forward. Can't rely on ruckman going forward and kicking goals all the time leaving just Waite as our main KP player up there. Worse when Waite couldn't hit the side of a barn door from point blank range. Plus it's much better than swinging Bower back and forth, who has no idea how to play forward. With Laider possibly out Bower will need to stay in defence next week anyway. Wouldn't be rushing Walker back. Let him get match conditioning first.

Not that much would've matter today


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 5:16 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8161
Sugarcane wrote:
Stefchook wrote:
Sugarcane wrote:
When your seven goals down why do you let the other team have an extra man in defense?


Because if you keep matching them up, then they put another one back. And our forward line gets more and more crowded. And their forward line gets more and more open. Nearly all their goals came on the fast break out of defence into an open forward line. A number of them 'over the back'. I know we had to go offensive late in the game to give us a chance, but if we set up like that, teams are going to find it a lot easier to score against us, than we do against them.

We've struggled against flooding teams for a while. And after today, we're going to get a lot more of it. Need to play with a lot more skill and calmness and precision going forward. And not overattack. Leave a defensive wall, so teams don't simply kick it over our defence or slice through all the open space.

It would stop at 7 or 8 max
We had no chance the way it panned out kicking under pressure to Fletcher


What makes you think that? At the start of the last quarter it was something like 3 on 2 in their forward line versus 9 on 8 in our forward line. The loose player further up the ground should mean that we're not kicking the ball into the forward line under much pressure.

I don't know if we were saving it up for an occasion where it actually mattered a little more, but we should obviously have matched Fletcher up with Robbo in a tight tag. The real issue is not so much the extra numbers, which you get in most games these days, but who you leave free.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 5:20 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:18 pm
Posts: 296
Location: Outside Demetriou's Office - shhh!
Thanks for making my week an average one blues. Expected a harder effort than that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 5:22 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
cimm1979 wrote:
Has anyone used the "training load" defence yet?

Flat as pancakes.

Supposed to win by 60 and lost by 30. Does this put us behind Port, North and the GC.?

Don't want to hear excuses that was shit, thanks for !@#$%& all.


Training load defence is usually my area cimm. Not sure i could write it up today unless they thought we would get through today after a tough week on the track, will most likely lose to freo anyway, will get passed GWS and then we would be set for a good lump of wins. leaving us with something like 8-1. Not too crazy a plan really if they did go that way. If they did it backfired.

We didnt look good though. Very tired and lazy effort.

Id say the bombers second half last week was heavy training load influenced.

I have my theories with training loads and believe most teams (not so much the bottom ones) look at the fixture and time their peaks and troughs to get the best result at the end of the season. I am studying it closely this year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 5:27 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8161
Laguna wrote:
Thanks for making my week an average one blues. Expected a harder effort than that


I'll be vaguely over it in a couple of days. It's the 'ruining my weekend' that I object to.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 5:33 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35876
Location: Half back flank
Credit to the Dons but overall I thought it was a terrible game. During the 3rd qtr some of the stuff ups from both teams were just dreadful.

They had us worked out pretty well though, crowded the stoppages much more than the Pies did. We just couldn't get much clean ball, & when we did we stuffed it up. Watson & Stanton just murdered us (galling about the latter who I don't rate). I thought we were overrated by the win over Coll (but still expected to win comfortably).

Duigan looked very out of sorts to me. Waite was perplexing, marked well but just couldn't buy a goal. Having said that Crameri missed some easy ones for them so we can't use bad kicking as an excuse.

After having our depth talked up all week it'll be tested now. Let's hope Laidler's knee isn't too bad. If it is it's another classic Carlton medical staff move :sad:

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 5:51 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:26 am
Posts: 934
Only saw the last quarter at the pub as it was not shown on TV in Adelaide and I don't have Foxtel, but it looked like we were having a go, which probably didn't happen in the first three quarters. I am always anxious when we go into a game as raging favourites. Despite Ratten's assertion during the week that we are now mature enough to get over the hype - clearly we are not. Injuries are no excuse - Essendon* had plenty out, although we lost a few during the game. The same thing happened to them last year against us. Hopefully the injuries are not long term as our depth is pretty slim at present from all reports.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 6:07 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 4:57 pm
Posts: 151
Ruthless is not a term we can use for carlton yet its a shame im hoping we learn from today and realize if your off your game you will lose,
even to the lowest of low like today.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 6:08 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 11:57 am
Posts: 154
Back from the game, what a poor display.

Seemed everything that could go wrong did go wrong - but it all seemed to start in the centre square and around the clearances. We were just carved up.

Worst 3 quarters I have seen in a while, my little bloke was shattered watching that crap, at least a bit more respectable in the last.

Was amazing how many goals they scored on the rebound in to an open forward 50. Something majorly wrong tactically there. When we got it on the rebound we didn't score. Hopefully learnt something from that.

There forwards took us to the cleaners even without Hurley doing anything much.

Unfortunately I was impressed with their ball use.

Will be interesting to see what we dish up next week....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 6:22 pm 
Offline
Laurie Kerr

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 144
Carlton FC ‏ @Carlton_FC
INJURY NEWS: Andrew Carrazzo sustained a fractured shoulder blade in today's match at the MCG. He is expected to miss 6-8 weeks. #IAMCARLTON


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 6:26 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
Incredibly disappointing, that's three years in a row that we have gone in favourite in April ag the Dons and three times we have failed to win. This was by far the worst. I said after last week that the Pies game said as much about our weaknesses as our strengths and when we didn't utterly dominate the centre square, in fact were beaten there, our lack of tall forwards showed up as did our weaknesses in defence. Judd and Murph tried, points to Laidler for showing a lot of guts. Hendo battled hard, Betts kicked goals but didn't get much else of the ball and ag missed an easy set shot - he misses too many for a guy with his skill. Our coach needs to instill a fair bit more intent in the team, dropping this game to an inferior side undoes our great game last week, and really we have beaten a quarter strength disinterested Pies and two easybeats, how much have we improved? Terribly soft marking effort by Lucas in third, Brock tried hard but looks about the slowest player in the League. It was arrogance to select him when we lost a quick player. If we genuinely thought he was worth a game today he should be worth one next week, let's see what we do. Duigan looked slow. Love Robbo's courage but is he instructed to kick blind mongrel punts to Essendon* players or did he think that up himself? I actually thought Waite worked hard today but we badly need another tall forward. Walks will come back in but is a medium. When we are throwing Jammo and Laidler forward it says something.

Hated sitting at the G watching us be laughed at, but we were laughable today. Maybe we actually thought we were premiership favourites. Should beat Freeo, they have two or three quality players and a team of battlers, but they do have a really good coach who gets the team to be greater than the sum of their parts. Clearly we weren't that today. We need to be next week and for every week after that. Enough with treading water, when is the great leap forward?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 6:26 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 2:06 pm
Posts: 1098
Very disappointing, we were not switched on and were as flat as pancakes. Essendon* did to us what we did to Collingwood last week. Too many feel good stories during the week about us. A huge reality check.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 6:27 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Stefchook wrote:
Sugarcane wrote:
When your seven goals down why do you let the other team have an extra man in defense?


Because if you keep matching them up, then they put another one back. And our forward line gets more and more crowded. And their forward line gets more and more open. Nearly all their goals came on the fast break out of defence into an open forward line. A number of them 'over the back'. I know we had to go offensive late in the game to give us a chance, but if we set up like that, teams are going to find it a lot easier to score against us, than we do against them.

We've struggled against flooding teams for a while. And after today, we're going to get a lot more of it. Need to play with a lot more skill and calmness and precision going forward. And not overattack. Leave a defensive wall, so teams don't simply kick it over our defence or slice through all the open space.

Sadly, I've been saying this for two years. We play a game style where we need to overwhelm the opposition in order to win well.

There's been managers of Real Madrid who have been sacked for bringing that 'overload' philosophy, so I don't see why the club feels encouraged to continue with this iteration of the forward press.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 6:28 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:15 am
Posts: 3175
Location: The Wild West
JBK wrote:
Carlton FC ‏ @Carlton_FC
INJURY NEWS: Andrew Carrazzo sustained a fractured shoulder blade in today's match at the MCG. He is expected to miss 6-8 weeks. #IAMCARLTON


Flower me!!

:mad:

_________________
"If everyone is moving forward together, then success takes care of itself" - Henry Ford


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 6:29 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
Tripple post, I am getting stressed about the loss


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 6:33 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 7:36 pm
Posts: 323
Location: WAGGA WAGGA
AJ should have played mc did not put much thought into their small forwards our backs looked slowish today


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 389 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 20  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group