Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 6:37 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Keep 'em all.
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:13 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7357
Big strong sides,with big strong ruckmen win flags.How lucky are we,with an abundance of that rare commoditie.Four really good ruckmen on the same list.Each with differant qualities that compliment each other.Non of these guys have reached anything like there true potential yet.I want them to reach there potential under the Carlton umbrella.The time may come when we may trade,but not now.Fantastic work by match commitee,recruiters,and there development coach Matty Capuano. Now who would give away a rare gem,unless for top dollar.Come trade time,there will be a frenzy for one of these guys................i tell you what i would do.In the words of that famous whatshername French Queen,i would tell them to eat cake..................if you reckon the suiters are desperate now,wait till this time next year,they will be in a frenzy.Dont listen to all the urgers and coat pullers,hold off for another 12 months.If we must trade,trade at the right time and to a desperate buyer to get the best return.

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keep 'em all.
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:25 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 4945
I agree Mickstar - in hindsight we should have signed up Jacobs last year so at least we would be in a better bargaining position right now.
In my opinion our premiership window opens next year so a quality key defender would be fantastic - however I doubt Jacobs alone would be enough to get one as they are a rare commodity (just ask Hawks supporters).
At this stage I'm expecting top 4 next year with the only teams better placed being Hawthorn, Western Bulldogs and Collingwood. Saying that I'm not sure if Collingwood have the quality/class to overcome the hangover should they win the flag this year.

_________________
There is no footy god


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keep 'em all.
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:28 pm 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
But we only have 3 big strong ruckman and an athletic one.


ducking for cover


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keep 'em all.
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:31 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:37 am
Posts: 770
Gee Jacobs game on Sunday was awesome. He was fantastic. Keep em all


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keep 'em all.
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:32 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
It's very simple. Any week we're gonna have an AFL quality ruckman playing VFL when we have clear deficiencies that astute trading could rectify.

So either way our senior team will be missing a quality ruckman. Do you want that to be with or without a solid KPP?

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keep 'em all.
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 9:18 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 11:48 am
Posts: 2891
Trade one and draft another. It's the circle of life.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keep 'em all.
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 9:29 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:36 pm
Posts: 2646
Location: Melbourne
:mad: BUT there is potential for Hampson and/or Warnock to play in the forward line!!
If we trade one of them, or the gold coast take one... then we better get something worth while.
We have potential within our club right now, I would prefer us to work on that than to simply get rid of them just because we have too many.

I am sick of the amount of people still whinging that there is a whole in our forward line... but yet they want to get rid of guys who could potentially do damage down there!!??

_________________
GO BLUE BOYS!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keep 'em all.
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:35 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 8:33 pm
Posts: 4079
Location: The corner of BumF*** and YouGotAPrettyMouth
nightcrawler wrote:
Trade one and draft another. It's the circle of life.



This.

_________________
R A D I C A L B R O T H E R S

Inspired by the One-Minute Sculptures of Erwin Wurm

"All in all is all we are..."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keep 'em all.
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:06 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18030
They're all AFL quality but at all times at least one and probably two will be running around in the VFL. Situations like that build resentment and frustration.
We have to expect that the players themselves may be looking for opportunities elsewhere.

If we get a red hot offer and the player wants to go, let it happen.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keep 'em all.
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:19 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 3508
Location: Under Whelmed
When you're in a negotiating position of power though, it has to be a RED hot offer, otherwise we're dumb not to keep them all. Just because its trade week doesn't mean you have to trade for trading's sake.

_________________
This might sound extreme in the context of alleged sexual assault, drunken violence and a drug trafficking charge...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keep 'em all.
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:34 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
It is common sense to use any surplus to reqiurements on your list to address defeciencies.
Easier said than done as we have seen in trade weeks gone by.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keep 'em all.
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:56 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
Like BV said it's not just about what we want but what the players wants. If you're playing an AFL standard ruckman in the VFL do you really think they would want to stay?

Hampson went backwards this year because he didn't get a good run in the seniors like last season. Okay he's a great back up for us but having Kreuzer, Jacobs and Warnock actually hindered his development. I'd love to keep them all as well but the fact is with other clubs in need of rucks sniffing they're not all going to want to stay.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keep 'em all.
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 9:27 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Donstuie wrote:
It's very simple. Any week we're gonna have an AFL quality ruckman playing VFL when we have clear deficiencies that astute trading could rectify.

So either way our senior team will be missing a quality ruckman. Do you want that to be with or without a solid KPP?


..agreed, but for next year at least we can't expect krooz to carry too much ruck duty.. ..so really, it's 2 rucks and one in the vfl..jacobs and knockers in front of hammer now.. ..hammer can still use time to develop..so, he devlopes in vfland is depth in case of injury/form for other two..all 4 rucks are very young/inexperienced.. ..so, aside from krooz pre-injury.. ..up until now none of the other 3 have looked like holding down a ruck spot all season.. ..still young enough to come in and out of the side i reckon..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keep 'em all.
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 4:52 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 9:42 pm
Posts: 2909
Location: dudley!!!
Mickstar wrote:
Big strong sides,with big strong ruckmen win flags.How lucky are we,with an abundance of that rare commoditie.Four really good ruckmen on the same list.Each with differant qualities that compliment each other.Non of these guys have reached anything like there true potential yet.I want them to reach there potential under the Carlton umbrella.The time may come when we may trade,but not now.Fantastic work by match commitee,recruiters,and there development coach Matty Capuano. Now who would give away a rare gem,unless for top dollar.Come trade time,there will be a frenzy for one of these guys................i tell you what i would do.In the words of that famous whatshername French Queen,i would tell them to eat cake..................if you reckon the suiters are desperate now,wait till this time next year,they will be in a frenzy.Dont listen to all the urgers and coat pullers,hold off for another 12 months.If we must trade,trade at the right time and to a desperate buyer to get the best return.


amen to that!!!!!

_________________
my last one was rubbish


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keep 'em all.
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 5:22 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2864
There is another consideration. At the moment, both Jacobs and Hampson have currency, because both have played seniors this year and at time shown something.

Hypothetically, what if next year Krezuer plays full forward, and Jacobs and Warnock play ruck, and Hampson languishes in the seconds all year? He then has no currency for trade (and is out of contract, so could walk). Similarly, if Warnock and Kreuzer play ruck, Jacobs plays seconds (Hampson may be in and out as a forward) and has less currency.

Assuming Kreuzer and Warnock play most games next year, the number 4 ruckman may lose the currency he now has.

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keep 'em all.
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 5:55 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16960
Location: Melbourne
http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx

CFC makes offer to Big Red

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keep 'em all.
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 6:00 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7357
Siegfried wrote:
There is another consideration. At the moment, both Jacobs and Hampson have currency, because both have played seniors this year and at time shown something.

Hypothetically, what if next year Krezuer plays full forward, and Jacobs and Warnock play ruck, and Hampson languishes in the seconds all year? He then has no currency for trade (and is out of contract, so could walk). Similarly, if Warnock and Kreuzer play ruck, Jacobs plays seconds (Hampson may be in and out as a forward) and has less currency.

Assuming Kreuzer and Warnock play most games next year, the number 4 ruckman may lose the currency he now has.


Thats a reasoble view Siggy..................but i cant see Kruez coming back 100 %.Reckon they will ease him in slowly as a forward.I know,they tried it with very little success,but i reckon they will give it another crack..................and im bettin there will be an injury here and there and you wont have all fit and firing together.It always happens.Someone always goes down................and i will bet my left you know what there currency wont go down.Guys 200 cm plus dont grow on trees.Even if they are mediocre,and ours arent' mediocre,they dont lose currency purely on there size alone.Those four guys are GOLD at the moment.Reckon the suiters are desperate now,just wait till this time next year,it will be a feeding frenzy.Good poker players know when to hold.

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keep 'em all.
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 6:44 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 10:20 am
Posts: 397
Location: Melbourne
Sam would want a career path and the club that can offer him that will be where he goes, you couldn’t see him arguing over a few thousand $$.

If we are committed to him lets give him a 3-4 year deal so he can settle in for the long term and no doubt he will continue to develop with us.

How does he stack up against this lot of Carlton ruckmen…..

Cain Ackland
Dylan McLaren
Chris Bryan
Ricky Mott
Adrian Deluca
Mark Porter
Barnaby French

Pretty simple isn’t it….....

Dear List Manager,.......please get this decision right!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keep 'em all.
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:08 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 6:23 am
Posts: 1697
Location: Smorgyland Village North Carlton
Jacobs for Trengrove?

_________________
Green Shooter


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Keep 'em all.
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:18 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
Most would love to keep them all however in order to do so, you have to be able to keep all 4 ruckmen happy. If I were jacobs, I wouldnt be happy with the current situation.

Jacobs has been the best ruckman on our list for the past 2 yrs yet was consistently considered 4th choice and would lose his spot in the team any time one of the others showed a bit of form. If the situation remained the same, there would be no reason why he'd stay when he clearly deserves a first 22 spot in a team somewhere.

So we are left with 2 options - to either trade jacobs to another club or to trade one of our other ruckmen. Either way its going to be about jacobs getting a real opportunity to establish his AFL career rather than the club or supporters wanting to get rid of him.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DesEnglish and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group