Teddy Hopkins wrote:
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
Teddy Hopkins wrote:
But without Fev are we back to square one with the game plan? We shouldn't be as the players are fitter, older, more experienced, and should be able to pick up new plays more quickly. That's if there are any. Let's hope so. No one is arguing that Ratts was a gun player but will he turn out a gun coach.

New plays? I'll settle for less predictability. Playing against teams with good defences - you knew that they were going to sit someone in front of Fevola, force a hurried entry into the forward line and flood back quickly to fill in the holes, then when turnover occurs - move out of their zones in multiple numbers to move the ball down quickly into their own forward line. Collingwood and St.Kilda games probably the better example from last year.
We need to have every player on the same page. Some didn't execute their roles well last year. Either that's lack of repetitive drilling by the coaching staff at training, poor understanding/delivery by both coach and/or player when doing video review or simply lack of footy smarts or discipline by the player.
It's not enough to play 'keepings off' at training. Players need to know where to move, what their role is and how to think and act quickly. If they're slow on the uptake - then it's repeat, repeat, repeat until they get it right. It's little wonder Bret Thornton throws his head back and fires off filthy looks at teammates. He gets it. I reckon most of the back 6 get it...a little over half of the midfielders get it (although some in numbers under 11 are slow to react...and we don't really know if the forward line gets it. I think given that CHF position each week and told to play like Riewoldt (which is what Worsfold tells JK), Henderson will get it...it's the ones around him I'm a little concerned about.
Doc, I agree totally. It starts with the forward line and opposition kick ins from defence. How often have you seen the ball taken the virtual length of the field for the opposition to score? Where is our zone. I don't know where you sit but where I am fellow supporters are ready to jump from the third level of the MCG after they have seen the same thing for the umpteenth time. If we can see it, what is the coach doing about it?
And if our midfield is as good as any in the competition and I say it is with the addition of McLean and an injury free Hadley what are we doing chipping it around wide instead of going down the corridor? If you want the midfielders to kick goals have them shooting from in front not from the pocket. Makes sense doesn't it?
Our spine this year could be great. Starting from fullback - Jamison, Bower, McLean/Gibbs, Henderson, O'hAilpin/Waite.
Again, why stuff around the flanks?
Why not base the gameplan on winning rather than trying not to lose. That would be a novel idea, woudn't it.

I agree with some of your post Teddy, but not all of it. I agree that at times our defensive structures including the zone weren't that great, but especially with the zone, all it needs is one bloke to doze off and it is rendered ineffective, especially against the better skilled teams.
Where I disagree is about the corridor and scoring to a degree. We were a top 4 team offensively last season (that will probably change without Fev) but mid pack defensively. The top 4 from last season were a nice contrast. Two had a preference for the wings, two through the middle neither exclusively though. Importantly to me though they were generally having shots at goal from similar positions(although the pies weren't early in the season)
So as you rightly point out it is much better to shoot from in front than the flanks (I think we shot from the flanks more than any other team last season) but I think that was more to do with an unwillingness to share once inside fifty as for example Johnson and Mooney do for Geelong rather than how we brought it down the ground (we'll leave out skill for the purpose of this

). Undoubtedly going through the middle does open up more areas, but there are a few cons as well. That though is the big debate, but for me considering our defensive record I didn't mind the defensive option. Without Fev there we may not be as easy to rebound against so once we workout our forwardline things may change. It will be interesting to see how it unfolds.