Synbad wrote:
Until Campo becomes a player that can spark when were down by 5 goals .. to me he will always be a downhill skiier.
approaching 30 and still hasnt been able to do it.
He is never a great player in a side thats down.
However when we win he looks fantastic.
There's certainly some truth in what you say, Sybad. But you might also say that when Campo plays well we do well, and not just the other way round. The reality is we don't have a lot of players with high levels of class and skill. And so when they contribute strongly, we tend to do well. And when they don't, we tend to struggle.
I also agree that as an outside player, it's always a little harder to turn the tide. Although with his increased tackling and defensive pressure in recent years, he plays inside much better than he used to. When compared with any of our other inside players (besides Kouta), he compares reasonably well. (Which probably highlights an area where we struggle quite a bit!)
Regarding yesterday's performance, I'm not sure how much you can draw out of Campo's game. Like he did a bit in the Wizard Cup, they were trying to play him down back in a loose sweeping, rebounding role. But unfortunately, the Kangaroos seemed to prepare fairly well to combat this strategy. And they placed a heavy tag on him. And realistically, Campo is always going to struggle when playing in defence, with a top tagger sitting in his pocket. I think we could have reacted a bit quicker, and either got him up forward much earlier in the game (I think I saw him make a brief appearance up there late in the game), or else into the midfield proper. At least that way, Campo would have had a better chance of winning some ball. And hopefully, it would have forced one of their ball-winning midfielders out of the mix.
In many ways, the Campo issue is one and the same as the Stevens and Lappin issue. Our results will depend a fair bit on how effectively we can free them up, or get them into dangerous positions.