TalkingCarlton :: View topic - Carlton v Sydney (over 25's)

How is Heath Scotland a struggler? i'd take him over fosdike any day

Kirk, Brett 123 29

...

Saddington, J 142 26

Saddington, J 142 26

This is a comparison of Carlton and Sydneys 25+ players. I've put in bold the senior players who are the reason we are down the bottom. Discounting those strugglers we have 5 decent 25+ players to Sydneys 12.

Sydneys Players are not much better on paper they just have a better coach

I put Saddington in cause he is a Sydney reject, he may come good time will tell.

Come on Sydney, I'm no Pagan fan either but they guys I put in bold don't make Sydneys squad let alone team.

Sydney Williams, Paul 294 32
Kirk, Brett 123 29
Hall, Barry 179 28
O'Loughlin, M 222 28
Barry, Leo 171 28
Crouch, J 182 27
Mathews, B 159 27
Goodes, A 161 25
Fosdike, Nic 116 25
Bolton, Jude 139 25
Davis, Nick 130 25
Bolton, Craig 103 25

Carlton Koutoufides, A 249 32
French, B 113 30
Lappin, M 214 29
McGrath, C 59 26
Longmuir, T 82 26
Whitnall, L 179 26
Saddington, J 142 26
Chambers, C 64 26
Stevens, N 169 26
Scotland, H 94 25
Prendergast, I 62 25

This is a comparison of Carlton and Sydneys 25+ players. I've put in bold the senior players who are the reason we are down the bottom. Discounting those strugglers we have 5 decent 25+ players to Sydneys 12.

TheGame wrote:

Nonsensical post.
Whya are you comparing us to Sydney???...silly really but anyway....or the exercise ..

Why not compare us to the Bulldogs??

Synbad wrote:

TheGame wrote:

Nonsensical post.
Whya are you comparing us to Sydney???...silly really but anyway....or the exercise ..

Why not compare us to the Bulldogs??

He should write a post comparing Denis Pagan to Alf Stewart from Home and Away, or our squad to a small Amazonian rodent.

Agree... nonsensical point

The Tyrant wrote:

Synbad wrote:

TheGame wrote:

Nonsensical post.
Whya are you comparing us to Sydney???...silly really but anyway....or the exercise ..

Why not compare us to the Bulldogs??

He should write a post comparing Denis Pagan to Alf Stewart from Home and Away, or our squad to a small Amazonian rodent.

Agree... nonsensical point

LMAO you of all people telling me I speak nonsense.

Carlton vs Sydney?

It's no contest - CARLTON BY A MILE.

In Carlton they're called potato cakes

In Sydney they're called potato sc*llops

CARLTON BY THE LENGTH OF THE STREET

Lock the thread now mods - she's all over.

Author:	TheGame [ Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:30 pm ]
Post subject:	Carlton v Sydney (over 25's)
Sydney Williams, Paul 294 32 Kirk, Brett 123 29 Hall, Barry 179 28 O'Loughlin, M 222 28 Barry, Leo 171 28 Crouch, J 182 27 Mathews, B 159 27 Goodes, A 161 25 Fosdike, Nic 116 25 Bolton, Jude 139 25 Davis, Nick 130 25 Bolton, Craig 103 25 Carlton Koutoufides, A 249 32 French, B 113 30 Lappin, M 214 29 McGrath, C 59 26 Longmuir, T 82 26 Whitnall, L 179 26 Saddington, J 142 26 Chambers, C 64 26 Stevens, N 169 26 Scotland, H 94 25 Prendergast, I 62 25 This is a comparison of Carlton and Sydneys 25+ players. I've put in bold the senior players who are the reason we are down the bottom. Discounting those strugglers we have 5 decent 25+ players to Sydneys 12.

Author:	blu944 [ Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:40 pm ]
Post subject:
How is Heath Scotland a struggler? i'd take him over fosdike any day

Author:	TheGame [ Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:45 pm ]
Post subject:
blu944 wrote: How is Heath Scotland a struggler? i'd take him over fosdike any day He came good at the end of the year but he has been inconsistent and was dropped. He is the best out of the bolds. Seriously though Kouta and Lance get a pasting here and look at what they have around them compared to the Sydney senior group.

Author:	thehalford [ Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:48 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Carlton v Sydney (over 25's)
TheGame wrote: Kirk, Brett 123 29 ... Saddington, J 142 26 Didn't think Kirk was that old. And putting Saddington as one of our problems when he a) hasn't played a game for Carlton, and b) would have been in SYDNEY'S list had he not been traded is a little harsh. The rest I pretty much agree with.

Author:	Ryan8024 [ Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:49 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Carlton v Sydney (over 25's)
TheGame wrote: Saddington, J 142 26 This is a comparison of Carlton and Sydneys 25+ players. I've put in bold the senior players who are the reason we are down the bottom. Discounting those strugglers we have 5 decent 25+ players to Sydneys 12. Bit harsh considering Saddington is not only yet to play a game, but would've been Sydney's 13th decent senior player over 25 in 2006, had we not traded for him. Btw, claiming those other players "reasons we are down the bottom" is clutching at straws, at best. Not to mention that only one of them has been with the club for more than a couple of years.

TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/

Carlton v Sydney (over 25's) http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7496	Page 1 of 5

Author:	TheGame [ Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:54 pm ]
Post subject:
I put Saddington in cause he is a Sydney reject, he may come good time will tell. Either way nitpicking aside look at the two lists and then tell me Kouta is the problem. Tell me Lance is the problem. You can blame Kouta till the sun comes up but the older players around him are right there for all to see.

Author:	Sydney Blue [ Tue Jan 03, 2006 2:00 pm ]
Post subject:
Sydneys Players are not much better on paper they just have a better coach

Author:	TheGame [ Tue Jan 03, 2006 2:26 pm ]
Post subject:
Sydney Blue wrote: Sydneys Players are not much better on paper they just have a better coach Come on Sydney, I'm no Pagan fan either but they guys I put in bold don't make Sydneys squad let alone team.

Author:	Kouta [ Tue Jan 03, 2006 2:35 pm ]
Post subject:
TheGame wrote: I put Saddington in cause he is a Sydney reject, he may come good time will tell. Richards and Chambers are also rejects but the Swans view them as players who can win them another flag. We can't afford to finish last again and playing Teague on Stafford again will win us another spoon. TheGame wrote: Come on Sydney, I'm no Pagan fan either but they guys I put in bold don't make Sydneys squad let alone team. Saddington did on 7 occasions last year and I wouldn't rate Spriggs (25 in 23 days) who should be on that list as a better footballer than David Clarke.

Author:	The Tyrant [ Tue Jan 03, 2006 3:06 pm ]
Post subject:
I think he's trying to make the point that Sydney are more likely to win the premiership this season with their squad than we are. Gee, thats a shocker.... I thought we were dead certs for it.....

Author:	Synbad [ Tue Jan 03, 2006 3:13 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Carlton v Sydney (over 25's)
TheGame wrote: Sydney Williams, Paul 294 32 Kirk, Brett 123 29 Hall, Barry 179 28 O'Loughlin, M 222 28 Barry, Leo 171 28 Crouch, J 182 27 Mathews, B 159 27 Goodes, A 161 25 Fosdike, Nic 116 25 Bolton, Jude 139 25 Davis, Nick 130 25 Bolton, Craig 103 25 Carlton Koutoufides, A 249 32 French, B 113 30 Lappin, M 214 29 McGrath, C 59 26 Longmuir, T 82 26 Whitnall, L 179 26 Saddington, J 142 26 Chambers, C 64 26 Stevens, N 169 26 Scotland, H 94 25 Prendergast, I 62 25 This is a comparison of Carlton and Sydneys 25+ players. I've put in bold the senior players who are the reason we are down the bottom. Discounting those strugglers we have 5 decent 25+ players to Sydneys 12. Nonsensical post. Whya are you comparing us to Sydney???...silly really but anyway....or the exercise .. Why not compare us to the Bulldogs??

Author:	The Tyrant [ Tue Jan 03, 2006 3:17 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Carlton v Sydney (over 25's)
Synbad wrote: TheGame wrote: Sydney Williams, Paul 294 32 Kirk, Brett 123 29 Hall, Barry 179 28 O'Loughlin, M 222 28 Barry, Leo 171 28 Crouch, J 182 27 Mathews, B 159 27 Goodes, A 161 25 Fosdike, Nic 116 25 Bolton, Jude 139 25 Davis, Nick 130 25 Bolton, Craig 103 25 Carlton Koutoufides, A 249 32 French, B 113 30 Lappin, M 214 29 McGrath, C 59 26 Longmuir, T 82 26 Whitnall, L 179 26 Saddington, J 142 26 Chambers, C 64 26 Stevens, N 169 26 Scotland, H 94 25 Prendergast, I 62 25 This is a comparison of Carlton and Sydneys 25+ players. I've put in bold the senior players who are the reason we are down the bottom. Discounting those strugglers we have 5 decent 25+ players to Sydneys 12. Nonsensical post. Whya are you comparing us to Sydney???...silly really but anyway....or the exercise .. Why not compare us to the Bulldogs?? He should write a post comparing Denis Pagan to Alf Stewart from Home and Away, or our squad to a small Amazonian rodent. Agree... nonsensical point

Author:	Synbad [ Tue Jan 03, 2006 3:20 pm ]
Post subject:
Or we can just cut up a rat.....

Author:	TheBluesMuse [ Tue Jan 03, 2006 4:26 pm ]
Post subject:
Nah don't worry about age, it is TEAM that's the difference right? Afterall what Carlton is lacking is TEAM, you can't win a flag without TEAM and Sydney have TEAM in spades.

Page 1 of 5	All times are UTC + 10 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	Kaptain Kouta [ Tue Jan 03, 2006 5:08 pm ]
Post subject:
Scallops

Author:	TheGame [ Tue Jan 03, 2006 8:20 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Carlton v Sydney (over 25's)
The Tyrant wrote: Synbad wrote: TheGame wrote: Sydney Williams, Paul 294 32 Kirk, Brett 123 29 Hall, Barry 179 28 O'Loughlin, M 222 28 Barry, Leo 171 28 Crouch, J 182 27 Mathews, B 159 27 Goodes, A 161 25 Fosdike, Nic 116 25 Bolton, Jude 139 25 Davis, Nick 130 25 Bolton, Craig 103 25 Carlton Koutoufides, A 249 32 French, B 113 30 Lappin, M 214 29 McGrath, C 59 26 Longmuir, T 82 26 Whitnall, L 179 26 Saddington, J 142 26 Chambers, C 64 26 Stevens, N 169 26 Scotland, H 94 25 Prendergast, I 62 25 This is a comparison of Carlton and Sydneys 25+ players. I've put in bold the senior players who are the reason we are down the bottom. Discounting those strugglers we have 5 decent 25+ players to Sydneys 12. Nonsensical post. Whya are you comparing us to Sydney???...silly really but anyway....or the exercise .. Why not compare us to the Bulldogs?? He should write a post comparing Denis Pagan to Alf Stewart from Home and Away, or our squad to a small Amazonian rodent. Agree... nonsensical point LMAO you of all people telling me I speak nonsense.

Author:	Deano Supremo [ Tue Jan 03, 2006 8:29 pm ]
Post subject:
Carlton vs Sydney? It's no contest - CARLTON BY A MILE. In Carlton they're called potato cakes In Sydney they're called potato sc*llops CARLTON BY THE LENGTH OF THE STREET Lock the thread now mods - she's all over.

Author:	The Tyrant [ Tue Jan 03, 2006 8:58 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Carlton v Sydney (over 25's)
TheGame wrote: The Tyrant wrote: Synbad wrote: TheGame wrote: Sydney Williams, Paul 294 32 Kirk, Brett 123 29 Hall, Barry 179 28 O'Loughlin, M 222 28 Barry, Leo 171 28 Crouch, J 182 27 Mathews, B 159 27 Goodes, A 161 25 Fosdike, Nic 116 25 Bolton, Jude 139 25 Davis, Nick 130 25 Bolton, Craig 103 25 Carlton Koutoufides, A 249 32 French, B 113 30 Lappin, M 214 29 McGrath, C 59 26 Longmuir, T 82 26 Whitnall, L 179 26 Saddington, J 142 26 Chambers, C 64 26 Stevens, N 169 26 Scotland, H 94 25 Prendergast, I 62 25 This is a comparison of Carlton and Sydneys 25+ players. I've put in bold the senior players who are the reason we are down the bottom. Discounting those strugglers we have 5 decent 25+ players to Sydneys 12. Nonsensical post. Whya are you comparing us to Sydney???...silly really but anyway....or the exercise .. Why not compare us to the Bulldogs?? He should write a post comparing Denis Pagan to Alf Stewart from Home and Away, or our squad to a small Amazonian rodent. Agree... nonsensical point LMAO you of all people telling me I speak nonsense. exactly... you should be ashamed. I mean, come on brainiac. Sydney have a much better team than we do. What a surprise!!!! We finished 14 places apart!!! Perhaps your point is that Pagan should invent a spaceship and collect time-altering chronotons from the Tempest nebula and get Walker and Murphy on them, so they can get to 25 sooner? At least I save most of my nonsense for the nonsense forums. I recognise I'm a timeslot hit. I can't wait for the next thread where we list how few crap Sydney players under 25 they have as opposed to ours.

Author:	TheGame [ Tue Jan 03, 2006 9:04 pm ]
Post subject:
This thread was to highlight that our captain is not the reason why we are shite. Tyrant you weren't involved in any of the million discussions over the last week so don't stick your neck in when you don't know what its about.

Author:	Kaptain Kouta [ Tue Jan 03, 2006 9:16 pm ]
Post subject:
Deano Supremo wrote: Carlton vs Sydney? It's no contest - CARLTON BY A MILE. In Carlton they're called potato cakes In Sydney they're called potato sc*llops CARLTON BY THE LENGTH OF THE STREET Lock the thread now mods - she's all over. No, It's the Swans who are ahead of us. Our so-called leadership group are insisting on calling them potato cakes, which is causing confusion in any of the players from outside Victoria. This confusion, and the other players' love for Potato Scallops is causing tension in the team. That's why we are shite at the moment. When the Victorians accept that it's potato scallops, we'll be on our way to our next flag.