Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 29, 2025 5:10 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:28 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
First of all, it's quite clear that Marc Murphy is most definitely leadership material and will most likely captain the club one day. That much is true.

But, out of the rest of our younger kids, who could also be a captain or leader of the club?

Someone like Kade would have to be up there given he has recently been put in to the leadership group. I see him as becoming a vice captain of the club somewhere down the track.

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:30 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 6836
i'd say JK has leadership stamped all over him and though he probably wont captain this club (unless in the absence of murph) he could be a great vice-captain and leader on the field, someone opposition teams fear and has an awe and a presence about him. and like you said i think simmo has got it too and hopefully some fo the players we pick up in this year's draft have it too because all premiership teams have heaps of leaders in their side.

_________________
Last edited by true_blue3 on Mon Sep 26, 1981 5:07 pm; edited 92 times in total


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:43 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 1763
Agree PJ.

Murphy - future captain - like father, like son.
Simpson - VC, as recognised by his peers into the leadership group this year.
Hartlett - haven't seen much of him in terms of air time, but loves the physical side of things by all reports in VFL, and I just reckon he may have a leadership role, so long as he stays injury free.
Fisher - he's well respected by his peers and his committment against adversity with the injuries he's had is a good role model for others.
Waite - see Hartlett, minus the air time bit.

_________________
For some silly reason, you people want to assassinate him, and it's just rubbish. You people. All of you, ALL of you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:45 pm 
Offline
John James
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 3:57 pm
Posts: 691
Location: Who left the hair straighter on?
You need to ad Walker into the mix. He wants to be a leader and that must count for something. He put himself up for the leadership group at the start of he's first or second year

_________________
http://www.benharper.net
http://www.thevascoera.com
http://www.theblackkeys.com
http://www.shihad.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:46 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 6836
Wangers wrote:
Agree PJ.

Murphy - future captain - like father, like son.
Simpson - VC, as recognised by his peers into the leadership group this year.
Hartlett - haven't seen much of him in terms of air time, but loves the physical side of things by all reports in VFL, and I just reckon he may have a leadership role, so long as he stays injury free.
Fisher - he's well respected by his peers and his committment against adversity with the injuries he's had is a good role model for others.
Waite - see Hartlett, minus the air time bit.


you dont reckon JK's got much leadership in him?

_________________
Last edited by true_blue3 on Mon Sep 26, 1981 5:07 pm; edited 92 times in total


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:52 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 1763
true_blue24 wrote:
Wangers wrote:
Agree PJ.

Murphy - future captain - like father, like son.
Simpson - VC, as recognised by his peers into the leadership group this year.
Hartlett - haven't seen much of him in terms of air time, but loves the physical side of things by all reports in VFL, and I just reckon he may have a leadership role, so long as he stays injury free.
Fisher - he's well respected by his peers and his committment against adversity with the injuries he's had is a good role model for others.
Waite - see Hartlett, minus the air time bit.


you dont reckon JK's got much leadership in him?


Quite possibly, but, I believe, you cannot have a team with too many designated leaders. The team dynamic would be outta kilter. However, you do want a team that displays leadership behaviours, individually, without being designated leaders, persay.

_________________
For some silly reason, you people want to assassinate him, and it's just rubbish. You people. All of you, ALL of you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:55 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 6836
Wangers wrote:
true_blue24 wrote:
Wangers wrote:
Agree PJ.

Murphy - future captain - like father, like son.
Simpson - VC, as recognised by his peers into the leadership group this year.
Hartlett - haven't seen much of him in terms of air time, but loves the physical side of things by all reports in VFL, and I just reckon he may have a leadership role, so long as he stays injury free.
Fisher - he's well respected by his peers and his committment against adversity with the injuries he's had is a good role model for others.
Waite - see Hartlett, minus the air time bit.


you dont reckon JK's got much leadership in him?


Quite possibly, but, I believe, you cannot have a team with too many designated leaders. The team dynamic would be outta kilter. However, you do want a team that displays leadership behaviours, individually, without being designated leaders, persay.


yeah i agree with that but i think JK would make a better leader than fisher (not that fisher ahs done anything worng) and possibly more than hartlett, waite and simpson but its still too early we cant just look at a player and say he'll be a better leader than another player, i just think kennedy is the type of player who could physically and mentally let his presence be felt same with hartlett.

_________________
Last edited by true_blue3 on Mon Sep 26, 1981 5:07 pm; edited 92 times in total


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:05 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 1763
true_blue24 wrote:
Wangers wrote:
true_blue24 wrote:
Wangers wrote:
Agree PJ.

Murphy - future captain - like father, like son.
Simpson - VC, as recognised by his peers into the leadership group this year.
Hartlett - haven't seen much of him in terms of air time, but loves the physical side of things by all reports in VFL, and I just reckon he may have a leadership role, so long as he stays injury free.
Fisher - he's well respected by his peers and his committment against adversity with the injuries he's had is a good role model for others.
Waite - see Hartlett, minus the air time bit.


you dont reckon JK's got much leadership in him?


Quite possibly, but, I believe, you cannot have a team with too many designated leaders. The team dynamic would be outta kilter. However, you do want a team that displays leadership behaviours, individually, without being designated leaders, persay.


yeah i agree with that but i think JK would make a better leader than fisher (not that fisher ahs done anything worng) and possibly more than hartlett, waite and simpson but its still too early we cant just look at a player and say he'll be a better leader than another player, i just think kennedy is the type of player who could physically and mentally let his presence be felt same with hartlett.


Maybe the case - it's just my opinion and observations thus far, and I could be wrong. The thread was about who we thought are leadership material.

_________________
For some silly reason, you people want to assassinate him, and it's just rubbish. You people. All of you, ALL of you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:07 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 6836
Wangers wrote:
true_blue24 wrote:
Wangers wrote:
true_blue24 wrote:
Wangers wrote:
Agree PJ.

Murphy - future captain - like father, like son.
Simpson - VC, as recognised by his peers into the leadership group this year.
Hartlett - haven't seen much of him in terms of air time, but loves the physical side of things by all reports in VFL, and I just reckon he may have a leadership role, so long as he stays injury free.
Fisher - he's well respected by his peers and his committment against adversity with the injuries he's had is a good role model for others.
Waite - see Hartlett, minus the air time bit.


you dont reckon JK's got much leadership in him?


Quite possibly, but, I believe, you cannot have a team with too many designated leaders. The team dynamic would be outta kilter. However, you do want a team that displays leadership behaviours, individually, without being designated leaders, persay.


yeah i agree with that but i think JK would make a better leader than fisher (not that fisher ahs done anything worng) and possibly more than hartlett, waite and simpson but its still too early we cant just look at a player and say he'll be a better leader than another player, i just think kennedy is the type of player who could physically and mentally let his presence be felt same with hartlett.


Maybe the case - it's just my opinion and observations thus far, and I could be wrong. The thread was about who we thought would be part of the future leadership team.


i think we both agree that all the players mentioned above are a chance.

_________________
Last edited by true_blue3 on Mon Sep 26, 1981 5:07 pm; edited 92 times in total


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 11:05 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 9603
Location: Beijing
Good sides have leadership density - you don't have to be the captain to be a leader. I remember Parkin talking at a coaching seminar where he talked about the 95 flag and how he had leaders in the different lines of the side i.e back half (read Peter Dean) midfield (Williams, Bradley, Harry), Forwards (Sticks). Our new crops of young players will develop that leadership density over time.
Go Blues!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 11:13 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
Blackwell? - someone posted that he was directing traffic on field last week?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 12:26 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
BlueBull wrote:
You need to ad Walker into the mix. He wants to be a leader and that must count for something. He put himself up for the leadership group at the start of he's first or second year

I agree, but it appears Pagan doesn't have much confidence in Walker or he'd release him to a wing and put a Bannister or Russell on the HBF.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 8:17 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:55 pm
Posts: 776
Location: UK
JuzzCarlton wrote:
BlueBull wrote:
You need to ad Walker into the mix. He wants to be a leader and that must count for something. He put himself up for the leadership group at the start of he's first or second year

I agree, but it appears Pagan doesn't have much confidence in Walker or he'd release him to a wing and put a Bannister or Russell on the HBF.


Oh come on. He gave him the job on the (or at least one of the) most dangerous Bulldogs players on the weekend. And left him on him for the entire game. That isn't a sign of no confidence whichever way you want to look at it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 10:39 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 2:16 pm
Posts: 370
Location: Adelaide
Murphy=captain
Kennedy=could be a captain one day but more than likely will be VC
Fisher=he has to stop getting injured.
Walker=maybe, fearless and smart are good attributes

_________________
Revenge is a dish best served cold

&

I AM PROUD SPONSOR OF THE CAROLINE WILSON HATE CLUB


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 12:52 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
Possibly because he has been playing for what seems like forever in a seriously bad team, but T-Bird gets my vote for leadership material.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 2:42 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
Mordan wrote:
JuzzCarlton wrote:
BlueBull wrote:
You need to ad Walker into the mix. He wants to be a leader and that must count for something. He put himself up for the leadership group at the start of he's first or second year

I agree, but it appears Pagan doesn't have much confidence in Walker or he'd release him to a wing and put a Bannister or Russell on the HBF.


Oh come on. He gave him the job on the (or at least one of the) most dangerous Bulldogs players on the weekend. And left him on him for the entire game. That isn't a sign of no confidence whichever way you want to look at it.

He puts Walker down back because we don't have anyone else who can do the job. Pagan doesn't have confidence in his kicking and playing him closer to goal where a turnover and mistake costs you a goal is a strange decision. :?

How many other developing players have you seen put under such pressure so early in their careers?

Russell is a better kick ATM and he should be played in defence along with Bannister who is a better option than Teague.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 3:02 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
DownUnderChick wrote:
Possibly because he has been playing for what seems like forever in a seriously bad team, but T-Bird gets my vote for leadership material.


I'd have issues with the way that he tends to pay out fellow players - a bit more control of his emotions would raise his leadership prospects I'd think


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 3:28 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
Quote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
Possibly because he has been playing for what seems like forever in a seriously bad team, but T-Bird gets my vote for leadership material.


I'd have issues with the way that he tends to pay out fellow players - a bit more control of his emotions would raise his leadership prospects I'd think


4thChicken playing in the worst defense in AFL HISTORY for the better part of 4 years, it's a wonder T-Bird hasn't murdered anyone.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 3:32 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 2:16 pm
Posts: 370
Location: Adelaide
maybe thats his problem? 8)

_________________
Revenge is a dish best served cold

&

I AM PROUD SPONSOR OF THE CAROLINE WILSON HATE CLUB


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 4:01 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
Quote:
maybe thats his problem?


BB95 who do you think he needs to kill in our team???? 8)

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Megaman and 49 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group