TalkingCarlton
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/

Top 50 - by Mike Shehan
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=567		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  The Shag [ Sat Mar 12, 2005 9:52 am ]
Post subject:  Top 50 - by Mike Shehan
Fevola, Lappin and the man in the tux....Nick Stevens all made Mike Sheahan's top 50 for 2004.

1 N. RIEWOLDT St Kilda
2 C. JUDD West Coast
3 W. TREDRA Port Adel
4 B. HALL Sydney
5 M. VOSS Brisbane Lions
6 J. HIRD Essendon*
7 N. LAPPIN Brisbane Lions
8 C. CORNES Port Adelaide
9 S. BLACK Brisbane Lions
10 J. BROWN Brisbane Lions
11 M. MICHAEL Brisbane Lions
12 M. LLOYD Essendon*
13 M. SCARLETT Geelong
14 M. RICCIUTO Adelaide
15 J. AKERMANIS Brisbane Lions
16 N. BUCKLEY Collingwood
17 F. GEHRIG St Kilda
18 B. COUSINS West Coast
19 L. POWER Brisbane Lions
20 P. BURGOYNE Port Adelaide
21 A. GOODES Sydney
22 S. CRAWFORD Hawthorn
23 B. FEVOLA Carlton
24 P. EVERITT Hawthorn
25 A. McLEOD Adelaide
26 J. WHITE Melbourne
27 J. LEPPITSCH Brisbane Lions
28 M. LAPPIN Carlton
29 D. KERR West Coast
30 L. BALL St Kilda
31 C. JOHNSON Brisbane Lions
32 C. LING Geelong
33 A. McPHEE Essendon*
34 B. KIRK Sydney
35 B. HARVEY Kangaroos
36 J. CLEMENT Collingwood
37 N. STEVENS Carlton
38 D. WELLS Kangaroos
39 M. RICHARDSON Richmond
40 M. PAVLICH Fremantle
41 N. BROWN Richmond
42 A. EMBLEY West Coast
43 C. BRUCE Melbourne
44 B. JOHNSON W. Bulldogs
45 D. COX West Coast
46 C. FLETCHER West Coast
47 L. HAYES St Kilda
48 L. BARRY Sydney
49 K. CORNES Port Adelaide
50 G. ABLETT Geelong
Author:  ScottSaunders [ Sat Mar 12, 2005 11:39 am ]
Post subject: 
k. cornes is the top 50

written proof the sheahan is a dick head
Author:  buzzaaaah [ Sat Mar 12, 2005 11:47 am ]
Post subject: 
Forget about Cornes, how the @#$%&! did B Harvey get in and get above N Stevens. This guy is clueless. Why is there such importance placed on his list. I see him more as the politics and features writer not as any sort of expert. Disgrace of a writer in a disgrace of a paper
Author:  thehalford [ Sat Mar 12, 2005 11:49 am ]
Post subject: 
ThePrez wrote:
k. cornes is the top 50

written proof the sheahan is a dick head


I had no trouble with Kane Cornes being there, it'd Brent Harvey, Jimmy Clement, Matty Richardson that shouldn't be there. I can't understand why Fev's so low either.
Author:  Effes [ Sat Mar 12, 2005 12:02 pm ]
Post subject: 
Kane Cornes deserves his spot

Why shouldn't he be included Prez?
Author:  AGRO [ Sat Mar 12, 2005 12:28 pm ]
Post subject: 
Sorry, did a someone called Mike Sheahan write a column in a newspaper today??? :roll:
Author:  Muesli [ Sat Mar 12, 2005 1:19 pm ]
Post subject: 
There's no way B. Harvey should be on the list he had a shocking year last year. Barry Hall is a good player but no way near number 4 in the comp.
Author:  monkee [ Sat Mar 12, 2005 1:30 pm ]
Post subject: 
I think just about everybody now knows that this list is made up in Sheehan's own fantasies of games and years long past. He still beleives that the potential of Richardson makes him belong in the top 50, when he has done very little in the last few years that would have him in the top 100 players in the league. I dont even remembe seeing it advertised as they usually do. SAyong that, i i would love to see Lance in the top 10 next year, and Livo rounding out the 50 with another 20 blue names filling the list. Hey i can dream cant i????
Carn the blues !!!!!!!!!!!!

And a shout out to the new sponsor Dan Murphy, i love your work!
Author:  camel [ Sat Mar 12, 2005 3:36 pm ]
Post subject: 
buzzaaaah wrote:
Forget about Cornes, how the F@%&#! did B Harvey get in and get above N Stevens. This guy is clueless. Why is there such importance placed on his list. I see him more as the politics and features writer not as any sort of expert. Disgrace of a writer in a disgrace of a paper


I think any sense of importance stems from the broader footballing industry feeding on itself, rather than any semblance of serious credibility. Regardless of who makes Sheahan's list it is just his opinion and an almost impossible task as different players mean different things to their respective teams.

Example, as sensational as Voss, Lappin, Black and Akermanis are, are they individually more important to the Lions than, say, Jonathon Brown. With such a depth of midfielders the Lions could hope to cover any one of their fab four, but with Brown missing that is harder to cover.

It's a bit like the Wheels Car of the Year, every year the following issue is littered with people dissing the mag for their decision, regardless of which car wins. Yet, if people just chilled a bit and let the magazine make it's own decision and respect that they may come to a different conclusion then there'd be a few less ulcers around.

IMO Sheahan's top 50 creates controversy because most people reckon they could do it better. I'm not saying that people could or could not compile a better list, but it's just one person's opinion.
Author:  Zippy [ Sat Mar 12, 2005 4:00 pm ]
Post subject: 
Boomer Harver in the top 50 is a joke. He played a shocker of a season last year and I'm sure he would admit that. IMO Kane Kornes definetely deserves his place and is hugely under rated. Going on last years effors Goodes and Crawford are probably ranked a bit high.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC + 10 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/