keogh wrote:
kingkerna wrote:
keogh wrote:
A few points
If the teams were completely reversed this forum would be full of whinging of the highest order
If that happened on Grand Final day the game would be a joke given it’s 2024
Times change
Have one captains call maybe two
The review system disrupts the flow of a game that’s great but so be it
Over 120 min a few more disruptions won’t make much difference
And just tell us what Clark said
Don’t @#$%&! around with it
Please tell us more on how these calls would work, so I can rip the idea to pieces.
Thanks
The ball was obviously touched given the player’s reaction
You can tell if the players are trying it on or truly believe it’s touched by body language
The captain goes to the designated umpire in charge to challenge that the ball was touched in flight
They are allowed to challenge once in a game regardless of the result
With all the score reviews having more than one challenge disrupts the flow of the game too much
Now rip it to shreds because imagine if Carlton were on the receiving end of that non call on Grand Final day
How would you feel?
You haven't thought this through at all have you?
So we had the ball, they call for a review, play stops, then what? A ball up? But we could have handballed and goaled anyway.
It would become a strategic thing, up by a kick with minutes left, ball in your forward line but opposition has it, I know let's call for a review so our defenders can get back during the review. It's just shit upon shit upon shit.