carntheblues wrote:
david31 wrote:
All list management decisions going forward need to address the threshold question of durability. Can we rely on this player to be available for the majority of games?
AFL seasons are long and become a grind in the winter months. The better clubs have lists that run deep and are generally durable. Our list is starting to run deep but we’re carrying too many players who are not durable. We know the names. Need to make some tough calls. If we go with the same group of injury prone players and they miss the majority of games through injury as they usually do, we will only he ourselves to blame. Based on interviews with Lloyd and Cook, the club understands the issue and intends to address it. Not sure why it has taken this long though.
Maybe we need to include a position in the soft cap for a clairvoyant. That way we can vet all potential new recruits and weed out those that wont be durable before they break down!
Or, you know, someone to look at the players' past records and ask themselves what are the chances of a perennial sicknote becoming a regular for us.
Games played per season by some of our recruits prior to arriving at Carlton...
Williams: 11, 8, 12, 22, 23, 2, 24, 11
Martin: 11, 12, 21, 22, 15, 16
Marchbank: 5, 2
McGovern: 23, 13, 12
McDonald: 2, 15, 20, 25, 12, 7
Admittedly, I don't know how many of these absences were due to injury vs selection, but note how all but one of these guys managed full seasons at some point in their career but landed with us after patchy runs. Since then they've continued along similar or worse trajectories. Conversely, we recruit an iron man like Newnes, and he remains an ever-reliable option for us.
I know that players can turn things around as their bodies mature, and sometimes it's worth a punt if they're going cheap. But we overstacked the list with gambles, probably because we couldn't attract the elite to our floundering club. Now that we're desirable again, I hope we can make less risky recruitment decisions.