Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Mar 29, 2024 10:17 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1841 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 ... 93  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2022
PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 2:18 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 19436
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
Crusader wrote:
bluehammer wrote:
My only query would be whether Cunningham accepts a rookie demotion or backs himself to find a new home on a primary list...

But yep great summary.

It’s not even a demotion nowadays. Unless it’s changed, I don’t even think the player’s salary is capped in any way.

When Kennedy was moved onto the rookie list, the first $80k of his salary wasn’t counted against the cap, but every dollar thereafter was.

The player’s side of the deal is the ‘Free Agent for life’ designation.
Thanks Crusader, I was completely ignorant to that. I thought there was a salary hit and basically a 'taken it or leave it' last chance saloon style thing.

Very interesting.

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2022
PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 3:16 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 6314
Location: Bendigo
GreatEx wrote:
My only amendment to Crusader's excellent analysis would be to recruit an older head for the ruck instead of going to the draft, unless we think Mirkov is ready. Our ruck stocks are already youthful, I'd like us to have a plug-n-play option.

We’ve gone past the window where the older head would’ve fit into the ruck mix.

Pittonet - 9th season
De Koning - 6th season

If six years isn’t enough, then we’re getting into Ahab territory. If we find ourselves in the shit again next year (incidentally, three years on the trot for Pitto), then we’ll be kicking ourselves if we haven’t started the regeneration.

Mirkov is a wildcard. I was pilloried for suggesting that we couldn’t possibly make any plans around him this year, but now it seems the consensus is that 2023 is also a wash… well, no shit. I mean, what are we expecting here? We’ve seen some of the most supreme athletes (which, he ain’t) get chewed up and spat out trying to switch codes.

The only realistic goal of the Mirkov Project is to create a capable reserve ruckman - more of a club resource than a 100 game AFL player. We won’t even know whether that’s a possibility until next year.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2022
PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 3:23 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 6314
Location: Bendigo
bluehammer wrote:
Crusader wrote:
bluehammer wrote:
My only query would be whether Cunningham accepts a rookie demotion or backs himself to find a new home on a primary list...

But yep great summary.

It’s not even a demotion nowadays. Unless it’s changed, I don’t even think the player’s salary is capped in any way.

When Kennedy was moved onto the rookie list, the first $80k of his salary wasn’t counted against the cap, but every dollar thereafter was.

The player’s side of the deal is the ‘Free Agent for life’ designation.
Thanks Crusader, I was completely ignorant to that. I thought there was a salary hit and basically a 'taken it or leave it' last chance saloon style thing.

Very interesting.

I’m not exactly certain here… the Kennedy & Betts situation would’ve triggered the ‘Carlton Clause’.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2022
PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 2:07 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 4435
Regardless you need at least 2 guys on your list who are bona fide capable rucks

Not a 1.0 and a 0.75 and several 0.2s and a 210cm 0.01 (no disrespect to him but if he isn't getting picked now then he is not currently serviceable)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2022
PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:39 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 6314
Location: Bendigo
Crusader wrote:
[6-7] Outside Mids: Move Cuningham to the rookie list, promote Cottrell to Primary list & add at least one premium runner.
> T/FA <
Newnes - 1yr contract
Cottrell - 2yr contract
O’Brien (r) - 1yr contract
Cuningham (r) 1yr contract
Hayes (r) - retained for 2023

It irks me that O’Brien will get another year, but he’s played too many games this season to get the arse… there’s always next year :lol: .

Similarly, Newnes and Hayes are just placeholders. Not locking anything down, but providing senior minds and bodies to plug a hole in the defensive structure.

Cuningham is up against it. Truth be told, the player that comes back will probably be more of a high half forward than wing & the young talent seems to be gravitating towards that role.

Cottrell is the one that has surprised me this year. This 80kg version might be alright. He has more hunger for the contest than O’Brien, which isn’t saying much, but if you want an Ed Langdon type of guy and had to chose between the two… it ain’t Lochie.

Statistically, Cottrell is a reasonable comparison to Langdon per 100 minutes of playing time. The major caveat, obviously, is that one plays an extra 30min per game and leaves 3-4 rotations on the table for his teammates.

Still, there might be enough organic improvement without having to pinch pennies elsewhere so that Amon, for instance, can come across.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2022
PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2022 1:00 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 22924
Location: Bondi Beach
Paddycripps wrote:
Regardless you need at least 2 guys on your list who are bona fide capable rucks

Not a 1.0 and a 0.75 and several 0.2s and a 210cm 0.01 (no disrespect to him but if he isn't getting picked now then he is not currently serviceable)



Well put.
Well defined.
We need to get fair dinkum as to where the players are in their development.
We are here to win games and premierships.
We need bonafide support for roles, not bums on seats, or Titles that aren't fitting.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2022
PostPosted: Sun Jun 26, 2022 12:53 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2021 11:10 am
Posts: 1495
Hope we go to the draft this year. Our list is developing well and needs an injection of young talent. This will also help with any Salary Cap issues.

I would then look for a couple of cheap mature options for back up Ruck and KPP. If we can reduce our injuries I don't believe we need to do much more


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2022
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:48 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 22924
Location: Bondi Beach
The ruck position is an interesting debate.

How many is the right number to have on the list?

Port always seem to contract and develop 5.

I remember we took their scraps off their hands with No.5 ruck Cain Ackland but also attracted the 4th ruck on their list with Barnaby French who turned out allright, whilct their No 1 & 2 rucks (and No. 3) took them to a Flag: Dean Brogan, Brendan Lade, and Toby Thurstans. That's 2 bonafide first class rucks and one part timer. Talk about insurance against the brutal Lions back in the day


Quote:
Amon aside, Power champion Cornes recently suggested that perhaps ruckman Sam Hayes’ days with the club could be numbered.

The 23-year-old is fit and available but finds himself in the SANFL despite the fact Ken Hinkley is without Scott Lycett and is playing Jeremy Finlayson in the ruck with Charlie Dixon pinch-hitting.

Davies admits Hayes is currently down the pecking order, even behind mid-season draftee Brynn Teakle before he was injured, but not all hope is lost once he irons out some kinks.

“I think in fairness to Sam Hayes, there’s not too many rucks that come into their team in the competition who stay in their team at the first go at it,” Davies said.

“Hayesy’s got seven games and knows now what he needs to be better at and that’s his work around the ground.

“We think his actual ruck work is outstanding, but his ability to get around the ground is something he needs to continue to work on.

“We’re certainly not in the basket of suggesting that Sam can’t play at AFL level into the future, but right now we’re focusing on something else.

“We’ve got Brynn Teakle and it’s very hard not to fall in love with the small amount of time that he has been at the club.

“But we also think we’ve got another one in Dante Visentini who has been doing some really good work at SANFL for an 18-year-old who hasn’t played a great deal of footy over the last couple of years.”

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2022
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:59 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 4435
bondiblue wrote:
The ruck position is an interesting debate.

How many is the right number to have on the list?

Port always seem to contract and develop 5.

I remember we took their scraps off their hands with No.5 ruck Cain Ackland but also attracted the 4th ruck on their list with Barnaby French who turned out allright, whilct their No 1 & 2 rucks (and No. 3) took them to a Flag: Dean Brogan, Brendan Lade, and Toby Thurstans. That's 2 bonafide first class rucks and one part timer. Talk about insurance against the brutal Lions back in the day


Quote:
Amon aside, Power champion Cornes recently suggested that perhaps ruckman Sam Hayes’ days with the club could be numbered.

The 23-year-old is fit and available but finds himself in the SANFL despite the fact Ken Hinkley is without Scott Lycett and is playing Jeremy Finlayson in the ruck with Charlie Dixon pinch-hitting.

Davies admits Hayes is currently down the pecking order, even behind mid-season draftee Brynn Teakle before he was injured, but not all hope is lost once he irons out some kinks.

“I think in fairness to Sam Hayes, there’s not too many rucks that come into their team in the competition who stay in their team at the first go at it,” Davies said.

“Hayesy’s got seven games and knows now what he needs to be better at and that’s his work around the ground.

“We think his actual ruck work is outstanding, but his ability to get around the ground is something he needs to continue to work on.

“We’re certainly not in the basket of suggesting that Sam can’t play at AFL level into the future, but right now we’re focusing on something else.

“We’ve got Brynn Teakle and it’s very hard not to fall in love with the small amount of time that he has been at the club.

“But we also think we’ve got another one in Dante Visentini who has been doing some really good work at SANFL for an 18-year-old who hasn’t played a great deal of footy over the last couple of years.”


I don't think it is about how many 200cm players you have but more how many 200cm players you have who can actually be relied upon.

We went into the year with 1 of those.

TDK lit it up on the weekend. Is it possible he could do a Kouta of 1995 and growth out of sight in the lead up to the finals?

I didn't think he would deliver that sort of game in the ruck after Pitto went down. If anything he had been struggling the last month or so. He has tried valiantly but nowhere near dominated games let alone broke even. But then this game he was amazing. I saw the game on replay when I get home and he was arguably BIG for mine behind Walsh. I wonder if he has changed his approach to the ruck contest. He seemed to back his leap more on the weekend. Either way I am thrilled. Key is to back it up on Friday night.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2022
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 3:00 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 5826
Cunningham
Marchbank
Martin
McDonald
McGovern
Williams

There’s six talented players who miss too much footy with injury. I’ll be surprised if all six are on our primary list again next year.

Contract terms and medical prognoses will largely inform the decisions. We obviously don’t have access to that information.

But unless their bodies are cooked, and if the TC contract tracker is to be believed, Martin (2024), McGovern (2023) and Williams (2026) will stay - unless the club needs to make a salary cap dump and is willing to trade them for peanuts. We shouldn’t have to do that though, if it’s true they had front loaded contracts.

Cunningham, Marchbank & McDonald are apparently out of contract at the end of 2022. I reckon McDonald is gone. As long as Cunningham & Marchbank don’t suffer any further significant set backs over the next couple of months, I think moving those two to our rookie list would be a good result.

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2022
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 4:02 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 4435
aboynamedsue wrote:
Cunningham
Marchbank
Martin
McDonald
McGovern
Williams

There’s six talented players who miss too much footy with injury. I’ll be surprised if all six are on our primary list again next year.

Contract terms and medical prognoses will largely inform the decisions. We obviously don’t have access to that information.

But unless their bodies are cooked, and if the TC contract tracker is to be believed, Martin (2024), McGovern (2023) and Williams (2026) will stay - unless the club needs to make a salary cap dump and is willing to trade them for peanuts. We shouldn’t have to do that though, if it’s true they had front loaded contracts.

Cunningham, Marchbank & McDonald are apparently out of contract at the end of 2022. I reckon McDonald is gone. As long as Cunningham & Marchbank don’t suffer any further significant set backs over the next couple of months, I think moving those two to our rookie list would be a good result.


Boy oh boy those dates are frightening. I hope a lot of these deals are front loaded.

Here are some stats. Years at Carlton and games played. It doesn't make for pretty reading and confirms all these players are injury prone.

Martin
2020 : 15 games played
2021 : 11
2022 : 9
Summary : seems incapable of playing a full season , his last 2 years at GC were similar (15 & 16 games)

McGovern
2019 : 16
2020 : 12
2021 : 5
2022 : 2
Summary : seems incapable of playing a full season , his last 2 years at Adel were similar (12 & 13 games). Note : I assume he missed games at Adel due to injury as opposed to not being in their Best 22?

Williams
2021 : 14
2022 : 8
Summary : seems incapable of playing a full season , his last year at GWS he played just 11 games.

Marchbank
2017 : 16
2018 : 12
2019 : 13
2020 : 0
2021 : 0
2022 : 1
Summary : seems to struggle to even get on the park at Carlton, his last 2 years at GWS he played 2 & 5 games (but was he in their Best 22?)

McDonald
2021 : 3
2022 : 2
Summary : seems to struggle to even get on the park at Carlton, his last 2 years at Melb he played 7 & 12 games (but was he in their Best 22?)

Cuningham
2016 : 3
2017 : 8
2018 : 5
2019 : 9
2020 : 12
2021 : 4
2022 : 0
Summary : in 7 years he's only cracked double digit games once but early doors he mightn't have been a walk up selection.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2022
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 5:04 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 22924
Location: Bondi Beach
aboynamedsue wrote:
Cunningham
Marchbank
Martin
McDonald
McGovern
Williams

There’s six talented players who miss too much footy with injury. I’ll be surprised if all six are on our primary list again next year.

Contract terms and medical prognoses will largely inform the decisions. We obviously don’t have access to that information.

But unless their bodies are cooked, and if the TC contract tracker is to be believed, Martin (2024), McGovern (2023) and Williams (2026) will stay - unless the club needs to make a salary cap dump and is willing to trade them for peanuts. We shouldn’t have to do that though, if it’s true they had front loaded contracts.

Cunningham, Marchbank & McDonald are apparently out of contract at the end of 2022. I reckon McDonald is gone. As long as Cunningham & Marchbank don’t suffer any further significant set backs over the next couple of months, I think moving those two to our rookie list would be a good result.


I'm surprised it hasn't been posted. I heard from someone who knows that Oscar had the 2 screws inserted to 'fuse' the injured part and if all goes well by end of the year, he has an offer on the table.

I'm guessing Oscar will be the KPD back up as rookie, and if Durdin is retained he's the KPD back up on a list. We can then go to the draft and select a KPD in the 1st or 2nd round to develop.

Marchbank is only 25yo. He has a developed body. Is a potential A grader. Showed glimpses of his prowess in only game he's played, and his team mates love him. We stuck with Charlie and Doc, and I can't see the club not doing the same.

I take your point that there's 6 injury prone players from 8 last year, and they take up valuable list spots, but are they stopping us from making the selections in the draft we want to make eg KPD, Ruck, Wing? I don't think anyone is forcing our hand to drop any of those uncontracted players this year.

I'm guessing we want to create 4 list spots for 2 draft picks (#18, #36 :wink: ), 1 Trade, 1 upgrade LOB

List spots can be created by:

1. Ed Curnow = list spot
2. Williamson = list spot
3. Fogarty = list spot
4. Jones- Durdin = list spot ...rather do this than lose Marchbank
5. Hayes- = list spot ... rather do this than lose Cuningham.

Then there's Newman and Newnes, like Marchy and Cunners, also out of contract.

Looking at it like this, Marchbank and Cunners aren't safe if Durdin and Hayes valued higher. Ditto Newman and Newnes who have had good year thus far.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2022
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 5:13 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:09 pm
Posts: 4486
Club made it pretty clear that the MSD selections weren't just with a six month outlook. Still, everything needs to be sorted out end of year and trades / FA in and out effect the available spots.

_________________
Just throwing it out there.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2022
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 5:27 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2021 11:10 am
Posts: 1495
I’m told the club is keen for McDonald to continue and it’s why they took the conservative route with his back and recovery. They believe they can fix it
He’s 26 and looked good at FB early this year and kept Young out of the side. If he can get fit he’s going to be a good player for us


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2022
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 5:32 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 5826
bondiblue wrote:
aboynamedsue wrote:
Cunningham
Marchbank
Martin
McDonald
McGovern
Williams

There’s six talented players who miss too much footy with injury. I’ll be surprised if all six are on our primary list again next year.

Contract terms and medical prognoses will largely inform the decisions. We obviously don’t have access to that information.

But unless their bodies are cooked, and if the TC contract tracker is to be believed, Martin (2024), McGovern (2023) and Williams (2026) will stay - unless the club needs to make a salary cap dump and is willing to trade them for peanuts. We shouldn’t have to do that though, if it’s true they had front loaded contracts.

Cunningham, Marchbank & McDonald are apparently out of contract at the end of 2022. I reckon McDonald is gone. As long as Cunningham & Marchbank don’t suffer any further significant set backs over the next couple of months, I think moving those two to our rookie list would be a good result.


I'm surprised it hasn't been posted. I heard from someone who knows that Oscar had the 2 screws inserted to 'fuse' the injured part and if all goes well by end of the year, he has an offer on the table.

I'm guessing Oscar will be the KPD back up as rookie, and if Durdin is retained he's the KPD back up on a list. We can then go to the draft and select a KPD in the 1st or 2nd round to develop.

Marchbank is only 25yo. He has a developed body. Is a potential A grader. Showed glimpses of his prowess in only game he's played, and his team mates love him. We stuck with Charlie and Doc, and I can't see the club not doing the same.

I take your point that there's 6 injury prone players from 8 last year, and they take up valuable list spots, but are they stopping us from making the selections in the draft we want to make eg KPD, Ruck, Wing? I don't think anyone is forcing our hand to drop any of those uncontracted players this year.

I'm guessing we want to create 4 list spots for 2 draft picks (#18, #36 :wink: ), 1 Trade, 1 upgrade LOB

List spots can be created by:

1. Ed Curnow = list spot
2. Williamson = list spot
3. Fogarty = list spot
4. Jones- Durdin = list spot ...rather do this than lose Marchbank
5. Hayes- = list spot ... rather do this than lose Cuningham.

Then there's Newman and Newnes, like Marchy and Cunners, also out of contract.

Looking at it like this, Marchbank and Cunners aren't safe if Durdin and Hayes valued higher. Ditto Newman and Newnes who have had good year thus far.


I’m pretty sure Newman got a two year deal at the end of last year?

It’s probably a choice between Durdin and McDonald, rather than between Durdin and Marchbank as I think Marchbank plays a different role to the other two. If the prognosis for Marchbank is reasonable, I hope we can move him to the rookie list. That might be bad news for Parks, who I thought showed improvement early this year and seems well regarded.

You mentioned Fogarty & Williamson, Philp & Setterfield are another two who might be in the gun. Plus Dow (who I think is contracted and so is more likely to be traded than delisted) and Ed Curnow (ret?).

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2022
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 5:59 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2021 11:10 am
Posts: 1495
If I was to guess I would think Ed Curnow, Philp, Fogarty, Parks, Williamson are the ones most in trouble. Cuningham will need to show something as well. That would leave 5 spots to fill if we keep S.Durdin & Hayes

Dow I’m told will stay.

Also a rumour floating around that McGovern wants to move back to SA as his wife is from there and they have a young child


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2022
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 9:25 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10060
I note Footy Classified (if you prefer McGuire Media) already ramping up the Blues Salary Cap bursting trying to sign 3 x $1million men next year. What can I possible say.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2022
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2022 7:56 am 
Offline
formerly Fevola

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:57 pm
Posts: 4432
i really do hope we slowly start locking Curnow, McKay and Dekoning up now rather than leave it to next year. But the club cant be negligent enough not to have prepared for this. I hope so anyway.

Bloody media trying to find something negative as they have nothing else at the moment.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2022
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2022 2:29 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 4435
Drewgirl wrote:
i really do hope we slowly start locking Curnow, McKay and Dekoning up now rather than leave it to next year. But the club cant be negligent enough not to have prepared for this. I hope so anyway.

Bloody media trying to find something negative as they have nothing else at the moment.


TDK showed flashes of his athleticism early in his career so we knew he could develop into a star one day.

I think one good thing is we have a lot of young players who look like they will be (some already are) good players for us. It might be we don't need some of the more expensive injury prone experienced players but if they are contracted there isn't much we can do about it.

I am sure they would have factored in TDK's likely rise.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2022
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2022 2:30 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 4435
All that said how the hell would Cornes know the deals our players are on?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1841 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 ... 93  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 56 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group