Blue Vain wrote:
london blue wrote:
Unprofessional going public with a review. As challenged Teague has been with his lack of experience the board has set him up for failure these last 2 months. We’ve left him hang out to dry. Regardless of whether he is the right man, the boards public process has been a disgrace. Complete lack of integrity.
I can't agree. Does anyone actually believe we could implement a review using external participants and keep it quiet?
We were better being open and transparent with our intentions.
I for one was rapt that the review has been public and even a little messy...it will hold us much much more to account
Sorry to disagree with LB above but I am sick and tired of all this empathy for DT...Call me heartless, call me anything but nobody put a gun to his head when the job was offered to him. He was told he would just be an interim coach so he should've been reflective enough to examine his own skillsets etc. and possibly realise he needed to develop further before embarking
He took a chance and and he has been found wanting...big time...you make your bed, you lie in it
I don' know what his personal tragedies have been but I hope his life can turn around from those. Good luck with future endeavours but you were never, never, never the right person to replace Bolton
Not defending Teague at all. Don’t care if he is the right bloke or not.
My point on lack of professionalism - since the announcement the only person who has responded to questions on process and possible outcomes is Teague. Poor leadership and suggests he has been set up.
As the initiator the board should have fronted the media given the attention it received.
I believe what we witnessed last night was a team amd club running scared.