bluechampion wrote:
List management priorities need to be based on how we think we're gonna play in 2022 and onwards.
With that in mind we need to decide on the following:
What our Ruck situation is going to be -
a) Do we play one ruckman with a tall utility to offer a chop-out?
b) Do we play two genuine rucks?
If a) who is that tall utility player? Do we need to trade one in? Do we think that at this stage in his career De Koning is that player and Pittonet is the no 1 ruckman?
If b) do we need another ruck on the list so that we can play the same style in the VFL, and to provide depth?
This then affects our forward set-up -
Our no. 1 and no. 2 tall forwards are set: McKay & Curnow. We then have either a resting ruckman or a tall utility-type. That's probably enough talls, so where do players like Silvagni & McGovern fit into this set-up?
An inform Casboult circa round 1-6 in 2020 was so crucial for us. The best contested mark in the AFL and at 200cm and 105kg could hole his ground in the ruck. Perfect.
If DeKoning could get his timing for marking sorted he'd be great as the 3rd tall/ruck. But, at some stage, DeKoning will be No.1 ruck and it may well be 2022 if he has a huge preseason developing his strength.
Silvagni and Gov wouldn't be needed as 3rd tall if we had a bonafide ruck-forward.
I'm an unabashed fan of 2 genuine rucks who are a threat forward too.
Silvagni is perfect as a big bodies mid imo.
I don't want Silvagni rucking...unless we have no choice due to injury.
I think the ruck position is almost our most pressing. DeKoning is 2-3 years off what we need him to be. He needs to bulk up, get fitter and get a bit of mongrel about him. He needs to have a big pre-season. Pittonet can't jump off the ground. He's not the answer. We need to find a new No 1 ruckman from somewhere. DeKoning can develop in the forward line and relieve ruck.