Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Apr 20, 2024 1:21 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 201 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 11:46 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2020 11:50 am
Posts: 1896
Location: Brisbane
bondiblue wrote:
Noice jim.
Makes CC61's numbers look like he's done some prozac :wink:

Huh?

Whaddya mean exactly?

_________________
Que Sera, Sera


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 1:37 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2020 11:50 am
Posts: 1896
Location: Brisbane
jim wrote:
CC1961 wrote:
MOST QUARTERS WON FOR YEAR:
Geelong - 38
Bris, Port - 36
Carlton, St.K - 34

LEAST QUARTERS LOST FOR YEAR:
Geelong - 21
Bris, Port - 22
Rich - 24
Carlton, St.K, GWS - 25

Hmmm. Like being 4th for Inside 50's we're 4th for overall quarters won.
Should be in finals with double-chance.

Now about those 4+ goal runs by opposition...


Individually. we were

9th 8-8 1st qtr 87%.........9th
10th 8-8 2nd qtr 87%.......9th
6th 9-6-1 3rd qtr 107%.....6th
3rd 11-5 last qtrs 104%....1st (tied w Geel, WB, Melb)

(editing Jim' list in yellow to show 'ladder' type standing for quarters won.)

Greater 2nd half team, specially last qtrs, except when we choked.

Added edits to Jim's above...

Carlton's average score per quarter (as opposed to how many quarters won) and where we ranked vs other teams:

Qu 1: 16 pts (9th)
Qu 2: 15.9 (6th)
Qu 3: 13.3 (12th)
Qu 4: 14.5 (9th)

Soooo.....

summarising Jim's & my tables I have these observations:

The first quarter figures of quarters won and points scored in a 'ranking' level has us at 9th overall for Both.
Not a finals-playing proposition.
Jim's 87% is a for/agst % so shows us clearly losing both 1st & 2nd qs by the same proportion.

In Q2 our scoring is about the same but the 6th ranking just indicates other sides having a mixed bag with Q2 scoring as well. Again 9th in quarters won.

1st half summary = both quarters as bad as each other.

Despite the idea that we do these 'comebacks' after half time, Q3 is our worst for scoring this year and ranked 12th to other clubs accordingly.
The rise to 6th in 3rd Q won is indicative that we at least tighten up the scoring for the opposition and this is our Best defensive quarter with an average of 12.4 by opposition teams.

In fact only 3 other teams had less scored against them in 3rd Quarters (Geel, Coll, Freo)

3rd quarters thus dour, grinding affairs as Carlton has finally tried to get back into the game.
Finally restricting opposition yet NOT doing the heavy scoring that the 'Premiership Quarter' requires.

Finally, we won more 4th quarters than any other and are ranked equal 1st with 11 wins
These 'winning' last Qs included all our won games except Geelong and our losses to Rich, Melb, St.K, Port, Syd

The 5 we lost, we lost BADLY - Gee, Haw, WC, Coll, GWS where we generated a lowly total of 3 goals 7 points in the last across those games (or just 5 points in each match).

This resulted in our 'average' score per last quarter dropping BELOW each of the 1st & 2nd quarters at only 14.5 points (9th overall again)

Subtracting those 5 Disasters our remaining average for last quarters would have been 18.8 points ranking us 3rd behind only Geelong (21.1) and Melbourne (19.6)


Summary:
- we didn't come "flying out of the gates" as each game began
- and we were next to comatose as the 2nd halves began too.

Thus the irony is, we actually scored MORE in the 1st halves on average than we did in the 2nd halves by about 4 points.
As bad as our 1 quarter starts were, they were our highest scoring quarters.

Late flurries in 2/3 rds of our games in the last, though occasionally exciting, were not enough to undo the damage already done by slow starts after the first bounce and long break.

_________________
Que Sera, Sera


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 7:24 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2018 7:19 am
Posts: 2087
Location: Melbourne
I wish I had that much time on my hands :smoking:

_________________
Our tradition demands success!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 10:33 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33617
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
This performance made me agree with Kane Cornes on something.

THAT'S how bad it was.....

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 11:29 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 8247
Location: Australia
CC1961 wrote:
jim wrote:
CC1961 wrote:
MOST QUARTERS WON FOR YEAR:
Geelong - 38
Bris, Port - 36
Carlton, St.K - 34

LEAST QUARTERS LOST FOR YEAR:
Geelong - 21
Bris, Port - 22
Rich - 24
Carlton, St.K, GWS - 25

Hmmm. Like being 4th for Inside 50's we're 4th for overall quarters won.
Should be in finals with double-chance.

Now about those 4+ goal runs by opposition...


Individually. we were

9th 8-8 1st qtr 87%.........9th
10th 8-8 2nd qtr 87%.......9th
6th 9-6-1 3rd qtr 107%.....6th
3rd 11-5 last qtrs 104%....1st (tied w Geel, WB, Melb)

(editing Jim' list in yellow to show 'ladder' type standing for quarters won.)

Greater 2nd half team, specially last qtrs, except when we choked.

Added edits to Jim's above...

Carlton's average score per quarter (as opposed to how many quarters won) and where we ranked vs other teams:

Qu 1: 16 pts (9th)
Qu 2: 15.9 (6th)
Qu 3: 13.3 (12th)
Qu 4: 14.5 (9th)

Soooo.....

summarising Jim's & my tables I have these observations:

The first quarter figures of quarters won and points scored in a 'ranking' level has us at 9th overall for Both.
Not a finals-playing proposition.
Jim's 87% is a for/agst % so shows us clearly losing both 1st & 2nd qs by the same proportion.

In Q2 our scoring is about the same but the 6th ranking just indicates other sides having a mixed bag with Q2 scoring as well. Again 9th in quarters won.

1st half summary = both quarters as bad as each other.

Despite the idea that we do these 'comebacks' after half time, Q3 is our worst for scoring this year and ranked 12th to other clubs accordingly.
The rise to 6th in 3rd Q won is indicative that we at least tighten up the scoring for the opposition and this is our Best defensive quarter with an average of 12.4 by opposition teams.

In fact only 3 other teams had less scored against them in 3rd Quarters (Geel, Coll, Freo)

3rd quarters thus dour, grinding affairs as Carlton has finally tried to get back into the game.
Finally restricting opposition yet NOT doing the heavy scoring that the 'Premiership Quarter' requires.

Finally, we won more 4th quarters than any other and are ranked equal 1st with 11 wins
These 'winning' last Qs included all our won games except Geelong and our losses to Rich, Melb, St.K, Port, Syd

The 5 we lost, we lost BADLY - Gee, Haw, WC, Coll, GWS where we generated a lowly total of 3 goals 7 points in the last across those games (or just 5 points in each match).

This resulted in our 'average' score per last quarter dropping BELOW each of the 1st & 2nd quarters at only 14.5 points (9th overall again)

Subtracting those 5 Disasters our remaining average for last quarters would have been 18.8 points ranking us 3rd behind only Geelong (21.1) and Melbourne (19.6)


Summary:
- we didn't come "flying out of the gates" as each game began
- and we were next to comatose as the 2nd halves began too.

Thus the irony is, we actually scored MORE in the 1st halves on average than we did in the 2nd halves by about 4 points.
As bad as our 1 quarter starts were, they were our highest scoring quarters.

Late flurries in 2/3 rds of our games in the last, though occasionally exciting, were not enough to undo the damage already done by slow starts after the first bounce and long break.


Maybe we’re just slower and less skilful but fitter than most other clubs so the longer the game goes the more telling our defensive pressure is and the better we compete overall?

If this is the case hopefully we’ll see much better results next year when we go back to full length quarters....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 11:34 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2020 11:50 am
Posts: 1896
Location: Brisbane
CFC8795 wrote:
I wish I had that much time on my hands :smoking:

Ha.
Waking up at 1am (check post time)
sigh... with a thought in my head that turns into a "bee in my bonnet" and just had to write it down.

_________________
Que Sera, Sera


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 11:51 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 23030
Location: Bondi Beach
CC1961 wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
Noice jim.
Makes CC61's numbers look like he's done some prozac :wink:

Huh?

Whaddya mean exactly?



I have been on a suger fix with your thread.

Seeing jims numbers brought me back down with a differing viewpoint.

I'm grateful for both.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 12:02 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 23030
Location: Bondi Beach
CC1961 wrote:
jim wrote:
CC1961 wrote:
MOST QUARTERS WON FOR YEAR:
Geelong - 38
Bris, Port - 36
Carlton, St.K - 34

LEAST QUARTERS LOST FOR YEAR:
Geelong - 21
Bris, Port - 22
Rich - 24
Carlton, St.K, GWS - 25

Hmmm. Like being 4th for Inside 50's we're 4th for overall quarters won.
Should be in finals with double-chance.

Now about those 4+ goal runs by opposition...


Individually. we were

9th 8-8 1st qtr 87%.........9th
10th 8-8 2nd qtr 87%.......9th
6th 9-6-1 3rd qtr 107%.....6th
3rd 11-5 last qtrs 104%....1st (tied w Geel, WB, Melb)

(editing Jim' list in yellow to show 'ladder' type standing for quarters won.)

Greater 2nd half team, specially last qtrs, except when we choked.

Added edits to Jim's above...

Carlton's average score per quarter (as opposed to how many quarters won) and where we ranked vs other teams:

Qu 1: 16 pts (9th)
Qu 2: 15.9 (6th)
Qu 3: 13.3 (12th)
Qu 4: 14.5 (9th)

Soooo.....

summarising Jim's & my tables I have these observations:




The first quarter figures of quarters won and points scored in a 'ranking' level has us at 9th overall for Both.
Not a finals-playing proposition.
Jim's 87% is a for/agst % so shows us clearly losing both 1st & 2nd qs by the same proportion.

In Q2 our scoring is about the same but the 6th ranking just indicates other sides having a mixed bag with Q2 scoring as well. Again 9th in quarters won.

1st half summary = both quarters as bad as each other.

Despite the idea that we do these 'comebacks' after half time, Q3 is our worst for scoring this year and ranked 12th to other clubs accordingly.
The rise to 6th in 3rd Q won is indicative that we at least tighten up the scoring for the opposition and this is our Best defensive quarter with an average of 12.4 by opposition teams.

In fact only 3 other teams had less scored against them in 3rd Quarters (Geel, Coll, Freo)

3rd quarters thus dour, grinding affairs as Carlton has finally tried to get back into the game.
Finally restricting opposition yet NOT doing the heavy scoring that the 'Premiership Quarter' requires.

Finally, we won more 4th quarters than any other and are ranked equal 1st with 11 wins
These 'winning' last Qs included all our won games except Geelong and our losses to Rich, Melb, St.K, Port, Syd

The 5 we lost, we lost BADLY - Gee, Haw, WC, Coll, GWS where we generated a lowly total of 3 goals 7 points in the last across those games (or just 5 points in each match).

This resulted in our 'average' score per last quarter dropping BELOW each of the 1st & 2nd quarters at only 14.5 points (9th overall again)

Subtracting those 5 Disasters our remaining average for last quarters would have been 18.8 points ranking us 3rd behind only Geelong (21.1) and Melbourne (19.6)


Summary:
- we didn't come "flying out of the gates" as each game began
- and we were next to comatose as the 2nd halves began too.

Thus the irony is, we actually scored MORE in the 1st halves on average than we did in the 2nd halves by about 4 points.
As bad as our 1 quarter starts were, they were our highest scoring quarters.

Late flurries in 2/3 rds of our games in the last, though occasionally exciting, were not enough to undo the damage already done by slow starts after the first bounce and long break.


Thanks CC1961

Puts things in perspective when in ladder, but seeing the terrible actual numbers in the last against those 5 teams mentioned... :yikes:

We are up and down, typical of an up and coming team, or, one on the decline. I think its the former.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 7:12 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 7776
CC1961 wrote:
jim wrote:
CC1961 wrote:
MOST QUARTERS WON FOR YEAR:
Geelong - 38
Bris, Port - 36
Carlton, St.K - 34

LEAST QUARTERS LOST FOR YEAR:
Geelong - 21
Bris, Port - 22
Rich - 24
Carlton, St.K, GWS - 25

Hmmm. Like being 4th for Inside 50's we're 4th for overall quarters won.
Should be in finals with double-chance.

Now about those 4+ goal runs by opposition...


Individually. we were

9th 8-8 1st qtr 87%.........9th
10th 8-8 2nd qtr 87%.......9th
6th 9-6-1 3rd qtr 107%.....6th
3rd 11-5 last qtrs 104%....1st (tied w Geel, WB, Melb)

(editing Jim' list in yellow to show 'ladder' type standing for quarters won.)

Greater 2nd half team, specially last qtrs, except when we choked.

Added edits to Jim's above...

Carlton's average score per quarter (as opposed to how many quarters won) and where we ranked vs other teams:

Qu 1: 16 pts (9th)
Qu 2: 15.9 (6th)
Qu 3: 13.3 (12th)
Qu 4: 14.5 (9th)

Soooo.....

summarising Jim's & my tables I have these observations:

The first quarter figures of quarters won and points scored in a 'ranking' level has us at 9th overall for Both.
Not a finals-playing proposition.
Jim's 87% is a for/agst % so shows us clearly losing both 1st & 2nd qs by the same proportion.

In Q2 our scoring is about the same but the 6th ranking just indicates other sides having a mixed bag with Q2 scoring as well. Again 9th in quarters won.

1st half summary = both quarters as bad as each other.

Despite the idea that we do these 'comebacks' after half time, Q3 is our worst for scoring this year and ranked 12th to other clubs accordingly.
The rise to 6th in 3rd Q won is indicative that we at least tighten up the scoring for the opposition and this is our Best defensive quarter with an average of 12.4 by opposition teams.

In fact only 3 other teams had less scored against them in 3rd Quarters (Geel, Coll, Freo)

3rd quarters thus dour, grinding affairs as Carlton has finally tried to get back into the game.
Finally restricting opposition yet NOT doing the heavy scoring that the 'Premiership Quarter' requires.

Finally, we won more 4th quarters than any other and are ranked equal 1st with 11 wins
These 'winning' last Qs included all our won games except Geelong and our losses to Rich, Melb, St.K, Port, Syd

The 5 we lost, we lost BADLY - Gee, Haw, WC, Coll, GWS where we generated a lowly total of 3 goals 7 points in the last across those games (or just 5 points in each match).

This resulted in our 'average' score per last quarter dropping BELOW each of the 1st & 2nd quarters at only 14.5 points (9th overall again)

Subtracting those 5 Disasters our remaining average for last quarters would have been 18.8 points ranking us 3rd behind only Geelong (21.1) and Melbourne (19.6)


Summary:
- we didn't come "flying out of the gates" as each game began
- and we were next to comatose as the 2nd halves began too.

Thus the irony is, we actually scored MORE in the 1st halves on average than we did in the 2nd halves by about 4 points.
As bad as our 1 quarter starts were, they were our highest scoring quarters.

Late flurries in 2/3 rds of our games in the last, though occasionally exciting, were not enough to undo the damage already done by slow starts after the first bounce and long break.


It's one thing I noticed through games this year, not necessarily Carlton games, is often scoring slowed overall after the first half. So often a side would score 5 goals in the first or 2nd qtr but finish with only 7 to 9 for the game. Brisbane beat Collingwood scoring 5 goals in the 2nd qtr and only one goal the other 3 qtrs. That might be why we are didn't alot but still rank highly for qtrs won after half time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 7:13 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 7776
bluedog wrote:
jim wrote:

Individually. we were

9th 8-8 1st qtr 87%
10th 8-8 2nd qtr 87%
6th 9-6-1 3rd qtr 107%
3rd 11-5 last qtrs 104%

Greater 2nd half team, specially last qtrs, except when we choked.




Interesting, jim, and thanks for this.
:thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 9:15 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2018 7:19 am
Posts: 2087
Location: Melbourne
CC1961 wrote:
CFC8795 wrote:
I wish I had that much time on my hands :smoking:

Ha.
Waking up at 1am (check post time)
sigh... with a thought in my head that turns into a "bee in my bonnet" and just had to write it down.

I think you will find Pornhub helps :smoking:

_________________
Our tradition demands success!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 11:04 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2020 11:50 am
Posts: 1896
Location: Brisbane
CFC8795 wrote:
CC1961 wrote:
CFC8795 wrote:
I wish I had that much time on my hands :smoking:

Ha.
Waking up at 1am (check post time)
sigh... with a thought in my head that turns into a "bee in my bonnet" and just had to write it down.

I think you will find Pornhub helps :smoking:

Sick puppy.

The awesome slinky blonde next to me (her words), says:
"Tell him why on Earth would you ever need to go there!"

You've done well CFC8795, you've prompted something...

signing off now.

:thanks:

_________________
Que Sera, Sera


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 17, 2020 8:16 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2018 7:19 am
Posts: 2087
Location: Melbourne
CC1961,
I'm glad you took it as a joke as I meant.
I'm also glad you used a proper noun for 'Earth'.
Cheers :beer:
May we both still be on TC when we achieve number 17 :thumbsup:

_________________
Our tradition demands success!


Last edited by CFC8795 on Sat Sep 19, 2020 7:56 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 17, 2020 11:11 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 23030
Location: Bondi Beach
CFC8795 wrote:
CC1961 wrote:
CFC8795 wrote:
I wish I had that much time on my hands :smoking:

Ha.
Waking up at 1am (check post time)
sigh... with a thought in my head that turns into a "bee in my bonnet" and just had to write it down.

I think you will find Pornhub helps :smoking:


You're pulling my leg.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 17, 2020 11:29 am 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 1:06 pm
Posts: 9296
bondiblue wrote:
CFC8795 wrote:
CC1961 wrote:
CFC8795 wrote:
I wish I had that much time on my hands :smoking:

Ha.
Waking up at 1am (check post time)
sigh... with a thought in my head that turns into a "bee in my bonnet" and just had to write it down.

I think you will find Pornhub helps :smoking:


You're pulling my leg.


Get a room.

_________________
Orandum est ut sit mens sana in corpore sano. Fortem posce animum mortis terrore carentem, qui spatium vitae extremum inter munera ponat naturae, qui ferre queat quoscumque labores.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 18, 2020 11:45 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 7776
CC1961 wrote:
CC1961 wrote:
Tragically, we ARE getting the ball in... we are still 4TH FOR INSIDE 50s
yet Carlton is WORST FOR GOALS FROM INSIDE 50s. (19%)


Oh, and the three teams that ARE above us on inside 50s?

No surprise here: Port Adelaide, Brisbane, Richmond.

Yep- Places ONE, TWO & THREE on this year's ladder!

Our coaches should be taken out somewhere and SHOT.


One of the issues with COVID, not being able to train with more than 8 at a time. The issue is ongoing, a disconnect between our mids and forwards, something Teague talks about alot. Training with just 8 at a time didn't allow us to work on that at all, especially with fewer sessions. Certainly favored sides with well-entrenched, instinctive game styles.

Another thing that didn't help was, to the end of the GWS game, the 7 previous 2nd halfs had produced a score of 13.42! Kicking straight would've helped that goals from inside 50 percentage.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 18, 2020 12:02 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2020 11:50 am
Posts: 1896
Location: Brisbane
Wow, great observation Jim!
Hadn't noticed that.

Sigh...
another coach needed?
Is there an actual 'goal-kicking' coach?

_________________
Que Sera, Sera


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 3:51 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
So Teague didn't have a phone?
No Zoom or WhatsApp?
He could've read TC for that matter.
He could have rung half the posters on here for advice.

Here's how to talk to your forward and midfield line coaches when you can't train together.

"Tell the freaking forwards to leave someone at home and tell the freaking mids to carry the footy another thirty metres and not to bomb it long from the wing to the 45 metre mark. Is that too hard to understand?"

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:57 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10073
jim wrote:
CC1961 wrote:
CC1961 wrote:
Tragically, we ARE getting the ball in... we are still 4TH FOR INSIDE 50s
yet Carlton is WORST FOR GOALS FROM INSIDE 50s. (19%)


Oh, and the three teams that ARE above us on inside 50s?

No surprise here: Port Adelaide, Brisbane, Richmond.

Yep- Places ONE, TWO & THREE on this year's ladder!

Our coaches should be taken out somewhere and SHOT.


One of the issues with COVID, not being able to train with more than 8 at a time. The issue is ongoing, a disconnect between our mids and forwards, something Teague talks about alot. Training with just 8 at a time didn't allow us to work on that at all, especially with fewer sessions. Certainly favored sides with well-entrenched, instinctive game styles.

Another thing that didn't help was, to the end of the GWS game, the 7 previous 2nd halfs had produced a score of 13.42! Kicking straight would've helped that goals from inside 50 percentage.


I do agree to an extent, but considering they have had multiple new inclusions, how did a side like StKilda excel with such restrictions?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 4:50 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2020 11:50 am
Posts: 1896
Location: Brisbane
Blue Sombrero wrote:
So Teague didn't have a phone?
No Zoom or WhatsApp?

He could've read TC for that matter.
He could have rung half the posters on here for advice.


Here's how to talk to your forward and midfield line coaches when you can't train together.

"Tell the freaking forwards to leave someone at home and tell the freaking mids to carry the footy another thirty metres and not to bomb it long from the wing to the 45 metre mark. Is that too hard to understand?"

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Effing Brilliant my funny mexican-hat wearin' friend!

Funny how we're all still bleeding here in the post-Adelaide game thread...

What are the [REDACTED] chances any of your suggestions are 'trialled' today?

Y'know - "better late than never"

I'll be going so I'll do a post-match wide-viewing-angle report on what transpired.

I won't be holding my breath.

(and not coz of covid - Qld, mask-free, livin' the dream!!!)

:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Que Sera, Sera


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 201 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group