Blue Vain wrote:
jamespul65 wrote:
I think teague needs help and the currant assistant JB needs to go .
I think you're raisin a valid point
this all sounds like sour grapes
| TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| R11 West Coast v Carlton (post match discussion) http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=36959 |
Page 10 of 11 |
| Author: | Navy One [ Tue Aug 11, 2020 3:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R11 West Coast v Carlton (post match discussion) |
snakehips wrote: NTBlue wrote: Cain Liddle should edit the video of this weeks game, send it to the AFL and umpires coach and ask for an explanation as to why decisions were judged in favour of West Coast when they tackled a Carlton player, but when a Carlton player tackled a West Coast player in exactly the same manner it was either a free to West Coast, play on or a ball up. And the video should repeatedly play the trip to Curnow and the slam to the ground of Cripps by NicNat. Maybe if the umpires saw it repeated 30 or 40 times they might pick up the inconsistency. Think someone might have saved Liddle a few hours in the editing suite NTBhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6UCJ6FP3_k&feature=youtu.be Makes your blood boil watching that ... The AFL in their customary manner will signoff on that crap ..... Their top braille official couldn't see anything wrong |
|
| Author: | Navy Blue Horse [ Tue Aug 11, 2020 3:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R11 West Coast v Carlton (post match discussion) |
Blue Vain wrote: jamespul65 wrote: I think teague needs help and the currant assistant JB needs to go . I think you're raisin a valid point this all sounds like sour grapes |
|
| Author: | bondiblue [ Tue Aug 11, 2020 3:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R11 West Coast v Carlton (post match discussion) |
snakehips wrote: NTBlue wrote: Cain Liddle should edit the video of this weeks game, send it to the AFL and umpires coach and ask for an explanation as to why decisions were judged in favour of West Coast when they tackled a Carlton player, but when a Carlton player tackled a West Coast player in exactly the same manner it was either a free to West Coast, play on or a ball up. And the video should repeatedly play the trip to Curnow and the slam to the ground of Cripps by NicNat. Maybe if the umpires saw it repeated 30 or 40 times they might pick up the inconsistency. Think someone might have saved Liddle a few hours in the editing suite NTBhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6UCJ6FP3_k&feature=youtu.be Carlton was winning by 19 points. Should have been 25 points. Carlton lost by 22 points. Carlton was robbed. Disgusts me to think this is the people's game in an egalitarian society. AFL is corrupt and has screwed up the rules of our game. Stephen Hocking and his desperation to leave his mark, has left a stain on our game. Sack him! Refer to decision to not make Princes Park the 2nd home of footy, Mark of the year, Rising Star award, unprecedented penalties, umpiring year after year, Michael christian penalties, and lack of them. It is a joke. Cudos to the person who put that footage together. |
|
| Author: | Blue Vain [ Tue Aug 11, 2020 3:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R11 West Coast v Carlton (post match discussion) |
Navy Blue Horse wrote: Blue Vain wrote: jamespul65 wrote: I think teague needs help and the currant assistant JB needs to go . I think you're raisin a valid point this all sounds like sour grapes Barker could cop it in the date.... |
|
| Author: | Blue4ever [ Tue Aug 11, 2020 3:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R11 West Coast v Carlton (post match discussion) |
Navy One wrote: snakehips wrote: NTBlue wrote: Cain Liddle should edit the video of this weeks game, send it to the AFL and umpires coach and ask for an explanation as to why decisions were judged in favour of West Coast when they tackled a Carlton player, but when a Carlton player tackled a West Coast player in exactly the same manner it was either a free to West Coast, play on or a ball up. And the video should repeatedly play the trip to Curnow and the slam to the ground of Cripps by NicNat. Maybe if the umpires saw it repeated 30 or 40 times they might pick up the inconsistency. Think someone might have saved Liddle a few hours in the editing suite NTBhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6UCJ6FP3_k&feature=youtu.be Makes your blood boil watching that ... The AFL in their customary manner will signoff on that crap ..... Their top braille official couldn't see anything wrong Yep, just as I was ready to move on I watched that clip. The one that really gets to me is the dropping the ball not paid against Natinui, should have been 26 points up. Pissed Offfffff. |
|
| Author: | Heavs [ Tue Aug 11, 2020 4:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R11 West Coast v Carlton (post match discussion) |
Blue Vain wrote: Navy Blue Horse wrote: Blue Vain wrote: jamespul65 wrote: I think teague needs help and the currant assistant JB needs to go . I think you're raisin a valid point this all sounds like sour grapes Barker could cop it in the date.... I still can't believe we never drafted Luke Sultana in 2018. |
|
| Author: | Nick [ Tue Aug 11, 2020 4:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R11 West Coast v Carlton (post match discussion) |
What was the MRO grading on the Shuey trip? “Nothing to see here” ? |
|
| Author: | frank dardew [ Tue Aug 11, 2020 4:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R11 West Coast v Carlton (post match discussion) |
$1000 fine for Shuey |
|
| Author: | GWS [ Tue Aug 11, 2020 6:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R11 West Coast v Carlton (post match discussion) |
bondiblue wrote: ...in an egalitarian society. Nearly wet my pants there bondi...
|
|
| Author: | billc3 [ Tue Aug 11, 2020 8:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R11 West Coast v Carlton (post match discussion) |
Blue4ever wrote: Navy One wrote: snakehips wrote: NTBlue wrote: Cain Liddle should edit the video of this weeks game, send it to the AFL and umpires coach and ask for an explanation as to why decisions were judged in favour of West Coast when they tackled a Carlton player, but when a Carlton player tackled a West Coast player in exactly the same manner it was either a free to West Coast, play on or a ball up. And the video should repeatedly play the trip to Curnow and the slam to the ground of Cripps by NicNat. Maybe if the umpires saw it repeated 30 or 40 times they might pick up the inconsistency. Think someone might have saved Liddle a few hours in the editing suite NTBhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6UCJ6FP3_k&feature=youtu.be Makes your blood boil watching that ... The AFL in their customary manner will signoff on that crap ..... Their top braille official couldn't see anything wrong Yep, just as I was ready to move on I watched that clip. The one that really gets to me is the dropping the ball not paid against Natinui, should have been 26 points up. Pissed Offfffff. Forgot about the ruck contest free.. How can that be missed?? Go Blues |
|
| Author: | sticksaftersiren87 [ Tue Aug 11, 2020 9:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R11 West Coast v Carlton (post match discussion) |
The missed deliberate by no 14 from eagles boggles my mine. |
|
| Author: | The Normal One [ Wed Aug 12, 2020 8:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | R11 West Coast v Carlton (post match discussion) |
Navy Blue Horse wrote: Blue Vain wrote: jamespul65 wrote: I think teague needs help and the currant assistant JB needs to go . I think you're raisin a valid point this all sounds like sour grapes Stop wining everyone. |
|
| Author: | Blue Sombrero [ Wed Aug 12, 2020 12:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R11 West Coast v Carlton (post match discussion) |
We are the Blues. W have 16 trophies in the cabernet. |
|
| Author: | sammywaslow [ Wed Aug 12, 2020 3:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | R11 West Coast v Carlton (post match discussion) |
Blue Sombrero wrote: We are the Blues. W have 16 trophies in the cabernet. My sediment exactly. But sheesh, that highlight video?!? That it’s from a single game and goes for 4.5 minutes is an indictment. In other sports, there might be a couple of controversial decisions per round in a given competition. Royally screwed. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
| Author: | Blue Vain [ Wed Aug 12, 2020 4:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R11 West Coast v Carlton (post match discussion) |
Blue Sombrero wrote: We are the Blues. W have 16 trophies in the cabernet. That could be the attraction for Ollie Wines |
|
| Author: | Beijing Blue [ Wed Aug 12, 2020 7:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R11 West Coast v Carlton (post match discussion) |
Blue Vain wrote: Blue Sombrero wrote: We are the Blues. W have 16 trophies in the cabernet. That could be the attraction for Ollie Wines 
|
|
| Author: | camel [ Wed Aug 12, 2020 8:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R11 West Coast v Carlton (post match discussion) |
Blue Vain wrote: Blue Sombrero wrote: We are the Blues. W have 16 trophies in the cabernet. That could be the attraction for Ollie Wines I dunno, let's ask 79vintage. |
|
| Author: | The Normal One [ Wed Aug 12, 2020 8:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | R11 West Coast v Carlton (post match discussion) |
Wow, umpires paying free kicks for fun in the. In era game tonight. We would’ve had 10 I. The first quarter one with this interpretation. |
|
| Author: | Beijing Blue [ Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R11 West Coast v Carlton (post match discussion) |
Why do I hate them so....? |
|
| Author: | bluedog [ Wed Aug 12, 2020 11:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R11 West Coast v Carlton (post match discussion) |
Blue Sombrero wrote: We are the Blues. W have 16 trophies in the cabernet. That's the spirit!! |
|
| Page 10 of 11 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|