Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Apr 18, 2024 4:04 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 134 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 5:46 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 1:54 pm
Posts: 2251
Sydney Blue wrote:
Our 4 tall forwards conceded 8 free kicks we got 2 our way up the midfield
Ports tall forwards gave up 1 and got 3 their way inside the forward 50.

Are Caz Gov and Harry unlucky or undisciplined.

I thought we lost it rather than Port win it.
I know they missed some sitters but Cunningham on his right rather than his left then it's game over. Mind you Caz was free right in front of him and Eddie to the right.

Mystery surround Gibbons not looking for short options backwards. Like to see wide angle maybe everyone manned.

It would have been nice to win that.

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk


agree it would have helped had cunners been on his preferred but he needs to understand that and hit up whoever the free players were ( i think he had betts and casboult) with a 20m chip kick


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 5:49 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 4435
Teddy Hopkins wrote:
Was yelling at the TV with a minute or two left, do not kick it to a contest, milk the clock.


Guess I wasn't yelling loud enough.



Teague said the plan is to kick down the line and get it out of bounds. Not sure I like that strategy. We couldn't even get it right anyhow.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 5:50 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 4435
doofdoof wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Our 4 tall forwards conceded 8 free kicks we got 2 our way up the midfield
Ports tall forwards gave up 1 and got 3 their way inside the forward 50.

Are Caz Gov and Harry unlucky or undisciplined.

I thought we lost it rather than Port win it.
I know they missed some sitters but Cunningham on his right rather than his left then it's game over. Mind you Caz was free right in front of him and Eddie to the right.

Mystery surround Gibbons not looking for short options backwards. Like to see wide angle maybe everyone manned.

It would have been nice to win that.

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk


agree it would have helped had cunners been on his preferred but he needs to understand that and hit up whoever the free players were ( i think he had betts and casboult) with a 20m chip kick


Yep terrible lack of poise. In the matter of 2 seconds he gave the ball back. Just stupid football.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 5:51 pm 
Online
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:48 pm
Posts: 4175
Location: Perth
Wasn’t able to watch due to sons footy. Listened to the first half on the radio and tried checking scores periodically as I could after that.

Gutted. Awful way to lose. Especially if we lacked composure and should of iced it.

_________________
We are on our way back...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 6:05 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:16 pm
Posts: 337
MPH78 wrote:
Wasn’t able to watch due to sons footy. Listened to the first half on the radio and tried checking scores periodically as I could after that.

Gutted. Awful way to lose. Especially if we lacked composure and should of iced it.


We lost. They could have. Took a miracle kick after the siren. THey missed 3 sitters in the last 5. Toss of the coin. We lost. Can’t blame the last minute, we could have been 20 down or 7 up by then.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 6:08 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2018 7:19 am
Posts: 2087
Location: Melbourne
tasboy wrote:
MPH78 wrote:
Wasn’t able to watch due to sons footy. Listened to the first half on the radio and tried checking scores periodically as I could after that.

Gutted. Awful way to lose. Especially if we lacked composure and should of iced it.


We lost. They could have. Took a miracle kick after the siren. THey missed 3 sitters in the last 5. Toss of the coin. We lost. Can’t blame the last minute, we could have been 20 down or 7 up by then.

PA had three quick goals at the start of the first before we even looked like scoring.

_________________
Our tradition demands success!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 6:15 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 11556
Location: Melbourne
CK95 wrote:
I only noticed Westhoff for the first time in the last qtr.


Me too and I yelled DONT YOU @#$%&! START NOW


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 7:00 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:59 am
Posts: 1949
Proud of our team.
We played four quarters.
The game could have gone either way.
Now turn to next week.
That's the nature of football.
If we bring the same application every week, we can play finals.

_________________
Blue is the colour, Blue is our colourful conversation, football is the game, talking carlton is our aim, we're all together, we're all together, winning is our aim, arguing is a pain, let's debate for gain. .. .!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 7:00 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 5:18 pm
Posts: 1514
Location: Deep Blue Sea
CFC8795 wrote:
tasboy wrote:
MPH78 wrote:
Wasn’t able to watch due to sons footy. Listened to the first half on the radio and tried checking scores periodically as I could after that.

Gutted. Awful way to lose. Especially if we lacked composure and should of iced it.


We lost. They could have. Took a miracle kick after the siren. THey missed 3 sitters in the last 5. Toss of the coin. We lost. Can’t blame the last minute, we could have been 20 down or 7 up by then.

PA had three quick goals at the start of the first before we even looked like scoring.


I think the 3rd of those 3 goals was dumb play by us and the easiest goal of the game. The guy Crippa was minding(?) stayed down goal side of the pack while Crippa is trying to help/hinder Weiters. Half a metre out and thank you very much. In a 3 point game it hurts as much as Gray's goal.

_________________
"IF YOU FAIL TO PREPARE, YOU'RE PREPARED TO FAIL" - Mark Spitz


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 7:27 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:09 pm
Posts: 4549
79Vintage wrote:
Proud of our team.
We played four quarters.
The game could have gone either way.
Now turn to next week.
That's the nature of football.
If we bring the same application every week, we can play finals.

+1
: thumbs up:

_________________
Just throwing it out there.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 7:42 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 3581
Navy One wrote:
CFC8795 wrote:
tasboy wrote:
MPH78 wrote:
Wasn’t able to watch due to sons footy. Listened to the first half on the radio and tried checking scores periodically as I could after that.

Gutted. Awful way to lose. Especially if we lacked composure and should of iced it.


We lost. They could have. Took a miracle kick after the siren. THey missed 3 sitters in the last 5. Toss of the coin. We lost. Can’t blame the last minute, we could have been 20 down or 7 up by then.

PA had three quick goals at the start of the first before we even looked like scoring.


I think the 3rd of those 3 goals was dumb play by us and the easiest goal of the game. The guy Crippa was minding(?) stayed down goal side of the pack while Crippa is trying to help/hinder Weiters. Half a metre out and thank you very much. In a 3 point game it hurts as much as Gray's goal.


Gutted after but already keen for next week.

Noted the Cripps mistake in the match day. If Plowman did that it would almost be the talking point of the post game. Was poor by Cripps. Very poor.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 7:50 pm 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
Shattered. We only need a big man to compete on the wing and it was over


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 8:16 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:51 am
Posts: 4197
Location: lygon street
We have a horrible tendency to fly for the same mark and do nothing but spoil each other and inevitably both players end up on the ground while their opponent makes of like vandals with the ball. Cripps did it to Weiters and cost us a goal. Martin did it a couple of times, one certainly ended up a in a shot at goal which I think might have been missed. Need to develop a bit more awareness of what their team mates are doing. Weiters well and truly had it covered and would have marked it, instead Cripps gifts his direct opponent a goal from a metre out.

I know we want to win every week and losses like today hurt, but we are still developing and improving. Today was a bitter pill to swallow in the way it went down. But the effort and 4 quarter performance against a high quality opponent, in many ways it was one of our better performances of the year. We missed out on the 4 points but we backed up our best win with another great performance.

Next week becomes extremely important. Cannot drop the ball against an opponent that is bottom 3 this year.

_________________
Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 8:17 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2018 8:32 pm
Posts: 456
Seemed like lots of those contests where Port outmarked us way too easily. After watching Teague's press conference, I'm not sure that Gibbons can be accused of lacking composure, seems like he was doing exactly what he was expected to do.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 8:23 pm 
Offline
Laurie Kerr

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:30 pm
Posts: 116
Stoked to see a Carlton game live, yelled myself hoarse - neither players or umpires acted on my advice obviously - numb that we lost. (Had thought they kicked the one from the goal square so was still recovering)..
I love when we do quick movement and the 3 talls interacting - just looks beautiful and unstoppable. I’m sure they had to hang back, hence why they had numbers far too often.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 8:24 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2015 6:07 pm
Posts: 240
free dixon wtf

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... x-SpsDnj0j


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:28 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
Posts: 7858
Location: Melbourne
@#$%&!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

_________________
:lol: :-D :) :? :( :x :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:32 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 5828
ferdinand wrote:
Seemed like lots of those contests where Port outmarked us way too easily. After watching Teague's press conference, I'm not sure that Gibbons can be accused of lacking composure, seems like he was doing exactly what he was expected to do.


Yep. The alternative for Gibbons was to kick backwards into our defensive fifty. Port would have pressed up and the next kick would have been dicey unless we could somehow get a free man. He took seconds off the clock, steadied and kicked long to a contest on the boundary where we had Pittonet, Levi & Harry. It wasn’t a bad option if there was nothing else on.

The really disappointing thing was that Pittonet, Levi & Harry couldn’t kill the contest and get the ball out of bounds. Getting out marked in that situation is unforgivable.

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:39 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 47340
Location: Prison Island
aboynamedsue wrote:
ferdinand wrote:
Seemed like lots of those contests where Port outmarked us way too easily. After watching Teague's press conference, I'm not sure that Gibbons can be accused of lacking composure, seems like he was doing exactly what he was expected to do.


Yep. The alternative for Gibbons was to kick backwards into our defensive fifty. Port would have pressed up and the next kick would have been dicey unless we could somehow get a free man. He took seconds off the clock, steadied and kicked long to a contest on the boundary where we had Pittonet, Levi & Harry. It wasn’t a bad option if there was nothing else on.

The really disappointing thing was that Pittonet, Levi & Harry couldn’t kill the contest and get the ball out of bounds. Getting out marked in that situation is unforgivable.


We seemed to turn it over time and time again kicking it long to a contest. We need to work on positioning and having someone at the fall of the ball. Port seemed to be able to take it away from those contests with ease.

I thought we were clearly outmuscled and outbodied in contested/clearance situations as well but we somehow stuck with them.

We did bloody well and should have earned some respect. I guess it's good that losing hurts again? @#$%&! that top of the ladder team had to be one that got away.

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 9:50 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 5828
grrofunger wrote:
aboynamedsue wrote:
ferdinand wrote:
Seemed like lots of those contests where Port outmarked us way too easily. After watching Teague's press conference, I'm not sure that Gibbons can be accused of lacking composure, seems like he was doing exactly what he was expected to do.


Yep. The alternative for Gibbons was to kick backwards into our defensive fifty. Port would have pressed up and the next kick would have been dicey unless we could somehow get a free man. He took seconds off the clock, steadied and kicked long to a contest on the boundary where we had Pittonet, Levi & Harry. It wasn’t a bad option if there was nothing else on.

The really disappointing thing was that Pittonet, Levi & Harry couldn’t kill the contest and get the ball out of bounds. Getting out marked in that situation is unforgivable.


We seemed to turn it over time and time again kicking it long to a contest. We need to work on positioning and having someone at the fall of the ball. Port seemed to be able to take it away from those contests with ease.

I thought we were clearly outmuscled and outbodied in contested/clearance situations as well but we somehow stuck with them.

We did bloody well and should have earned some respect. I guess it's good that losing hurts again? @#$%&! that top of the ladder team had to be one that got away.


It doesn’t matter how many you have at the fall of the ball if the opposition mark it! Pittonet, Levi or Harry needed to impact that last contest. Opposition marks in our forward line is a source of immense frustration for me, especially when we field 3 tall targets down there. For me, the long kick into attack isn’t the problem, it’s when our big blokes allow the opposition to mark it.

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 134 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group