Sidefx wrote:
I do have to agree with Keogh on one thing though, that we still lack a lot of depth and especially in the middle and you can only look to the head coach (who is gone) and the recruiting manager to blame. I'm not on the bashing SOS bandwagon, but at some point the blame will eventually have to fall somewhere unless we improve on our midfield depth.
As I have said before, this trade period we should be looking for multiple fringe players with potential, like Martin. To maximise our trades and remain in the early part of the drafts. And as Keogh has pointed out, we don't need to go all Geelong and get big names, selling the farm or future 1st rounders to rise back up the ladder. Richmond's fringe players and rookie elevations have proven that it's not needed. We have a good talented core already, we just need help around the edges like Richmond has done and players in the right age bracket.
Spent two hours at Ikon Park with a member of the Executive Leadership Team prior to the start of the season....
After almost 20 top 30 picks and over 40 list changes:
- we lack mids and midfield depth, both young talent and experienced mids
- lack small, rebounding defenders (young or otherwise)
- no small forwards
- we haven’t utilised the state leagues/rookie list for untried talent
- so many tall/3rd tall defenders/ forwards when the comp is focused on pressure...
- after all the change over an extended period of time, our list should not have the gaps it does
Just to be clear, this was his personal opinion, not an official club view