Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon May 20, 2024 6:37 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5310 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ... 266  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2020 7:59 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Agree Doc and it’s not just the smokescreen we are not tackling enough although that is a by product of being switched on mentally and having a ruthless determination to win
Haven’t seen either of those in his brief coaching reign yet
A couple of comeback Hollywood wins which are good at the time but doesn’t ensure a sustainable platform to win continually


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2020 8:44 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 19543
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
We've been trotting out this "dearth of talent in 23-27 age group" for years. In fact the 18yo players drafted when we first used it have probably retired.

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2020 8:50 pm 
Offline
formerly Yazzamatazz
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:16 pm
Posts: 7455
Location: NowHere.....
Sometimes I wonder if SOS played it a little safe with recruiting, in terms of character types with his sons at the club.. possibly bypassing better players.. it's just a thought that crosses my minds sometimes.

Teague was a brave/hard player, I'm sure that attribute is high on his requirements regarding recruitment going forward.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk

_________________
Circumstance has no value. It is how one relates to a situation that has value. All true meaning resides in the personal relationship to a phenomenon, what it means to you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2020 9:32 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
DocSherrin III wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
I've tried to find a post to see what your position is Doc...too hard to find. Easier to ask.

What is your position?


Janakurpara and Piditaka for the most part. Was missionary but the back isn't what it used to be.

bondiblue wrote:
How and why is Teague 100% wrong? Curious


A seven goal start? Yeah - sorry...I think the guy can coach, but he's gotta get them mentally switched on. That's part of his job.


I actually think it rests with the players. they're professional footballers. like Nathan Buckley said years ago.... not his job to. motivate them

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2020 9:33 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 23030
Location: Bondi Beach
DocSherrin III wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
I've tried to find a post to see what your position is Doc...too hard to find. Easier to ask.

What is your position?


Janakurpara and Piditaka for the most part. Was missionary but the back isn't what it used to be.

bondiblue wrote:
How and why is Teague 100% wrong? Curious


A seven goal start? Yeah - sorry...I think the guy can coach, but he's gotta get them mentally switched on. That's part of his job.


100%

Leigh Matthews mentioned something along those lines today.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2020 9:45 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 23030
Location: Bondi Beach
Lace Out wrote:
Sometimes I wonder if SOS played it a little safe with recruiting, in terms of character types with his sons at the club.. possibly bypassing better players.. it's just a thought that crosses my minds sometimes.

Teague was a brave/hard player, I'm sure that attribute is high on his requirements regarding recruitment going forward.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk


Lace I love your thinking.

I was thinking today, I dont think the players today would know how brave Teague was, let alone how tough the era he played in. I mean 'really know'. Coz they aren't coming out with vigour, putting it nicely. They either know how hard they have to go in or they don't. These players need a rocket up 'em

Teague might be expecting the kids to know they have to come with hardness and ruthlessness to win, just because they were top 5 picks or 1st rounders.

Maybe he thinks the TAC or the private school system teaches kids mongrel. They're insulated. There's no senior players (in their 20's & 30s) to follow and learn the ropes at school or Under 18 club.

Teague has to move hearts minds to make them human canonballs.

This week!

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2020 11:01 pm 
Offline
formerly Yazzamatazz
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:16 pm
Posts: 7455
Location: NowHere.....
Lets hope so Bondi.

It's time for a big scalp, the cats this weekend is just the shot in the arm we need.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk

_________________
Circumstance has no value. It is how one relates to a situation that has value. All true meaning resides in the personal relationship to a phenomenon, what it means to you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2020 11:32 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10110
Lace Out wrote:
Sometimes I wonder if SOS played it a little safe with recruiting, in terms of character types with his sons at the club.. possibly bypassing better players.. it's just a thought that crosses my minds sometimes.

Teague was a brave/hard player, I'm sure that attribute is high on his requirements regarding recruitment going forward.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk


Not SoS as such but a club policy and if it was about his boys, McGovern wouldn’t have been traded in. So please stop pointing the finger or looking at the boys and SOS as excuses. Just not fair play.
Remember Bolton stating we want ‘good characters and humans’. Remember the debate around drafting Charlie between SOS and Brendon. Luckily we went the extrovert on that occasion. Don’t believe we as a club wanted to go down that path on to many occasions. Also the reason we traded out others such as Robinson.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 12:10 am 
Offline
formerly Yazzamatazz
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:16 pm
Posts: 7455
Location: NowHere.....
Fair enough.

I only think SOS as he has family that could be directly affected and is in a position to protect.
Doesn't mean it's true, just something that's crossed my mind as a parent.

I know the club also could not afford any more headlines and were looking for strong character types to help pull the club forward.

I just think you need to take the best footballers you can get your hands on. You can always tweak a winning side in due course.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk

_________________
Circumstance has no value. It is how one relates to a situation that has value. All true meaning resides in the personal relationship to a phenomenon, what it means to you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 3:05 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Lace Out wrote:
Sometimes I wonder if SOS played it a little safe with recruiting, in terms of character types with his sons at the club.. possibly bypassing better players.. it's just a thought that crosses my minds sometimes.

Teague was a brave/hard player, I'm sure that attribute is high on his requirements regarding recruitment going forward.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk

I have never thought this.
The list manager is (usually) told what types to recruit by the coach based on the projected game plan.
Nobody will ever convince me that SOS favoured his kids. He separated himself from those particular decisions.
Jack can play. He also has in spades what was lacking in the first quarter last weekend, desire and effort. No way he would have been standing around like Harry watching opposition players win the footy.
Ben we don't know about but one thing he does have, is the pressure of being a Silvagni that sits heavy on all of them. He will bring the same level of intent to the game that Serge had, that SOS had, Alex had and Jack has. Games are won by getting the footy and putting it through the sticks. In the first quarter we did neither.
SOS had a shit hand in a high stakes poker game. Everybody knows it's impossible to get a team off the bottom with one first rounder and one second rounder per year. The AFL knows it and that's why Richmond, Hawthorn, StK and nor GCS have their priority picks and in the case of GCS, draft ad zone concessions that everybody was a bit put out at but really didnt think would amount to anything in the long term. If they get into the top 10 this year and then get their priority pick this year and their academy players and their zone players, Eddie will start the complaints.
SOS never got any of that. He had to turn lead into gold. He had some wins and some losses and some we still don't know about.
Our development team has a lot to answer for as well. Russell will do well because he has the track record but how many of our players never developed or got worse before that?
Holman is playing better in the GCS. Gower is at least playing at the Dogs after not even getting a game for us.
We'd probably have Coniglio except the AFL deliberately intervened and now Cogs is getting paid partly outside the cap as an AFL ambassador or whatever it is.
I can never work out why SOS gets blamed for everything. As Carlton supporters we have always wanted instant gratification.
He didn't give us that. We don't really know what he gave us yet. Most of the recruits from the draft aren't shaving yet, let alone playing good footy. Let them develop before we crucify SOS. If he'd delivered Cogs, we'd look a lot better..... That's why Gil the dill stepped in. It's also why GCS didn't get their package until we jumped above them on the ladder.
Blame him. He can't stand the thought of a strong Carlton. When we're strong, we hold sway in the direction of the AFL decision making process, like Collingwood. That doesn't suit them.
End of rant.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 6:30 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17584
SurreyBlue wrote:
Remember the debate around drafting Charlie between SOS and Brendon.


No. :?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 6:56 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 9:42 pm
Posts: 2214
Location: dudley!!!
Blue Sombrero wrote:
Lace Out wrote:
Sometimes I wonder if SOS played it a little safe with recruiting, in terms of character types with his sons at the club.. possibly bypassing better players.. it's just a thought that crosses my minds sometimes.

Teague was a brave/hard player, I'm sure that attribute is high on his requirements regarding recruitment going forward.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk

I have never thought this.
The list manager is (usually) told what types to recruit by the coach based on the projected game plan.
Nobody will ever convince me that SOS favoured his kids. He separated himself from those particular decisions.
Jack can play. He also has in spades what was lacking in the first quarter last weekend, desire and effort. No way he would have been standing around like Harry watching opposition players win the footy.
Ben we don't know about but one thing he does have, is the pressure of being a Silvagni that sits heavy on all of them. He will bring the same level of intent to the game that Serge had, that SOS had, Alex had and Jack has. Games are won by getting the footy and putting it through the sticks. In the first quarter we did neither.
SOS had a shit hand in a high stakes poker game. Everybody knows it's impossible to get a team off the bottom with one first rounder and one second rounder per year. The AFL knows it and that's why Richmond, Hawthorn, StK and nor GCS have their priority picks and in the case of GCS, draft ad zone concessions that everybody was a bit put out at but really didnt think would amount to anything in the long term. If they get into the top 10 this year and then get their priority pick this year and their academy players and their zone players, Eddie will start the complaints.
SOS never got any of that. He had to turn lead into gold. He had some wins and some losses and some we still don't know about.
Our development team has a lot to answer for as well. Russell will do well because he has the track record but how many of our players never developed or got worse before that?
Holman is playing better in the GCS. Gower is at least playing at the Dogs after not even getting a game for us.
We'd probably have Coniglio except the AFL deliberately intervened and now Cogs is getting paid partly outside the cap as an AFL ambassador or whatever it is.
I can never work out why SOS gets blamed for everything. As Carlton supporters we have always wanted instant gratification.
He didn't give us that. We don't really know what he gave us yet. Most of the recruits from the draft aren't shaving yet, let alone playing good footy. Let them develop before we crucify SOS. If he'd delivered Cogs, we'd look a lot better..... That's why Gil the dill stepped in. It's also why GCS didn't get their package until we jumped above them on the ladder.
Blame him. He can't stand the thought of a strong Carlton. When we're strong, we hold sway in the direction of the AFL decision making process, like Collingwood. That doesn't suit them.
End of rant.



:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

it hard not to think gil has something against us

_________________
my last one was rubbish


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:45 am 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 1:06 pm
Posts: 9296
DocSherrin III wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
I've tried to find a post to see what your position is Doc...too hard to find. Easier to ask.

What is your position?


Janakurpara and Piditaka for the most part. Was missionary but the back isn't what it used to be.



:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Orandum est ut sit mens sana in corpore sano. Fortem posce animum mortis terrore carentem, qui spatium vitae extremum inter munera ponat naturae, qui ferre queat quoscumque labores.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 2:59 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28221
Genuine question re one of the remaining constants who's been there a long time...

What does Barker bring to the table ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 2:59 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 23030
Location: Bondi Beach
robertbb wrote:
DocSherrin III wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
I've tried to find a post to see what your position is Doc...too hard to find. Easier to ask.

What is your position?


Janakurpara and Piditaka for the most part. Was missionary but the back isn't what it used to be.



:lol: :lol: :lol:


He's a classic isn't he. A vocabulary as long as John Holmes it seems....

I reckon he's a Trippa ... a tripadam

Onya Doc

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 3:13 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 9:31 pm
Posts: 893
Rexy wrote:
Genuine question re one of the remaining constants who's been there a long time...

What does Barker bring to the table ?

Great question. He’s been our “stoppage” coach for the last few years. I personally have significant issues with how we play at stoppages:
(1) the only method we have is hack it forward (other teams use a string of handballs to release a player into space running towards goal who can make a rational decision to either low the eyes or kick long but to the advantage of our forwards). Our pure clearance numbers are actually good but we don’t get the bang for our buck other teams get off much less clearances because we have no real method after the first contested possession.
(2) we get sucked to the ball like bees to a honey pot which allows the other team to keep 1-2 players 5-10 metres off the stoppage. Once these guys get the ball fed out to them, they are off to the races and we can’t contain the spread because all our players are stuck where the ball was a few seconds prior.

Time for a change. John has been there for too long. We need a fresh perspective.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 3:21 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 9:58 pm
Posts: 4299
david31 wrote:
Rexy wrote:
Genuine question re one of the remaining constants who's been there a long time...

What does Barker bring to the table ?

Great question. He’s been our “stoppage” coach for the last few years. I personally have significant issues with how we play at stoppages:
(1) the only method we have is hack it forward (other teams use a string of handballs to release a player into space running towards goal who can make a rational decision to either low the eyes or kick long but to the advantage of our forwards). Our pure clearance numbers are actually good but we don’t get the bang for our buck other teams get off much less clearances because we have no real method after the first contested possession.
(2) we get sucked to the ball like bees to a honey pot which allows the other team to keep 1-2 players 5-10 metres off the stoppage. Once these guys get the ball fed out to them, they are off to the races and we can’t contain the spread because all our players are stuck where the ball was a few seconds prior.

Time for a change. John has been there for too long. We need a fresh perspective.


On point 1, when Diesel came back to the club, we did start hanballing a lot more especially under pressure rather than just blindly throwing it onto the boot. We did see a fair bit of improvement then. Why we stopped is anyones guess.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 6:20 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 23030
Location: Bondi Beach
Rexy wrote:
Genuine question re one of the remaining constants who's been there a long time...

What does Barker bring to the table ?


woof woof woof

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 6:44 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 1:06 pm
Posts: 9296
Rexy wrote:
Genuine question re one of the remaining constants who's been there a long time...

What does Barker bring to the table ?


Nude photos of someone would be my guess.

Him and Andy McKay I could never, ever get my head around what they actually did well.

_________________
Orandum est ut sit mens sana in corpore sano. Fortem posce animum mortis terrore carentem, qui spatium vitae extremum inter munera ponat naturae, qui ferre queat quoscumque labores.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 7:09 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:09 pm
Posts: 4659
Our set plays haven't been good since we lost Paganite

_________________
░L░I░N░K░I░N░B░I░O ░


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5310 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ... 266  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group