TalkingCarlton
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/

R11: Drug Cheats v Carlton (pre match discussion)
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=36580
Page 6 of 7

Author:  Rexy [ Fri May 31, 2019 5:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R11: Drug Cheats v Carlton (pre match discussion)

Bags is in you beauty :lol:

Author:  jim [ Fri May 31, 2019 5:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R11: Drug Cheats v Carlton (pre match discussion)

Lang, Fasolo, Dow and Setterfield are the 4 interchange.

Author:  dablues [ Fri May 31, 2019 5:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R11: Drug Cheats v Carlton (pre match discussion)

So Kennedy, setters and Cripps all playing. Let’s hope it rains and it’s wet.

Author:  Rexy [ Fri May 31, 2019 5:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R11: Drug Cheats v Carlton (pre match discussion)

dablues wrote:
So Kennedy, setters and Cripps all playing. Let’s hope it rains and it’s wet.


Cripps and Setterfield aren't slow if that's your inference.

Author:  jake_h03 [ Fri May 31, 2019 5:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R11: Drug Cheats v Carlton (pre match discussion)

jim wrote:
Lang, Fasolo, Dow and Setterfield are the 4 interchange.


Happy with that from the extended bench. Better balanced forward line without all 3 talls. Relieved there's no Polson, Garlett. Kerr would make us too top heavy and Schumacher hasn't really banged the door down despite being emergency a few times

Author:  HTP [ Fri May 31, 2019 5:42 pm ]
Post subject:  R11: Drug Cheats v Carlton (pre match discussion)

Cripps is surprisingly untouchable once he gets going. Has he been caught HTB when he’s gone for a gallop this year? My computer says no.

Author:  dannyboy [ Fri May 31, 2019 5:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R11: Drug Cheats v Carlton (pre match discussion)

you take your computer to games?

Author:  HTP [ Fri May 31, 2019 6:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R11: Drug Cheats v Carlton (pre match discussion)

dannyboy wrote:
you take your computer to games?


Oh, I see. Here we go. I suppose you're one of those, "I go to the footy with my mates" types, am I right? Well good for you, Mr Footy Mates. Look at you going to the footy with meatsacks.

I SUPPOSE IT'S FUNNY TO YOU WHEN I CAN'T FIND A POWER OUTLET.

It's so HILARIOUS when someone bumps my beer and it spills into my mate. And my mate short circuit. "Hah, look mate! That guy's mate's just short circuited! So funny! Lol, lol, lol!"

Because he's a computer.

Jerk.

Author:  bluegirl72 [ Fri May 31, 2019 6:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R11: Drug Cheats v Carlton (pre match discussion)

HTP wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
you take your computer to games?


Oh, I see. Here we go. I suppose you're one of those, "I go to the footy with my mates" types, am I right? Well good for you, Mr Footy Mates. Look at you going to the footy with meatsacks.

I SUPPOSE IT'S FUNNY TO YOU WHEN I CAN'T FIND A POWER OUTLET.

It's so HILARIOUS when someone bumps my beer and it spills into my mate. And my mate short circuit. "Hah, look mate! That guy's mate's just short circuited! So funny! Lol, lol, lol!"

Because he's a computer.

Jerk.

:lol: :lol: :clap:

Author:  jake_h03 [ Fri May 31, 2019 6:55 pm ]
Post subject:  R11: Drug Cheats v Carlton (pre match discussion)

HTP wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
you take your computer to games?


Oh, I see. Here we go. I suppose you're one of those, "I go to the footy with my mates" types, am I right? Well good for you, Mr Footy Mates. Look at you going to the footy with meatsacks.

I SUPPOSE IT'S FUNNY TO YOU WHEN I CAN'T FIND A POWER OUTLET.

It's so HILARIOUS when someone bumps my beer and it spills into my mate. And my mate short circuit. "Hah, look mate! That guy's mate's just short circuited! So funny! Lol, lol, lol!"

Because he's a computer.

Jerk.


NERRRRRRRRD!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Author:  Adam Chatfield [ Fri May 31, 2019 8:55 pm ]
Post subject:  R11: Drug Cheats v Carlton (pre match discussion)

HTP wrote:
Cripps is surprisingly untouchable once he gets going. Has he been caught HTB when he’s gone for a gallop this year? My computer says no.


He has but not all that often.

As for the ins, less tall is better.

Author:  billc3 [ Fri May 31, 2019 9:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R11: Drug Cheats v Carlton (pre match discussion)

HTP wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
you take your computer to games?


Oh, I see. Here we go. I suppose you're one of those, "I go to the footy with my mates" types, am I right? Well good for you, Mr Footy Mates. Look at you going to the footy with meatsacks.

I SUPPOSE IT'S FUNNY TO YOU WHEN I CAN'T FIND A POWER OUTLET.

It's so HILARIOUS when someone bumps my beer and it spills into my mate. And my mate short circuit. "Hah, look mate! That guy's mate's just short circuited! So funny! Lol, lol, lol!"

Because he's a computer.

Jerk.
Your mate's a bloody Siri?!?!

(with attribution to Damian Power :wink:)

Go Blues

Author:  CFC8795 [ Fri May 31, 2019 9:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R11: Drug Cheats v Carlton (pre match discussion)

HTP wrote:
Cripps is surprisingly untouchable once he gets going. Has he been caught HTB when he’s gone for a gallop this year? My computer says no.


HTP, isn’t this a reference to Carol Beer played by David Walliams in “ Little Britain”?

Author:  scottopee [ Sat Jun 01, 2019 1:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R11: Drug Cheats v Carlton (pre match discussion)

HTP wrote:
Cripps is surprisingly untouchable once he gets going. Has he been caught HTB when he’s gone for a gallop this year? My computer says no.


Yet when he is he just handballs it away to a 50/50 contest so whats the point?

Author:  scottopee [ Sat Jun 01, 2019 1:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R11: Drug Cheats v Carlton (pre match discussion)

Rexy wrote:
dablues wrote:
So Kennedy, setters and Cripps all playing. Let’s hope it rains and it’s wet.


Cripps and Setterfield aren't slow if that's your inference.


Cripps and Setterfield are extremely slow if your inferring their not.

Author:  CFC8795 [ Sat Jun 01, 2019 1:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R11: Drug Cheats v Carlton (pre match discussion)

Let’s be clear about the difference between inferring and implying.
To infer is to conclude or deduce from evidence.
To imply is to suggest.
I think dablues was implying that Cripps, Kennedy and Setters are slow.

Author:  billc3 [ Sat Jun 01, 2019 3:43 pm ]
Post subject:  R11: Drug Cheats v Carlton (pre match discussion)

I thought he was talking about the way he interferes with the way they tie up their shorts.....

Go Blues

Author:  dannyboy [ Sat Jun 01, 2019 5:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R11: Drug Cheats v Carlton (pre match discussion)

my mates are so old some of them are also plugged in.

Author:  tommi [ Sat Jun 01, 2019 5:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R11: Drug Cheats v Carlton (pre match discussion)

DILDO...!


kindest regards tommi

Author:  dablues [ Sat Jun 01, 2019 5:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: R11: Drug Cheats v Carlton (pre match discussion)

CFC8795 wrote:
Let’s be clear about the difference between inferring and implying.
To infer is to conclude or deduce from evidence.
To imply is to suggest.
I think dablues was implying that Cripps, Kennedy and Setters are slow.




Yes I was and Yes they are. Not McLean slow but certainly not fast... :donk:

Page 6 of 7 All times are UTC + 10 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/