bluebo baggers wrote:
CFC8795 wrote:
Does anyone know what Daisy "allegedly" said to the umpire?
"You're worse than Eleni Glouftis"
Apparently he said "you are a f******g cheat."
| TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| R9: GWS Vs Carlton (Post match discussion) http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=36570 |
Page 5 of 5 |
| Author: | moshe25 [ Mon May 20, 2019 6:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R9: GWS Vs Carlton (Post match discussion) |
DocSherrin III wrote: Navy One wrote: FMD ..... then we have that clown Lloyd (the one on our payroll) saying he was OK with what Mumford did. Shut the "F" up and piss off. Glad Lloyd said that. Maybe some of you need to take the blindfold off. Same thing with Dale Thomas. Pull your @#$%&! head in...it's a boundary umpire! At least a $10k fine. Disgraceful. Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk |
|
| Author: | ScottSaunders2 [ Mon May 20, 2019 6:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R9: GWS Vs Carlton (Post match discussion) |
fine yes, weeks no. |
|
| Author: | Arnhem blues [ Mon May 20, 2019 6:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R9: GWS Vs Carlton (Post match discussion) |
I made a stand today about Carlton's poor season and took the Carlton cover off my mobile phone. If they do it again - there goes my Carlton coffee mug. I know that sounds harsh but am quietly confident they will get the message before I have to get rid of the scarf... |
|
| Author: | bluedog [ Mon May 20, 2019 6:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R9: GWS Vs Carlton (Post match discussion) |
Jez1966 wrote: CFC8795 wrote: Does anyone know what Daisy "allegedly" said to the umpire? https://www.afl.com.au/news/2019-05-20/ ... e-tribunal Allegedly "YOU'RE a f***ing cheat." to boundary umpire Michael Barlow. Should have said: 'I'd really like to call you a f****ing cheat, but I won't, this time.' |
|
| Author: | Navy One [ Mon May 20, 2019 7:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R9: GWS Vs Carlton (Post match discussion) |
DocSherrin III wrote: Navy One wrote: FMD ..... then we have that clown Lloyd (the one on our payroll) saying he was OK with what Mumford did. Shut the "F" up and piss off. Glad Lloyd said that. Maybe some of you need to take the blindfold off. Same thing with Dale Thomas. Pull your @#$%&! head in...it's a boundary umpire! At least a $10k fine. Disgraceful. Lloyd saying we need to toughen up .... got absolutely no issues with that. We're a bunch of nice guys. Get in there and tackle hard but what Mumford did is a c##t's act. |
|
| Author: | kezza [ Mon May 20, 2019 7:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R9: GWS Vs Carlton (Post match discussion) |
windy wrote: And another thing - Why the white jumper, surely not a jumper clash with their bright orange? I was wondering the same thing. They played Hawthorn the week before and both had similar colours, orange back and gold back. I felt the jumpers clashed so why didn't GWS wear an away jumper then? |
|
| Author: | kezza [ Mon May 20, 2019 7:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R9: GWS Vs Carlton (Post match discussion) |
bluebo baggers wrote: CFC8795 wrote: Does anyone know what Daisy "allegedly" said to the umpire? "You're worse than Eleni Glouftis" Apparently he said "you are a f******g cheat." |
|
| Author: | McConville33 [ Mon May 20, 2019 8:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R9: GWS Vs Carlton (Post match discussion) |
AGRO wrote: Time for Carlton to file that away for next season - if the AFL are condoning “live by the sword die by the sword” then next Carlton -v- GWS game, Mumford has to be lined up by Casboult or perhaps Charlie Curnow accidentally driving a knee straight into the small of his back whilst taking a speccy. Yeah that has credibility (not)! |
|
| Author: | Blue4ever [ Mon May 20, 2019 8:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R9: GWS Vs Carlton (Post match discussion) |
Navy One wrote: DocSherrin III wrote: Navy One wrote: FMD ..... then we have that clown Lloyd (the one on our payroll) saying he was OK with what Mumford did. Shut the "F" up and piss off. Glad Lloyd said that. Maybe some of you need to take the blindfold off. Same thing with Dale Thomas. Pull your @#$%&! head in...it's a boundary umpire! At least a $10k fine. Disgraceful. Lloyd saying we need to toughen up .... got absolutely no issues with that. We're a bunch of nice guys. Get in there and tackle hard but what Mumford did is a c##t's act. Agree, it's 2019, not the 80's Mumford had one intention and he's got nothing to answer for FMD. We lose a player for 3/4 weeks and possibly another for calling an umpire a cheat. This year is travelling south at a very fast pace. Mumfords act was gutless and Cripps cops a fine after the GWS player responds as if he was shot, comical. |
|
| Author: | keogh [ Mon May 20, 2019 8:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R9: GWS Vs Carlton (Post match discussion) |
Watched the game Lucky it wasn’t 20 goal loss Absolutely pathetic So many spuds Not enough studs 4 years into our rebuild What a joke Don’t worry sugar Coaters I won’t bang on But you can’t pull your socks up if you haven’t go any |
|
| Author: | kezza [ Mon May 20, 2019 8:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R9: GWS Vs Carlton (Post match discussion) |
ScottSaunders2 wrote: fine yes, weeks no. One of the radio shows tonight suggesting he may get 4 weeks. |
|
| Author: | MIL [ Mon May 20, 2019 8:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R9: GWS Vs Carlton (Post match discussion) |
AFL are so predictable. They need a strong GWS....Mummy gets off somehow. They have zero care for the Blues, as they've got metro Melbourne more than covered. Rampe calls the Ump a girl....fine....Daisy calls one a cheat and it's straight to the tribunal. Lol. |
|
| Author: | Blue4ever [ Mon May 20, 2019 8:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R9: GWS Vs Carlton (Post match discussion) |
kezza wrote: ScottSaunders2 wrote: fine yes, weeks no. One of the radio shows tonight suggesting he may get 4 weeks. I can't recall any other player getting suspended for abusing an umpire. |
|
| Author: | Teddy Hopkins [ Mon May 20, 2019 10:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R9: GWS Vs Carlton (Post match discussion) |
Teddy Hopkins wrote: DesEnglish wrote: Sorry, last point. Does Mumford get off because he’s a good bloke and someone wants a beer with him? Late hit on a player who did not have the ball and took him out of the game. This from a player with priors. Should be simple. I said, SHOULD. I was right. It was simple. |
|
| Author: | AGRO [ Tue May 21, 2019 10:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R9: GWS Vs Carlton (Post match discussion) |
Blue4ever wrote: kezza wrote: ScottSaunders2 wrote: fine yes, weeks no. One of the radio shows tonight suggesting he may get 4 weeks. I can't recall any other player getting suspended for abusing an umpire. Even James “Golden Balls and Drug Cheat” Hird only got a $20,000 fine for calling Umpire Scott McLaren “disgraceful” on a national and then high rating “The Footy Show”. So based on that, if Daisy called the umpire a “flowering cheat” in front of an inflated audience of 10,000 people  at GWS, and factoring in the anti-Carlton AFL bias, he should get away with crucifixion.
|
|
| Author: | bondiblue [ Tue May 21, 2019 12:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R9: GWS Vs Carlton (Post match discussion) |
AGRO wrote: Blue4ever wrote: kezza wrote: ScottSaunders2 wrote: fine yes, weeks no. One of the radio shows tonight suggesting he may get 4 weeks. I can't recall any other player getting suspended for abusing an umpire. Even James “Golden Balls and Drug Cheat” Hird only got a $20,000 fine for calling Umpire Scott McLaren “disgraceful” on a national and then high rating “The Footy Show”. So based on that, if Daisy called the umpire a “flowering cheat” in front of an inflated audience of 10,000 people at GWS, and factoring in the anti-Carlton AFL bias, he should get away with crucifixion.Great points you bring up as usual AGRO. Love it. Thanks. |
|
| Page 5 of 5 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|