AGRO wrote:
99prelim wrote:
AGRO wrote:
Charlie Constable.
He may be your 'i told you so', broken record, 'hindsight is a wonderful thing' regurgitation BUT
1. He went pick 36 so every other club passed on him at least once
2. Geel were afforded the luxury of giving him a year in the ressies...invaluable learning and transitioning experience
He may well become a better player than LOB, but right now, picking the better one is a toss of the coin. We simply don't have enough evidence either way. Revisit after they've both played 50-70 games
And if Constable is deemed the better player, no doubt you'll play us the entire album, not just the A and B side
Look I know I got that pick 10 wrong - as you say hindsight is a beautiful thing, Tim Kelly is clearly a better player than Charlie Constable.
But I’ll still stick with my original pick 10 of Constable.
A
nd if you’re still posting here in 10 years time I’ll still continue to give you the shits unless of course one of us is dead before then.If it makes you feel better, you don't give me the shits...My post (apart from my 'album' smart arse comment) was genuine
Yes you picked Constable...big deal. Many others didn't
It's like picking a Melb Cup winner. Punters can mount a case for half the field.
I'm sure the recruiters could mount a case for why he went at pick 36
For mine, I wouldve taken Jack Higgins
And...Constable has had a different apprenticeship to LOB...right now we're not comparing apples with apples
Can I give you a bear hug now...or extend an olive branch? You know about olive branches? Well of course you would