Blue Sombrero wrote:
Gary L:yon said something very true on the couch on Monday.
They were talking about how Ken Hinkley had set his players free to run past the man on the mark and how successful it had been.
Rootsy said,
The player who takes a mark can't handball to someone if there's nobody running past. (True)
Gary said,
It's a chicken and egg thing. If the player runs past and gets ignored, he isn't going to keep running past.
That sums up our team in a nutshell. For the past couple of years, players running past or running to space have been ignored in favour of getting the footy towards the boundary and into the hands of Cripps, Murphy, Simmo, Doc, Thomas and maybe Kreuzer and Ed Curnow. They have ignored the kids running to space. They haven't trusted them. I've made that comment half a dozen times in the last six months. If we are to go anywhere, we HAVE to trust the kids with the football and they have to demand the ball and then do something with it. It's a chicken and egg thing.
Let's watch Port next week. if they do what they did last week and we do what we did, we will get slaughtered by their four first year players running through the middle with PP, Rockliff and Boak feeding it out to them.
We also have to play two rucks next week or Phillips will get the Gawn treatment. Hit outs to advantage are all of a sudden more important.
For me it's simple...the player with the ball needs to make the best decision...does he honour the running player just because he presents or does he assess what dangers lurk around that player and choose differently. Nothing shits me more than players running past, blissfully unaware that unless the handball is cm perfect (and bullet like)*, they will get tackled
The desision maker is the player with the ball.
* our hand balling technique is Under 12s