TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
Tactics for new rules discussion http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=36414 |
Page 2 of 2 |
Author: | smithy [ Tue Nov 06, 2018 6:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Tactics for new rules discussion |
windy wrote: Lol @ smithy Ever see K Bartlett play? You make shit up Anecdotal. Name 10 others from the same era that dived every week then. |
Author: | smithy [ Tue Nov 06, 2018 6:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Tactics for new rules discussion |
dannyboy wrote: or too much coverage/replays ruins it. There have always been stagers - blocks dropping as they'd been hit with a brick wall then bouncing back up to take the free, players have always sought to take advantage...spirit of the game is a wonderful colonial idea. I think you are living in a fantasy land if you think it was as endemic as it is now. |
Author: | dannyboy [ Tue Nov 06, 2018 7:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Tactics for new rules discussion |
In my fantasy we are happy to disagree. |
Author: | Blue Sombrero [ Wed Nov 07, 2018 12:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Tactics for new rules discussion |
Well we could start with this.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHCYsDmXaoc |
Author: | dannyboy [ Wed Nov 07, 2018 7:36 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Tactics for new rules discussion |
but its not endemic, just spasmodic, a lot of spasmodic incidents of course (mathematically, E=SC2, when does spasmodic become endemic - perhaps when there are enough cameras to case the spasms?) but there you have it. |
Author: | moshe25 [ Wed Nov 07, 2018 1:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Tactics for new rules discussion |
smithy wrote: windy wrote: Lol @ smithy Ever see K Bartlett play? You make shit up Anecdotal. Name 10 others from the same era that dived every week then. Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk |
Author: | AGRO [ Wed Nov 07, 2018 1:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Tactics for new rules discussion |
moshe25 wrote: smithy wrote: windy wrote: Lol @ smithy Ever see K Bartlett play? You make shit up Anecdotal. Name 10 others from the same era that dived every week then. Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk Difficult since KB did have his heyday in the Cretaceous Era. |
Author: | dannyboy [ Wed Nov 07, 2018 6:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Tactics for new rules discussion |
I can name 10 teams Essendon* - @#$%&! staging cheats! Collingwood - @#$%&! staging flower! Richmond - @#$%&! violent stagers! Fitzroy - even @#$%&! complained about the light!!!! Melbourne - @#$%&! diamond (remember that player , could kick a mile but mostly, when he did get a kick, out on the full) crusted stagers! South Melbourne/Sydney - @#$%&! helicopter whingers! Footscray - even @#$%&! complained when the wind didn't turn up at their shit hole of a ground! Hawthorn - @#$%&! complained about not being allowed to whack you behind play (or falling on Kenny Hunter's head, @#$%&! Matthews!)! St Kilda - @#$%&! whinging about the cost of heroin. Geelong - @#$%&! complaining about losing their handbags! |
Author: | Brently8 [ Mon Nov 12, 2018 10:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Tactics for new rules discussion |
I can remember Kernahan flopping forward in plenty of marking contests to accentuate contact. |
Author: | windy [ Tue Nov 13, 2018 7:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Tactics for new rules discussion |
Peter Hudson was the same |
Author: | dannyboy [ Tue Nov 13, 2018 7:44 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Tactics for new rules discussion |
all players strive for an edge - on except for that British chap who played in the spirit of the game - Tarzan was it? |
Author: | Sydney Blue [ Fri Dec 07, 2018 7:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Tactics for new rules discussion |
Sydney Blue wrote: I have a tactic You have just kicked a goal in the final minute to put you 2 points up. You are losing the centre clearances by 3 to 1 The 6 6 6 puts the opposition with best chance of scoring particularly as the centre clearances are so one sided. So you get your full forward to step out the square. Then your entire forward line bolts into defense to fill the space. By the time the ump conveys the message to the central umpire you have already flooded the defensive 50 Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk It appears the AFL Have read this and have now introduce a 50 meter penalty https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/afl ... 50kqp.html |
Author: | choo [ Fri Dec 07, 2018 8:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Tactics for new rules discussion |
Sydney Blue wrote: Sydney Blue wrote: I have a tactic You have just kicked a goal in the final minute to put you 2 points up. You are losing the centre clearances by 3 to 1 The 6 6 6 puts the opposition with best chance of scoring particularly as the centre clearances are so one sided. So you get your full forward to step out the square. Then your entire forward line bolts into defense to fill the space. By the time the ump conveys the message to the central umpire you have already flooded the defensive 50 Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk It appears the AFL Have read this and have now introduce a 50 meter penalty https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/afl ... 50kqp.html I blame SB |
Author: | Teddy Hopkins [ Sun Dec 09, 2018 12:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Tactics for new rules discussion |
Currently watching 1970 GF on Fox. No theatrics, no grandstanding, just two teams going hammer and tongs. And a little blonde fellow who shall remain nameless has kicked 3 goals in the 3rd quarter. |
Author: | smithy [ Mon Dec 10, 2018 2:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Tactics for new rules discussion |
But Teddy I've been assured everything is the same and there has always been rampant staging, surely this cannot be? Like me you must have been imagining things. It couldn't be because our culture has changed to the extent that cheating has become largely acceptable, please report to your commissar immediately. |
Author: | Blue Vain [ Mon Dec 10, 2018 5:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Tactics for new rules discussion |
Teddy Hopkins wrote: Currently watching 1970 GF on Fox. No theatrics, no grandstanding, just two teams going hammer and tongs. And a little blonde fellow who shall remain nameless has kicked 3 goals in the 3rd quarter. You have to love the commentary 'A stitch in time saves nine" "Oh no, Carlton are handballing in the backline AGAIN!" |
Author: | dannyboy [ Wed Dec 12, 2018 2:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Tactics for new rules discussion |
smithy wrote: But Teddy I've been assured everything is the same and there has always been rampant staging, surely this cannot be? Like me you must have been imagining things. It couldn't be because our culture has changed to the extent that cheating has become largely acceptable, please report to your commissar immediately. so 1 game decides everything? |
Author: | smithy [ Wed Dec 12, 2018 3:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Tactics for new rules discussion |
Tongue was planted firmly in cheek Danny, relax. |
Author: | Blue Sombrero [ Thu Dec 13, 2018 11:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Tactics for new rules discussion |
windy wrote: Peter Hudson was the same Peter Hudson flopped forward a fair bit when Wes Lofts and Vin Waite caught him in a sandwich as well. Only three Full backs ever kept him goal less in a VFL match, Ruchmond's barry Richardson, who was at St Pats Ballarat when I started there, Ian Cooper from Collingwood and Curly Austin. Also he was held goal less once in Tassie by one Bruce Greenhill from the now defunct Sandy Bay footy club Not bad for a man who played senior footy between 1963-1981 in Tassie and Melbourne. |
Page 2 of 2 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |