How shit must the Swans be?

82 tackles compared to 54, 53 & 58 over the last three weeks. Much better.

We got these kids for their skill and run then suppressed it.
They all had a purpose and a avenue to attack.

no zone
no probs

+1.

We got these kids for their skill and run then suppressed it.
They all had a purpose and a avenue to attack.

no zone
no probs

Yeah sure.
We've been playing predominantly man on man defence for weeks. The difference is we're not playing a seventh defender as often. And to suggest playing a zone defence somehow stifles run is fanciful. A zone is only relevant when the OPPOSITION have the ball.
The reality is we got some good players in, we played the second bottom side and we took our chances when they didn't.
But if some of the keyboard warriors think "their" plan to get us back on track somehow affected the result, knock yourselves out.
Whatever the case, we can all enjoy a win for the next 7 days.

Yeah sure.
We've been playing predominantly man on man defence for weeks. The difference is we're not playing a seventh defender as often. And to suggest playing a zone defence somehow stifles run is fanciful. A zone is only relevant when the OPPOSITION have the ball.
The reality is we got some good players in, we played the second bottom side and we took our chances when they didn't.
But if some of the keyboard warriors think "their" plan to get us back on track somehow affected the result, knock yourselves out.
Whatever the case, we can all enjoy a win for the next 7 days.

You can insert all the emojis you like but you're talking crap.
We played man on man, no spare men, no guarding grass with hit up players.
Bolton has the balls to change his game style but you keep defending the crap.
We got some player is and lost others, give it a break you are becoming very tiresome.
They played to the kids strengthens and they played well.
For the first time in a long time they did't look confused or lost.
Are you a politician?

You can insert all the emojis you like but you're talking crap.
We played man on man, no spare men, no guarding grass with hit up players.
Bolton has the balls to change his game style but you keep defending the crap.
We got some player is and lost others, give it a break you are becoming very tiresome.
They played to the kids strengthens and they played well.
For the first time in a long time they did't look confused or lost.
Are you a politician?

to me the difference was about skill, this time we didn't continually hit them on the chest, giving the ball back and having us all out of position

plus I also liked Lobbe's game (as I did his first quarter against the Hawks) his work is very good.

Next continuity - Kennedy, Cripps, Dow and SPS have played some games together in a row.

Finally, Polson and Picket. I know Pickett didn't do a lot but he and Polson have speed and hurry their defenders or manage scraps where the ball is help up until Cripps and co arrive.

Also The Suns were shite n- that always helps.

A politician? No, just a football follower.
No spare men? Marchbank played as a spare in the first quarter. That just tells me you don't have any idea. Like others, you make shit up to justify your opinion. Watch the game.
Bolts coached well. The players played well. It has nothing to do with demands made by uninformed keyboard warriors.
As for your comments about zones suppressing run, I note you didn't attempt to justify that. It was laughable.

Why cant people just give credit where it's due?

Yeah sure.
We've been playing predominantly man on man defence for weeks. The difference is we're not playing a seventh defender as often. And to suggest playing a zone defence somehow stifles run is fanciful. A zone is only relevant when the OPPOSITION have the ball.
The reality is we got some good players in, we played the second bottom side and we took our chances when they didn't.
But if some of the keyboard warriors think "their" plan to get us back on track somehow affected the result, knock yourselves out.
Whatever the case, we can all enjoy a win for the next 7 days.