Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Apr 20, 2024 7:06 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 220 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 11:18 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33617
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Rexy wrote:
BigGartos wrote:
Rexy wrote:
there was no reason to go into this game with Rowe - none !

back half just too crowded with talls and confusing - should have had Mullett as another mobile utility

If I recall correctly, Rowe started forward as the big body to support Charlie. But with Phillips gone early Rowe shared ruck for a while then went back. So Eventually Kennedy provided ruck support for a badly struggling Krooz !
For some reason they wanted Rowe as the depp defender, presumably to keep Jones further up the ground, and Rowe was slaughtered by Hipwood.

I don’t want to see Rowe in the team ever again.


Kreuzer started forward with Charlie. Phillips was 1st ruck. Rowe started back with Marchbank on a wing. :screwy:

Phillips got injured early so they swung Rowe forward.

You can't predict what injuries are going to happen but that starting structure was ridiculous, IMHO.
And I want to know who decides on these structures.

Is it just Bolton, or do our line coaches (Barker in particular, as our "Head of Strategy and High Performance") decide this?

Whoever it is needs a kick up the arse.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 12:09 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17563
Rexy wrote:
BigGartos wrote:
Rexy wrote:
there was no reason to go into this game with Rowe - none !

back half just too crowded with talls and confusing - should have had Mullett as another mobile utility

If I recall correctly, Rowe started forward as the big body to support Charlie. But with Phillips gone early Rowe shared ruck for a while then went back. So Eventually Kennedy provided ruck support for a badly struggling Krooz !
For some reason they wanted Rowe as the depp defender, presumably to keep Jones further up the ground, and Rowe was slaughtered by Hipwood.

I don’t want to see Rowe in the team ever again.


Kreuzer started forward with Charlie. Phillips was 1st ruck. Rowe started back with Marchbank on a wing. :screwy:

Phillips got injured early so they swung Rowe forward.

You can't predict what injuries are going to happen but that starting structure was ridiculous, IMHO.


Why? :? Rowe has started back all season, Phillips deserved first crack in the ruck and Marchbank was playing as the defensive wingman which he plays well.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 12:28 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28221
Blue Vain wrote:
Rexy wrote:
BigGartos wrote:
Rexy wrote:
there was no reason to go into this game with Rowe - none !

back half just too crowded with talls and confusing - should have had Mullett as another mobile utility

If I recall correctly, Rowe started forward as the big body to support Charlie. But with Phillips gone early Rowe shared ruck for a while then went back. So Eventually Kennedy provided ruck support for a badly struggling Krooz !
For some reason they wanted Rowe as the depp defender, presumably to keep Jones further up the ground, and Rowe was slaughtered by Hipwood.

I don’t want to see Rowe in the team ever again.


Kreuzer started forward with Charlie. Phillips was 1st ruck. Rowe started back with Marchbank on a wing. :screwy:

Phillips got injured early so they swung Rowe forward.

You can't predict what injuries are going to happen but that starting structure was ridiculous, IMHO.


Why? :? Rowe has started back all season, Phillips deserved first crack in the ruck and Marchbank was playing as the defensive wingman which he plays well.


Rowe isn't an AFL player... and I'm being polite.

We recruited Marchbank as a quality KPD.

Phillips definitely deserves the #1 ruck :thumbsup:

Mullett should have played as a mobile utility instead of Rowe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 12:47 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 5331
Location: Melbourne
Jones has been a huge disappointment this year, and Rowe has been putrid.
Hardly the two key defenders the youngsters can look up to.
Apart from Simmo and Murphy, we have the worst senior core in the AFL.

_________________
James Hird and Essendon* FC - #FOREVERDRUGCHEATS


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 12:52 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 5331
Location: Melbourne
Donstuie wrote:
Rexy wrote:
BigGartos wrote:
Rexy wrote:
there was no reason to go into this game with Rowe - none !

back half just too crowded with talls and confusing - should have had Mullett as another mobile utility

If I recall correctly, Rowe started forward as the big body to support Charlie. But with Phillips gone early Rowe shared ruck for a while then went back. So Eventually Kennedy provided ruck support for a badly struggling Krooz !
For some reason they wanted Rowe as the depp defender, presumably to keep Jones further up the ground, and Rowe was slaughtered by Hipwood.

I don’t want to see Rowe in the team ever again.


Kreuzer started forward with Charlie. Phillips was 1st ruck. Rowe started back with Marchbank on a wing. :screwy:

Phillips got injured early so they swung Rowe forward.

You can't predict what injuries are going to happen but that starting structure was ridiculous, IMHO.
And I want to know who decides on these structures.

Is it just Bolton, or do our line coaches (Barker in particular, as our "Head of Strategy and High Performance") decide this?

Whoever it is needs a kick up the arse.


Barker needs to go at the end of the year.
Simple as that.
Been a massive FAIL in his role this year.

_________________
James Hird and Essendon* FC - #FOREVERDRUGCHEATS


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 1:00 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 1:54 pm
Posts: 415
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
McKay sitting in the front row was like the ultimate troll

What I can't understand is taking McKay to Brisbane and have him sitting in the crowd , why wasn't he in the coaches box sitting along side of SIMMO and listening to him and learning something , wouldn't that be a learning experience for him, fmd it's not rocket science, an absolute waste of a resource for the day and they go on about teaching the kids ( yeh right )


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 2:31 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 4544
Waterman wrote:
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
McKay sitting in the front row was like the ultimate troll

What I can't understand is taking McKay to Brisbane and have him sitting in the crowd , why wasn't he in the coaches box sitting along side of SIMMO and listening to him and learning something , wouldn't that be a learning experience for him, fmd it's not rocket science, an absolute waste of a resource for the day and they go on about teaching the kids ( yeh right )
Very astute point there...

Go Blues

_________________
“Every single element of the Club has to be the best in the league, meticulously and methodically, and only by doing this will we be elite and challenge for number 17.”
Greg Lee


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 2:34 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 2630
Waterman wrote:
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
McKay sitting in the front row was like the ultimate troll

What I can't understand is taking McKay to Brisbane and have him sitting in the crowd , why wasn't he in the coaches box sitting along side of SIMMO and listening to him and learning something , wouldn't that be a learning experience for him, fmd it's not rocket science, an absolute waste of a resource for the day and they go on about teaching the kids ( yeh right )


Learn from the coaches box!!! I would hope he could have been able to teach them something yesterday. :oops:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 2:40 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33617
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
What I find alarming is that our worst performances (Melbourne aside) have been against the worst opposition.

Gold Coast
Collingwood (early on when they were still shit)
Norf
Freo
Brisbane

Yet against the top teams (again, Melbourne excluded) we seem to find a resolve and in some cases given ourselves genuine opportunities to win if not for better composure or luck.

Going back to Murph's "We got ahead of ourselves" comment, is it genuinely a case of the group expecting an easier day and not paying proper respect to their opposition? If so they need their @#$%&! heads examined because they've done nothing yet to deserve that mindset, and they're @#$%&! stupid for not learning from their mistakes.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:43 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2016 1:04 pm
Posts: 1104
Location: Brisbane
taken me over 24 hours to sign in as I have been too disappointed.

BTW bris in GMCbris is for Brisbane where I live (in relative seclusion so as to not let people become aware of the Blue membership card in my pocket). Glad my kids barrack for Brisbane. When they were born I didnt have the heart to make them support the Blues when all their friends would be Lions supporters. At least they have something to look forward too.

We were terrible. It was hard to watch.

Yep still disappointed.

BTW, saw an online post the Big H has asked to be traded and that's why we arent playing him. Jeez I hope that's a load of crap!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 6:18 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:55 pm
Posts: 11563
Location: Brisbane
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Phillips's shot for goal in the first quarter go out on the full?

If so, why do the stats show that he did not give away any free kicks?

http://www.afl.com.au/match-centre/2018/16/bl-v-carl

_________________
THEY LIKE TO SEND UP!!!!!!!!

Until each team plays each other the same number of times, the AFL, as a fair dinkum competition, cannot be taken seriously.

He (Mr Swann) said the honour and pride associated with the club's traditional navy blue jumper was priceless.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 6:37 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 8247
Location: Australia
kkk wrote:
I get that we lost Philips early when the plan was to have he and Kruezer as our tall forwards with Charlie.

But how is it possible that Charlie was competing with 2 (and sometimes more) every time we kicked it high into the forward line, whilst we had 4 key defenders on the ground. Rowe was tried in the 2nd, but thereafter he, Marchbank, Jones and Weitering were all playing back. Surely one had to be played forward just to try to draw a player away from Curnow?


Weitering was off injured all the last quarter, that’s why Rowe was moved back to the backline. Marchbank went off injured also in the last quarter.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 6:42 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 8247
Location: Australia
Rexy wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Rexy wrote:
BigGartos wrote:
Rexy wrote:
there was no reason to go into this game with Rowe - none !

back half just too crowded with talls and confusing - should have had Mullett as another mobile utility

If I recall correctly, Rowe started forward as the big body to support Charlie. But with Phillips gone early Rowe shared ruck for a while then went back. So Eventually Kennedy provided ruck support for a badly struggling Krooz !
For some reason they wanted Rowe as the depp defender, presumably to keep Jones further up the ground, and Rowe was slaughtered by Hipwood.

I don’t want to see Rowe in the team ever again.


Kreuzer started forward with Charlie. Phillips was 1st ruck. Rowe started back with Marchbank on a wing. :screwy:

Phillips got injured early so they swung Rowe forward.

You can't predict what injuries are going to happen but that starting structure was ridiculous, IMHO.


Why? :? Rowe has started back all season, Phillips deserved first crack in the ruck and Marchbank was playing as the defensive wingman which he plays well.


Rowe isn't an AFL player... and I'm being polite.

We recruited Marchbank as a quality KPD.

Phillips definitely deserves the #1 ruck :thumbsup:

Mullett should have played as a mobile utility instead of Rowe.


Rowe was playing well last year until he was injured, ever since he came back this year he has lost all mobility, and he didn’t have a lot to stat with. Should have been playing VFL all this year to recover but we have no depth.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 7:18 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 14283
I have been away for the weekend and had no foxtel.
I recorded the game, have no intention of watching it.
We all knew this was going to happen, went in too tall and slow.
Just don't know if we are ever going to get out of this hole.
If we lose Cripps, that is me done.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 8:32 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 2456
AGRO wrote:
I’ve got another one.

I think we had 5 players who didn’t have a disposal smothered.


:thumbsup:


The only positive I can come up with:
In 2001, we smashed the Lions by something like 80pts.
They went on to win the Premiership, and two after that.

In truth, this loss was not about our list or injuries. If so, we would have been smashed by at least this much every week. No, this was above the shoulders.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:52 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:59 am
Posts: 8605
kezza wrote:
I have been away for the weekend and had no foxtel.
I recorded the game, have no intention of watching it.
We all knew this was going to happen, went in too tall and slow.
Just don't know if we are ever going to get out of this hole.
If we lose Cripps, that is me done.




I think that will do it for me also Kezza after 65 years :cry:

_________________
Cheats never prosper (except in the AFL)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 10:47 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Sun May 31, 2015 8:24 pm
Posts: 829
kezza wrote:
I have been away for the weekend and had no foxtel.
I recorded the game, have no intention of watching it.
We all knew this was going to happen, went in too tall and slow.
Just don't know if we are ever going to get out of this hole.
If we lose Cripps, that is me done.


Watch the first quarter and then turn it off. The first is actually quite enjoyable.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 09, 2018 9:36 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10324
Location: Coburg
And in the first Rowe starts strongly - it is when he moves forward that things start to go wrong.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 09, 2018 7:51 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 7776
Just watching Talking Footy.

Lions had 309 uncontested possession and 24 marks inside 50. That's off the chart!

They were showing highlights of how we were zoning and showing how, as Carey said, we had absolutely no idea where we should be standing and positioning ourselves. Just totally lost as to what to do. He said the message, whatever he's teaching, is just not getting though using that style of play.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 09, 2018 7:59 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28221
jim, don't watch ch7


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 220 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 73 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group