TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
R9: Carlton v Melbourne - Pat Kerr to debut http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=36185 |
Page 6 of 11 |
Author: | jake_h03 [ Wed May 16, 2018 8:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | R9: Carlton v Melbourne - AFL appeal both Curnow decisions |
Regardless of the outcome, the fact that we won’t know if the boys are available until a couple of hours before teams are named is farcical. You’ve had a whole bloody week Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
Author: | tommi [ Wed May 16, 2018 9:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: R9: Carlton v Melbourne - AFL appeal both Curnow decisio |
Thist ^^^....! kindest regards tommi |
Author: | Ockham's Razor [ Wed May 16, 2018 9:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: R9: Carlton v Melbourne - AFL appeal both Curnow decisio |
The AFL hypocrisy needs to be laid bare. Someone in the media needs to grow the balls to call it out. Round 6, 2018 five players were charged with making contact with an umpire. All five received a fine. That's right, all five did exactly what Ed, Charlie & May did and all five were fined. None of the five did what Tom Hawkins did, ie. none of them plead guilty at the tribunal. Each of the five were offered a fine at the first instance by good ol boy Michael Christian. The five players; Dustin Martin Ben Cunnington Steven Motlop David Swallow Matt Crouch Each were offered a $500 discount if they accepted an early plea to making careless contact with an umpire and pay $1,000. Where's the confected outrage. Simply because the Cats were sufficiently naive to cave into head office doesn't mean Blues or others need to be victims of the AFL again making up outcomes on the run. |
Author: | billc3 [ Wed May 16, 2018 10:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: R9: Carlton v Melbourne - Pre Match Discussion |
doofdoof wrote: scottopee wrote: AGRO wrote: You have to apply the "AFL Carlton Test" that the AFL applies at all times when making a decision that may affect the Carlton Football Club. If there two choices or actions to be made about the Carlton Football Club and one of those decisions actions may result in a net benefit to the Carlton Football Club, then make the other decision. Or you are totally wrong...... He may be onto something Go Blues |
Author: | Sydney Blue [ Wed May 16, 2018 10:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: R9: Carlton v Melbourne - AFL appeal both Curnow decisio |
Ockham's Razor wrote: The AFL hypocrisy needs to be laid bare. If this is true we should all repost this on every social media platform available Someone in the media needs to grow the balls to call it out. Round 6, 2018 five players were charged with making contact with an umpire. All five received a fine. That's right, all five did exactly what Ed, Charlie & May did and all five were fined. None of the five did what Tom Hawkins did, ie. none of them plead guilty at the tribunal. Each of the five were offered a fine at the first instance by good ol boy Michael Christian. The five players; Dustin Martin Ben Cunnington Steven Motlop David Swallow Matt Crouch Each were offered a $500 discount if they accepted an early plea to making careless contact with an umpire and pay $1,000. Where's the confected outrage. Simply because the Cats were sufficiently naive to cave into head office doesn't mean Blues or others need to be victims of the AFL again making up outcomes on the run. Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk |
Author: | MIL [ Wed May 16, 2018 10:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: R9: Carlton v Melbourne - AFL appeal both Curnow decisio |
This is our Line In The Sand game. If the AFL win this appeal then corruption of the tribunal must have occurred. Take AFL to Supreme Court and do them over well and good....go them for costs and embarrass them. Dennis Denutto could win this with his eyes closed. They have given us zero for decades and screwed us over while they pander to the expansion teams. We are Carlton......flower you AFL |
Author: | Mots87 [ Wed May 16, 2018 10:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: R9: Carlton v Melbourne - AFL appeal both Curnow decisio |
I expect the club to very strong in their support for Ed and Charlie. The AFL don't do us any favours. Time for them to be called out and tested on their inconsistencies. Take no prisoners on this one CFC. |
Author: | MIL [ Wed May 16, 2018 10:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: R9: Carlton v Melbourne - AFL appeal both Curnow decisio |
Mots87 wrote: I expect the club to very strong in their support for Ed and Charlie. The AFL don't do us any favours. Time for them to be called out and tested on their inconsistencies. Take no prisoners on this one CFC. For team unity and resilience we must do this, but I'm scared they will cave on the side of "umps are sacrosanct" crap. Yes they are to be protected but not for harmless unintentional softest of soft contact. Hawkins lashed out in anger.....he was guilty as sin so the Cats didn't try anything. AFL should start to educate their guys to not get within the personal space zone if they can avoid it, and this would have prevented both of the Curnow touches. |
Author: | Blue Sombrero [ Wed May 16, 2018 11:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: R9: Carlton v Melbourne - AFL appeal both Curnow decisio |
I think it would be reasonable for the club to ask that the suspension not be this week but the following, as it has already interrupted the entire week's prep for the game, not knowing wtf is going on and jeopardise the entire team performance. I ask that somewhat hopefully, given they sat up till 0200 the night before the draft to make sure we had no hope of getting Godard and Wells. As an aside, does anybody here follow Robbo and have they had any contact with him about this debacle? |
Author: | chubbyruss [ Thu May 17, 2018 7:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: R9: Carlton v Melbourne - AFL appeal both Curnow decisio |
Ockham's Razor wrote: The AFL hypocrisy needs to be laid bare. Someone in the media needs to grow the balls to call it out. Round 6, 2018 five players were charged with making contact with an umpire. All five received a fine. That's right, all five did exactly what Ed, Charlie & May did and all five were fined. None of the five did what Tom Hawkins did, ie. none of them plead guilty at the tribunal. Each of the five were offered a fine at the first instance by good ol boy Michael Christian. The five players; Dustin Martin Ben Cunnington Steven Motlop David Swallow Matt Crouch Each were offered a $500 discount if they accepted an early plea to making careless contact with an umpire and pay $1,000. Where's the confected outrage. Simply because the Cats were sufficiently naive to cave into head office doesn't mean Blues or others need to be victims of the AFL again making up outcomes on the run. OR is on the ball as usual https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/match- ... 650f20d587 Also in Round 5 - Hawk James Cousins was offered a $1000 fine for careless conduct on umpire Jeff Dalgliesh. |
Author: | bluegirl72 [ Thu May 17, 2018 9:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: R9: Carlton v Melbourne - AFL appeal both Curnow decisio |
Yes he is. I hope he or some brave supporter will ring the 'whately' show and report these facts. |
Author: | Wojee [ Thu May 17, 2018 9:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: R9: Carlton v Melbourne - AFL appeal both Curnow decisio |
bluegirl72 wrote: Yes he is. I hope he or some brave supporter will ring the 'whately' show and report these facts. Send in the screen grabs doing the rounds of players touching umpires who didn't even come under scrutiny. |
Author: | buzzaaaah [ Thu May 17, 2018 9:37 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: R9: Carlton v Melbourne - AFL appeal both Curnow decisio |
The AFL tribunal is a body appointed by the AFL to adjudicate on serious reportable offences. Steve Shocking this week appealed one of their decisions on the basis that they came to a decision that was "not reasonable" given the evidence. If he actually believes that is true, then the tribunal members must be dismissed immediately. If they are make decisions that no reasonable person would make, that makes their positions untenable. |
Author: | Wojee [ Thu May 17, 2018 9:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: R9: Carlton v Melbourne - AFL appeal both Curnow decisio |
buzzaaaah wrote: The AFL tribunal is a body appointed by the AFL to adjudicate on serious reportable offences. Steve Shocking this week appealed one of their decisions on the basis that they came to a decision that was "not reasonable" given the evidence. If he actually believes that is true, then the tribunal members must be dismissed immediately. If they are make decisions that no reasonable person would make, that makes their positions untenable. Makey Uppy in full force. |
Author: | johnny [ Thu May 17, 2018 1:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: R9: Carlton v Melbourne - AFL appeal both Curnow decisio |
You're a DOG Lewis!! Sorry......Just getting warmed up. |
Author: | Donstuie [ Thu May 17, 2018 1:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | R9: Carlton v Melbourne - AFL appeal both Curnow decisions |
johnny wrote: You're a DOG Lewis!! Sorry......Just getting warmed up. Well he was calling for the Curnows to be suspended last night. So get into im! |
Author: | bluegirl72 [ Thu May 17, 2018 3:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: R9: Carlton v Melbourne - AFL appeal both Curnow decisio |
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2018-05-17/l ... m-3pm-aest |
Author: | Navy One [ Thu May 17, 2018 3:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: R9: Carlton v Melbourne - AFL appeal both Curnow decisio |
I assume Hodgey wasn't even cited for this ........ (2 years ago mind you) http://nnimgt-a.akamaihd.net/transform/v1/crop/frm/GGnMDP6H6ep7kM2Dx35kRi/f8b2848a-13c5-40e1-b801-f1fa7d1b895b.jpg/r0_0_2164_1404_w1200_h678_fmax.jpg |
Author: | Donstuie [ Thu May 17, 2018 3:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | R9: Carlton v Melbourne - AFL appeal both Curnow decisions |
#GoodBloke |
Author: | CK95 [ Thu May 17, 2018 4:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Any news? Sent from my XT1033 using Tapatalk |
Page 6 of 11 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |