Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Mar 29, 2024 6:41 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2152 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2018 8:41 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 2:58 pm
Posts: 1636
Pick 13 was enough to get him alone, then auction McAdam in a separate deal getting a pick round the 30 range, so we dudded ourselves a late second rounder- change my mind.

_________________
"Then joked and said he (Jack himself) probably wouldn't even need to play until round 2 against Collingwood."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2018 9:04 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:50 am
Posts: 1150
We did overpay for McGovern. Probably that last 2nd rd for a 2019 3rd over.

He was worth a 2nd and mcadam I reckon, considering he was contracted.

_________________
Go Blues


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2018 9:09 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 3581
smithy wrote:
By most accounts the Sturt lad Shane McAdam was probably going to go late second round. Some rated top 20.


I haven’t looked at any phantom drafts, but where was he rated that highly and by who? Most accounts?

smithy wrote:
So we gave up in reality a first round pick (13) and the equivalent of a second round pick (30-40). A fairly high price.


Go double check what Adelaide gave up to Sydney to get that pick 13 as well.

It was slightly overs in my opinion too. You don’t need to misrepresent what the deal was though.

Now I just want to see his highlights package on the field in navy blue.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2018 9:38 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 2:58 pm
Posts: 1636
toddkurnski wrote:
smithy wrote:
By most accounts the Sturt lad Shane McAdam was probably going to go late second round. Some rated top 20.


I haven’t looked at any phantom drafts, but where was he rated that highly and by who? Most accounts?

smithy wrote:
So we gave up in reality a first round pick (13) and the equivalent of a second round pick (30-40). A fairly high price.


Go double check what Adelaide gave up to Sydney to get that pick 13 as well.

It was slightly overs in my opinion too. You don’t need to misrepresent what the deal was though.

Now I just want to see his highlights package on the field in navy blue.


I'm glad you asked, from the age - The Crows will receive pick 13 and 23-year-old McAdam, who starred in the SANFL this year and was on the radar of many clubs, some of which rated him inside the top 20 in the draft.

So if anything I was being conservative

_________________
"Then joked and said he (Jack himself) probably wouldn't even need to play until round 2 against Collingwood."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2018 9:56 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 6:45 pm
Posts: 1711
I find it funny that many on here reckon we OVERPAID for a proven AFL player who can play forward or Back in Mcgovern.
This Mcadam bloke must be some superstar for a SNAFL player and as for Picks 26 + 28 last time i checked they hadn't had a single stat........
We had a VFL superstar and he just got delisted coz he couldn't cut it at AFL level.
Picks 26 + 28 ????????? they MAY turn out to be duds or stars but do we really know yet????

Mitch Mcgovern is a STAR on the rise who is a PROVEN afl player that has played some very very good footy and will only get better and better.

IMO I'd rather McGovern every day of the week coz i know what he will deliver for the next 10 - 12 years..

Mcadam????
Picks 26 + 28 ???????


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2018 10:28 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 47259
Location: Prison Island
Also Fasolo wasn’t a trade.

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2018 10:44 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 3581
smithy wrote:
toddkurnski wrote:
smithy wrote:
By most accounts the Sturt lad Shane McAdam was probably going to go late second round. Some rated top 20.


I haven’t looked at any phantom drafts, but where was he rated that highly and by who? Most accounts?

smithy wrote:
So we gave up in reality a first round pick (13) and the equivalent of a second round pick (30-40). A fairly high price.


Go double check what Adelaide gave up to Sydney to get that pick 13 as well.

It was slightly overs in my opinion too. You don’t need to misrepresent what the deal was though.

Now I just want to see his highlights package on the field in navy blue.


I'm glad you asked, from the age - The Crows will receive pick 13 and 23-year-old McAdam, who starred in the SANFL this year and was on the radar of many clubs, some of which rated him inside the top 20 in the draft.

So if anything I was being conservative

So the Age (who at the age?) are saying we could have gone to many clubs and got a top 20 pick (because some rated him there), but instead chose to get a future pick upgrade. Does that make sense? Some rated him top 20, could have got him cheaper than that, for a late second, but chose not to? Must be some really dumb clubs out there.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 12:42 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
toddkurnski wrote:
smithy wrote:
toddkurnski wrote:
smithy wrote:
By most accounts the Sturt lad Shane McAdam was probably going to go late second round. Some rated top 20.


I haven’t looked at any phantom drafts, but where was he rated that highly and by who? Most accounts?

smithy wrote:
So we gave up in reality a first round pick (13) and the equivalent of a second round pick (30-40). A fairly high price.


Go double check what Adelaide gave up to Sydney to get that pick 13 as well.

It was slightly overs in my opinion too. You don’t need to misrepresent what the deal was though.

Now I just want to see his highlights package on the field in navy blue.


I'm glad you asked, from the age - The Crows will receive pick 13 and 23-year-old McAdam, who starred in the SANFL this year and was on the radar of many clubs, some of which rated him inside the top 20 in the draft.

So if anything I was being conservative

So the Age (who at the age?) are saying we could have gone to many clubs and got a top 20 pick (because some rated him there), but instead chose to get a future pick upgrade. Does that make sense? Some rated him top 20, could have got him cheaper than that, for a late second, but chose not to? Must be some really dumb clubs out there.

The media is talking up the 2nd tier players to make it look as through the AFL actually helped us.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 8:15 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 22935
Location: Bondi Beach
Blue Sombrero wrote:
toddkurnski wrote:
smithy wrote:
toddkurnski wrote:
smithy wrote:
By most accounts the Sturt lad Shane McAdam was probably going to go late second round. Some rated top 20.


I haven’t looked at any phantom drafts, but where was he rated that highly and by who? Most accounts?

smithy wrote:
So we gave up in reality a first round pick (13) and the equivalent of a second round pick (30-40). A fairly high price.


Go double check what Adelaide gave up to Sydney to get that pick 13 as well.

It was slightly overs in my opinion too. You don’t need to misrepresent what the deal was though.

Now I just want to see his highlights package on the field in navy blue.


I'm glad you asked, from the age - The Crows will receive pick 13 and 23-year-old McAdam, who starred in the SANFL this year and was on the radar of many clubs, some of which rated him inside the top 20 in the draft.

So if anything I was being conservative

So the Age (who at the age?) are saying we could have gone to many clubs and got a top 20 pick (because some rated him there), but instead chose to get a future pick upgrade. Does that make sense? Some rated him top 20, could have got him cheaper than that, for a late second, but chose not to? Must be some really dumb clubs out there.

The media is talking up the 2nd tier players to make it look as through the AFL actually helped us.


I like your thinking BS. I agree.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 8:25 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17518
bondiblue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Yes, but besides them, there was no one.


There's the "etc" you may have missed.

Let me help:

2 x 1st Rounders for Treloar
1 x 1st Rounder for Adams
etc


Obviously my attempts at humour require some additional tweaking. :lol:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Last edited by Blue Vain on Tue Oct 23, 2018 8:26 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 8:25 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 5959
There is always speculation
Will Fasolo turn it around

McAdam is that sort of Fasolo type player
Is younger than Fasolo
But unproven at AFL
The SANFL is a shit standard
All these things are part of the equation



If you look at McGoverns output it’s not that great
We don’t need another player like him
We need mids
Stands out like a sore thumb

Some amazing highlights buts that’s it

As I said it’s panic The club don’t want to wait any longer
The club was in a bit of shock with some of the efforts
this year
The Fremantle first half in Melbourne
The Brisbane game
The GWS game

It’s the short term fix

Guys it doesn’t work
If The recruiting staff are any good
we would have got at least one decent mid
from the 20s and greater depth if we had kept
both of them

Look at MCGoverns output
It isn’t that impressive

Carlton have not adapted to how you
build a premiership team since the draft and salary cap
took full effect 20 years ago

Posters here give examples of teams getting star players
for draft picks
Don’t forget that these teams were better than we are now
By a long way


despite a change in off field personnel
the club continues to be inpatient
We need more depth in the middle and build are list with kids

The AFL offer us some help and we piss it up the wall
With freebies from the lower leagues
McAdam may be a dud
McGovern may be a star
There may be no good mids after pick 25

If it’s the opposite then the people in charge at Carlton should
just @#$%&! off

Because mistakes aren’t learnt from


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 8:50 am 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 1:06 pm
Posts: 9296
So the club is an inpatient? Is it terminal?

_________________
Orandum est ut sit mens sana in corpore sano. Fortem posce animum mortis terrore carentem, qui spatium vitae extremum inter munera ponat naturae, qui ferre queat quoscumque labores.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 9:02 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
well said Deano as usual - agree with everything you said - also its like Charlie and Cripps re-signing if someone of that age and ability wants to come to the bottom side who won 2 games he MUST see something he thinks is sustainable and something that will bear fruit

I think the messaging of him wanting to come is something we can all hang our hat on for future success


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 10:04 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1581
frank dardew wrote:
well said Deano as usual - agree with everything you said - also its like Charlie and Cripps re-signing if someone of that age and ability wants to come to the bottom side who won 2 games he MUST see something he thinks is sustainable and something that will bear fruit

I think the messaging of him wanting to come is something we can all hang our hat on for future success


Spot on the McGovern signing will have positive knock on effects , on field and other areas.
Will help remove some of the non destination club stigma we have developed.

_________________
Go Blue Boys


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 2:53 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 3844
Location: Canberra Town!
keogh wrote:
There is always speculation
Will Fasolo turn it around

McAdam is that sort of Fasolo type player
Is younger than Fasolo
But unproven at AFL
The SANFL is a shit standard
All these things are part of the equation



If you look at McGoverns output it’s not that great
We don’t need another player like him
We need mids
Stands out like a sore thumb

Some amazing highlights buts that’s it

As I said it’s panic The club don’t want to wait any longer
The club was in a bit of shock with some of the efforts
this year
The Fremantle first half in Melbourne
The Brisbane game
The GWS game

It’s the short term fix

Guys it doesn’t work
If The recruiting staff are any good
we would have got at least one decent mid
from the 20s and greater depth if we had kept
both of them

Look at MCGoverns output
It isn’t that impressive

Carlton have not adapted to how you
build a premiership team since the draft and salary cap
took full effect 20 years ago

Posters here give examples of teams getting star players
for draft picks
Don’t forget that these teams were better than we are now
By a long way


despite a change in off field personnel
the club continues to be inpatient
We need more depth in the middle and build are list with kids

The AFL offer us some help and we piss it up the wall
With freebies from the lower leagues
McAdam may be a dud
McGovern may be a star
There may be no good mids after pick 25

If it’s the opposite then the people in charge at Carlton should
just @#$%&! off

Because mistakes aren’t learnt from


The club said 3 years ago it was going to go to three consecutive drafts and stock up on talent, that's exactly what we have done and have traded out Henderson, Touhy and Gibbs to help with that rebuild.

We have a lot of young talent on the list - we wanted to bring in some midrange talent round that 23-27 years old bracket, and we did exactly that with Mcgovern and Newman, and also added another bluechip kid in setterfield to compliment Walsh this season. Even Fasolo is only 26.

It feels like you are being hyper critical.

I have no doubt the club was alarm how badly we fell away at times in 2018 - who wasn't?

Losing Docherty on top of Gibbs plus the crazy number of injuires exposed our lack of AFL mature depth badly. Its exactly why we need the likes of Mcgovern, Fasolo and Newman - to help cover some of those deficiencies while our kids grow.

I also think McGoven is going to be a bloody star for us. A front half with McKay, Curnow and McGovern is potent to say the least. Athleticism at ground level and in the Air.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 3:02 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17518
:thumbsup:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 3:06 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 22935
Location: Bondi Beach
thegezman wrote:
keogh wrote:
There is always speculation
Will Fasolo turn it around

McAdam is that sort of Fasolo type player
Is younger than Fasolo
But unproven at AFL
The SANFL is a shit standard
All these things are part of the equation



If you look at McGoverns output it’s not that great
We don’t need another player like him
We need mids
Stands out like a sore thumb

Some amazing highlights buts that’s it

As I said it’s panic The club don’t want to wait any longer
The club was in a bit of shock with some of the efforts
this year
The Fremantle first half in Melbourne
The Brisbane game
The GWS game

It’s the short term fix

Guys it doesn’t work
If The recruiting staff are any good
we would have got at least one decent mid
from the 20s and greater depth if we had kept
both of them

Look at MCGoverns output
It isn’t that impressive

Carlton have not adapted to how you
build a premiership team since the draft and salary cap
took full effect 20 years ago

Posters here give examples of teams getting star players
for draft picks
Don’t forget that these teams were better than we are now
By a long way


despite a change in off field personnel
the club continues to be inpatient
We need more depth in the middle and build are list with kids

The AFL offer us some help and we piss it up the wall
With freebies from the lower leagues
McAdam may be a dud
McGovern may be a star
There may be no good mids after pick 25

If it’s the opposite then the people in charge at Carlton should
just @#$%&! off

Because mistakes aren’t learnt from


The club said 3 years ago it was going to go to three consecutive drafts and stock up on talent, that's exactly what we have done and have traded out Henderson, Touhy and Gibbs to help with that rebuild.

We have a lot of young talent on the list - we wanted to bring in some midrange talent round that 23-27 years old bracket, and we did exactly that with Mcgovern and Newman, and also added another bluechip kid in setterfield to compliment Walsh this season. Even Fasolo is only 26.

It feels like you are being hyper critical.

I have no doubt the club was alarm how badly we fell away at times in 2018 - who wasn't?

Losing Docherty on top of Gibbs plus the crazy number of injuires exposed our lack of AFL mature depth badly. Its exactly why we need the likes of Mcgovern, Fasolo and Newman - to help cover some of those deficiencies while our kids grow.

I also think McGoven is going to be a bloody star for us. A front half with McKay, Curnow and McGovern is potent to say the least. Athleticism at ground level and in the Air.


Well pt gezman.

You know that, I know that, keogh knows that, everyone knows that ... even the anti media acknowledge that when they forget to hate Carlton.

Some people want to create reaction or debate. I think keogh has succeeded doing both, but its the same old same old points....I have put money on McGovern being a bargain. He's a star in the making. As 3rd fiddle, or 4th if you include Betts, Mitch has created a great highlights real, because he has star quality. He can run, jump, mark and kick goals. If he continues doing that and gets better with experience at carlton....the world is his oyster.

Watch the kids step up next year. I wonder what keogh thinks of Andrew Russel's recruitment and the impact he's likely to have. If kepgh calls him a retread, I will.... :mad: ... ignore him.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 3:12 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1002
keogh wrote:
There is always speculation
Will Fasolo turn it around

McAdam is that sort of Fasolo type player
Is younger than Fasolo
But unproven at AFL
The SANFL is a shit standard
All these things are part of the equation



If you look at McGoverns output it’s not that great
We don’t need another player like him
We need mids
Stands out like a sore thumb

Some amazing highlights buts that’s it

As I said it’s panic The club don’t want to wait any longer
The club was in a bit of shock with some of the efforts
this year
The Fremantle first half in Melbourne
The Brisbane game
The GWS game

It’s the short term fix

Guys it doesn’t work
If The recruiting staff are any good
we would have got at least one decent mid
from the 20s and greater depth if we had kept
both of them

Look at MCGoverns output
It isn’t that impressive

Carlton have not adapted to how you
build a premiership team since the draft and salary cap
took full effect 20 years ago

Posters here give examples of teams getting star players
for draft picks
Don’t forget that these teams were better than we are now
By a long way


despite a change in off field personnel
the club continues to be inpatient
We need more depth in the middle and build are list with kids

The AFL offer us some help and we piss it up the wall
With freebies from the lower leagues
McAdam may be a dud
McGovern may be a star
There may be no good mids after pick 25

If it’s the opposite then the people in charge at Carlton should
just @#$%&! off

Because mistakes aren’t learnt from


Just for a bit of objectivity, what would you have done with a player that wanted to come to our club, is in the age demographic that we are looking for and plays in the part of the ground we have limited talent in?

I am a bit like you Keogh, I am not thrilled with the deal, but a second rounder and McAdam would never get the deal done so you either do the deal or walk away.

If we walk away, then what would be the flow on affect in future years, if a player is considering us or another team and can't be sure that a trade will be done?

In regards to Fasolo it is simply a swap for Wright and didn't cost us anything and if Russel can get his body and head right may prove to be bargain pickup. It's a pass in my opinion


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 3:19 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 4435
McGovern was a third tall forward at Adelaide. Those types don't get a lot of possessions, because a. they are tall forwards, and b. because they are third in line.

He is a quality player and will just make our forwardline all the more dangerous as we will now have three genuine tall targets up there. Cannot recall the last time Carlton had such a set up.

The list is coming along just nicely.

Now we need some luck with injuries so the youngsters can develop.

Another good young key defender would be good, as would a high quality small forward.

I see Dow and Walsh (assuming we get him) as two ripping young midfielders who can take the club forward. From what I can gather both have excellent personalities (see leadership qualities) and both can play both inside and outside. They will set us in good stead for the years to come.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 3:21 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 4435
Steve_C7 wrote:
keogh wrote:
There is always speculation
Will Fasolo turn it around

McAdam is that sort of Fasolo type player
Is younger than Fasolo
But unproven at AFL
The SANFL is a shit standard
All these things are part of the equation



If you look at McGoverns output it’s not that great
We don’t need another player like him
We need mids
Stands out like a sore thumb

Some amazing highlights buts that’s it

As I said it’s panic The club don’t want to wait any longer
The club was in a bit of shock with some of the efforts
this year
The Fremantle first half in Melbourne
The Brisbane game
The GWS game

It’s the short term fix

Guys it doesn’t work
If The recruiting staff are any good
we would have got at least one decent mid
from the 20s and greater depth if we had kept
both of them

Look at MCGoverns output
It isn’t that impressive

Carlton have not adapted to how you
build a premiership team since the draft and salary cap
took full effect 20 years ago

Posters here give examples of teams getting star players
for draft picks
Don’t forget that these teams were better than we are now
By a long way


despite a change in off field personnel
the club continues to be inpatient
We need more depth in the middle and build are list with kids

The AFL offer us some help and we piss it up the wall
With freebies from the lower leagues
McAdam may be a dud
McGovern may be a star
There may be no good mids after pick 25

If it’s the opposite then the people in charge at Carlton should
just @#$%&! off

Because mistakes aren’t learnt from


Just for a bit of objectivity, what would you have done with a player that wanted to come to our club, is in the age demographic that we are looking for and plays in the part of the ground we have limited talent in?

I am a bit like you Keogh, I am not thrilled with the deal, but a second rounder and McAdam would never get the deal done so you either do the deal or walk away.

If we walk away, then what would be the flow on affect in future years, if a player is considering us or another team and can't be sure that a trade will be done?

In regards to Fasolo it is simply a swap for Wright and didn't cost us anything and if Russel can get his body and head right may prove to be bargain pickup. It's a pass in my opinion


A bird in the hand. (literally).


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2152 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Braithy, Cazzesman, Humpers, RickJ, Swindon Blue and 71 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group