Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 2:45 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2152 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 108  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: List Management 2018
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 11:50 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33617
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Pelchen (of all people) talking some sense

https://player.whooshkaa.com/episode/?id=187844

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: List Management 2018
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 11:54 am 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
Paddycripps wrote:
I get good mid age players want to leave.

We need to get some quality 22-26 year old mids into the list asap. This is the most important part of the ground and the one we are most lacking in.

But the problem is nobody wants to come to us .

So we have to use our picks in the draft on young mids who are ready to impact. Strong of body and mind. Wines types.

No more skinny kids. We've enough of them

That's the only way out of this hole IMO.

Get a PP.

Go to draft with

1
19
22?
29?

Draft an entire midfield

Bulls

Tough lads

Cripps is tired of tags, I got that from a mate of his. He needs support it he will flee.


Cripps will be tagged anyway. Bit of a cop out if he has leadership aspirations, beyond VC.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2018
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 12:31 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14469
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
Donstuie wrote:
Pelchen (of all people) talking some sense

https://player.whooshkaa.com/episode/?id=187844

Old mate RoCo didn't get the response he wanted

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2018
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 1:07 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17567
tap in 79 wrote:
Henderson & Tuohy are cases in point. They went trophy hunting. Carlton got little in return.


An interesting memory.
Lachy Henderson, we got a first round pick for. If I recall correctly, most people were saying we bent the Cats over with that trade. :? The bloke turns 29 this year and cant get on the park. I doubt he'd be any value to us at the moment while he's sitting on the sidelines.

As for Tuohey, he didn't go trophy hunting at all. We offered him a low contract which he rightly didn't accept. He openly stated he wanted to stay.
In return we got Caleb Marchbank. A probable 10 year defender and probably one of our 2 best players until he rolled his ankle.
Would you like to take the deal back?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2018
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 1:45 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24306
Location: Kaloyasena
Blue Vain wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
Henderson & Tuohy are cases in point. They went trophy hunting. Carlton got little in return.


An interesting memory.
Lachy Henderson, we got a first round pick for. If I recall correctly, most people were saying we bent the Cats over with that trade. :? The bloke turns 29 this year and cant get on the park. I doubt he'd be any value to us at the moment while he's sitting on the sidelines.

As for Tuohey, he didn't go trophy hunting at all. We offered him a low contract which he rightly didn't accept. He openly stated he wanted to stay.
In return we got Caleb Marchbank. A probable 10 year defender and probably one of our 2 best players until he rolled his ankle.
Would you like to take the deal back?



I’d like to have paid less for it.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2018
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 1:57 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
Donstuie wrote:
Pelchen (of all people) talking some sense

https://player.whooshkaa.com/episode/?id=187844
Why "of all people"? This guy understands list management more than most and has a track record, doesn't he?

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2018
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 3:58 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2035
Blue Vain wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
Henderson & Tuohy are cases in point. They went trophy hunting. Carlton got little in return.


An interesting memory.
Lachy Henderson, we got a first round pick for. If I recall correctly, most people were saying we bent the Cats over with that trade. :? The bloke turns 29 this year and cant get on the park. I doubt he'd be any value to us at the moment while he's sitting on the sidelines.

As for Tuohey, he didn't go trophy hunting at all. We offered him a low contract which he rightly didn't accept. He openly stated he wanted to stay.
In return we got Caleb Marchbank. A probable 10 year defender and probably one of our 2 best players until he rolled his ankle.
Would you like to take the deal back?


What I am saying is that for a tier 3 club (Carlton) to lose a 100 game player (Henderson) to a club contending (Geelong)they should get top dollar for it.

The present system is basically speculative. We'll GIVE you a top player and you get a speculative first round draft pick in return...and let's face facts - 1st Round draft picks are still speculative.

eg Carlton speculated when they got Kreuzer instead of Cotchin that he would turn out to be a more important player. Injuries and other factors proved otherwise.
eg Carlton speculated that Livingston (pick 4 in 2000) would be a good player etc.

Carlton, Gold Coast, Brisbane- they all lose many of their better players and get relatively little in return. Getting a first round draft pick - let's face facts - is sold as being a panacea but is really just more speculation...and on it goes.

The draft system is not working for tier 3 clubs - who has Gold Coast lost - Dixon, that Hawthorn bloke, etc etc...how will the AFL cope if they lose Lynch...I bet you it takes up some discussion, a lot more than the welfare of Carlton. That is for sure.

Tuohy- I stand by it being trophy hunting. It was sold otherwise to the media, and you listen to the interview where he said he was underpaid. He was very sheepish about lying about this. Fact is- he is a top player and he has gone to a top club contending.

Ask yourself just 1 question - why do Sydney, Hawthorn and Geelong NEVER have to rebuild? Does it have something to do with the trading/drafting system not making them pay enough to pick the eyes out of bottom clubs. I think it does.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: List Management 2018
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 4:05 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33617
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
moshe25 wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
Pelchen (of all people) talking some sense

https://player.whooshkaa.com/episode/?id=187844
Why "of all people"? This guy understands list management more than most and has a track record, doesn't he?

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

For the longest time the bloke had very little positive to say about us, and along with some of his questionably ethical list mgmt choices (Hay to Norf) has been near the top of the TC hitlist.

But in fairness he’s been more measured in recent times.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2018
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 4:43 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 17263
Location: threeohfivethree
tap in 79 wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
Henderson & Tuohy are cases in point. They went trophy hunting. Carlton got little in return.


An interesting memory.
Lachy Henderson, we got a first round pick for. If I recall correctly, most people were saying we bent the Cats over with that trade. :? The bloke turns 29 this year and cant get on the park. I doubt he'd be any value to us at the moment while he's sitting on the sidelines.

As for Tuohey, he didn't go trophy hunting at all. We offered him a low contract which he rightly didn't accept. He openly stated he wanted to stay.
In return we got Caleb Marchbank. A probable 10 year defender and probably one of our 2 best players until he rolled his ankle.
Would you like to take the deal back?


What I am saying is that for a tier 3 club (Carlton) to lose a 100 game player (Henderson) to a club contending (Geelong)they should get top dollar for it.

The present system is basically speculative. We'll GIVE you a top player and you get a speculative first round draft pick in return...and let's face facts - 1st Round draft picks are still speculative.

eg Carlton speculated when they got Kreuzer instead of Cotchin that he would turn out to be a more important player. Injuries and other factors proved otherwise.
eg Carlton speculated that Livingston (pick 4 in 2000) would be a good player etc.

Carlton, Gold Coast, Brisbane- they all lose many of their better players and get relatively little in return. Getting a first round draft pick - let's face facts - is sold as being a panacea but is really just more speculation...and on it goes.

The draft system is not working for tier 3 clubs - who has Gold Coast lost - Dixon, that Hawthorn bloke, etc etc...how will the AFL cope if they lose Lynch...I bet you it takes up some discussion, a lot more than the welfare of Carlton. That is for sure.

Tuohy- I stand by it being trophy hunting. It was sold otherwise to the media, and you listen to the interview where he said he was underpaid. He was very sheepish about lying about this. Fact is- he is a top player and he has gone to a top club contending.

Ask yourself just 1 question - why do Sydney, Hawthorn and Geelong NEVER have to rebuild? Does it have something to do with the trading/drafting system not making them pay enough to pick the eyes out of bottom clubs. I think it does.


And Geelong speculated that Henderson would be a whole lot better for them than he has been.

There are no guarantees any player or draft pick will work out.

How's Chris Yarran going at Richmond?

_________________
"Liberals feel unworthy of their possessions. Conservatives feel they deserve everything they've stolen."

Mort Sahl


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: List Management 2018
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 4:59 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 4548
Or Menzel at Adelaide

Go you good things

_________________
“Every single element of the Club has to be the best in the league, meticulously and methodically, and only by doing this will we be elite and challenge for number 17.”
Greg Lee


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2018
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 5:25 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
Mind you, I think Jarrod Waite has been better than ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!
(Which is what the AFL thought we should get as compensation for him).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: List Management 2018
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 6:26 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22323
Pelchen... who'd have thought. Much smarter than the knee jerk reactionary fan base we have on here.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2018
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 6:34 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2035
GWS wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
Henderson & Tuohy are cases in point. They went trophy hunting. Carlton got little in return.


An interesting memory.
Lachy Henderson, we got a first round pick for. If I recall correctly, most people were saying we bent the Cats over with that trade. :? The bloke turns 29 this year and cant get on the park. I doubt he'd be any value to us at the moment while he's sitting on the sidelines.

As for Tuohey, he didn't go trophy hunting at all. We offered him a low contract which he rightly didn't accept. He openly stated he wanted to stay.
In return we got Caleb Marchbank. A probable 10 year defender and probably one of our 2 best players until he rolled his ankle.
Would you like to take the deal back?


What I am saying is that for a tier 3 club (Carlton) to lose a 100 game player (Henderson) to a club contending (Geelong)they should get top dollar for it.

The present system is basically speculative. We'll GIVE you a top player and you get a speculative first round draft pick in return...and let's face facts - 1st Round draft picks are still speculative.

eg Carlton speculated when they got Kreuzer instead of Cotchin that he would turn out to be a more important player. Injuries and other factors proved otherwise.
eg Carlton speculated that Livingston (pick 4 in 2000) would be a good player etc.

Carlton, Gold Coast, Brisbane- they all lose many of their better players and get relatively little in return. Getting a first round draft pick - let's face facts - is sold as being a panacea but is really just more speculation...and on it goes.

The draft system is not working for tier 3 clubs - who has Gold Coast lost - Dixon, that Hawthorn bloke, etc etc...how will the AFL cope if they lose Lynch...I bet you it takes up some discussion, a lot more than the welfare of Carlton. That is for sure.

Tuohy- I stand by it being trophy hunting. It was sold otherwise to the media, and you listen to the interview where he said he was underpaid. He was very sheepish about lying about this. Fact is- he is a top player and he has gone to a top club contending.

Ask yourself just 1 question - why do Sydney, Hawthorn and Geelong NEVER have to rebuild? Does it have something to do with the trading/drafting system not making them pay enough to pick the eyes out of bottom clubs. I think it does.


And Geelong speculated that Henderson would be a whole lot better for them than he has been.

There are no guarantees any player or draft pick will work out.

How's Chris Yarran going at Richmond?


Geelong got good value with Henderson - he was number 1 at Geelong in 2017 for intercept possessions.

My question, which no one can answer, is that if AFL equalisation is working out so well - why will Sydney, Geelong and Hawthorn make the finals yet again as they have for about 8 or 9 of the last 10 years. In Sydney's case about 18 of the last 20 years.

Surely these clubs have currency already so to stay on top all they have to do is be attractive for players from lesser clubs and they can get them for unders.

GWS is a new kid to the block...but with Shiel and Coniglio etc as their base - I can't see them missing finals for a long time.

Sydney Swans - if a player like Jordan Foote came to Carlton it would take ages for him to become good, but at the Swans ( a strong team already) new players can be absorbed into a strong system and on it goes.

The weak get weaker as the strong get stronger. That's fine if that's the system the AFL wants, but don't try and sell us the lie of "equalisation". That's a lie. Geelong, Sydney and Hawthorn know it is a lie.

2nd question - if equalisation is working out so well why are there 3-4 dead rubbers every weekend?

Round 6
Western Bulldogs vs Carlton - dead rubber
GWS vs Brisbane - dead rubber
Hawthorn vs St Kilda - dead rubber
Adelaide vs Gold Coast - should be a dead rubber...but perhaps with 2/3rds of Adelaide's midfield out Gold Coast has a chance.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: List Management 2018
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 6:55 pm 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
tap in 79 wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
Henderson & Tuohy are cases in point. They went trophy hunting. Carlton got little in return.


An interesting memory.
Lachy Henderson, we got a first round pick for. If I recall correctly, most people were saying we bent the Cats over with that trade. :? The bloke turns 29 this year and cant get on the park. I doubt he'd be any value to us at the moment while he's sitting on the sidelines.

As for Tuohey, he didn't go trophy hunting at all. We offered him a low contract which he rightly didn't accept. He openly stated he wanted to stay.
In return we got Caleb Marchbank. A probable 10 year defender and probably one of our 2 best players until he rolled his ankle.
Would you like to take the deal back?


What I am saying is that for a tier 3 club (Carlton) to lose a 100 game player (Henderson) to a club contending (Geelong)they should get top dollar for it.

The present system is basically speculative. We'll GIVE you a top player and you get a speculative first round draft pick in return...and let's face facts - 1st Round draft picks are still speculative.

eg Carlton speculated when they got Kreuzer instead of Cotchin that he would turn out to be a more important player. Injuries and other factors proved otherwise.
eg Carlton speculated that Livingston (pick 4 in 2000) would be a good player etc.

Carlton, Gold Coast, Brisbane- they all lose many of their better players and get relatively little in return. Getting a first round draft pick - let's face facts - is sold as being a panacea but is really just more speculation...and on it goes.

The draft system is not working for tier 3 clubs - who has Gold Coast lost - Dixon, that Hawthorn bloke, etc etc...how will the AFL cope if they lose Lynch...I bet you it takes up some discussion, a lot more than the welfare of Carlton. That is for sure.

Tuohy- I stand by it being trophy hunting. It was sold otherwise to the media, and you listen to the interview where he said he was underpaid. He was very sheepish about lying about this. Fact is- he is a top player and he has gone to a top club contending.

Ask yourself just 1 question - why do Sydney, Hawthorn and Geelong NEVER have to rebuild? Does it have something to do with the trading/drafting system not making them pay enough to pick the eyes out of bottom clubs. I think it does.


Was Henderson a top player? He had good patches, but wasn’t a top player for us. Good deal IMO that we ended up with.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2018
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 6:55 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
tap in 79 wrote:
GWS wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
Henderson & Tuohy are cases in point. They went trophy hunting. Carlton got little in return.


An interesting memory.
Lachy Henderson, we got a first round pick for. If I recall correctly, most people were saying we bent the Cats over with that trade. :? The bloke turns 29 this year and cant get on the park. I doubt he'd be any value to us at the moment while he's sitting on the sidelines.

As for Tuohey, he didn't go trophy hunting at all. We offered him a low contract which he rightly didn't accept. He openly stated he wanted to stay.
In return we got Caleb Marchbank. A probable 10 year defender and probably one of our 2 best players until he rolled his ankle.
Would you like to take the deal back?


What I am saying is that for a tier 3 club (Carlton) to lose a 100 game player (Henderson) to a club contending (Geelong)they should get top dollar for it.

The present system is basically speculative. We'll GIVE you a top player and you get a speculative first round draft pick in return...and let's face facts - 1st Round draft picks are still speculative.

eg Carlton speculated when they got Kreuzer instead of Cotchin that he would turn out to be a more important player. Injuries and other factors proved otherwise.
eg Carlton speculated that Livingston (pick 4 in 2000) would be a good player etc.

Carlton, Gold Coast, Brisbane- they all lose many of their better players and get relatively little in return. Getting a first round draft pick - let's face facts - is sold as being a panacea but is really just more speculation...and on it goes.

The draft system is not working for tier 3 clubs - who has Gold Coast lost - Dixon, that Hawthorn bloke, etc etc...how will the AFL cope if they lose Lynch...I bet you it takes up some discussion, a lot more than the welfare of Carlton. That is for sure.

Tuohy- I stand by it being trophy hunting. It was sold otherwise to the media, and you listen to the interview where he said he was underpaid. He was very sheepish about lying about this. Fact is- he is a top player and he has gone to a top club contending.

Ask yourself just 1 question - why do Sydney, Hawthorn and Geelong NEVER have to rebuild? Does it have something to do with the trading/drafting system not making them pay enough to pick the eyes out of bottom clubs. I think it does.


And Geelong speculated that Henderson would be a whole lot better for them than he has been.

There are no guarantees any player or draft pick will work out.

How's Chris Yarran going at Richmond?


Geelong got good value with Henderson - he was number 1 at Geelong in 2017 for intercept possessions.

My question, which no one can answer, is that if AFL equalisation is working out so well - why will Sydney, Geelong and Hawthorn make the finals yet again as they have for about 8 or 9 of the last 10 years. In Sydney's case about 18 of the last 20 years.

Surely these clubs have currency already so to stay on top all they have to do is be attractive for players from lesser clubs and they can get them for unders.

GWS is a new kid to the block...but with Shiel and Coniglio etc as their base - I can't see them missing finals for a long time.

Sydney Swans - if a player like Jordan Foote came to Carlton it would take ages for him to become good, but at the Swans ( a strong team already) new players can be absorbed into a strong system and on it goes.

The weak get weaker as the strong get stronger. That's fine if that's the system the AFL wants, but don't try and sell us the lie of "equalisation". That's a lie. Geelong, Sydney and Hawthorn know it is a lie.

2nd question - if equalisation is working out so well why are there 3-4 dead rubbers every weekend?

Round 6
Western Bulldogs vs Carlton - dead rubber
GWS vs Brisbane - dead rubber
Hawthorn vs St Kilda - dead rubber
Adelaide vs Gold Coast - should be a dead rubber...but perhaps with 2/3rds of Adelaide's midfield out Gold Coast has a chance.


The last two premiers undermine your case a bit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: List Management 2018
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 6:58 pm 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
tap in 79 wrote:
GWS wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
Henderson & Tuohy are cases in point. They went trophy hunting. Carlton got little in return.


An interesting memory.
Lachy Henderson, we got a first round pick for. If I recall correctly, most people were saying we bent the Cats over with that trade. :? The bloke turns 29 this year and cant get on the park. I doubt he'd be any value to us at the moment while he's sitting on the sidelines.

As for Tuohey, he didn't go trophy hunting at all. We offered him a low contract which he rightly didn't accept. He openly stated he wanted to stay.
In return we got Caleb Marchbank. A probable 10 year defender and probably one of our 2 best players until he rolled his ankle.
Would you like to take the deal back?


What I am saying is that for a tier 3 club (Carlton) to lose a 100 game player (Henderson) to a club contending (Geelong)they should get top dollar for it.

The present system is basically speculative. We'll GIVE you a top player and you get a speculative first round draft pick in return...and let's face facts - 1st Round draft picks are still speculative.

eg Carlton speculated when they got Kreuzer instead of Cotchin that he would turn out to be a more important player. Injuries and other factors proved otherwise.
eg Carlton speculated that Livingston (pick 4 in 2000) would be a good player etc.

Carlton, Gold Coast, Brisbane- they all lose many of their better players and get relatively little in return. Getting a first round draft pick - let's face facts - is sold as being a panacea but is really just more speculation...and on it goes.

The draft system is not working for tier 3 clubs - who has Gold Coast lost - Dixon, that Hawthorn bloke, etc etc...how will the AFL cope if they lose Lynch...I bet you it takes up some discussion, a lot more than the welfare of Carlton. That is for sure.

Tuohy- I stand by it being trophy hunting. It was sold otherwise to the media, and you listen to the interview where he said he was underpaid. He was very sheepish about lying about this. Fact is- he is a top player and he has gone to a top club contending.

Ask yourself just 1 question - why do Sydney, Hawthorn and Geelong NEVER have to rebuild? Does it have something to do with the trading/drafting system not making them pay enough to pick the eyes out of bottom clubs. I think it does.


And Geelong speculated that Henderson would be a whole lot better for them than he has been.

There are no guarantees any player or draft pick will work out.

How's Chris Yarran going at Richmond?


Geelong got good value with Henderson - he was number 1 at Geelong in 2017 for intercept possessions.

My question, which no one can answer, is that if AFL equalisation is working out so well - why will Sydney, Geelong and Hawthorn make the finals yet again as they have for about 8 or 9 of the last 10 years. In Sydney's case about 18 of the last 20 years.

Surely these clubs have currency already so to stay on top all they have to do is be attractive for players from lesser clubs and they can get them for unders.

GWS is a new kid to the block...but with Shiel and Coniglio etc as their base - I can't see them missing finals for a long time.

Sydney Swans - if a player like Jordan Foote came to Carlton it would take ages for him to become good, but at the Swans ( a strong team already) new players can be absorbed into a strong system and on it goes.

The weak get weaker as the strong get stronger. That's fine if that's the system the AFL wants, but don't try and sell us the lie of "equalisation". That's a lie. Geelong, Sydney and Hawthorn know it is a lie.

2nd question - if equalisation is working out so well why are there 3-4 dead rubbers every weekend?

Round 6
Western Bulldogs vs Carlton - dead rubber
GWS vs Brisbane - dead rubber
Hawthorn vs St Kilda - dead rubber
Adelaide vs Gold Coast - should be a dead rubber...but perhaps with 2/3rds of Adelaide's midfield out Gold Coast has a chance.


You answered your own questions when saying GWS will be in finals for a long time. They have a base of top lines players who will be around a long time, who then pass onto the next generation of top liners hopefully for them.

Hawks an Carts have had that since the mid 2000’s after they invested in the draft, and those players became stars, who guided the next tier through. Once the star line dries up, watch them fall. It will, don’t worry about that.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2018
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 9:14 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:43 pm
Posts: 4745
GWS wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
Henderson & Tuohy are cases in point. They went trophy hunting. Carlton got little in return.


An interesting memory.
Lachy Henderson, we got a first round pick for. If I recall correctly, most people were saying we bent the Cats over with that trade. :? The bloke turns 29 this year and cant get on the park. I doubt he'd be any value to us at the moment while he's sitting on the sidelines.

As for Tuohey, he didn't go trophy hunting at all. We offered him a low contract which he rightly didn't accept. He openly stated he wanted to stay.
In return we got Caleb Marchbank. A probable 10 year defender and probably one of our 2 best players until he rolled his ankle.
Would you like to take the deal back?


What I am saying is that for a tier 3 club (Carlton) to lose a 100 game player (Henderson) to a club contending (Geelong)they should get top dollar for it.

The present system is basically speculative. We'll GIVE you a top player and you get a speculative first round draft pick in return...and let's face facts - 1st Round draft picks are still speculative.

eg Carlton speculated when they got Kreuzer instead of Cotchin that he would turn out to be a more important player. Injuries and other factors proved otherwise.
eg Carlton speculated that Livingston (pick 4 in 2000) would be a good player etc.

Carlton, Gold Coast, Brisbane- they all lose many of their better players and get relatively little in return. Getting a first round draft pick - let's face facts - is sold as being a panacea but is really just more speculation...and on it goes.

The draft system is not working for tier 3 clubs - who has Gold Coast lost - Dixon, that Hawthorn bloke, etc etc...how will the AFL cope if they lose Lynch...I bet you it takes up some discussion, a lot more than the welfare of Carlton. That is for sure.

Tuohy- I stand by it being trophy hunting. It was sold otherwise to the media, and you listen to the interview where he said he was underpaid. He was very sheepish about lying about this. Fact is- he is a top player and he has gone to a top club contending.

Ask yourself just 1 question - why do Sydney, Hawthorn and Geelong NEVER have to rebuild? Does it have something to do with the trading/drafting system not making them pay enough to pick the eyes out of bottom clubs. I think it does.


And Geelong speculated that Henderson would be a whole lot better for them than he has been.

There are no guarantees any player or draft pick will work out.

How's Chris Yarran going at Richmond?


Hendo is a dud....was at Brissy, us and and is at Cats. Soft, drops many marks when in prime position and promises without delivering. Over-rated hugely. Yazz is a sad case of so much talent lost....his best was devastating.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: List Management 2018
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 10:04 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 4548
Hope the boys were watching Victory tonight

Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk

_________________
“Every single element of the Club has to be the best in the league, meticulously and methodically, and only by doing this will we be elite and challenge for number 17.”
Greg Lee


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2018
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 10:18 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24306
Location: Kaloyasena
Blue Vain wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
Henderson & Tuohy are cases in point. They went trophy hunting. Carlton got little in return.


An interesting memory.

As for Tuohey, he didn't go trophy hunting at all. We offered him a low contract which he rightly didn't accept. He openly stated he wanted to stay.
In return we got Caleb Marchbank. A probable 10 year defender and probably one of our 2 best players until he rolled his ankle.
Would you like to take the deal back?



If I recall correctly it was Tuohy and pick 20 for Marchbank - not Tuohy for Marchbank.

As I said not against getting Marchbank, but we paid David Jones prices.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2018
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 10:34 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 4548
AGRO wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
Henderson & Tuohy are cases in point. They went trophy hunting. Carlton got little in return.


An interesting memory.

As for Tuohey, he didn't go trophy hunting at all. We offered him a low contract which he rightly didn't accept. He openly stated he wanted to stay.
In return we got Caleb Marchbank. A probable 10 year defender and probably one of our 2 best players until he rolled his ankle.
Would you like to take the deal back?



If I recall correctly it was Tuohy and pick 20 for Marchbank - not Tuohy for Marchbank.

As I said not against getting Marchbank, but we paid David Jones prices.
Marchbank and Pickett....
Unless you're Antony Green, very difficult to call at this stage..

Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk

_________________
“Every single element of the Club has to be the best in the league, meticulously and methodically, and only by doing this will we be elite and challenge for number 17.”
Greg Lee


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2152 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 108  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 302 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group