Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Apr 20, 2024 7:45 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6991 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220 ... 350  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2018 7:32 am 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Sun May 31, 2015 8:24 pm
Posts: 829
Braithy wrote:
Crippa wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
They need small wins based on the things they can control. Effort, commitment to the contest, tackling etc. The rest is totally out of their control.



i agree.

and this season as a whole, has been an abysmal failure with effort, commitment and tackling when compared to the last two seasons. based on that measuring stick, bolton has taken a considerable step backwards from last year, yeah?


Kreuzer, Gibbs, ASOS, Jones, Docherty, Fisher, Plowman are all first class re effort, commitment to the contest and tackling. Some will say Murphy is also. Others probably wouldn't. So yes maybe we are down in these areas without these leaders but it ain't Bolts fault. In the current side people like both Curnows, Cripps, Rowe, Dow, Marchy, Simo, Kennedy and Silvani can't be faulted for effort and commitment and tackles. Say what you want about their skills but that's not what you are talking about above, so that's a group of 17 who can't be faulted for effort and commitment, yeah?



a sweeping generalisation for this season (minus a game or a quarter here & there) – all i see when we play is mass confusion from players, and games this year where the effort across the board from players is not up to an acceptable standard.

if in fact what you were saying was actually true, we wouldn't be sitting on 2 wins with a 60% record. I also have no answers for you if you can't see the distinct difference in effort from last season, to this one.

in fact, i raise the notion, our play has become so bad we could throw a tent over it all and call it a 3-ringed circus.


Correct. If you take a list that has 17 players who you can bet your house are guaranteed to give you the three things you mentioned (effort, commitment, tackling) and have 7-8 of those out of the side injured then of course you will see a distinct difference from last season. Duh!

What hasn't changed Braithy? That's right. The coach. No change from last season. So I can't fathom how you blame the coach and not the injuries in your original post that started this exchange between us.

By the way I always enjoy your posts regardless of if I agree with your point of view. :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2018 4:46 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17563
The Duke wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
The Duke wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
I can't believe we didn't play man on man in the last with a spare player rotating through the middle.
Watching them play kick to kick with our mob standing five metres away in a zone was mind-boggling.
At one stage in our F50 we were one against four. That means we had four spare players somewhere.


95% of the game we played man on man. To the point we played a mostly 7 or 8 man forward line to pick up their spares. How did that work for us? We were massively outclassed. How we set up had very little to do with it.

The Duke wrote:
I feel super happy for people who are okay with where we're at right now, but at the same time I feel sorry for them. This isn't good - not by any measure.


How wonderful for you. Do you really think anyone here gives a @#$%&! about how you feel about them?


:garthp: You've lost your shit BV. Block me if you don't want to discuss issues civilly - but spare me this bullshit. :screwy:


You're not discussing the issues at all, Duke. It was a condescending remark from you saying you feel sorry for people who don't share your view!
I'm not happy with our current position but I understand there are mitigating circumstances. To suggest I'm worthy of pity for that, Isn't discussing the issues by any standards. It was a post belittling anyone who doesn't share your views.


There's a pile of pot/kettle in that statement. If I went back 50 pages I reckon I could find a post on every one from you saying we've got no clue about football & coaching etc.
I reject that. I'm happy for you to prove me wrong. Show me the posts.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2018 6:20 pm 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
How many on our list? 44?

We have 29 to choose from this week.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2018 10:19 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17563
moshe25 wrote:
jamespul65 wrote:
dont need to be smart blue vain and moshe and yes i do understand
Don't know what this refers to....

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk


That makes 2 of us.... :?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2018 8:41 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 4778
Crippa wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Crippa wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
They need small wins based on the things they can control. Effort, commitment to the contest, tackling etc. The rest is totally out of their control.



i agree.

and this season as a whole, has been an abysmal failure with effort, commitment and tackling when compared to the last two seasons. based on that measuring stick, bolton has taken a considerable step backwards from last year, yeah?


Kreuzer, Gibbs, ASOS, Jones, Docherty, Fisher, Plowman are all first class re effort, commitment to the contest and tackling. Some will say Murphy is also. Others probably wouldn't. So yes maybe we are down in these areas without these leaders but it ain't Bolts fault. In the current side people like both Curnows, Cripps, Rowe, Dow, Marchy, Simo, Kennedy and Silvani can't be faulted for effort and commitment and tackles. Say what you want about their skills but that's not what you are talking about above, so that's a group of 17 who can't be faulted for effort and commitment, yeah?



a sweeping generalisation for this season (minus a game or a quarter here & there) – all i see when we play is mass confusion from players, and games this year where the effort across the board from players is not up to an acceptable standard.

if in fact what you were saying was actually true, we wouldn't be sitting on 2 wins with a 60% record. I also have no answers for you if you can't see the distinct difference in effort from last season, to this one.

in fact, i raise the notion, our play has become so bad we could throw a tent over it all and call it a 3-ringed circus.


Correct. If you take a list that has 17 players who you can bet your house are guaranteed to give you the three things you mentioned (effort, commitment, tackling) and have 7-8 of those out of the side injured then of course you will see a distinct difference from last season. Duh!

What hasn't changed Braithy? That's right. The coach. No change from last season. So I can't fathom how you blame the coach and not the injuries in your original post that started this exchange between us.

By the way I always enjoy your posts regardless of if I agree with your point of view. :thumbsup:


haha ... and me of yours & everyone's in here. healthy discussion when we're staying on topic and not tearing at each other is about the only thing which gets me through seasons like this (and the last 20 or so) ...

and for the record i hope i am horribly wrong about bolton being a contending coach with a full (& more developed) list at his disposal. Obviously i think there's more chance of me winning powerball than that. but sheesh, i'd love to be wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2018 11:07 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 5506
The Normal One wrote:
How many on our list? 44?

We have 29 to choose from this week.


That's been pretty much every week this year to date. :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 5:51 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33617
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Barker to GWS?
https://outline.com/qhbsu

Please God make this happen....

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 7:32 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 18335
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Donstuie wrote:
Barker to GWS?
https://outline.com/qhbsu

Please God make this happen....


Why?

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 8:05 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 7776
Rexy wrote:
Can someone tell me why, when one of our players has the ball in defence, there's no-one ahead presenting or even looking like they want the ball ?


Because we're still so poorly drilled, even after 3 years. We were so poorly drilled that the week before a side with 16-17 men killed us 7 goals to 1 in that last qtr and somehow outnumbered us everywhere. That, combined with the lack of effort in alot of games tell you the coach is not getting through to the players. 3 wins from the last 30 games tells a big story, injuries or not. We're better than that. If people are happy with that coaching they're very easily pleased and set low standards.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 8:43 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17563
jim wrote:
We were so poorly drilled that the week before a side with 16-17 men killed us 7 goals to 1 in that last qtr

It doesn't matter how many times you say it. It's the same uninformed bullshit that it was the first time.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 8:59 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 47349
Location: Prison Island
16 - less than a minute
17 - approx 8 minutes

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 9:23 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:35 pm
Posts: 1233
grrofunger wrote:
16 - less than a minute
17 - approx 8 minutes

So is that 9 minutes out of a 20 minute quater (nearly 50%) or 9 minutes out of approx 30 minutes?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 10:03 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 47349
Location: Prison Island
no idea to be honest

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2018 6:19 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17563
It doesn't matter. The reality is he has continually said they scored 7 goals to 1 with less players on the ground which is bullshit. And when he's pulled up on it, he continues to say it.
We've had a crap year. Surely theres enough for people to whinge about without fabricating stuff to be outraged about.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2018 7:36 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 20264
Location: North of the border
Blue Vain wrote:
It doesn't matter. The reality is he has continually said they scored 7 goals to 1 with less players on the ground which is bullshit. And when he's pulled up on it, he continues to say it.
We've had a crap year. Surely theres enough for people to whinge about without fabricating stuff to be outraged about.
We had a numbers advantage for best part of a half a quarter and couldn't exploit it.
If the situation was reversed we would use this as an excuse for losing and it most likely would have been 10 plus goals to 1.
We lost Kruezer and Kennedy round 1 and 20 weeks later have not recovered and have been using injuries as an excuse all season and yet given an opportunity to gain an advantage we couldn't do it.
We are the poorest coached side in the comp sooner we realise that the better off we will be.
It's not just Bolton it is the entire coaching group

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2018 9:35 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17563
Sydney Blue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
It doesn't matter. The reality is he has continually said they scored 7 goals to 1 with less players on the ground which is bullshit. And when he's pulled up on it, he continues to say it.
We've had a crap year. Surely theres enough for people to whinge about without fabricating stuff to be outraged about.
We had a numbers advantage for best part of a half a quarter and couldn't exploit it.



That part is true.
The rest of your post is supposition so I'm not debating it. It's your view. I disagree.

My post was debunking the lie that we were outscored 7 goals to 1 with 16 players.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2018 12:39 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 3581
My issue with the coaching is the lack of strategy off half back.

You can get done at stoppages simply because you don't have the talent there.
You can leak goals when the ball is coming in quickly with little pressure because of the above.

But when we have the ball we so often lack the ability to switch quickly to create space, or find a contest and place the ball to advantage, or have our half forwards make space/block/decoy for Curnow or McKay. I think that is something all the players should be well drilled in even if they are young or coming in from the seconds.

We cough it up on the wing at a contest we are outnumbered at and then the opposition switch into the corridor where they have a free man. Yes there may be a poorly executed kick that caused the turnover but how do we end up both outnumbered at the contest and they still have a free player in the corridor? Either the tactic is poor or players don't understand it. Fix one of them.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2018 12:44 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 3581
One thing Bolton did understand was the value of Gibbs. Happy to be corrected if I am wrong but I remember hearing he was against the first attempt to poach Gibbs because he knew what would happen to our midfield. Well, he was right.

I agree with the trade as a long term strategy but I guess did not see how bad the short term pain would be with Gibbs gone, then compounded further by losing Docherty.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2018 12:46 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 1:06 pm
Posts: 9296
todd, do you think perhaps this might have something to do with our quickest and most skillful half backs (Docherty, Williamson and Byrne) being injured all year?

_________________
Orandum est ut sit mens sana in corpore sano. Fortem posce animum mortis terrore carentem, qui spatium vitae extremum inter munera ponat naturae, qui ferre queat quoscumque labores.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2018 12:57 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 3581
robertbb wrote:
todd, do you think perhaps this might have something to do with our quickest and most skillful half backs (Docherty, Williamson and Byrne) being injured all year?

It certainly does and that is why I cut some slack about kicking ability. But the point is both the players out there kicking it (Byrne, Ed Curnow, Lang, Thomas, Simpson, Murphy, gulp Kerridge) or the players up the field (Pickett, Wright, Curnow, McKay) don't appear to be well drilled enough to create space or coordinated enough to get to the right spots with numbers if we have to go to a contest. So we chip across with four 20m kicks from one half back to the other then kick it to a contest on the wing where we are outnumbered whilst they still have a player free in the middle.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6991 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220 ... 350  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 53 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group