Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 5:53 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6991 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230 ... 350  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 11:29 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 33890
Sydney Blue wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
I believe the reasons why our young players collectively haven't been able to perform as well as those at other teams has been explained on many occasions.
Yes by Jim

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk


If there was a 20 track album titled "Why Carlton are shit", Jim's got his CD player set to repeat on track 1.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 11:35 am 
Online
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 20299
Location: North of the border
Sidefx wrote:
The Duke wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
There is a lot of criticism of posters who are questioning the coaching and development. Where the argument that it is injuries and the youth and inexperienced players as to why we only won 2 games.
Posters saying give it 2 to 3 years and when our youth matures we will be flying.
The very fact we could only manage 1 player in the AFLPA under 22 team might suggest we might be looking at this through navy blue glasses

https://coupler.foxsports.com.au/api/v1 ... 9a957f4138

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk


100%. I think the reality is obvious for people outside the navy haze to identify. Even some of Bolton's strongest supporters have serious doubts that I think they're suppressing.


What rubbish!



Proof??


So are you suggesting the AFLPA are just a bunch a numpties and don't know what they are talking about and the posters on here have a better understanding of how good our under 22's are going to be compared to the rest of the players in the AFL - Like they only play the game against each other what the hell would they know

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 12:43 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 1:54 pm
Posts: 2251
Sydney Blue wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
The Duke wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
There is a lot of criticism of posters who are questioning the coaching and development. Where the argument that it is injuries and the youth and inexperienced players as to why we only won 2 games.
Posters saying give it 2 to 3 years and when our youth matures we will be flying.
The very fact we could only manage 1 player in the AFLPA under 22 team might suggest we might be looking at this through navy blue glasses

https://coupler.foxsports.com.au/api/v1 ... 9a957f4138

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk


100%. I think the reality is obvious for people outside the navy haze to identify. Even some of Bolton's strongest supporters have serious doubts that I think they're suppressing.


What rubbish!



Proof??


So are you suggesting the AFLPA are just a bunch a numpties and don't know what they are talking about and the posters on here have a better understanding of how good our under 22's are going to be compared to the rest of the players in the AFL - Like they only play the game against each other what the hell would they know


The team is selected by the fans Syd. I voted for Charlie and Fisher to get in...Who did you pick?

Numpties :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 1:21 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 5510
Damn those facts....... :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 1:23 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:06 pm
Posts: 3366
Even if it was picked by the players, I doubt they watch many games. Shit judges, as Blight might paraphrase.

_________________
"In better news for Blues fans, Jarrad Waite was not named on the club's injury list."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 1:30 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 5510
Sydney Blue wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
The Duke wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
There is a lot of criticism of posters who are questioning the coaching and development. Where the argument that it is injuries and the youth and inexperienced players as to why we only won 2 games.
Posters saying give it 2 to 3 years and when our youth matures we will be flying.
The very fact we could only manage 1 player in the AFLPA under 22 team might suggest we might be looking at this through navy blue glasses

https://coupler.foxsports.com.au/api/v1 ... 9a957f4138

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk


100%. I think the reality is obvious for people outside the navy haze to identify. Even some of Bolton's strongest supporters have serious doubts that I think they're suppressing.


What rubbish!



Proof??


So are you suggesting the AFLPA are just a bunch a numpties and don't know what they are talking about and the posters on here have a better understanding of how good our under 22's are going to be compared to the rest of the players in the AFL - Like they only play the game against each other what the hell would they know


A. Rubbish to the fact Bolton's strongest supports have serious doubts.
B. FYI We had 6 wins last year and Cripps was a gun and we had 5 rising stars, yet only Charlie Curnow was selected in the 2017 team.

Here's a tip, why don't you and your detractor mates start trying to find the positives in the club, coaching and players. The reality is the season is over, Bolton is staying and our 23 players under the age of 23 will not be 3 years older next season.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 1:36 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 32853
Location: The Brown Wedge
Wojee wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
I believe the reasons why our young players collectively haven't been able to perform as well as those at other teams has been explained on many occasions.
Yes by Jim

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk


If there was a 20 track album titled "Why Carlton are shit", Jim's got his CD player set to repeat on track 1.


After 3 years, every player on our list has either been recruited, drafted or re-signed. I get the 'reasons' for this failure ie some injuries etc, but there's also a shitload of 'excuses' which simply don't stack up.

The coach goes on about the importance of synergy. Well if that's the case, he [REDACTED] up because they just drafted 3 or 4 blokes who have now gone 12-24 months later.

So either a) synergy doesn't matter, or b) it matters a heap and we don't know what the @#$%&! we're doing.

You can't have both.

My opinion is they [REDACTED] up - which is easy to say with hindsight, but when you're the head coach, that's the reason they pay you the big bucks - to get that right. I personally don't want someone who's [REDACTED] up so spectacularly in charge for another season just in case they continue to @#$%&! it up.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 1:43 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:44 am
Posts: 819
The Duke wrote:
Wojee wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
I believe the reasons why our young players collectively haven't been able to perform as well as those at other teams has been explained on many occasions.
Yes by Jim

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk


If there was a 20 track album titled "Why Carlton are shit", Jim's got his CD player set to repeat on track 1.


After 3 years, every player on our list has either been recruited, drafted or re-signed. I get the 'reasons' for this failure ie some injuries etc, but there's also a shitload of 'excuses' which simply don't stack up.

The coach goes on about the importance of synergy. Well if that's the case, he [REDACTED] up because they just drafted 3 or 4 blokes who have now gone 12-24 months later.

So either a) synergy doesn't matter, or b) it matters a heap and we don't know what the @#$%&! we're doing.

You can't have both.

My opinion is they [REDACTED] up - which is easy to say with hindsight, but when you're the head coach, that's the reason they pay you the big bucks - to get that right. I personally don't want someone who's [REDACTED] up so spectacularly in charge for another season just in case they continue to @#$%&! it up.



It’s almost like building a team from scratch that is capable of winning a flag takes time?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 1:45 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33617
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Sydney Blue wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
I believe the reasons why our young players collectively haven't been able to perform as well as those at other teams has been explained on many occasions.
Yes by Jim

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk

No

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 1:51 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 5510
TBH, the problem with the coaching this year can be blamed solely on the communication between Bolton and his social media person. Because if they were doing their job and passed on all the advice from the keyboard coaches on here and other places, it seems we would be playing finals for sure.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 2:03 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17567
Sydney Blue wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
I believe the reasons why our young players collectively haven't been able to perform as well as those at other teams has been explained on many occasions.
Yes by Jim

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk


Just think about that for a minute. Are you tying yourself to Jim to provide credibility to your views?
The same person who has been shown up multiple times for producing false information. Is that your stance?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 2:03 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 32853
Location: The Brown Wedge
Menzel_Mayhem wrote:
The Duke wrote:
Wojee wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
I believe the reasons why our young players collectively haven't been able to perform as well as those at other teams has been explained on many occasions.
Yes by Jim

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk


If there was a 20 track album titled "Why Carlton are shit", Jim's got his CD player set to repeat on track 1.


After 3 years, every player on our list has either been recruited, drafted or re-signed. I get the 'reasons' for this failure ie some injuries etc, but there's also a shitload of 'excuses' which simply don't stack up.

The coach goes on about the importance of synergy. Well if that's the case, he [REDACTED] up because they just drafted 3 or 4 blokes who have now gone 12-24 months later.

So either a) synergy doesn't matter, or b) it matters a heap and we don't know what the @#$%&! we're doing.

You can't have both.

My opinion is they [REDACTED] up - which is easy to say with hindsight, but when you're the head coach, that's the reason they pay you the big bucks - to get that right. I personally don't want someone who's [REDACTED] up so spectacularly in charge for another season just in case they continue to @#$%&! it up.



It’s almost like building a team from scratch that is capable of winning a flag takes time?


Did you read any of my post?

I'm happy for you to discuss why you believe de-listing several fringe players was a good idea only to bring in more fringe players to be de-listed, then blame synergy as one of the reasons for our shitness. But what you offered didn't even come close to that.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 2:26 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 33890
The Duke wrote:
Menzel_Mayhem wrote:


It’s almost like building a team from scratch that is capable of winning a flag takes time?


Did you read any of my post?

I'm happy for you to discuss why you believe de-listing several fringe players was a good idea only to bring in more fringe players to be de-listed, then blame synergy as one of the reasons for our shitness. But what you offered didn't even come close to that.


My reading of that situation is that the fringe players recruited were supposed to primarily provide depth/ply their trade in the VFL with the hope that maybe one or two might come on. They replaced players who had been given some time at the club and who (rightly or wrongly) were deemed to have reached their ceiling and came at minimal cost.

A couple of the players who were moved on are playing OK elsewhere while none of those brought in have done anything so it's a net loss, but in the overall scheme of things they're not the players who are going to drag Carlton back up the ladder.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 2:48 pm 
Online
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 20299
Location: North of the border
Blue Vain wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
I believe the reasons why our young players collectively haven't been able to perform as well as those at other teams has been explained on many occasions.
Yes by Jim

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk


Just think about that for a minute. Are you tying yourself to Jim to provide credibility to your views?
The same person who has been shown up multiple times for producing false information. Is that your stance?


I am getting old so my memory is fading a bit but I do recall Jim posting half way through the year that we were worse off now than 3 years ago
He was rebuked and shouted down by someone ( who could that be) stating that three years ago we lost to hawks by 128 points we then went on to lose 3 games by over hundred
the same poster stated that we were going to improve in the back half of the year and win 4-5 games and yet we won just 1

shall we search for the post or do you want to fess up you were totally wrong and as it turns out Jim was right

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 3:16 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17567
Sydney Blue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
I believe the reasons why our young players collectively haven't been able to perform as well as those at other teams has been explained on many occasions.
Yes by Jim

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk


Just think about that for a minute. Are you tying yourself to Jim to provide credibility to your views?
The same person who has been shown up multiple times for producing false information. Is that your stance?


I am getting old so my memory is fading a bit but I do recall Jim posting half way through the year that we were worse off now than 3 years ago
He was rebuked and shouted down by someone ( who could that be) stating that three years ago we lost to hawks by 128 points we then went on to lose 3 games by over hundred
the same poster stated that we were going to improve in the back half of the year and win 4-5 games and yet we won just 1

shall we search for the post or do you want to fess up you were totally wrong and as it turns out Jim was right


You're getting confused between opinions and facts. I was offering an opinion. Jim has been blatantly being dishonest in his facts lately, even when he's been told numerous times he;'s wrong yet he continues with them. As for my opinion, I always stand by my views and admit them, and fess up if I'm wrong. (You should give it a go :grin: ) Yes, I did say we would get our players back from injury and win 4 or 5 games. Our injury toll continued and I was wrong.
To suggest we are worse off than 3 years ago however is shortsighted and foolish IMO.

As we both said, 3 years ago we lost to the Hawks by 138 points. Our list that year consisted of Jason Tutt, Brad Walsh, Andrejs Everett, Simon White, Tom Bell, Matthew Watson, David Ellard, Cameron Wood, Mark Whiley, Matthew Dick, Clem Smith, Troy Menzel, Blaine Johnson, Blaine Boekhorst etc etc and a heap of veterans.

Anyone who suggests we are worse off now has no idea whatsoever. We have plenty of top shelf kids coming through. The club is doing the right thing and playing them. If the sooks cant handle that, bad luck IMO. Kudos to the club for looking past them and doing the right thing for the future.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Last edited by Blue Vain on Fri Aug 31, 2018 3:37 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 3:19 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:06 am
Posts: 1826
Sidefx wrote:
TBH, the problem with the coaching this year can be blamed solely on the communication between Bolton and his social media person. Because if they were doing their job and passed on all the advice from the keyboard coaches on here and other places, it seems we would be playing finals for sure.

Love your style!! :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 3:30 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 4517
Location: Blisstonia.
Sydney Blue wrote:
There is a lot of criticism of posters who are questioning the coaching and development. Where the argument that it is injuries and the youth and inexperienced players as to why we only won 2 games.
Posters saying give it 2 to 3 years and when our youth matures we will be flying.
The very fact we could only manage 1 player in the AFLPA under 22 team might suggest we might be looking at this through navy blue glasses

https://coupler.foxsports.com.au/api/v1 ... 9a957f4138

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk


4 teams of the Top 8 didn't have one player, including GWS.

Some of these guys are nearing (or over for some) 100 games and are approaching 23.

Most of our youth are from the last 3 drafts and are still 18-20.

I'm not sure this is sufficient evidence your honour.

_________________
"They're [REDACTED]'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 3:47 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:49 pm
Posts: 1065
Location: On A Sailing Ship To Nowhere Leaving Anyplace
Blueboy74 wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
There is a lot of criticism of posters who are questioning the coaching and development. Where the argument that it is injuries and the youth and inexperienced players as to why we only won 2 games.
Posters saying give it 2 to 3 years and when our youth matures we will be flying.
The very fact we could only manage 1 player in the AFLPA under 22 team might suggest we might be looking at this through navy blue glasses

https://coupler.foxsports.com.au/api/v1 ... 9a957f4138

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk


4 teams of the Top 8 didn't have one player, including GWS.

Some of these guys are nearing (or over for some) 100 games and are approaching 23.

Most of our youth are from the last 3 drafts and are still 18-20.



I'm not sure this is sufficient evidence your honour.


QFT :clap: :clap:

_________________
Hooked on The Blues


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 4:07 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:35 pm
Posts: 1233
Blueboy74 wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
There is a lot of criticism of posters who are questioning the coaching and development. Where the argument that it is injuries and the youth and inexperienced players as to why we only won 2 games.
Posters saying give it 2 to 3 years and when our youth matures we will be flying.
The very fact we could only manage 1 player in the AFLPA under 22 team might suggest we might be looking at this through navy blue glasses

https://coupler.foxsports.com.au/api/v1 ... 9a957f4138

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk


4 teams of the Top 8 didn't have one player, including GWS.

Some of these guys are nearing (or over for some) 100 games and are approaching 23.

Most of our youth are from the last 3 drafts and are still 18-20.

I'm not sure this is sufficient evidence your honour.

Don't let the facts get in the way of a good story :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 4:29 pm 
Online
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 20299
Location: North of the border
Blue Vain wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
I believe the reasons why our young players collectively haven't been able to perform as well as those at other teams has been explained on many occasions.
Yes by Jim

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk


Just think about that for a minute. Are you tying yourself to Jim to provide credibility to your views?
The same person who has been shown up multiple times for producing false information. Is that your stance?


I am getting old so my memory is fading a bit but I do recall Jim posting half way through the year that we were worse off now than 3 years ago
He was rebuked and shouted down by someone ( who could that be) stating that three years ago we lost to hawks by 128 points we then went on to lose 3 games by over hundred
the same poster stated that we were going to improve in the back half of the year and win 4-5 games and yet we won just 1

shall we search for the post or do you want to fess up you were totally wrong and as it turns out Jim was right


You're getting confused between opinions and facts. I was offering an opinion. Jim has been blatantly being dishonest in his facts lately, even when he's been told numerous times he;'s wrong yet he continues with them. As for my opinion, I always stand by my views and admit them, and fess up if I'm wrong. (You should give it a go :grin: ) Yes, I did say we would get our players back from injury and win 4 or 5 games. Our injury toll continued and I was wrong.
To suggest we are worse off than 3 years ago however is shortsighted and foolish IMO.

As we both said, 3 years ago we lost to the Hawks by 138 points. Our list that year consisted of Jason Tutt, Brad Walsh, Andrejs Everett, Simon White, Tom Bell, Matthew Watson, David Ellard, Cameron Wood, Mark Whiley, Matthew Dick, Clem Smith, Troy Menzel, Blaine Johnson, Blaine Boekhorst etc etc and a heap of veterans.

Anyone who suggests we are worse off now has no idea whatsoever. We have plenty of top shelf kids coming through. The club is doing the right thing and playing them. If the sooks cant handle that, bad luck IMO. Kudos to the club for looking past them and doing the right thing for the future.



I don't have to suggest we are worse off than 3 years ago the numbers speak for them selves
forget the who's who just look at the numbers - Despite that shocking list of players they still achieved a better outcome than those this year
7 wins > 6 wins > 2 wins

To much crystal ball gazing goes on in here - Sorry but I deal with the reality of the current teams performance I don't gaze into the future to try and predict what will happen

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6991 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230 ... 350  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bluedog, Braithy, DesEnglish, famousblueraincoat, Humpers, jim, Jono182, MPH78 and 315 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group