Graham sub AGAIN. FFS that's great development guys. Well done you peanuts.
Not to mention McLean out for a guy that was inj last week and was out of form before that.
Some please explain the logic behind this crap.
| TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| R18: Carlton v North Melbourne (Match discussion) http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=34165 |
Page 1 of 20 |
| Author: | Effes [ Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | R18: Carlton v North Melbourne (Match discussion) |
Final teams #AFLBluesNorth - Brock McLean out for Carlton, replaced by Jarrad Waite. Ben Brown out for North, replaced by Majak Daw. #AFLBluesNorth subs: Nick Graham (@CarltonFC) and Jack Ziebell (@NorthKangaroos) FINAL INTERCHANGES Carlton: Mitch Robinson, Jarrad Waite, David Ellard Substitute: Nick Graham North Melbourne: Ben Jacobs, Ben Cunnington, Majak Daw Substitute: Jack Ziebell |
|
| Author: | ryan2000 [ Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R18: Carlton v North Melbourne (Match discussion) |
SEN Said that Menzel may be a late withdrawal???? |
|
| Author: | verbs [ Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R18: Carlton v North Melbourne (Match discussion) |
Didn't see that coming. |
|
| Author: | Rexy [ Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R18: Carlton v North Melbourne (Match discussion) |
Blues $4.05 head to head on tattsbet - great value ! |
|
| Author: | ThePsychologist [ Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R18: Carlton v North Melbourne (Match discussion) |
Graham sub AGAIN. FFS that's great development guys. Well done you peanuts. Not to mention McLean out for a guy that was inj last week and was out of form before that. Some please explain the logic behind this crap.
|
|
| Author: | ryan2000 [ Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R18: Carlton v North Melbourne (Match discussion) |
ThePsychologist wrote: Graham sub AGAIN. FFS that's great development guys. Well done you peanuts. It's for this very reason that i hate the substitute rule. Just scrap it. |
|
| Author: | Rexy [ Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R18: Carlton v North Melbourne (Match discussion) |
ThePsychologist wrote: Graham sub AGAIN. FFS that's great development guys. Well done you peanuts. Not to mention McLean out for a guy that was inj last week and was out of form before that. Some please explain the logic behind this crap. are you blaming mick ? |
|
| Author: | ThePsychologist [ Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R18: Carlton v North Melbourne (Match discussion) |
Rexy wrote: ThePsychologist wrote: Graham sub AGAIN. FFS that's great development guys. Well done you peanuts. Not to mention McLean out for a guy that was inj last week and was out of form before that. Some please explain the logic behind this crap. are you blaming mick ? Not blaming anyone, just like to try and understand because I don't get it |
|
| Author: | Rexy [ Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R18: Carlton v North Melbourne (Match discussion) |
ThePsychologist wrote: Rexy wrote: ThePsychologist wrote: Graham sub AGAIN. FFS that's great development guys. Well done you peanuts. Not to mention McLean out for a guy that was inj last week and was out of form before that. Some please explain the logic behind this crap. are you blaming mick ? Not blaming anyone, just like to try and understand because I don't get it who are you calling peanuts ? mick ? |
|
| Author: | ThePsychologist [ Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R18: Carlton v North Melbourne (Match discussion) |
Rexy wrote: ThePsychologist wrote: Rexy wrote: ThePsychologist wrote: Graham sub AGAIN. FFS that's great development guys. Well done you peanuts. Not to mention McLean out for a guy that was inj last week and was out of form before that. Some please explain the logic behind this crap. are you blaming mick ? Not blaming anyone, just like to try and understand because I don't get it who are you calling peanuts ? mick ? The whole lot of them because this year has got me totally confused. I don't understand what they are trying to do. Can someone explain it to me?? |
|
| Author: | Rexy [ Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R18: Carlton v North Melbourne (Match discussion) |
well mick being the boss might calmly explain it in the aftermatch... ? |
|
| Author: | cimm1979 [ Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R18: Carlton v North Melbourne (Match discussion) |
Rexy wrote: well mick being the boss might calmly explain it in the aftermatch... ? 
|
|
| Author: | grrofunger [ Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R18: Carlton v North Melbourne (Match discussion) |
bloody garlett just hit the post - but we are 6 points up with 5 minutes to go can we hold on? |
|
| Author: | ThePsychologist [ Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R18: Carlton v North Melbourne (Match discussion) |
I'd just like an explanation on how playing Graham as sub AGAIN helps. This will be his 6th game and not one has been a full game. You would think with McLean out it would be his opportunity. It just doesn't make sense. It's dumb and not the way you develop players. He would be better off playing a full game in the twos |
|
| Author: | Rexy [ Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R18: Carlton v North Melbourne (Match discussion) |
ThePsychologist wrote: I'd just like an explanation on how playing Graham as sub AGAIN helps. This will be his 6th game and not one has been a full game. You would think with McLean out it would be his opportunity. It just doesn't make sense. It's dumb and not the way you develop players. He would be better off playing a full game in the twos dont worry about it, mick knows what he's doing 
|
|
| Author: | DesEnglish [ Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R18: Carlton v North Melbourne (Match discussion) |
I see they brought in Daw to combat our Wood |
|
| Author: | ThePsychologist [ Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R18: Carlton v North Melbourne (Match discussion) |
Rexy wrote: ThePsychologist wrote: I'd just like an explanation on how playing Graham as sub AGAIN helps. This will be his 6th game and not one has been a full game. You would think with McLean out it would be his opportunity. It just doesn't make sense. It's dumb and not the way you develop players. He would be better off playing a full game in the twos dont worry about it, mick knows what he's doing I'm not convinced either way at the moment but your agenda is boring. |
|
| Author: | Rexy [ Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R18: Carlton v North Melbourne (Match discussion) |
MLG on 3aw at about 7pm |
|
| Author: | The Duke [ Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R18: Carlton v North Melbourne (Match discussion) |
grrofunger wrote: bloody garlett just hit the post - but we are 6 points up with 5 minutes to go can we hold on? How was that high tackle against Hendo? I had to rewind it just to confirm what a dick the umpire was. 
|
|
| Author: | Rexy [ Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R18: Carlton v North Melbourne (Match discussion) |
ThePsychologist wrote: Rexy wrote: ThePsychologist wrote: I'd just like an explanation on how playing Graham as sub AGAIN helps. This will be his 6th game and not one has been a full game. You would think with McLean out it would be his opportunity. It just doesn't make sense. It's dumb and not the way you develop players. He would be better off playing a full game in the twos dont worry about it, mick knows what he's doing I'm not convinced either way at the moment but your agenda is boring. agenda's agenda's agenda's... |
|
| Page 1 of 20 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|