Graham sub
| TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| R17: Sydney v Carlton (Match discussion) http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=34144 |
Page 1 of 23 |
| Author: | Effes [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 6:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | R17: Sydney v Carlton (Match discussion) |
Final teams #AFLSwansBlues - No changes. Subs: Brandon Jack (@sydneyswans) and Nick Graham (@CarltonFC) FINAL INTERCHANGES Sydney Swans: Craig Bird, Gary Rohan, Jake Lloyd Substitute: Brandon Jack Carlton: Sam Docherty, Chris Judd, Blaine Johnson Substitute: Nick Graham |
|
| Author: | Rexy [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 6:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Graham sub
|
|
| Author: | emtwenty [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 6:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R17: Sydney v Carlton (Match discussion) |
Armfield and Watson both travelled. We must have been expecting a possible late change. |
|
| Author: | Rexy [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 6:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Re: R17: Sydney v Carlton (Match discussion) |
emtwenty wrote: Armfield and Watson both travelled. We must have been expecting a possible late change. Maybe just being extra cautious. |
|
| Author: | Warby [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 6:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R17: Sydney v Carlton (Match discussion) |
I hate the sub rule....I liked the bench setup the way it always was....what was wrong with it? Red vests .....crapola !!! |
|
| Author: | ThePsychologist [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 6:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R17: Sydney v Carlton (Match discussion) |
ffs 
|
|
| Author: | Drewgirl [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 6:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R17: Sydney v Carlton (Match discussion) |
Yep sub rule sucks...... Years ago you chucked a young guy on the bench and gave him a bit of time here and there, now the 3 need to be a strong part of the team. |
|
| Author: | Blues2005 [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 6:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R17: Sydney v Carlton (Match discussion) |
I've always thought that we've never really "got" the sub selection - we continually seem to pick the wrong player/type of player for the role. What is the point of bringing Graham into the side as the sub? |
|
| Author: | Megaman [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 6:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R17: Sydney v Carlton (Match discussion) |
So we can kick his ass back to cramer pronto |
|
| Author: | Wojee [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 6:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | R17: Sydney v Carlton (Match discussion) |
Warby wrote: I hate the sub rule....I liked the bench setup the way it always was....what was wrong with it? Red vests .....crapola !!! I like the sub rule. Carlton just doesn't utilize it properly. |
|
| Author: | Warby [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 6:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R17: Sydney v Carlton (Match discussion) |
ThePsychologist wrote: ffs From that I figure you like the new bench setup?.....what's good about it? |
|
| Author: | Synbad [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 6:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R17: Sydney v Carlton (Match discussion) |
for the sake of common sense he doesnt have a fitness base for AFL football... 2) he shouldnt be playing because he doesnt do what hes been asked to do Johnson is getting time... he wont...!!! Think about why a rookie will play before a second year listed player You guys arent following.... are you?? |
|
| Author: | ThePsychologist [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 7:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R17: Sydney v Carlton (Match discussion) |
Warby wrote: ThePsychologist wrote: ffs From that I figure you like the new bench setup?.....what's good about it? Was commenting about Graham as sub 
|
|
| Author: | Warby [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 7:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R17: Sydney v Carlton (Match discussion) |
ThePsychologist wrote: Warby wrote: ThePsychologist wrote: ffs From that I figure you like the new bench setup?.....what's good about it? Was commenting about Graham as sub Fair enough..... 
|
|
| Author: | Synbad [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 7:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R17: Sydney v Carlton (Match discussion) |
yes we all wanna see graham be a gun......... but everything has a context.... hes getting a game and not playing at cramer because we have nobody to cme in... armfield isnt right... temay is crappier holman isnt any better. garlett wants to go home Lucas is in all time lows few injured graham becomes the benchboy theres nothing to see.... you think graham should get a game because hes young... even if he doesnt do what he has been asked to do for 2 years? he will be lucky to be on the list end of year.... InCretybility will be happy... Hinkley would wanna pick him up and turn him into the next Bartell.... |
|
| Author: | bondiblue [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 7:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R17: Sydney v Carlton (Match discussion) |
I'm confident we can match them in the midfield and have enough firepower up forward to win if they are show form. The trrick is to win the midfield battle. Come on Blues...we've been close for long enough. play tight on Buddy and give it to 'em Belly. |
|
| Author: | Synbad [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 7:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R17: Sydney v Carlton (Match discussion) |
its all about effort... and if we put in that effort we cant complain either way what is unsatisfactory is if we dont put in any kind of real effort |
|
| Author: | bluegirl72 [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 7:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R17: Sydney v Carlton (Match discussion) |
woah!!! Laids goes KAPOWEEE and hits MM with acannonball to the belly. can't blame him considering he never got a chance in 2013. |
|
| Author: | grrofunger [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 7:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R17: Sydney v Carlton (Match discussion) |
what did he say? |
|
| Author: | Warby [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 7:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R17: Sydney v Carlton (Match discussion) |
bluegirl72 wrote: woah!!! Laids goes KAPOWEEE and hits MM with acannonball to the belly. can't blame him considering he never got a chance in 2013. I was always a fan of Laids.....and surprised and sad to see him go. |
|
| Page 1 of 23 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|